|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
Data corrente: |
24/10/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/02/2018 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
CAPALBO, D. M. F.; VICIEN, C. E. |
Afiliação: |
DEISE MARIA FONTANA CAPALBO, CNPMA; C. E. VICIEN. |
Título: |
Brazilian capacity building experiences in biosafety: impacts in governance and supporting decision-making. |
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS, 14., 2017, Guadalajara. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: past, present and future: book of abstracts...Guadalajara: ISBR, 2017. Ref. PS XII-6. p. 148. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
GMOs are widely spread around the world, and Brazil is now the second producer behind the USA (1). Initially a defined policy in biosafety was put in place by 1995 which was revised in 2005 (2) with the participation of politicians, decision makers, scientific organization representatives, and groups from organized civil society. The main decision body in place since then is CTNBio, comprised of 27 PhD members and their respective alternates who hold a two-year term, renewable for up to two consecutive periods. So, a significant technical capacity had to be gathered and a critical mass had to be prepared. As expertise is gained with practice and experience, it was recognized that capacity-building initiatives were urgent for different levels of audiences. This presentation will show some experiences on how individuals, groups, institutions, and governmental authorities acted to provide training and technical assistance for the decision bodies. There were, and still are, many types of capacity-building activities in place. Different approaches incorporated a variety of forms and disciplines, and many factors were taken into account (e.g., target beneficiaries, effective content for the level of decision-maker?s audience, specific needs, and integration and collaboration among the various disciplines and capacity builders). Among such actions, active participation of country experts in international fora was also encouraged. The need for skilled risk assessors demands a continued effort from governmental and non-governmental organizations; so capacity-building has to be a continuous action. Inclusive discussions, robust scientific criteria and methods are some of the key factors that are needed to support evidence-based risk assessment, and they should be part of the content addressed by any reliable capacity building initiatives. MenosGMOs are widely spread around the world, and Brazil is now the second producer behind the USA (1). Initially a defined policy in biosafety was put in place by 1995 which was revised in 2005 (2) with the participation of politicians, decision makers, scientific organization representatives, and groups from organized civil society. The main decision body in place since then is CTNBio, comprised of 27 PhD members and their respective alternates who hold a two-year term, renewable for up to two consecutive periods. So, a significant technical capacity had to be gathered and a critical mass had to be prepared. As expertise is gained with practice and experience, it was recognized that capacity-building initiatives were urgent for different levels of audiences. This presentation will show some experiences on how individuals, groups, institutions, and governmental authorities acted to provide training and technical assistance for the decision bodies. There were, and still are, many types of capacity-building activities in place. Different approaches incorporated a variety of forms and disciplines, and many factors were taken into account (e.g., target beneficiaries, effective content for the level of decision-maker?s audience, specific needs, and integration and collaboration among the various disciplines and capacity builders). Among such actions, active participation of country experts in international fora was also encouraged. The need for skilled risk assessors demands a contin... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Biosegurança. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biosafety. |
Categoria do assunto: |
