| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/07/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/07/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
NACHTIGAL, J. C.; SOUZA, R. T. de; VITAL, K. C. G. da C.; HENRIQUE, C. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
JAIR COSTA NACHTIGAL, CNPUV; REGINALDO TEODORO DE SOUZA, CNPUV; KELLY CRISTINA GOMES DA CRUZ VITAL, Estação Experimental de Viticultura Tropical; CLAYTON RODRIGO HENRIQUE, Universidade de Jales - UNI-JALES. |
|
Título: |
Efeitos de reguladores de crescimento na maturação de uvas sem sementes, cv. BRS Morena. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2005 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO LATINO-AMERICANO DE VITICULTURA E ENOLOGIA, 10.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE VITICULTURA E ENOLOGIA, 11.; SEMINÁRIO FRANCO-BRASILEIRO DE VITICULTURA E ENOLOGIA, 2., 2005, Bento Gonçalves. Anais... Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2005. p. 282. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
A cultivar BRS Morena é uma uva de mesa sem sementes, de coloração preta e adaptada ao cultivo em regiões tropicais e subtropicais, lançada pela Embrapa Uva e Vinho, em 2003. O presente trabalho teve por objetivo verificar o efeito o efeito de diferentes concentrações de reguladores de crescimento na maturação de uva sem sementes, cv. BRS Morena, conduzida no sistema de latada, sobre o porta-enxerto IAC 572 e com irrigação por microaspersão. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cultivar BRS Morena; Uva de mesa sem sementes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Uva. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/237560/1/Nachtigal-cbve-2005-p282.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01242nam a2200181 a 4500
001 2144945
005 2022-07-26
008 2005 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aNACHTIGAL, J. C.
245 $aEfeitos de reguladores de crescimento na maturação de uvas sem sementes, cv. BRS Morena.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONGRESSO LATINO-AMERICANO DE VITICULTURA E ENOLOGIA, 10.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE VITICULTURA E ENOLOGIA, 11.; SEMINÁRIO FRANCO-BRASILEIRO DE VITICULTURA E ENOLOGIA, 2., 2005, Bento Gonçalves. Anais... Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2005. p. 282.$c2005
520 $aA cultivar BRS Morena é uma uva de mesa sem sementes, de coloração preta e adaptada ao cultivo em regiões tropicais e subtropicais, lançada pela Embrapa Uva e Vinho, em 2003. O presente trabalho teve por objetivo verificar o efeito o efeito de diferentes concentrações de reguladores de crescimento na maturação de uva sem sementes, cv. BRS Morena, conduzida no sistema de latada, sobre o porta-enxerto IAC 572 e com irrigação por microaspersão.
650 $aUva
653 $aCultivar BRS Morena
653 $aUva de mesa sem sementes
700 1 $aSOUZA, R. T. de
700 1 $aVITAL, K. C. G. da C.
700 1 $aHENRIQUE, C. R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/08/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/08/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MARICHAL, R.; GRIMALDI, M.; FEIJOO M. A.; OSZWALD, J.; PRAXEDES, C.; RUIZ COBO, D. H.; DEL PILAR HURTADO, M.; DESJARDINS, T.; SILVA JUNIOR, M. L. da; COSTA, L. G. da S.; MIRANDA, I. S.; OLIVEIRA, M. N. D.; BROWN, G. G.; TSÉLOUIKO, S.; MARTINS, M. B.; DECAËNS, T.; VELASQUEZ, E.; LAVELLE, P. |
|
Afiliação: |
Raphael Marichal, Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Michel Grimaldi, Centre IRD Ile de France; Alexander Feijoo M., Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira; Johan Oszwald, Université de RenneS; Catarina Praxedes, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi; Dario Hernan Ruiz Cobo, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira; Maria del Pilar Hurtado, CIAT; Thierry Desjardins, Centre IRD Ile de France; Mario Lopes da Silva Junior, UFRA; Luiz Gonzaga da Silva Costa, UFRA; Izildinha Souza Miranda, UFRA; Mariana Nascimento Delgado Oliveira, UFRA; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; Stéphanie Tsélouiko, Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Marlucia Bonifacio Martins, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi; Thibaud Decaëns, Université de Rouen; Elena Velasquez, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Patrick Lavelle, Université Pierre et Marie Curie. |
|
Título: |
Soil macroinvertebrate communities and ecosystem services indeforested landscapes of Amazonia. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Applied Soil Ecology, v. 83, p. 177-185, Nov. 2014. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.05.006 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
XVI International Colloquium on Soil Zoology & XIII International Colloquium on Apterygota, 2012, Coimbra. Selected papers. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Land use changes in the Amazon region strongly impact soil macroinvertebrate communities, whichare recognized as major drivers of soil functions (Lavelle et al., 2006). To explore these relations, wetested the hypotheses that (i) soil macrofauna communities respond to landscape changes and (ii) soilmacrofauna and ecosystem services are linked. We conducted a survey of macrofauna communities andindicators of ecosystem services at 270 sites in southern Colombia (department of Caqueta) and north-ern Brazil (state of Pará), two areas of the Amazon where family agriculture dominates. Sites representeda variety of land use types: forests, fallows, annual or perennial crops, and pastures. At each site weassessed soil macroinvertebrate density (18 taxonomic units) and the following ecosystem service indi-cators: soil and aboveground biomass carbon stock; water infiltration rate; aeration, drainage and waterstorage capacities based on pore-size distribution; soil chemical fertility; and soil aggregation. Signifi-cant covariation was observed between macrofauna communities and landscape metric data (co-inertiaanalysis: RV = 0.30, p < 0.01, Monte Carlo test) and between macrofauna communities and ecosystemservice indicators (co-inertia