|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Territorial. |
Data corrente: |
04/04/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
07/04/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
SOFIATTI, V.; SILVA, O. R. R. F.; ANDRADE JÚNIOR, E. R.; FERREIRA, A. C. de B.; PERINA, F. J.; BOGIANI, J. C. |
Afiliação: |
VALDINEI SOFIATTI, CNPA; ODILON RENY RIBEIRO FERREIRA SILVA, CNPA; EDSON R. ANDRADE JÚNIOR, IMAMT; ALEXANDRE CUNHA DE B FERREIRA, CNPA; FABIANO JOSE PERINA, CNPA; JULIO CESAR BOGIANI, CNPM. |
Título: |
Integration of stalk destruction methods for the glyphosate herbicide-resistant cotton. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Agricultural Studies, v. 10, n. 2, p. 1-13, 2022. |
ISBN: |
2166-0379 |
DOI: |
10.5296/jas.v10i2.19307 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
The increase in geographical areas used for cultivation of transgenic glyphosate herbicide-resistant cotton has hindered the stalk destruction, compromised the phytosanitary break implementation and consequently increased the population of insect pests and cotton plant pathogens. This study evaluated the efficiency of the combining mechanical and chemical methods in the destruction of transgenic cotton stalk resistant to the glyphosate herbicide. Two experiments were carried out in 2015 and 2016 in Primavera do Leste, Mato Grosso, Brazil and Luís Eduardo Magalhães, Bahia, Brazil, respectively. The study evaluated different mechanical destruction equipment in combination with the chemical methods. In each environment, a randomized block experiment with four replications was employed. The results of the experiments indicated that the mechanical destruction increased the control efficiency by at least 10% when compared to chemical destruction of the cotton stalk. Chemical destruction with herbicides combined with mechanical destruction methods does not increase the control efficiency of cotton stalks destruction. Furthermore, the application of hormonal herbicides following the mechanical shredding of cotton stalks does not increase the control efficiency of glyphosate-resistant cotton stalk. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural machinery; Phytosanitary break. |
Thesagro: |
Gossypium Hirsutum. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Regrowth. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1141829/1/6015.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02084naa a2200253 a 4500 001 2141950 005 2022-04-07 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2166-0379 024 7 $a10.5296/jas.v10i2.19307$2DOI 100 1 $aSOFIATTI, V. 245 $aIntegration of stalk destruction methods for the glyphosate herbicide-resistant cotton.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aThe increase in geographical areas used for cultivation of transgenic glyphosate herbicide-resistant cotton has hindered the stalk destruction, compromised the phytosanitary break implementation and consequently increased the population of insect pests and cotton plant pathogens. This study evaluated the efficiency of the combining mechanical and chemical methods in the destruction of transgenic cotton stalk resistant to the glyphosate herbicide. Two experiments were carried out in 2015 and 2016 in Primavera do Leste, Mato Grosso, Brazil and Luís Eduardo Magalhães, Bahia, Brazil, respectively. The study evaluated different mechanical destruction equipment in combination with the chemical methods. In each environment, a randomized block experiment with four replications was employed. The results of the experiments indicated that the mechanical destruction increased the control efficiency by at least 10% when compared to chemical destruction of the cotton stalk. Chemical destruction with herbicides combined with mechanical destruction methods does not increase the control efficiency of cotton stalks destruction. Furthermore, the application of hormonal herbicides following the mechanical shredding of cotton stalks does not increase the control efficiency of glyphosate-resistant cotton stalk. 650 $aRegrowth 650 $aGossypium Hirsutum 653 $aAgricultural machinery 653 $aPhytosanitary break 700 1 $aSILVA, O. R. R. F. 700 1 $aANDRADE JÚNIOR, E. R. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, A. C. de B. 700 1 $aPERINA, F. J. 700 1 $aBOGIANI, J. C. 773 $tJournal of Agricultural Studies$gv. 10, n. 2, p. 1-13, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Algodão (CNPA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 190 | |
4. | | ASSIS, J. S. de. Colheita e pós-colheita. In: MOUCO, M. A. do C. (Ed.). Cultivo da mangueira. Petrolina: Embrapa Semi-Árido, 2004. (Embrapa Semi-Árido. Sistemas de Produção, 2).Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
12. | | ASSIS, J. S. de. Rastreabilidade, auditoria e certificação na produção integrada. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FRUTICULTURA, 20.; ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TROPICAL HORTICULTURE, 54., 2008, Vitória. Frutas para todos : estratégias, tecnologias e visão sustentável: mini-cursos. Vitória: INCAPER: Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura, 2008. 1 CD-ROM.Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
18. | | BASSOI, L. H.; ASSIS, J. S. de. Distribuicao do sistema radicular de videiras irrigadas em latossolo Vermelho Amarelo do Tropico Semi-Arido. In: CONGRESSO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 13.; REUNIAO BRASILEIRA DE BIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 1.; SIMPOSIO BRASILEIRO SOBRE MICROBIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 4., REUNIAO BRASILEIRA SOBRE MICORRIZA, 6., REUNIAO BRASILEIRA DE MANEJO E CONSERVACAO DE SOLO E DA AGUA, 11., 1996. Aguas de Lindoia, SP. O solo nos ciclos da natureza: anais. Piracicaba. ESALQ/USP/CLCS/SBCS/SBM, 1996. 1 CD-ROM.Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 190 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|