W Química e Física |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/165481/1/RA-CapalboDMF-14ISBGMO-2017-p148.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02551nam a2200145 a 4500 001 2078058 005 2018-02-08 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCAPALBO, D. M. F. 245 $aBrazilian capacity building experiences in biosafety$bimpacts in governance and supporting decision-making.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS, 14., 2017, Guadalajara. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: past, present and future: book of abstracts...Guadalajara: ISBR, 2017. Ref. PS XII-6. p. 148.$c2017 520 $aGMOs are widely spread around the world, and Brazil is now the second producer behind the USA (1). Initially a defined policy in biosafety was put in place by 1995 which was revised in 2005 (2) with the participation of politicians, decision makers, scientific organization representatives, and groups from organized civil society. The main decision body in place since then is CTNBio, comprised of 27 PhD members and their respective alternates who hold a two-year term, renewable for up to two consecutive periods. So, a significant technical capacity had to be gathered and a critical mass had to be prepared. As expertise is gained with practice and experience, it was recognized that capacity-building initiatives were urgent for different levels of audiences. This presentation will show some experiences on how individuals, groups, institutions, and governmental authorities acted to provide training and technical assistance for the decision bodies. There were, and still are, many types of capacity-building activities in place. Different approaches incorporated a variety of forms and disciplines, and many factors were taken into account (e.g., target beneficiaries, effective content for the level of decision-maker?s audience, specific needs, and integration and collaboration among the various disciplines and capacity builders). Among such actions, active participation of country experts in international fora was also encouraged. The need for skilled risk assessors demands a continued effort from governmental and non-governmental organizations; so capacity-building has to be a continuous action. Inclusive discussions, robust scientific criteria and methods are some of the key factors that are needed to support evidence-based risk assessment, and they should be part of the content addressed by any reliable capacity building initiatives. 650 $aBiosafety 653 $aBiosegurança 700 1 $aVICIEN, C. E.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
01/11/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
23/12/2019 |
Autoria: |
REIFSCHNEIDER, F. J. B.; NASS, L. L.; DUARTE, P. de C.; FERRAZ, R. M. (ed.). |
Afiliação: |
FRANCISCO JOSE BECKER REIFSCHNEIDER, SRI; LUCIANO LOURENCO NASS, SRI; PAULO DE CAMARGO DUARTE, SRI; RODRIGO MONTALVÃO FERRAZ. |
Título: |
Agricultural innovation marketplace: south-south cooperation beyond theory. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF, 2016. |
Páginas: |
141 p. |
Descrição Física: |
il. : color. |
ISBN: |
978-85-921794-0-3 |
Idioma: |
Inglês Português |
Notas: |
Autores: Ana Gláucia Heinrich; André Nepomuceno Dusi; Eliseu Roberto de A. Alves; Francisco José B. Reifschneider; João Victor B. Chaud; Josina A. Siqueira Reis; Luciano Lourenço Nass; Maria Eduarda N. Cajueiro; Osório Vilela Filho; Paulo Eduardo de Melo; Paulo de Camargo Duarte; Rodrigo Montalvão Feraz; Simone Staiger Rivas; Valéria C. Panno Vieira.
Coleção Eliseu Alves: Biblioteca da Embrapa Sede. |
Conteúdo: |
Agriculture and development. The agricultural innovation marketplace- the mktplace. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural innovation; Inovação agrícola; Programas e projetos governamentais. |
Thesagro: |
Cooperação internacional; Desenvolvimento rural; Pesquisa agrícola; Produção agrícola; Transferência de tecnologia. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agricultural research; Governmental programs and projects; international cooperation; Rural development; Technology transfer. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- E Economia e Indústria Agrícola X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/152325/1/MKTPlace.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01510nam a2200337 a 4500 001 2055961 005 2019-12-23 008 2016 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 020 $a978-85-921794-0-3 100 1 $aREIFSCHNEIDER, F. J. B. 245 $aAgricultural innovation marketplace$bsouth-south cooperation beyond theory. 260 $aBrasília, DF$c2016 300 $a141 p.$cil. : color. 500 $aAutores: Ana Gláucia Heinrich; André Nepomuceno Dusi; Eliseu Roberto de A. Alves; Francisco José B. Reifschneider; João Victor B. Chaud; Josina A. Siqueira Reis; Luciano Lourenço Nass; Maria Eduarda N. Cajueiro; Osório Vilela Filho; Paulo Eduardo de Melo; Paulo de Camargo Duarte; Rodrigo Montalvão Feraz; Simone Staiger Rivas; Valéria C. Panno Vieira. Coleção Eliseu Alves: Biblioteca da Embrapa Sede. 520 $aAgriculture and development. The agricultural innovation marketplace- the mktplace. 650 $aAgricultural research 650 $aGovernmental programs and projects 650 $ainternational cooperation 650 $aRural development 650 $aTechnology transfer 650 $aCooperação internacional 650 $aDesenvolvimento rural 650 $aPesquisa agrícola 650 $aProdução agrícola 650 $aTransferência de tecnologia 653 $aAgricultural innovation 653 $aInovação agrícola 653 $aProgramas e projetos governamentais 700 1 $aNASS, L. L. 700 1 $aDUARTE, P. de C. 700 1 $aFERRAZ, R. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|