| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/12/2000 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/03/2006 |
|
Autoria: |
GAZZONI, D. L. |
|
Título: |
An evaluation of the brazilian SOY-IPM Programme. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2000 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSO OF ENTOMOLOGY, 21., 2000, Foz do Iguassu. Abstracts... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2000. |
|
Volume: |
v.2 |
|
Páginas: |
p.678. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
During the early 1970s, a survey demonstratedthat insecticides were the exclusive soybean pest control method. An average of 6 applications/season were made, using very high toxic and enviromentaly hazardous insectides, and also at far higher rates than needed. To address this situation a Soybean Integrated Pest Management program (Soy-IPM) was designed, validated and implemented in Brasil, starting in 1975. The process represented an interaction between R & D instittutions (Universities, Research Institutes), Extension and Technicl Assistance Institutions (Former Embrater system, Cooperatives, Private offices, NGOs), leadede by Embrapa Soja. Early studies and implementation were set up simultaneously at Parana and Rio Grande do Sul states, followed by quick spreading to all over the Brazilian soybean cultivated region. The peak for IPM adoption (ca.70%) happened during the 1982/83 growing season, after intensive integrated efforts to expand the program. Nowadays, an adoption index of 40% was observed from the surveys made at the grower level. Financial accumulated returns for the last 25 years are estimated to vary from conservative US$750 million to in excess of US$ 4 billions, according to calculation methodology. The gross value of harvested Brazilian soybean for last season, at the farm level, was US$4,5 billions. The accumulated EMBRAPA's overall budget for the last 25 yr ranked bellow US$6billions, and these figures are very useful to establish the cos/benefit raio for the Soy-IPM. A recent survey made with official and private technical assistant professionals showed that biological control of velvetbean caterpillar is estimated to be used on 10% of Parana State soybean farms, whileuse of the mixture of sodium chloride plus insecticide to control soybeanstink bugs reaches almost 25% of the soybean area, in the same state. This last techiniques, developd by Embrapa, allows the reduction of the insecticide rate by 50%, with the same effects observed on the pests when the insecticides are applied at the full rate. For the control of stink bugs, Soy-IPM users applied once a season against 1.4 applications for non adopters. as for the control of the VBC non-users applied 1.8 sprayings/seasons against 0.6 sprayings for the Soy-IPM users. Endosulfan and monocrotophos represented 37% of the insecticide used to control VBC and 73,5 of the pesticides applied for stink bug control. MenosDuring the early 1970s, a survey demonstratedthat insecticides were the exclusive soybean pest control method. An average of 6 applications/season were made, using very high toxic and enviromentaly hazardous insectides, and also at far higher rates than needed. To address this situation a Soybean Integrated Pest Management program (Soy-IPM) was designed, validated and implemented in Brasil, starting in 1975. The process represented an interaction between R & D instittutions (Universities, Research Institutes), Extension and Technicl Assistance Institutions (Former Embrater system, Cooperatives, Private offices, NGOs), leadede by Embrapa Soja. Early studies and implementation were set up simultaneously at Parana and Rio Grande do Sul states, followed by quick spreading to all over the Brazilian soybean cultivated region. The peak for IPM adoption (ca.70%) happened during the 1982/83 growing season, after intensive integrated efforts to expand the program. Nowadays, an adoption index of 40% was observed from the surveys made at the grower level. Financial accumulated returns for the last 25 years are estimated to vary from conservative US$750 million to in excess of US$ 4 billions, according to calculation methodology. The gross value of harvested Brazilian soybean for last season, at the farm level, was US$4,5 billions. The accumulated EMBRAPA's overall budget for the last 25 yr ranked bellow US$6billions, and these figures are very useful to establish the cos/benefit raio fo... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Inseto praga; Manejo integrado de praga; Pest insects; Soybean. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
biological control; Brazil; integrated pest management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03159naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1462600
005 2006-03-09
008 2000 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGAZZONI, D. L.
245 $aAn evaluation of the brazilian SOY-IPM Programme.
