| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/04/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/02/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
ERMGASSEN, E. K. H. J. zu; ALCÂNTARA, M. P. de; BALMFORD, A.; BARIONI, L. G.; BEDUSCHI NETO, F.; BETTARELLO, M. M. F.; BRITO, G. de; CARRERO, G. C.; FLORENCE, E. da A. S.; GARCIA, E.; GONÇALVES, E. T.; LUZ, C. T. da; MALLMAN, G. M.; STRASSBURG, B. B. N.; VALENTIM, J. F.; LATAWIEC, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
ERASMUS K. H. J. ZU ERMGASSEN, University of Cambridge; MELQUESEDEK PEREIRA DE ALCÂNTARA, Institute for Conservation and Sustainable Development of the Amazon; ANDREW BALMFORD, University of Cambridge; LUIS GUSTAVO BARIONI, CNPTIA; FRANCISCO BEDUSCHI NETO, Instituto Centro de Vida / Grupo de Trabalho da Pecuária Sustentável; MURILO M. F. BETTARELLO, Via Verde Consultoria Agropecuária em Sistemas Tropicais; GENIVALDO DE BRITO, The Nature Conservancy; GABRIEL C. CARRERO, Institute for Conservation and Sustainable Development of the Amazon / University of Florida; EDUARDO DE A. S. FLORENCE, Instituto Centro de Vida; EDENISE GARCIA, The Nature Conservancy; EDUARDO TREVISAN GONÇALVES, Instituto de Manejo e Certificação Florestal e Agrícola; CASIO TRAJANO DA LUZ, Instituto de Manejo e Certificação Florestal e Agrícola; GIOVANNI M. MALLMAN, The Nature Conservancy; BERNARDO B. N. STRASSBURG, International Institute for Sustainability / Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-Acre; AGNIESZKA LATAWIEC, International Institute for Sustainability / Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro / University of East Anglia / University of Agriculture in Krakow. |
|
Título: |
Results from on-the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sustainability, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1-26, Apr. 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.3390/su10041301 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Agriculture in Brazil is booming. Brazil has the world´s second largest cattle herd and is the second largest producer of soybeans, with the production of beef, soybeans, and bioethanol forecast to increase further. Questions remain, however, about how Brazil can reconcile increases in agricultural production with protection of its remaining natural vegetation. While high hopes have been placed on the potential for intensification of low-productivity cattle ranching to spare land for other agricultural uses, cattle productivity in the Amazon biome (29% of the Brazilian cattle herd) remains stubbornly low, and it is not clear how to realize theoretical productivity gains in practice. We provide results from six initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon, which are successfully improving cattle productivity in beef and dairy production on more than 500,000 hectares of pastureland, while supporting compliance with the Brazilian Forest Code. Spread across diverse geographies, and using a wide range of technologies, participating farms have improved productivity by 30-490%. High-productivity cattle ranching requires some initial investment (R$1300?6900/ha or US$410-2180/ha), with average pay-back times of 2.5-8.5 years. We conclude by reflecting on the challenges that must be overcome to scale up these young initiatives, avoid rebound increases in deforestation, and mainstream sustainable cattle ranching in the Amazon. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultura sustentable; Land sparing; Livestock productivity; Productividad pecuaria; Sustainable intensification. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura sustentável; Bovinocultura; Pecuária; Produtividade. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Amazonia; Cattle; Livestock; Sustainable agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/175817/1/26607.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02794naa a2200469 a 4500
001 2118216
005 2020-02-04
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3390/su10041301$2DOI
100 1 $aERMGASSEN, E. K. H. J. zu
245 $aResults from on-the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aAgriculture in Brazil is booming. Brazil has the world´s second largest cattle herd and is the second largest producer of soybeans, with the production of beef, soybeans, and bioethanol forecast to increase further. Questions remain, however, about how Brazil can reconcile increases in agricultural production with protection of its remaining natural vegetation. While high hopes have been placed on the potential for intensification of low-productivity cattle ranching to spare land for other agricultural uses, cattle productivity in the Amazon biome (29% of the Brazilian cattle herd) remains stubbornly low, and it is not clear how to realize theoretical productivity gains in practice. We provide results from six initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon, which are successfully improving cattle productivity in beef and dairy production on more than 500,000 hectares of pastureland, while supporting compliance with the Brazilian Forest Code. Spread across diverse geographies, and using a wide range of technologies, participating farms have improved productivity by 30-490%. High-productivity cattle ranching requires some initial investment (R$1300?6900/ha or US$410-2180/ha), with average pay-back times of 2.5-8.5 years. We conclude by reflecting on the challenges that must be overcome to scale up these young initiatives, avoid rebound increases in deforestation, and mainstream sustainable cattle ranching in the Amazon.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aCattle
650 $aLivestock
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aAgricultura sustentável
650 $aBovinocultura
650 $aPecuária
650 $aProdutividade
653 $aAgricultura sustentable
653 $aLand sparing
653 $aLivestock productivity
653 $aProductividad pecuaria
653 $aSustainable intensification
700 1 $aALCÂNTARA, M. P. de
700 1 $aBALMFORD, A.
