| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com ctaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ESPERANÇA, I. P. L. DE C.; CARVALHO, I. C.; LAUDANO, A. P. C. P.; SANTOS, G.; AYRES, E. M. M.; DELIZA, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
ISABELLE PAES LEME DE CASTRO ESPERANÇA, UFRJ; ISABELLA CHICON CARVALHO, UNIRIO; ANA PAULA CORRIA PORTUGAL LAUDANO, UNIRIO; GABRIELA SANTOS, UNIRIO; ELLEN M. MENEZES AYRES, UNIRIO; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
|
Título: |
Using apple juice to replace sugar in grape nectar formulation associated with nutritional warning: the effects on the expected consumer liking. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá, 2023. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Pôster 168522; SLACAN. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Nutritional warning helps promote healthy choices. In Brazil, the black magnifying glass is utilized when added sugars are ≥7.5% in beverages. To avoid this warning, the food industry uses apple juice to replace added sugar, informing consumers through package claims. However, the impact of this information on consumer product perception remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of product formulation, warning ("High in added sugar"), and claim (“With apple juice”) on consumers' expected liking and intention to purchase fruit nectars. Six packages were developed following an incomplete factorial design with three factors (levels): (i)Product (Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar; Grape nectar with sugar; Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar), (ii)Claim and (iii)Warning (Present/Absent). Consumers (n=100) looked at the packages and evaluated the expected liking (9-point hedonic scales) and purchase intention (5-point scales). Additionally, participants expressed their agreement (7-point Likert scale) on the ways for sweetening nectars: using sugar, apple juice, or sugar and apple juice. Product affected the expected liking. Lower averages were observed for “Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar”, without warning, with claim (6.7±1.5) or without (6.6±1.6); and “Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar”, with warning, and with claim (6.8±1.5) or without (6.7±1.4) compared to “Grape nectar with sugar”, with warning, with or without claim (7.6±1.3; 7.8±1.4). Purchase intention demonstrated similar results. The factor "Product" contributed to a greater expected acceptance, even in the presence of "Claim" and "Warning" (both didn’t affect acceptance). Participants gave a higher score to apple juice as a suitable way to sweeten nectars (average=5.1), as opposite to sugar or apple juice and sugar suggesting a dichotomy between the expected liking by looking at the nectar package and a question that was answered requiring rational thinking. Further studies are necessary to comprehend the consumer's perception/preference, sugar replacement, and warnings. MenosNutritional warning helps promote healthy choices. In Brazil, the black magnifying glass is utilized when added sugars are ≥7.5% in beverages. To avoid this warning, the food industry uses apple juice to replace added sugar, informing consumers through package claims. However, the impact of this information on consumer product perception remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of product formulation, warning ("High in added sugar"), and claim (“With apple juice”) on consumers' expected liking and intention to purchase fruit nectars. Six packages were developed following an incomplete factorial design with three factors (levels): (i)Product (Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar; Grape nectar with sugar; Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar), (ii)Claim and (iii)Warning (Present/Absent). Consumers (n=100) looked at the packages and evaluated the expected liking (9-point hedonic scales) and purchase intention (5-point scales). Additionally, participants expressed their agreement (7-point Likert scale) on the ways for sweetening nectars: using sugar, apple juice, or sugar and apple juice. Product affected the expected liking. Lower averages were observed for “Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar”, without warning, with claim (6.7±1.5) or without (6.6±1.6); and “Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar”, with warning, and with claim (6.8±1.5) or without (6.7±1.4) compared to “Grape nectar with sugar”, with warning, with or without claim (7.6±1.3; 7.8±1.4). Purchase in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fermented. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Goat milk; Lactic acid bacteria. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03025nam a2200217 a 4500
001 2159377
005 2023-12-11
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aESPERANÇA, I. P. L. DE C.
245 $aUsing apple juice to replace sugar in grape nectar formulation associated with nutritional warning$bthe effects on the expected consumer liking.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá$c2023
500 $aPôster 168522; SLACAN.
