|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/09/2009 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
KAINER, K. A.; DiGIANO, M. L.; DUCHELLE, A. E.; WADT, L. H. de O.; BRUNA, E.; DAIN, J. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
Karen A. Kainer, University of Florida; Maria L. DiGiano, School of Natural Resources and the Environment; Emy E. Duchelle, School of Forest Resources and Conservation; LUCIA HELENA DE OLIVEIRA WADT, CPAF-AC; Emílio Bruna, University of Florida; Jonathan L. Dain, University of Florida. |
|
Título: |
Partnering for greater success: local stakeholders and research in tropical biology. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biotropica, Gainesville, v. 41, n. 5, p. 555-562, 2009. |
|
ISSN: |
1744-7429 (online) |
|
DOI: |
10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00560.x |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Local communities are important stakeholders in resource management and conservation efforts, particularly in the developing world. Although evidence is mixed in suggesting that these resident stakeholders are optimal forest stewards, it is highly unlikely that large tracts of tropical forests will be conserved without engaging local people who depend on them daily for their livelihoods. Stakeholders, who reside in biodiverse ecosystems like tropical forests, are the largest direct users and ultimate decision-makers of forest fate, can be important investors in conservation, harbor local ecological knowledge that complements Western science and frequently have long-term legitimate claims on lands where they reside. Research partnerships with local stakeholders can increase research relevance, enhance knowledge exchange and result in greater conservation success. Different phases of the research cycle present distinct opportunities for partnership, with flexibility in timing, approaches and strategies depending on researcher and local stakeholder needs and interests. Despite being the last step in the research process, dissemination of results can be the best starting point for researchers interested in experimenting with local stakeholder engagement. Still, tropical biologists might not choose to partner with local people because of lack of institutional rewards, insufficient training in stakeholder engagement, insecure research infrastructure in community settings, and time and funding limitations. Although not appropriate in all cases and despite significant challenges, some biological scientists and research institutions have successfully engaged local stakeholders in the research process, proving mutually beneficial for investigators and local people alike and resulting in important innovations in tropical biology and conservation. MenosLocal communities are important stakeholders in resource management and conservation efforts, particularly in the developing world. Although evidence is mixed in suggesting that these resident stakeholders are optimal forest stewards, it is highly unlikely that large tracts of tropical forests will be conserved without engaging local people who depend on them daily for their livelihoods. Stakeholders, who reside in biodiverse ecosystems like tropical forests, are the largest direct users and ultimate decision-makers of forest fate, can be important investors in conservation, harbor local ecological knowledge that complements Western science and frequently have long-term legitimate claims on lands where they reside. Research partnerships with local stakeholders can increase research relevance, enhance knowledge exchange and result in greater conservation success. Different phases of the research cycle present distinct opportunities for partnership, with flexibility in timing, approaches and strategies depending on researcher and local stakeholder needs and interests. Despite being the last step in the research process, dissemination of results can be the best starting point for researchers interested in experimenting with local stakeholder engagement. Still, tropical biologists might not choose to partner with local people because of lack of institutional rewards, insufficient training in stakeholder engagement, insecure research infrastructure in community settings, and time... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultura comunitaria; Agricultura sustentable; Bosques tropicales; Grupos de interés; Investigación cooperativa. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura de Subsistência; Agricultura sustentável; Comunidade rural; Floresta tropical úmida; Parceria; Pesquisa; Pesquisador; Proteção ambiental. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Community supported agriculture; Cooperative research; Stakeholders; Subsistence farming; Sustainable agriculture; Tropical forests. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/116254/1/22308.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03184naa a2200433 a 4500
001 1511990
005 2021-07-06
008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1744-7429 (online)
024 7 $a10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00560.x$2DOI
100 1 $aKAINER, K. A.
245 $aPartnering for greater success$blocal stakeholders and research in tropical biology.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2009
520 $aLocal communities are important stakeholders in resource management and conservation efforts, particularly in the developing world. Although evidence is mixed in suggesting that these resident stakeholders are optimal forest stewards, it is highly unlikely that large tracts of tropical forests will be conserved without engaging local people who depend on them daily for their livelihoods. Stakeholders, who reside in biodiverse ecosystems like tropical forests, are the largest direct users and ultimate decision-makers of forest fate, can be important investors in conservation, harbor local ecological knowledge that complements Western science and frequently have long-term legitimate claims on lands where they reside. Research partnerships with local stakeholders can increase research relevance, enhance knowledge exchange and result in greater conservation success. Different phases of the research cycle present distinct opportunities for partnership, with flexibility in timing, approaches and strategies depending on researcher and local stakeholder needs and interests. Despite being the last step in the research process, dissemination of results can be the best starting point for researchers interested in experimenting with local stakeholder engagement. Still, tropical biologists might not choose to partner with local people because of lack of institutional rewards, insufficient training in stakeholder engagement, insecure research infrastructure in community settings, and time and funding limitations. Although not appropriate in all cases and despite significant challenges, some biological scientists and research institutions have successfully engaged local stakeholders in the research process, proving mutually beneficial for investigators and local people alike and resulting in important innovations in tropical biology and conservation.
650 $aCommunity supported agriculture
650 $aCooperative research
650 $aStakeholders
650 $aSubsistence farming
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aTropical forests
650 $aAgricultura de Subsistência
650 $aAgricultura sustentável
650 $aComunidade rural
650 $aFloresta tropical úmida
650 $aParceria
650 $aPesquisa
650 $aPesquisador
650 $aProteção ambiental
653 $aAgricultura comunitaria
653 $aAgricultura sustentable
653 $aBosques tropicales
653 $aGrupos de interés
653 $aInvestigación cooperativa
700 1 $aDiGIANO, M. L.
700 1 $aDUCHELLE, A. E.
700 1 $aWADT, L. H. de O.
700 1 $aBRUNA, E.
700 1 $aDAIN, J. L.
773 $tBiotropica, Gainesville$gv. 41, n. 5, p. 555-562, 2009.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
