| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/03/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/03/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Orientação de Tese de Pós-Graduação |
|
Autoria: |
MENDES, M. I. de S. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARIA INÊS DE SOUZA MENDES, UFRB. |
|
Título: |
Regeneração in vitro de porta-enxertos e minienxertia em citros. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Dissertação (Mestrado em em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais ) - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 2016. |
|
Páginas: |
86 f. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Orientadora: Maria Angélica Pereira de Carvalho Costa; Coorientador: Walter dos Santos Soares Filho (CNPMF); : Abelmon da Silva Gesteira (CNPMF). |
|
Thesagro: |
Fruta cítrica; Porta enxerto. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Citrus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00660nam a2200157 a 4500
001 2089084
005 2018-03-14
008 2016 bl uuuu m 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMENDES, M. I. de S.
245 $aRegeneração in vitro de porta-enxertos e minienxertia em citros.
260 $aDissertação (Mestrado em em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais ) - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Cruz das Almas$c2016
300 $a86 f.$cil.
500 $aOrientadora: Maria Angélica Pereira de Carvalho Costa; Coorientador: Walter dos Santos Soares Filho (CNPMF); : Abelmon da Silva Gesteira (CNPMF).
650 $aCitrus
650 $aFruta cítrica
650 $aPorta enxerto
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/01/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/09/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ARAÚJO, A. C. C.; OLIVEIRA, J. S. K.; TORRES FILHO, R. A.; BRANDÃO, F. Z.; FONSECA, J. F. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
A. C. C. Araújo, Universidade Federal Fluminense, UFF; J. S. K. Oliveira, UFF; R. A. Torres Filho, UFF; F. Z. Brandão, UFF; JEFERSON FERREIRA DA FONSECA, CNPC. |
|
Título: |
Timed hormonal treatments in induction and synchronization of Saanen goats estrus during nonbreeding season. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOATS, 10., 2010, Recife. Technological development and associative attempts to a sustainable small livestock production: annals. Little Rock: IGA, 2010. 1 f. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
With the aim to evaluate reproductive performance of Saanen goats among different timed hormonal protocols during nonbreeding season, 30 females had the estrus cycles induced and synchronized by insertion of an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 60mg Medroxyprogesterone Acetate. All goats received 200 IU eCG and 37.5 ?g PGF2? analog 24 hours prior to sponge removal. After 5 days of mating, all animals received 250 IU hCG. Animals were divided in 3 groups: Group 1 (G1) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 6 days (n=10); Group 2 (G2) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 9 days (n=10) and Group 3 (G3) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 12 days (n=10). An ultrasound scanner was used to determine time of ovulation and animals were tested for estrus by the use of a buck. All animals (100%) from G2 and G3 had signs of estrus while one goat (10%) from G1 did not show sings. Estrus length had no difference between groups (G1: 34.66 ± 22.80; G2: 30.00 ± 12.96; G3: 37.20 ± 19.14 hours, P>0.05). Time between sponge removal and beginning of estrus (G1: 20.66 ± 16.73; G2: 20.40 ± 7.59; G3: 19.20 ± 10.51 hours) and time from beginning of estrus until ovulation (G1: 26.40 ± 5.37; G2: 30.00 ± 12.96; G3: 34.28 ± 8.28 hours) also did not differ (P>0.05). G2 had all animals ovulating (100%) while G1 had 8 and G3 had 7 (80% and 70%, respectively). Time between sponge removal and ovulation differ between G1 and G3 (39.00 ± 5.55 and 55.71 ± 12.83, hours respectively, P <0.05), but G2 didn´t differ of the others (50.40 ± 13.91 hours). Ovulation rate (G1: 1.50 ± 0.97; G2: 1.50 ± 0.53; G3: 1.00 ± 0.82) as well as ovulatory follicle diameter (G1: 1.00 ± 0.82 X 5.48 ± 0.62mm; G2: 5.68 ± 0.85 X 5.72 ± 1.13mm; G3: 5.77 ± 0.87 X 5.35 ± 0.69mm) had no difference between treatment protocols (P>0.05). MenosWith the aim to evaluate reproductive performance of Saanen goats among different timed hormonal protocols during nonbreeding season, 30 females had the estrus cycles induced and synchronized by insertion of