520 $aNutritional warning helps promote healthy choices. In Brazil, the black magnifying glass is utilized when added sugars are ≥7.5% in beverages. To avoid this warning, the food industry uses apple juice to replace added sugar, informing consumers through package claims. However, the impact of this information on consumer product perception remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of product formulation, warning ("High in added sugar"), and claim (“With apple juice”) on consumers' expected liking and intention to purchase fruit nectars. Six packages were developed following an incomplete factorial design with three factors (levels): (i)Product (Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar; Grape nectar with sugar; Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar), (ii)Claim and (iii)Warning (Present/Absent). Consumers (n=100) looked at the packages and evaluated the expected liking (9-point hedonic scales) and purchase intention (5-point scales). Additionally, participants expressed their agreement (7-point Likert scale) on the ways for sweetening nectars: using sugar, apple juice, or sugar and apple juice. Product affected the expected liking. Lower averages were observed for “Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar”, without warning, with claim (6.7±1.5) or without (6.6±1.6); and “Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar”, with warning, and with claim (6.8±1.5) or without (6.7±1.4) compared to “Grape nectar with sugar”, with warning, with or without claim (7.6±1.3; 7.8±1.4). Purchase intention demonstrated similar results. The factor "Product" contributed to a greater expected acceptance, even in the presence of "Claim" and "Warning" (both didn’t affect acceptance). Participants gave a higher score to apple juice as a suitable way to sweeten nectars (average=5.1), as opposite to sugar or apple juice and sugar suggesting a dichotomy between the expected liking by looking at the nectar package and a question that was answered requiring rational thinking. Further studies are necessary to comprehend the consumer's perception/preference, sugar replacement, and warnings.
650 $aGoat milk
650 $aLactic acid bacteria
653 $aFermented
700 1 $aCARVALHO, I. C.
700 1 $aLAUDANO, A. P. C. P.
700 1 $aSANTOS, G.
700 1 $aAYRES, E. M. M.
700 1 $aDELIZA, R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Unidades Centrais. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/06/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/01/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
TORRES, D. A. P.; FRONZAGLIA, T.; SANTANA, C. A. M.; ARAUJO, D. L. M. de; BOLFE, E. L.; LOPES, D. B.; PENA JUNIOR, M. A. G.; HENZ, G. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
DANIELLE ALENCAR PARENTE TORRES, SIM; THOMAZ FRONZAGLIA, SGI; CARLOS AUGUSTO MATTOS SANTANA, SIM; DANIELLA LOPES MARINHO DE ARAUJO, SGI; EDSON LUIS BOLFE, SIM; DANIELA BIAGGIONI LOPES, SIM; MARCOS ANTONIO GOMES PENA JUNIOR, SIM; GILMAR PAULO HENZ, SIM. |
|
Título: |
Cenas: bioeconomia: moldando o futuro. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MARCIAL, E. C.; CURADO, M. P. F.; OLIVEIRA, M. G. de; CRUZ JÚNIOR, S. C. da; COUTO, L. F. (Ed.). Brasil 2035: cenários para o desenvolvimento. Brasília, DF: Ipea: Assecor, 2017. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 219-238 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioeconomia; Prospecção de cenários. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00782naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2070476
005 2020-01-29
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aTORRES, D. A. P.
245 $aCenas$bbioeconomia: moldando o futuro.
260 $c2017
300 $ap. 219-238
650 $aAgricultura
653 $aBioeconomia
653 $aProspecção de cenários
700 1 $aFRONZAGLIA, T.
700 1 $aSANTANA, C. A. M.
700 1 $aARAUJO, D. L. M. de
700 1 $aBOLFE, E. L.
700 1 $aLOPES, D. B.
700 1 $aPENA JUNIOR, M. A. G.
700 1 $aHENZ, G. P.
773 $tIn: MARCIAL, E. C.; CURADO, M. P. F.; OLIVEIRA, M. G. de; CRUZ JÚNIOR, S. C. da; COUTO, L. F. (Ed.). Brasil 2035: cenários para o desenvolvimento. Brasília, DF: Ipea: Assecor, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
