| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/01/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
ABREU, L. S. de; BELLON, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUCIMAR SANTIAGO DE ABREU, CNPMA; STÉPHANE BELLON, INRA. |
|
Título: |
The dynamics and recomposition of agroecology in Latin America. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: HALBERG, N.; MULLER, A. (Ed.). Organic agriculture for sustainable livelihoods. London: Routeledge, 2012. p. 223-245. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agroecology be a new scientific paradigm leading to specific research topics, an alternative way to do research, reconnectin science, nature and society? Will it contribute to sustainable livelihoods, especially for aml y armers, or be a cornerstone for the development of agricultural enterprises? Will it be appropriated by social movements to support agricultural and rural transitions? ln order to contribute to answer these issues, this chapter includes five sections. After describing our approach, we show that family farming is socially and economically important in Latin Anlerica, with part of the certified production originating therefrom. We stress the need for taking into accoun tlocal conditions and differentiated groups of family producers characterized by both social and cultural differences and diversity of ecologically inspired production styles. Another aspect dealt with is the history of alternative agriculture from the 1970s, with identification of its successive events and characteristics, and the dynamics of alternative agriculture into the building up of agroecology and its different features in Latin Arnerica. Then, we analyse the current status of agroecology structuring in Latin America, i.e. the elements favoring the setting up of research and development programmes, as well as the participation of social movements . MenosThe growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agro... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroecologia; América Latina. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agroecology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03403naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1944301
005 2021-07-14
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aABREU, L. S. de
245 $aThe dynamics and recomposition of agroecology in Latin America.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2012
520 $aThe growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agroecology be a new scientific paradigm leading to specific research topics, an alternative way to do research, reconnectin science, nature and society? Will it contribute to sustainable livelihoods, especially for aml y armers, or be a cornerstone for the development of agricultural enterprises? Will it be appropriated by social movements to support agricultural and rural transitions? ln order to contribute to answer these issues, this chapter includes five sections. After describing our approach, we show that family farming is socially and economically important in Latin Anlerica, with part of the certified production originating therefrom. We stress the need for taking into accoun tlocal conditions and differentiated groups of family producers characterized by both social and cultural differences and diversity of ecologically inspired production styles. Another aspect dealt with is the history of alternative agriculture from the 1970s, with identification of its successive events and characteristics, and the dynamics of alternative agriculture into the building up of agroecology and its different features in Latin Arnerica. Then, we analyse the current status of agroecology structuring in Latin America, i.e. the elements favoring the setting up of research and development programmes, as well as the participation of social movements .
650 $aAgroecology
653 $aAgroecologia
653 $aAmérica Latina
700 1 $aBELLON, S.
773 $tIn: HALBERG, N.; MULLER, A. (Ed.). Organic agriculture for sustainable livelihoods. London: Routeledge, 2012. p. 223-245.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/07/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/07/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
LAU, D.; FERNANDES, J. M. C.; MARSARO JUNIOR, A. L.; LAZZARETT, A. T.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; WIEST, R.; RIEDER, R.; SAMPAIO, M. V.; STOETZER, A.; RUZICK, M.; RIFFEL, C. T.; RUTHES, E.; ANJOS, W. I. do; PALMA, J.; MENEZES JÚNIOR, A. de O.; REDAELLI, L. R.; MUNDSTOCK, S.; SANTOS, C. D. R. dos; PIVATO, J.; D’AGOSTINI, M.; SALVADORI, J. R.; SILVA, P. S.; PAIVA, P. E. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
DOUGLAS LAU, CNPT; JOSE MAURICIO CUNHA FERNANDES, CNPT; ALBERTO LUIZ MARSARO JUNIOR, CNPT; ALEXANDRE TAGLIARI LAZZARETT, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense; PAULO ROBERTO VALLE DA S PEREIRA, CNPF; ROBERTO WIEST, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense; RAFAEL RIEDER, Universidade de Passo Fundo; MARCUS VINICIUS SAMPAIO, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; ALFRED STOETZER, Fundação Agrária de Pesquisa Agropecuária; MARIELLI RUZICK, Fundação Agrária de Pesquisa Agropecuária; CINEI TERESINHA RIFFEL, Sociedade Educacional Três de Maio; ELDERSON RUTHES, Fundação ABC; WILLIAM IORDI DO ANJOS, Fundação ABC; JANINE PALMA, Cooperativa Central Gaúcha; AYRES DE OLIVEIRA MENEZES JÚNIOR, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; LUIZA RODRIGUES REDAELLI, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; SIMONE MUNDSTOCK, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; CARLOS DIEGO RIBEIRO DOS SANTOS, UFRGS; JULIANA PIVATO, PIBIC/CNPq - Embrapa Trigo; MONIQUE D’AGOSTINI, Universidade de Passo Fundo; JOSÉ ROBERTO SALVADORI, Universidade de Passo Fundo; PATRÍCIA SOBRAL SILVA, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Mato Grosso; PAULO EDUARDO BRANCO PAIVA, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecn. do Triângulo Mineiro. |
|
Título: |
Monitorar e manejar. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Cultivar Grandes Culturas, ano XX, n. 253, p. 36-39, jun.2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O ano de 2019 foi bastante favorável à ocorrência de pulgões e transmissão de vírus como o nanismo-amarelo na cultura do trigo. A importância destas epidemias tem levado a iniciativas para facilitar o monitoramento e a tomada de decisão de manejo desses afídeos. Esforços incluem o uso da Tecnologia de Informação |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cultura do trigo. |
|
Thesagro: |
Nanismo Amarelo; Pulgão; Tecnologia da Informação; Trigo; Vírus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/214693/1/Cultivar-253P36-39-2020.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01522naa a2200457 a 4500
001 2123932
005 2020-07-22
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aLAU, D.
245 $aMonitorar e manejar.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aO ano de 2019 foi bastante favorável à ocorrência de pulgões e transmissão de vírus como o nanismo-amarelo na cultura do trigo. A importância destas epidemias tem levado a iniciativas para facilitar o monitoramento e a tomada de decisão de manejo desses afídeos. Esforços incluem o uso da Tecnologia de Informação
650 $aNanismo Amarelo
650 $aPulgão
650 $aTecnologia da Informação
650 $aTrigo
650 $aVírus
653 $aCultura do trigo
700 1 $aFERNANDES, J. M. C.
700 1 $aMARSARO JUNIOR, A. L.
700 1 $aLAZZARETT, A. T.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.
700 1 $aWIEST, R.
700 1 $aRIEDER, R.
700 1 $aSAMPAIO, M. V.
700 1 $aSTOETZER, A.
700 1 $aRUZICK, M.
700 1 $aRIFFEL, C. T.
700 1 $aRUTHES, E.
700 1 $aANJOS, W. I. do
700 1 $aPALMA, J.
700 1 $aMENEZES JÚNIOR, A. de O.
700 1 $aREDAELLI, L. R.
700 1 $aMUNDSTOCK, S.
700 1 $aSANTOS, C. D. R. dos
700 1 $aPIVATO, J.
700 1 $aD’AGOSTINI, M.
700 1 $aSALVADORI, J. R.
700 1 $aSILVA, P. S.
700 1 $aPAIVA, P. E. B.
773 $tCultivar Grandes Culturas, ano XX$gn. 253, p. 36-39, jun.2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
