| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/02/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MATUK, F. A.; BEHAGEL, J. H.; SIMAS, F. N. B.; AMARAL, E. F. do; HAVERROTH, M.; TURNHOUT, E. |
|
Afiliação: |
Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University / Federal Institute of Minas Gerais; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University; Felipe Nogueira Bello Simas, Federal University of Viçosa; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University. |
|
Título: |
Including diverse knowledges and worldviews in environmental assessment and planning: the Brazilian Amazon Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land case. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecosystems and People, v. 16, n. 1, p. 95-113, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
2639-5916 |
|
DOI: |
10.1080/26395916.2020.1722752 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The concepts of 'ecosystem services' (ES) and 'nature's contributions to people' (NCP) inform environmental frameworks that set out to include Indigenous and Local Knowledge systems (ILK) and worldviews in policy and planning processes. These frameworks aim to enhance biodiversity conservation and human well-being in a legitimate and effective way. In this article, we explore how the concept of People's Contributions to Nature (PCN) is complementary to NCP. We use it to investigate challenges that planners and locals face in realizing the legitimate inclusion of diverse knowledges and worldviwes that account for people and ecosystems in a relational way. We introduce a case study where planners drew on ES and NCP and used participatory methods to implement a REDD+ policy in the Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land (Acre-Brazil). We find that both Kaxinawás and planners emphasize both NCP and PCN in their discourses. Nevertheless, differences between knowledge systems and disciplines, uneven power relations between Kaxinawás and planners, and an underconsideration of PCN by global frameworks challenge the legitimate inclusion of the Kaxinawá knowlege and worldviews to craft assessment and planning. We conclude that by explicitly addressing these challenges, science-policy interfaces can further advance knowledge legitimacy and policy effectiveness. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Abordagem participativa; Acre; Amazonia Occidental; Amazônia Ocidental; Conhecimento tradicional; Conocimiento tradicional; Contribuições das pessoas para a natureza; Gestión participativa; People's contributions to nature (PCN); Povos indígenas; Pueblos indígenas; Servicios ecosistémicos; Serviços ecossistêmicos; Terra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO); Western Amazon. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Ecosystem services; Indigenous knowledge; Indigenous peoples; Participatory management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/210896/1/26972.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02817naa a2200433 a 4500
001 2120347
005 2021-07-02
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2639-5916
024 7 $a10.1080/26395916.2020.1722752$2DOI
100 1 $aMATUK, F. A.
245 $aIncluding diverse knowledges and worldviews in environmental assessment and planning$bthe Brazilian Amazon Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land case.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThe concepts of 'ecosystem services' (ES) and 'nature's contributions to people' (NCP) inform environmental frameworks that set out to include Indigenous and Local Knowledge systems (ILK) and worldviews in policy and planning processes. These frameworks aim to enhance biodiversity conservation and human well-being in a legitimate and effective way. In this article, we explore how the concept of People's Contributions to Nature (PCN) is complementary to NCP. We use it to investigate challenges that planners and locals face in realizing the legitimate inclusion of diverse knowledges and worldviwes that account for people and ecosystems in a relational way. We introduce a case study where planners drew on ES and NCP and used participatory methods to implement a REDD+ policy in the Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land (Acre-Brazil). We find that both Kaxinawás and planners emphasize both NCP and PCN in their discourses. Nevertheless, differences between knowledge systems and disciplines, uneven power relations between Kaxinawás and planners, and an underconsideration of PCN by global frameworks challenge the legitimate inclusion of the Kaxinawá knowlege and worldviews to craft assessment and planning. We conclude that by explicitly addressing these challenges, science-policy interfaces can further advance knowledge legitimacy and policy effectiveness.
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aIndigenous knowledge
650 $aIndigenous peoples
650 $aParticipatory management
653 $aAbordagem participativa
653 $aAcre
653 $aAmazonia Occidental
653 $aAmazônia Ocidental
653 $aConhecimento tradicional
653 $aConocimiento tradicional
653 $aContribuições das pessoas para a natureza
653 $aGestión participativa
653 $aPeople's contributions to nature (PCN)
653 $aPovos indígenas
653 $aPueblos indígenas
653 $aServicios ecosistémicos
653 $aServiços ecossistêmicos
653 $aTerra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO)
653 $aWestern Amazon
700 1 $aBEHAGEL, J. H.
700 1 $aSIMAS, F. N. B.
700 1 $aAMARAL, E. F. do
700 1 $aHAVERROTH, M.
700 1 $aTURNHOUT, E.
773 $tEcosystems and People$gv. 16, n. 1, p. 95-113, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | MATUK, F. A.; BEHAGEL, J. H.; SIMAS, F. N. B.; AMARAL, E. F. do; HAVERROTH, M.; TURNHOUT, E. Including diverse knowledges and worldviews in environmental assessment and planning: the Brazilian Amazon Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land case. Ecosystems and People, v. 16, n. 1, p. 95-113, 2020.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: C - 0 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
