| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpms.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/09/2006 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/06/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BACCA, T.; LIMA, E. R.; PICANÇO, M. C.; GUEDES, R. N. C.; VIANA, J. H. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOAO HERBERT MOREIRA VIANA, CNPMS. |
|
Título: |
Optimum spacing of pheromone traps for monitoring the coffee leaf miner Leucoptera coffeella. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2006 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Dordrecht, v. 119, n. 1, p. 39-45, 2006. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Pest monitoring with pheromone traps is affected mainly by factors such as trap placement and pest biology. The intertrap distance can affect the capture due to competition among traps that are placed at short distances. We studied the interference among pheromone traps used to monitor males of the coffee leaf miner, Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Méneville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), with traps placed at various distances. Using geostatistical analysis, we determined at what distance captures were independent from other traps. Traps were placed in groups of 12 with distances among traps per group either 2, 5, 10, 15, or 30 m. Traps were checked for males every 4 days during 16 days. We found interference between traps when intertrap distances were shorter than 10 m. The range and magnitude of spatial dependence varied considerably among each sampling date and wind direction. For directions of 45° and 135°, the traps should be placed 110 and 177 m apart, respectively, to obtain spatially independent counts and therefore representative samplings for assessing the insect population in the area. These results have implications for developing sampling plans for managing L. coffeella with pheromone traps; the spatial analysis indicated that a trap density of one pheromone trap for every 3.5?4 ha would be adequate for the monitoring of the coffee leaf miner. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Coffee pest; Population monitoring; sampling range; Sex pheromone; Spatial analysis; Trap density; Trap interaction. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
geostatistics; Lepidoptera; Lyonetiidae. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02227naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1476050
005 2018-06-06
008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBACCA, T.
245 $aOptimum spacing of pheromone traps for monitoring the coffee leaf miner Leucoptera coffeella.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2006
520 $aPest monitoring with pheromone traps is affected mainly by factors such as trap placement and pest biology. The intertrap distance can affect the capture due to competition among traps that are placed at short distances. We studied the interference among pheromone traps used to monitor males of the coffee leaf miner, Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Méneville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), with traps placed at various distances. Using geostatistical analysis, we determined at what distance captures were independent from other traps. Traps were placed in groups of 12 with distances among traps per group either 2, 5, 10, 15, or 30 m. Traps were checked for males every 4 days during 16 days. We found interference between traps when intertrap distances were shorter than 10 m. The range and magnitude of spatial dependence varied considerably among each sampling date and wind direction. For directions of 45° and 135°, the traps should be placed 110 and 177 m apart, respectively, to obtain spatially independent counts and therefore representative samplings for assessing the insect population in the area. These results have implications for developing sampling plans for managing L. coffeella with pheromone traps; the spatial analysis indicated that a trap density of one pheromone trap for every 3.5?4 ha would be adequate for the monitoring of the coffee leaf miner.
650 $ageostatistics
650 $aLepidoptera
650 $aLyonetiidae
653 $aCoffee pest
653 $aPopulation monitoring
653 $asampling range
653 $aSex pheromone
653 $aSpatial analysis
653 $aTrap density
653 $aTrap interaction
700 1 $aLIMA, E. R.
700 1 $aPICANÇO, M. C.
700 1 $aGUEDES, R. N. C.
700 1 $aVIANA, J. H. M.
773 $tEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Dordrecht$gv. 119, n. 1, p. 39-45, 2006.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 61 | |
| 18. |  | DINIZ, M. de S.; OLIVEIRA, A. M. G.; PEREIRA, N. L.; OLIVEIRA, J. L. de. Avaliação de variedades de mandioca mansa com agricultores familiares de Guaratinga, BA. Revista Raízes e Amidos Tropicais, Botucatu, v. 5, p. 255-259, jul. 2009. 1 CD-ROM. Edição dos Anais do XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Mandioca; VII Workshop sobre Tecnologia em Agroindústrias de Tuberosas Tropicais. Botucatu, jul. 2009.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 4 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|   |
| 20. | | OLIVEIRA, A. M. G.; DINIZ, M. de S.; PEREIRA, N. L.; OLIVEIRA, J. L. de. Comportamento de variedades de mandioca avaliado com agricultores familiares de Guaratinga, BA. Revista Raízes e Amidos Tropicais, Botucatu, v. 5, p. 341-345, jul. 2009. 1 CD-ROM. Edição dos Anais do XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Mandioca; VII Workshop sobre Tecnologia em Agroindústrias de Tuberosas Tropicais. Botucatu, jul. 2009.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 4 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 61 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
