| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | MARTINS, P. A.; TROBO-MASEDA, L.; LIMA, F. A.; MORAIS JÚNIOR, W. G. DE; MARCO, J. LISBOA DE; SALUM, T. F. C.; GUISAN, J. M. Omega-3 production by fish oil hydrolysis using a lipase from Burkholderia gladioli BRM58833 immobilized and stabilized by post-immobilization techniques. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, v. 29, 101193, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/01/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/02/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
WANG, Y.; ZIV, G.; ADAMI, M.; ALMEIDA, C. A. de; ANTUNES, J. F. G.; COUTINHO, A. C.; ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.; GOMES, A. R.; GALBRAITH, D. |
|
Afiliação: |
YUNXIA WANG, University of Leeds; GUY ZIV, University of Leeds; MARCOS ADAMI, INPE; CLÁUDIO APARECIDO DE ALMEIDA, INPE; JOAO FRANCISCO GONCALVES ANTUNES, CNPTIA; ALEXANDRE CAMARGO COUTINHO, CNPTIA; JULIO CESAR DALLA MORA ESQUERDO, CNPTIA; ALESSANDRA RODRIGUES GOMES, INPE; DAVID GALBRAITH, University of Leeds. |
|
Título: |
Upturn in secondary forest clearing buffers primary forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature sustainability, v. 3, n. 4, Apr. 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0470-4 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Brazil contains two-thirds of remaining Amazonian rainforests and is responsible for the most Amazon forest loss. Primary forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon has declined considerably since 2004 but secondary forest loss has never been quantified. We use a recently developed high-resolution land use/land cover dataset to track secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon over 14 yr, providing the first estimates of secondary forest loss for the region. We find that secondary forest loss increased by (187 ± 48)% from 2008 to 2014. Moreover, the proportion of total forest loss accounted for by secondary forests rose from (37 ± 3)% in 2000 to (72 ± 5)% in 2014. The recent acceleration in secondary forests loss occurred across the entire region and was not driven simply by increasing secondary forest area but probably a conscious preferential shift towards clearance of a little-protected forest ecosystem (secondary forests). Our results suggest that secondary forests loss has eased deforestation pressure on primary forests. However, this has been at the expense of a lost carbon sequestration opportunity of 2.59?2.66 Pg C over our study period. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Desflorestamento; Floresta amazônica; Forest loss; Perda florestal; TERRACLASS. |
|
Thesagro: |
Desmatamento. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; Deforestation; Secondary forests. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02116naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2119612
005 2021-02-17
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0470-4$2DOI
100 1 $aWANG, Y.
245 $aUpturn in secondary forest clearing buffers primary forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aBrazil contains two-thirds of remaining Amazonian rainforests and is responsible for the most Amazon forest loss. Primary forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon has declined considerably since 2004 but secondary forest loss has never been quantified. We use a recently developed high-resolution land use/land cover dataset to track secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon over 14 yr, providing the first estimates of secondary forest loss for the region. We find that secondary forest loss increased by (187 ± 48)% from 2008 to 2014. Moreover, the proportion of total forest loss accounted for by secondary forests rose from (37 ± 3)% in 2000 to (72 ± 5)% in 2014. The recent acceleration in secondary forests loss occurred across the entire region and was not driven simply by increasing secondary forest area but probably a conscious preferential shift towards clearance of a little-protected forest ecosystem (secondary forests). Our results suggest that secondary forests loss has eased deforestation pressure on primary forests. However, this has been at the expense of a lost carbon sequestration opportunity of 2.59?2.66 Pg C over our study period.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aDeforestation
650 $aSecondary forests
650 $aDesmatamento
653 $aDesflorestamento
653 $aFloresta amazônica
653 $aForest loss
653 $aPerda florestal
653 $aTERRACLASS
700 1 $aZIV, G.
700 1 $aADAMI, M.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, C. A. de
700 1 $aANTUNES, J. F. G.
700 1 $aCOUTINHO, A. C.
700 1 $aESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.
700 1 $aGOMES, A. R.
700 1 $aGALBRAITH, D.
773 $tNature sustainability$gv. 3, n. 4, Apr. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
