| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/09/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
XAVIER, J. H. V.; GOMES, M. C.; ANJOS, F. S. dos; SCOPEL, E.; SILVA, F. A. M. da; Marc Corbeels. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSE HUMBERTO VALADARES XAVIER, CPAC; Mário Conill Gomes; Flávio Sacco dos Anjos; ERIC SCOPEL; FERNANDO ANTONIO MACENA DA SILVA, CPAC; CORBEELS, M. |
|
Título: |
Participatory multicriteria assessment of maize cropping systems in the context of family farmers in the Brazilian Cerrado. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, v. 18, n. 5, p. 410?426, 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 410-426 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Conservation agriculture (CA) is recognized as a promising crop management strategy
for sustainable agricultural intensification. The objective of this study was to evaluate
CA cropping systems for rainfed maize as an alternative to the traditional tillage-based
cropping systems (CT) in the context of family farms, using a multi-criteria model that
represents the point of view of farmers. Farmers considered several aspects for
evaluating the cropping systems, thatwere systematized in the model through five
criteria (with sub-criteria): (a) costs; (b) yield; (c) labour; (d) human health and
environment; and (e) production risks. CA did not differ from CT for the ?costs?
criterion but was superior for the ?yield? and ?labour? criteria. In contrast, CT
obtained better ratings for the criteria ?human health and environment? and
?production risks?. Considering all criteria, CA was better appraised than CT.
However, a new local policy measure that subsidizes the hiring of mechanized
tillage services overturns this outcome, indicating the importance of exogenous
factors. Overall, the participatory processes in building the model allowed us to
better understand the reasons of adoption or non-adoption of CA by small-scale
farmers in the tropics. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Análise; Conservação; Milho; Sistema de Cultivo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/216142/1/Jose-Humberto-Participatory-multicriteria-assessment-of-maize-cropping-systems.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02034naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2125055
005 2020-09-29
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aXAVIER, J. H. V.
245 $aParticipatory multicriteria assessment of maize cropping systems in the context of family farmers in the Brazilian Cerrado.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 410-426
520 $aConservation agriculture (CA) is recognized as a promising crop management strategy for sustainable agricultural intensification. The objective of this study was to evaluate CA cropping systems for rainfed maize as an alternative to the traditional tillage-based cropping systems (CT) in the context of family farms, using a multi-criteria model that represents the point of view of farmers. Farmers considered several aspects for evaluating the cropping systems, thatwere systematized in the model through five criteria (with sub-criteria): (a) costs; (b) yield; (c) labour; (d) human health and environment; and (e) production risks. CA did not differ from CT for the ?costs? criterion but was superior for the ?yield? and ?labour? criteria. In contrast, CT obtained better ratings for the criteria ?human health and environment? and ?production risks?. Considering all criteria, CA was better appraised than CT. However, a new local policy measure that subsidizes the hiring of mechanized tillage services overturns this outcome, indicating the importance of exogenous factors. Overall, the participatory processes in building the model allowed us to better understand the reasons of adoption or non-adoption of CA by small-scale farmers in the tropics.
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aAnálise
650 $aConservação
650 $aMilho
650 $aSistema de Cultivo
700 1 $aGOMES, M. C.
700 1 $aANJOS, F. S. dos
700 1 $aSCOPEL, E.
700 1 $aSILVA, F. A. M. da
700 1 $aMarc Corbeels
773 $tInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability$gv. 18, n. 5, p. 410?426, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
