| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/12/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
CONCEIÇÃO, M. A. F.; SOUZA, R. T. de; TONIETTO, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCO ANTONIO FONSECA CONCEICAO, CNPUV; REGINALDO TEODORO DE SOUZA, CNPUV; JORGE TONIETTO, CNPUV. |
|
Título: |
Estimating mcc system dryness index using the vineyard water indicator. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD VINE AND WINE CONGRESS, 39.; GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE OIV, 14., 2016, Bento Gonçalves. Vitiviniculture: technological advances to market challenges: abstracts. Bento Gonçalves: International Organisation of Vine and Wine, n. 2016-1302, 2016. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The Geoviticulture Multicriteria Climatic Classification System (MCC System) has been employed in different regions of the world for grapevine zoning studies. The Dryness Index (DI) is one of the three MCC indices and its calculation is based on a soil water balance approach. However, other climatic indices are still been used for the same purpose. One of them is the Vineyard Water Indicator (VWI). This index represents the ratio between the total rainfall and vineyard water requirement during the productive period of the culture. When compared to DI, the VWI has a simpler calculation methodology. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish a model to estimate DI based on VWI values. Climate data of 82 winegrowing regions in 18 countries were used. Four regression models were evaluated: linear, quadratic, logarithmic and the Mitscherlich model. ... |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Dryness Ind ex (DI; Dryness Index (DI); Geoviticulture; Geoviticulture Multicriteria Climatic Classific ation System (MCC System); Geoviticulture Multicriteria Climatic Classification System (MCC System); Soil water balance approac; Vineyard Water Indicator (VWI). |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/202798/1/39OIV2016-1302.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/155249/1/39OIV2016-1302.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01860nam a2200217 a 4500
001 2113034
005 2023-09-06
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCONCEIÇÃO, M. A. F.
245 $aEstimating mcc system dryness index using the vineyard water indicator.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: WORLD VINE AND WINE CONGRESS, 39.; GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE OIV, 14., 2016, Bento Gonçalves. Vitiviniculture: technological advances to market challenges: abstracts. Bento Gonçalves: International Organisation of Vine and Wine, n. 2016-1302$c2016
520 $aThe Geoviticulture Multicriteria Climatic Classification System (MCC System) has been employed in different regions of the world for grapevine zoning studies. The Dryness Index (DI) is one of the three MCC indices and its calculation is based on a soil water balance approach. However, other climatic indices are still been used for the same purpose. One of them is the Vineyard Water Indicator (VWI). This index represents the ratio between the total rainfall and vineyard water requirement during the productive period of the culture. When compared to DI, the VWI has a simpler calculation methodology. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish a model to estimate DI based on VWI values. Climate data of 82 winegrowing regions in 18 countries were used. Four regression models were evaluated: linear, quadratic, logarithmic and the Mitscherlich model. ...
653 $aDryness Ind ex (DI
653 $aDryness Index (DI)
653 $aGeoviticulture
653 $aGeoviticulture Multicriteria Climatic Classific ation System (MCC System)
653 $aGeoviticulture Multicriteria Climatic Classification System (MCC System)
653 $aSoil water balance approac
653 $aVineyard Water Indicator (VWI)
700 1 $aSOUZA, R. T. de
700 1 $aTONIETTO, J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/05/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/06/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, E. F. da; SILVA, G. F. da; FIGUEIREDO, E. O.; MENDONÇA, A. R. de; SANTANA, C. J. de O.; FIEDLER, N. C.; SILVA, J. P. M.; AGUIAR, M. O.; SANTOS, J. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
Evandro Ferreira da Silva, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI); Gilson Fernandes da Silva, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; EVANDRO ORFANO FIGUEIREDO, CPAF-AC; Adriano Ribeiro de Mendonça, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Cesar Junio de Oliveira Santana, Remsoft Solution; Nilton César Fiedler, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Jeferson Pereira Martins Silva, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Marcelo Otone Aguiar, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Jeangelis Silva Santos, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES). |
|
Título: |
Optimized forest planning: allocation of log storage yards in the Amazonian sustainable forest management area. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Forest Ecology and Management, v. 472, 118231, Sept. 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