700 1 $aBARIONI, L. G.
700 1 $aBEDUSCHI NETO, F.
700 1 $aBETTARELLO, M. M. F.
700 1 $aBRITO, G. de
700 1 $aCARRERO, G. C.
700 1 $aFLORENCE, E. da A. S.
700 1 $aGARCIA, E.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, E. T.
700 1 $aLUZ, C. T. da
700 1 $aMALLMAN, G. M.
700 1 $aSTRASSBURG, B. B. N.
700 1 $aVALENTIM, J. F.
700 1 $aLATAWIEC, A.
773 $tSustainability$gv. 10, n. 4, p. 1-26, Apr. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/03/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/03/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PEDREIRA, B. C. e; RESENDE, F. M.; BOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.; DEVENS, J.; HOLSCHUCH, S. G.; SANTOS, M. L.; CAVALLI, J.; MOMBACH, M. A.; PEREIRA, D. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; FABRICIO M. RESENDE, UFMT-SINOP; MAIRA L. B. BOURSCHEIDT, UFMT-SINOP; JOSIANE DEVENS, UFMT-SINOP; SOLANGE G. HOLSCHUCH, USP-ESALQ; MARIELY L. SANTOS, UFMT-SINOP; JOSIANA CAVALLI, UFMT-SINOP; MIRCÉIA A. MOMBACH, UFMT-SINOP; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP. |
|
Título: |
Accumulation and forage accumulation rate of new grasses in Mato Grosso. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado. Produção animal para as novas gerações: anais. Gramado: SBZ, 2016. Não paginado. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The Brazilian livestock production is pasture-based, requiring more technologies that allow to increase productivity with efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic performance of tropical grasses. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril in Sinop-MT from mar/2015 to mar/2016. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with three treatments and three replications (24 m2). The treatments were cultivars: Guara (Paspalum regnellii cv. BRS Guara), Tupi (Brachiaria humidicola cv. Tupi) and Marandu (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu). Pastures were fertilized with 80, 140 and 140 kg ha-1.year of N, P and K, respectively. In each cycle, forage mass (FM) was quantified by clipping two quadrat samples (0.5 by 1 m) per plot at 12 cm height. The fixed rest period was used as harvest strategy, allowing 28 or 42 days, in the rainy or dry season, respectively. Data were analysed using the mixed model method with a special parametric structure in the covariance matrix, through the MIXED procedure of SAS. Treatments means was estimated using ?LSMEANS? and ?PDIFF? was used to analyze means. Significance was detected at the 0.05 level of probability. There was a significant interaction between cultivar x season for forage accumulation (FA) (P<0.01) and forage accumulation rate (FAR) (P<0.05). Guará showed higher FA and FAR (P<0.05) in autumn and summer (5,280; 5,390 kg ha-1; 56.8, 64.1 kg ha-1.d), followed by spring (3,240 kg ha-1, 35.9 kg ha-1.d) and lower in winter (216 kg ha-1, 2.2 kg ha-1.d). Tupi showed higher FA (P<0.05) in summer (5,260), followed by spring (3,800) and less to autumn (2,920), and during winter there is no FA. Similar responses for FAR (62.6, 42.3 and 31.3 kg ha-1.d, respectively). Marandu provided greater FA (P<0.05) in the summer (4,870 kg ha-1), with similar values between autumn and spring (4,260 and 3,740 kg ha-1) and lower for winter (151 kg ha-1). The highest rates were measured in summer, followed by autumn and spring and lower in winter (57.9; 45.8; 41.5 and 1.6 kg ha-1.d, respectively). Comparing the three cultivars in the seasons, the FA varied only in autumn (P<0.05), when Guara was the most productivity, with 23% and 80% more forage produced than Maradu and Tupi, respectively. Guara has potential of production similar to Marandu, excepted during the autumn when was better. Guara can be an alternative as a forage grass in the Brazilian livestock production. MenosThe Brazilian livestock production is pasture-based, requiring more technologies that allow to increase productivity with efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic performance of tropical grasses. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril in Sinop-MT from mar/2015 to mar/2016. