| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/12/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
21/12/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
ALCANTARA, M. DE; ARES, G.; DELIZA, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCELA DE ALCANTARA, PDJ-CNPQ; GASTÓN ARES, Universidad de la República, Pando, Uruguay; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
|
Título: |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
10.3389/fnut.2022.921515 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
A large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices. MenosA large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger ef... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1150140/1/How-Do-Nutritional-Warnings-Work-on-Commercial-Products-Results-From-a-Hypothetical-Choice-Experiment.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02123naa a2200169 a 4500
001 2150140
005 2022-12-21
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3389/fnut.2022.921515$2DOI
100 1 $aALCANTARA, M. DE
245 $aHow Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aA large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices.
653 $aNutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice
700 1 $aARES, G.
700 1 $aDELIZA, R.
773 $tFrontiers in Nutrition$gv. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
| 4. |  | ROCHA, W. F.; SILVA, A. de B.; CHAVES, J. M.; NOLASCO, M. C.; ACCIOLY, L. J. de O.; SA, I. B.; PAREYN, F. G. C. Levantamento da cobertura vegetal e do uso do solo no Bioma das Caatingas. In: QUEIROZ, L. P.; RAPINI, A.; GIULIETTI, A. M. (ed.). Rumo ao amplo conhecimento da biodiversidade do Semi-Árido brasileiro. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia; Programa de Pesquisa em Biodiversidade, 2006. cap. 27, p. 141-144.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
|    |
| 5. | | ROCHA, W. F.; SILVA, A. de B.; CHAVES, J. M.; NOLASCO, M. C.; ACCIOLY, L. J. de O.; SA, I. B.; PAREYN, F. G. C. Plant coverage and soil usage in the biome caatinga. In: QUEIROZ, L. P. de; RAPINI, A.; GIULIETTI, A. M. (Ed.). Towards greater knowleadge of the brazilian semi-arid biodiversity. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, PPBio, 2006. cap. 27, p. 139-142.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 6. | | FRANCA-ROCHA, W.; ACCIOLY, L. J. de O.; SILVA, A. de B.; SA, I. B.; CHAVES, J. M.; CERQUEIRA, D. B. de; LOBÃO, J. S. B.; LOPES, H.; SÁ, I. I. S.; GOMES, E. C. Mapeamento da cobertura vegetal remanescente do bioma caatinga. In: SEMINÁRIO DE GEOTECNOLOGIA, 2., 2005, Salvador, BA. Geotecnologias aplicadas à modelagem espacial. Salvador: SBG, 2005. 1 CD-ROM.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