analysis: RV = 0.35, p < 0.01, Monte Carlo test). Points located in pastureswithin 100 m of forest had greater macrofauna density and diversity than those located in pastures withno forest within 100 m (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.01). Total macroinvertebrate density was signifi-cantly correlated with macroporosity (r2= 0.42, p < 0.01), as was the density of specific taxonomic groups:Chilopoda (r2= 0.43, p < 0.01), Isoptera (r2= 0.30, p < 0.01), Diplopoda (r2= 0.31, p < 0.01), and Formicidae(r2= 0.13, p < 0.01). Total macroinvertebrate density was also significantly correlated with available soilwater (r2= 0.38, p < 0.01) as well as other soil-service indicators (but with r2< 0.10). Results demonstratethat landscape dynamics and composition affect soil macrofauna communities, and that soil macro-fauna density is significantly correlated with soil services in deforested Amazonia, indicating that soilmacrofauna have an engineering and/or indicator function. MenosLand use changes in the Amazon region strongly impact soil macroinvertebrate communities, whichare recognized as major drivers of soil functions (Lavelle et al., 2006). To explore these relations, wetested the hypotheses that (i) soil macrofauna communities respond to landscape changes and (ii) soilmacrofauna and ecosystem services are linked. We conducted a survey of macrofauna communities andindicators of ecosystem services at 270 sites in southern Colombia (department of Caqueta) and north-ern Brazil (state of Pará), two areas of the Amazon where family agriculture dominates. Sites representeda variety of land use types: forests, fallows, annual or perennial crops, and pastures. At each site weassessed soil macroinvertebrate density (18 taxonomic units) and the following ecosystem service indi-cators: soil and aboveground biomass carbon stock; water infiltration rate; aeration, drainage and waterstorage capacities based on pore-size distribution; soil chemical fertility; and soil aggregation. Signifi-cant covariation was observed between macrofauna communities and landscape metric data (co-inertiaanalysis: RV = 0.30, p < 0.01, Monte Carlo test) and between macrofauna communities and ecosystemservice indicators (co-inertia analysis: RV = 0.35, p < 0.01, Monte Carlo test). Points located in pastureswithin 100 m of forest had greater macrofauna density and diversity than those located in pastures withno forest within 100 m (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.01). Total macroinver... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Landscape; Macro-invertebrates; Macroinvertebrado; Paisagem deflorestada; Soil services. |
|
Thesagro: |
Ecossistema. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03588naa a2200433 a 4500
001 2021462
005 2015-08-06
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.05.006$2DOI
100 1 $aMARICHAL, R.
245 $aSoil macroinvertebrate communities and ecosystem services indeforested landscapes of Amazonia.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
500 $aXVI International Colloquium on Soil Zoology & XIII International Colloquium on Apterygota, 2012, Coimbra. Selected papers.
520 $aLand use changes in the Amazon region strongly impact soil macroinvertebrate communities, whichare recognized as major drivers of soil functions (Lavelle et al., 2006). To explore these relations, wetested the hypotheses that (i) soil macrofauna communities respond to landscape changes and (ii) soilmacrofauna and ecosystem services are linked. We conducted a survey of macrofauna communities andindicators of ecosystem services at 270 sites in southern Colombia (department of Caqueta) and north-ern Brazil (state of Pará), two areas of the Amazon where family agriculture dominates. Sites representeda variety of land use types: forests, fallows, annual or perennial crops, and pastures. At each site weassessed soil macroinvertebrate density (18 taxonomic units) and the following ecosystem service indi-cators: soil and aboveground biomass carbon stock; water infiltration rate; aeration, drainage and waterstorage capacities based on pore-size distribution; soil chemical fertility; and soil aggregation. Signifi-cant covariation was observed between macrofauna communities and landscape metric data (co-inertiaanalysis: RV = 0.30, p < 0.01, Monte Carlo test) and between macrofauna communities and ecosystemservice indicators (co-inertia analysis: RV = 0.35, p < 0.01, Monte Carlo test). Points located in pastureswithin 100 m of forest had greater macrofauna density and diversity than those located in pastures withno forest within 100 m (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.01). Total macroinvertebrate density was signifi-cantly correlated with macroporosity (r2= 0.42, p < 0.01), as was the density of specific taxonomic groups:Chilopoda (r2= 0.43, p < 0.01), Isoptera (r2= 0.30, p < 0.01), Diplopoda (r2= 0.31, p < 0.01), and Formicidae(r2= 0.13, p < 0.01). Total macroinvertebrate density was also significantly correlated with available soilwater (r2= 0.38, p < 0.01) as well as other soil-service indicators (but with r2< 0.10). Results demonstratethat landscape dynamics and composition affect soil macrofauna communities, and that soil macro-fauna density is significantly correlated with soil services in deforested Amazonia, indicating that soilmacrofauna have an engineering and/or indicator function.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aEcossistema
653 $aLandscape
653 $aMacro-invertebrates
653 $aMacroinvertebrado
653 $aPaisagem deflorestada
653 $aSoil services
700 1 $aGRIMALDI, M.
700 1 $aFEIJOO M. A.
700 1 $aOSZWALD, J.
700 1 $aPRAXEDES, C.
700 1 $aRUIZ COBO, D. H.
700 1 $aDEL PILAR HURTADO, M.
700 1 $aDESJARDINS, T.
700 1 $aSILVA JUNIOR, M. L. da
700 1 $aCOSTA, L. G. da S.
700 1 $aMIRANDA, I. S.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. N. D.
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
700 1 $aTSÉLOUIKO, S.
700 1 $aMARTINS, M. B.
700 1 $aDECAËNS, T.
700 1 $aVELASQUEZ, E.
700 1 $aLAVELLE, P.
773 $tApplied Soil Ecology$gv. 83, p. 177-185, Nov. 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