an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 60mg Medroxyprogesterone Acetate. All goats received 200 IU eCG and 37.5 ?g PGF2? analog 24 hours prior to sponge removal. After 5 days of mating, all animals received 250 IU hCG. Animals were divided in 3 groups: Group 1 (G1) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 6 days (n=10); Group 2 (G2) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 9 days (n=10) and Group 3 (G3) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 12 days (n=10). An ultrasound scanner was used to determine time of ovulation and animals were tested for estrus by the use of a buck. All animals (100%) from G2 and G3 had signs of estrus while one goat (10%) from G1 did not show sings. Estrus length had no difference between groups (G1: 34.66 ± 22.80; G2: 30.00 ± 12.96; G3: 37.20 ± 19.14 hours, P>0.05). Time between sponge removal and beginning of estrus (G1: 20.66 ± 16.73; G2: 20.40 ± 7.59; G3: 19.20 ± 10.51 hours) and time from beginning of estrus until ovulation (G1: 26.40 ± 5.37; G2: 30.00 ± 12.96; G3: 34.28 ± 8.28 hours) also did not differ (P>0.05). G2 had all animals ovulating (100%) while G1 had 8 and G3 had 7 (80% and 70%, respectively). Time between sponge removal and ovulation differ between G1 and G3 (39.00 ± 5.55 and 55.71 ± 12.83, hours respectively, P <0.05), but G2 didn´t differ of the others... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Hormanal treatment; Induction; Sincronização do estro. |
|
Thesagro: |
Caprino; Ciclo estral; Indução; Sincronização do cio. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Animal performance; Estrus synchronization; Goats. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/27057/1/RAC-Timed-hormonal-treatments-in-induction-and-synchronization-of-Saanen.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02811nam a2200277 a 4500
001 1873520
005 2019-09-24
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aARAÚJO, A. C. C.
245 $aTimed hormonal treatments in induction and synchronization of Saanen goats estrus during nonbreeding season.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOATS, 10., 2010, Recife. Technological development and associative attempts to a sustainable small livestock production: annals. Little Rock: IGA, 2010. 1 f. 1 CD-ROM.$c2010
520 $aWith the aim to evaluate reproductive performance of Saanen goats among different timed hormonal protocols during nonbreeding season, 30 females had the estrus cycles induced and synchronized by insertion of an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 60mg Medroxyprogesterone Acetate. All goats received 200 IU eCG and 37.5 ?g PGF2? analog 24 hours prior to sponge removal. After 5 days of mating, all animals received 250 IU hCG. Animals were divided in 3 groups: Group 1 (G1) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 6 days (n=10); Group 2 (G2) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 9 days (n=10) and Group 3 (G3) ? vaginal sponge remaining for 12 days (n=10). An ultrasound scanner was used to determine time of ovulation and animals were tested for estrus by the use of a buck. All animals (100%) from G2 and G3 had signs of estrus while one goat (10%) from G1 did not show sings. Estrus length had no difference between groups (G1: 34.66 ± 22.80; G2: 30.00 ± 12.96; G3: 37.20 ± 19.14 hours, P>0.05). Time between sponge removal and beginning of estrus (G1: 20.66 ± 16.73; G2: 20.40 ± 7.59; G3: 19.20 ± 10.51 hours) and time from beginning of estrus until ovulation (G1: 26.40 ± 5.37; G2: 30.00 ± 12.96; G3: 34.28 ± 8.28 hours) also did not differ (P>0.05). G2 had all animals ovulating (100%) while G1 had 8 and G3 had 7 (80% and 70%, respectively). Time between sponge removal and ovulation differ between G1 and G3 (39.00 ± 5.55 and 55.71 ± 12.83, hours respectively, P <0.05), but G2 didn´t differ of the others (50.40 ± 13.91 hours). Ovulation rate (G1: 1.50 ± 0.97; G2: 1.50 ± 0.53; G3: 1.00 ± 0.82) as well as ovulatory follicle diameter (G1: 1.00 ± 0.82 X 5.48 ± 0.62mm; G2: 5.68 ± 0.85 X 5.72 ± 1.13mm; G3: 5.77 ± 0.87 X 5.35 ± 0.69mm) had no difference between treatment protocols (P>0.05).
650 $aAnimal performance
650 $aEstrus synchronization
650 $aGoats
650 $aCaprino
650 $aCiclo estral
650 $aIndução
650 $aSincronização do cio
653 $aHormanal treatment
653 $aInduction
653 $aSincronização do estro
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. S. K.
700 1 $aTORRES FILHO, R. A.
700 1 $aBRANDÃO, F. Z.
700 1 $aFONSECA, J. F. da
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