0378-1127 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118231 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In Amazonian native forest management, forest road infrastructures, such as log storage yards and skid trails, arethe most expensive attributes and are responsible for the significant environmental impacts with selective treefelling. Road optimization is crucial for reducing environmental impacts and production costs and is stronglylinked to the optimal location of storage yards, which are essential to forest road planning. Considering thepresent problem and the current solutions available, this case study aimed to evaluate the efficiency andeventual gains of optimized forest planning (OFP), as compared to traditional forest planning (TFP). The TFPmethod is currently used most frequently by forest companies in the Amazon region. The study area of 126.41 habelongs to the National Forest (NAFO) Saracá-Taquera, Forest Management Unit II (FMU-II), Annual ProductionUnit (APU) 04/2018, and Work Unit (WU) 2. For the analysis, two areas were defined for exploration: thefirstwas explored using the OFP mathematical model (57.75 ha) and the second followed the TFP plan of thecompany (68.66 ha). Plans and executions for both areas were compared. The OFP model significantly reducedthe Euclidean distances between tree and yards, with only 0.23 km difference in the amount of planned forestroads, when compared to TFP. Additionally, OFP demonstrated a higher productivity (trees.h-1and m3.h-1), areduction of skid distance (by an average of 17.16%), and reduced the cost of log skidding (m3 by 25.76%). Thus,this study proved that OFP is a viable solution that can be adopted by companies to increase productivity. MenosIn Amazonian native forest management, forest road infrastructures, such as log storage yards and skid trails, arethe most expensive attributes and are responsible for the significant environmental impacts with selective treefelling. Road optimization is crucial for reducing environmental impacts and production costs and is stronglylinked to the optimal location of storage yards, which are essential to forest road planning. Considering thepresent problem and the current solutions available, this case study aimed to evaluate the efficiency andeventual gains of optimized forest planning (OFP), as compared to traditional forest planning (TFP). The TFPmethod is currently used most frequently by forest companies in the Amazon region. The study area of 126.41 habelongs to the National Forest (NAFO) Saracá-Taquera, Forest Management Unit II (FMU-II), Annual ProductionUnit (APU) 04/2018, and Work Unit (WU) 2. For the analysis, two areas were defined for exploration: thefirstwas explored using the OFP mathematical model (57.75 ha) and the second followed the TFP plan of thecompany (68.66 ha). Plans and executions for both areas were compared. The OFP model significantly reducedthe Euclidean distances between tree and yards, with only 0.23 km difference in the amount of planned forestroads, when compared to TFP. Additionally, OFP demonstrated a higher productivity (trees.h-1and m3.h-1), areduction of skid distance (by an average of 17.16%), and reduced the cost of log skidding (m3 by ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Amazônia Oriental; Eastern amazon; FLONA Saracá-Taquera; Manejo florestal sustentável; Oriximiná (PA); Pará; Terra Santa (PA). |
|
Thesagro: |
Administração Florestal; Produtividade. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; Economic productivity; Sustainable forestry. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/213269/1/26998.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02801naa a2200385 a 4500
001 2122589
005 2021-06-28
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0378-1127
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118231$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, E. F. da
245 $aOptimized forest planning$ballocation of log storage yards in the Amazonian sustainable forest management area.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aIn Amazonian native forest management, forest road infrastructures, such as log storage yards and skid trails, arethe most expensive attributes and are responsible for the significant environmental impacts with selective treefelling. Road optimization is crucial for reducing environmental impacts and production costs and is stronglylinked to the optimal location of storage yards, which are essential to forest road planning. Considering thepresent problem and the current solutions available, this case study aimed to evaluate the efficiency andeventual gains of optimized forest planning (OFP), as compared to traditional forest planning (TFP). The TFPmethod is currently used most frequently by forest companies in the Amazon region. The study area of 126.41 habelongs to the National Forest (NAFO) Saracá-Taquera, Forest Management Unit II (FMU-II), Annual ProductionUnit (APU) 04/2018, and Work Unit (WU) 2. For the analysis, two areas were defined for exploration: thefirstwas explored using the OFP mathematical model (57.75 ha) and the second followed the TFP plan of thecompany (68.66 ha). Plans and executions for both areas were compared. The OFP model significantly reducedthe Euclidean distances between tree and yards, with only 0.23 km difference in the amount of planned forestroads, when compared to TFP. Additionally, OFP demonstrated a higher productivity (trees.h-1and m3.h-1), areduction of skid distance (by an average of 17.16%), and reduced the cost of log skidding (m3 by 25.76%). Thus,this study proved that OFP is a viable solution that can be adopted by companies to increase productivity.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aEconomic productivity
650 $aSustainable forestry
650 $aAdministração Florestal
650 $aProdutividade
653 $aAmazônia Oriental
653 $aEastern amazon
653 $aFLONA Saracá-Taquera
653 $aManejo florestal sustentável
653 $aOriximiná (PA)
653 $aPará
653 $aTerra Santa (PA)
700 1 $aSILVA, G. F. da
700 1 $aFIGUEIREDO, E. O.
700 1 $aMENDONÇA, A. R. de
700 1 $aSANTANA, C. J. de O.
700 1 $aFIEDLER, N. C.
700 1 $aSILVA, J. P. M.
700 1 $aAGUIAR, M. O.
700 1 $aSANTOS, J. S.
773 $tForest Ecology and Management$gv. 472, 118231, Sept. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | 5151182, ROCKS AND MINERALS, Rock and Minerals Association, New York-NY
Biblioteca(s): Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Solos. |   |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
