| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/11/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/11/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
HELLWIG, C. G.; MARTINS, C. R.; LIMA, A. D. V.; BARRETO, C. F.; MEDEIROS, J. C. F.; MALGARIM, M. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
CRISTIANO GEREMIAS HELLWIG; CARLOS ROBERTO MARTINS, CPACT; ANTONIO DAVI VAZ LIMA; CAROLINE FARIAS BARRETO; JULIO CESAR FARIAS MEDEIROS; MARCELO BARBOSA MALGARIM. |
|
Título: |
Hedge and central pruning in a high-density pecan orchard in southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Comunicata Scientiae, Bom Jesus, 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
2177-5133 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v13.3842 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
First online. Accepted: 28 March 2022. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed at evaluating the influence of two pruning methods, as well as absence of pruning, on vegetative and productive development and in the quality of pecan fruits in a high-density orchard. The experiment was conducted with the cultivar Melhorada in a commercial pecan orchard in municipality of Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. The study was carried out between July 2018 (dormancy phase of plants) and June 2020 (fruit ripening stage). In a randomized block design, the following treatments were applied: no pruning, hedge pruning and central pruning. Hedge pruning increased limb growth, while central pruning decreased the number of dry branches. Fruit production oscillated in the cycles. In the first, production was higher when central pruning was conducted. In the second cycle, it was higher in unpruned trees. Even though both pruning methods decreased the number of fruit with closed epicarps, they did not affect most variables of fruit quality. Therefore, results show that pruning methods promote vegetative development of pecan trees, reducing dry branches, but they are inconclusive regarding their production and have no significant effect on the main variables of their fruit quality. The evaluation and continuity of pruning for more cycles is important to obtain the most consistent results for indicating the best alternative for producers. |
|
Thesagro: |
Noz Peca; Poda. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Carya illinoinensis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1148402/1/Artigo-Hedge-and-central-pruning-in.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02130naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2148402
005 2022-11-17
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2177-5133
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v13.3842$2DOI
100 1 $aHELLWIG, C. G.
245 $aHedge and central pruning in a high-density pecan orchard in southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aFirst online. Accepted: 28 March 2022.
520 $aThis study aimed at evaluating the influence of two pruning methods, as well as absence of pruning, on vegetative and productive development and in the quality of pecan fruits in a high-density orchard. The experiment was conducted with the cultivar Melhorada in a commercial pecan orchard in municipality of Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. The study was carried out between July 2018 (dormancy phase of plants) and June 2020 (fruit ripening stage). In a randomized block design, the following treatments were applied: no pruning, hedge pruning and central pruning. Hedge pruning increased limb growth, while central pruning decreased the number of dry branches. Fruit production oscillated in the cycles. In the first, production was higher when central pruning was conducted. In the second cycle, it was higher in unpruned trees. Even though both pruning methods decreased the number of fruit with closed epicarps, they did not affect most variables of fruit quality. Therefore, results show that pruning methods promote vegetative development of pecan trees, reducing dry branches, but they are inconclusive regarding their production and have no significant effect on the main variables of their fruit quality. The evaluation and continuity of pruning for more cycles is important to obtain the most consistent results for indicating the best alternative for producers.
650 $aCarya illinoinensis
650 $aNoz Peca
650 $aPoda
700 1 $aMARTINS, C. R.
700 1 $aLIMA, A. D. V.
700 1 $aBARRETO, C. F.
700 1 $aMEDEIROS, J. C. F.
700 1 $aMALGARIM, M. B.
773 $tComunicata Scientiae, Bom Jesus, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