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with three treatments and three replications (24 m2). The treatments were cultivars: Guara (Paspalum regnellii cv. BRS Guara), Tupi (Brachiaria humidicola cv. Tupi) and Marandu (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu). Pastures were fertilized with 80, 140 and 140 kg ha-1.year of N, P and K, respectively. In each cycle, forage mass (FM) was quantified by clipping two quadrat samples (0.5 by 1 m) per plot at 12 cm height. The fixed rest period was used as harvest strategy, allowing 28 or 42 days, in the rainy or dry season, respectively. Data were analysed using the mixed model method with a special parametric structure in the covariance matrix, through the MIXED procedure of SAS. Treatments means was estimated using ?LSMEANS? and ?PDIFF? was used to analyze means. Significance was detected at the 0.05 level of probability. There was a significant interaction between cultivar x season for forage accumulation (FA) (P<0.01) and forage accumulation rate (FAR) (P<0.05). Guará showed higher FA and FAR (P<0.05) in autumn and summer (5,280; 5,390 kg ha-1; 56.8, 64.1 kg ha-1.d), followed by spring (3,240 kg ha-1, 35.9 kg ha-1.d) and... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Guara; Marandu; Tupi. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03259nam a2200253 a 4500
001 2066363
005 2017-03-06
008 2016 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
245 $aAccumulation and forage accumulation rate of new grasses in Mato Grosso.
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado. Produção animal para as novas gerações: anais. Gramado: SBZ, 2016. Não paginado.$c2016
520 $aThe Brazilian livestock production is pasture-based, requiring more technologies that allow to increase productivity with efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic performance of tropical grasses. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril in Sinop-MT from mar/2015 to mar/2016. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with three treatments and three replications (24 m2). The treatments were cultivars: Guara (Paspalum regnellii cv. BRS Guara), Tupi (Brachiaria humidicola cv. Tupi) and Marandu (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu). Pastures were fertilized with 80, 140 and 140 kg ha-1.year of N, P and K, respectively. In each cycle, forage mass (FM) was quantified by clipping two quadrat samples (0.5 by 1 m) per plot at 12 cm height. The fixed rest period was used as harvest strategy, allowing 28 or 42 days, in the rainy or dry season, respectively. Data were analysed using the mixed model method with a special parametric structure in the covariance matrix, through the MIXED procedure of SAS. Treatments means was estimated using ?LSMEANS? and ?PDIFF? was used to analyze means. Significance was detected at the 0.05 level of probability. There was a significant interaction between cultivar x season for forage accumulation (FA) (P<0.01) and forage accumulation rate (FAR) (P<0.05). Guará showed higher FA and FAR (P<0.05) in autumn and summer (5,280; 5,390 kg ha-1; 56.8, 64.1 kg ha-1.d), followed by spring (3,240 kg ha-1, 35.9 kg ha-1.d) and lower in winter (216 kg ha-1, 2.2 kg ha-1.d). Tupi showed higher FA (P<0.05) in summer (5,260), followed by spring (3,800) and less to autumn (2,920), and during winter there is no FA. Similar responses for FAR (62.6, 42.3 and 31.3 kg ha-1.d, respectively). Marandu provided greater FA (P<0.05) in the summer (4,870 kg ha-1), with similar values between autumn and spring (4,260 and 3,740 kg ha-1) and lower for winter (151 kg ha-1). The highest rates were measured in summer, followed by autumn and spring and lower in winter (57.9; 45.8; 41.5 and 1.6 kg ha-1.d, respectively). Comparing the three cultivars in the seasons, the FA varied only in autumn (P<0.05), when Guara was the most productivity, with 23% and 80% more forage produced than Maradu and Tupi, respectively. Guara has potential of production similar to Marandu, excepted during the autumn when was better. Guara can be an alternative as a forage grass in the Brazilian livestock production.
650 $aAmazonia
653 $aGuara
653 $aMarandu
653 $aTupi
700 1 $aRESENDE, F. M.
700 1 $aBOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.
700 1 $aDEVENS, J.
700 1 $aHOLSCHUCH, S. G.
700 1 $aSANTOS, M. L.
700 1 $aCAVALLI, J.
700 1 $aMOMBACH, M. A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, D. H.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