260 $c2000
300 $ap.678. v.2
490 $vv.2
520 $aDuring the early 1970s, a survey demonstratedthat insecticides were the exclusive soybean pest control method. An average of 6 applications/season were made, using very high toxic and enviromentaly hazardous insectides, and also at far higher rates than needed. To address this situation a Soybean Integrated Pest Management program (Soy-IPM) was designed, validated and implemented in Brasil, starting in 1975. The process represented an interaction between R & D instittutions (Universities, Research Institutes), Extension and Technicl Assistance Institutions (Former Embrater system, Cooperatives, Private offices, NGOs), leadede by Embrapa Soja. Early studies and implementation were set up simultaneously at Parana and Rio Grande do Sul states, followed by quick spreading to all over the Brazilian soybean cultivated region. The peak for IPM adoption (ca.70%) happened during the 1982/83 growing season, after intensive integrated efforts to expand the program. Nowadays, an adoption index of 40% was observed from the surveys made at the grower level. Financial accumulated returns for the last 25 years are estimated to vary from conservative US$750 million to in excess of US$ 4 billions, according to calculation methodology. The gross value of harvested Brazilian soybean for last season, at the farm level, was US$4,5 billions. The accumulated EMBRAPA's overall budget for the last 25 yr ranked bellow US$6billions, and these figures are very useful to establish the cos/benefit raio for the Soy-IPM. A recent survey made with official and private technical assistant professionals showed that biological control of velvetbean caterpillar is estimated to be used on 10% of Parana State soybean farms, whileuse of the mixture of sodium chloride plus insecticide to control soybeanstink bugs reaches almost 25% of the soybean area, in the same state. This last techiniques, developd by Embrapa, allows the reduction of the insecticide rate by 50%, with the same effects observed on the pests when the insecticides are applied at the full rate. For the control of stink bugs, Soy-IPM users applied once a season against 1.4 applications for non adopters. as for the control of the VBC non-users applied 1.8 sprayings/seasons against 0.6 sprayings for the Soy-IPM users. Endosulfan and monocrotophos represented 37% of the insecticide used to control VBC and 73,5 of the pesticides applied for stink bug control.
650 $abiological control
650 $aBrazil
650 $aintegrated pest management
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aSoja
653 $aBrasil
653 $aInseto praga
653 $aManejo integrado de praga
653 $aPest insects
653 $aSoybean
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSO OF ENTOMOLOGY, 21., 2000, Foz do Iguassu. Abstracts... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2000.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 69 | |
| 41. |  | MARIANTE, A. da S. Recursos genéticos animais. In: ALBUQUERQUE, A. C. S.; SILVA, A. G. da (Ed.). Agricultura tropical: quatro décadas de inovações tecnológicas, institucionais e políticas. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2008. Pt. 7. Cap. 2. v. 2 p. 665-678. il. Color.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|   |
| 43. | | SOUZA, E. H. de; SOUZA, F. V. D.; COSTA, M. A. P. de C.; COSTA JR, D. S.; SEREJO, J. A. dos S.; AMORIM, E. P.; LEDO, C. A. da S. Genetic variation of the Ananas genus with ornamental potential. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, v. 58, October, 2011.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|  |
| 44. | | MELO, L. Duas novas cultivares de feijão. A Lavoura, Rio de Janeiro, v. 113, n. 678, p. 10, jun. 2010.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 4 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|  |
| 46. | | REIS, R. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. A. de; ALMEIDA, J. M.; JESUS NETA, PALMIRA de; SANTOS, F. D.; SANTOS, V. da S.; CRUZ, R. S. Culinary quality and sensory profile of cassava varieties harvested at different ages qualidade culinária e perfil sensorial de variedades de mandioca de mesa Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 42, n. 2, p. 657-678, mar./abr. 2021. 1679-0359| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| 52. | | WOLSKI, M. S.; DALMOLIN, R. S. D.; FLORES, C. A.; MOURA-BUENO, J. M.; CATEN, A. ten; KAISER, D. R. Digital soil mapping and its implications in the extrapolation of soil-landscape relationships in detailed scale. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 52, n. 8, p. 633-642, fev. 2017. Título em português: Mapeamento digital do solo e suas implicações na extrapolação das relações solo-paisagem em escala de detalhe.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 53. | | CARLOTO, M. V.; EUCLIDES, V. P. B.; MONTAGNER, D. B.; LEMPP, B.; DIFANTE, G. dos S.; PAULA, C. C. L. de. Desempenho animal e características de pasto de capim-xaraés sob diferentes intensidades de pastejo, durante o período das águas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v.46, n.1, p.67-104, jan. 2011.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 57. | | CUNHA, R. da; SALOMAO, A. N.; EIRA, M. T. S.; MELLO, C. M. C. de; TANAKA, D. M. Metodos para conservacao a longo prazo de sementes de Tabebuia spp. Bignoniaceae. Revista do Instituto Florestal, Sao Paulo, v.4, p. 675-678, 1992. Ed. especial. Apresentado no 2º Congresso Nacional Sobre Essências Nativas, São Paulo, SP, 1992.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 58. | | GOUVEA, S. P. Monitoramento tecnológico em automação para o agronegócio. In: SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DE INSTRUMENTAÇÃO AGROPECUÁRIA, 2014, São Carlos, SP Anais do SIAGRO: ciência, inovação e mercado 2014. São Carlos, SP: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2014. p. 675-678. Editores: Carlos Manoel Pedro Vaz, Débora Marcondes Bastos Pereira Milori, Silvio Crestana.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| 60. | | SCHAEFER, C. E. R.; SILVA, D. D.; PAIVA, K. W. N.; PRUSKI, F. F.; ALQUERQUE FILHO, M. R.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. A. Perdas de solo, nutrientes, matéria orgânica e efeitos microestruturais em gissolo Vermelho-Amarelo sob chuva simulada. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 37, n. 5, p. 669-678, maio 2002 Título em inglês: Soil, nutrient and organic matter losses in a Red-Yellow Podzolic under simulated rainfall.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 69 | |
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
|
|
