| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/02/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/02/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SOARES, L. C. B.; BRITO, J. I. M.; ANJOS, E. dos; FARIAS, A. C. de; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e; PRADO, T. A.; BATISTA, E. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
LETÍCIA CAROLINA BORTOLANZA SOARES, UFMT, SINOP, MT; JÉSSICA IAKESTEST MATHEUS BRITO, UFMT, SINOP, MT; ELISMAR DOS ANJOS, UFMT, SINOP, MT; ARTUR CARMANINI DE FARIAS, UFMT, SINOP, MT; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT, SINOP, MT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; THIAGO ALVES PRADO, FORTUNA NUTRIÇÃO ANIMAL, NOVA CANAÃ DO NORTE, MT; ERICK DARLISSON BATISTA, UFMT, SINOP, MT. |
|
Título: |
Effects of high intake supplementation containing differents additives on ruminal fermentation of grazing cattle during the dry season. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 55.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 28., 2018, Goiânia. Construindo saberes, formando pessoas e transformando a produção animal: anais. Viçosa: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia; Brasília, DF: Associação Brasileira de Zootecnistas. |
|
Páginas: |
não paginado. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Effects of high intake supplementation containing different additives on ruminal ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentration and pH were evaluated in Nelore bulls grazing during dry season. Four Nelore bulls (425 ± 79.3 kg body weight, BW) fitted with ruminal cannula were studied in a 4 × 4 balanced Latin square design. Animals were distributed in 0.2 ha paddocks of Brachiaria brizantha cv. BRS Piatã where they received daily ad libitum protein-energy supplementation (160 g kg-1 crude protein). Treatments included the additives: 1) virginiamycin at 70 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM); 2) ADV: Advantage 4.1 (Alltech) at 1.25 g kg-1 DM, a yeast-based additive as replacement of virginiamycin; 3) TAN14: ByPro® (Silvateam Brasil) at 1.4 g kg-1 DM, a quebracho tannin extract as replacement of virginiamycin; and 4) TAN21: ByPro® at 2.1 g kg-1 DM as replacement of virginiamycin. All supplements contained salinomycin at 2.5 mg kg-1. Experimental periods lasted 20 days. On day 19, ruminal fluid was sampled from the animals at 8h00, 12h00, 16h00, and 20h00 hours (0, 4, 8, and 12 hours after supplementation, respectively). Statistical analyses were conducted using repeated measures. The average daily intake of supplementation was 16.7 ± 1.19 g kg-1 BW. The treatment × time interaction for RAN and pH were not observed (P>0.41). However, there were a sampling time effects for both measures (P<0.001), but in an opposite way. The lowest RAN values (P<0.01) were observed before supplementation (7.61 mg dL-1 vs. 14.4, 15.1 and 13.0 mg dL, for 4, 8, and 12 hours after supplementation, respectively), while pH were lowest 12 hours after supplementation (6.04 vs. 6.45, 6.50, and 6.35 for 0, 4, and 8 hours after supplementation, respectively). Treatments did not affect RAN concentration and pH (P>0.17), which averaged 12.51 mg dL-1 and 6.34, respectively. The average values of RAN concentration were 11.9 mg dL-1 for VIR, 15.6 mg dL-1 for ADV, 13.2 mg dL-1 for TAN14, and 9.3 mg dL-1 for TAN21. In conclusion, replacement of virginiamycin by the additives Advantage 4.1 and ByPro did not change RAN concentrations and pH in cattle receiving high intake supplementation during the dry season. MenosEffects of high intake supplementation containing different additives on ruminal ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentration and pH were evaluated in Nelore bulls grazing during dry season. Four Nelore bulls (425 ± 79.3 kg body weight, BW) fitted with ruminal cannula were studied in a 4 × 4 balanced Latin square design. Animals were distributed in 0.2 ha paddocks of Brachiaria brizantha cv. BRS Piatã where they received daily ad libitum protein-energy supplementation (160 g kg-1 crude protein). Treatments included the additives: 1) virginiamycin at 70 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM); 2) ADV: Advantage 4.1 (Alltech) at 1.25 g kg-1 DM, a yeast-based additive as replacement of virginiamycin; 3) TAN14: ByPro® (Silvateam Brasil) at 1.4 g kg-1 DM, a quebracho tannin extract as replacement of virginiamycin; and 4) TAN21: ByPro® at 2.1 g kg-1 DM as replacement of virginiamycin. All supplements contained salinomycin at 2.5 mg kg-1. Experimental periods lasted 20 days. On day 19, ruminal fluid was sampled from the animals at 8h00, 12h00, 16h00, and 20h00 hours (0, 4, 8, and 12 hours after supplementation, respectively). Statistical analyses were conducted using repeated measures. The average daily intake of supplementation was 16.7 ± 1.19 g kg-1 BW. The treatment × time interaction for RAN and pH were not observed (P>0.41). However, there were a sampling time effects for both measures (P<0.001), but in an opposite way. The lowest RAN values (P<0.01) were observed before supplementation (7.61 mg dL-1... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Ruminal acidosis; Tannins; Virginiamycin; Yeasts. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/192977/1/2018-cpamt-bruno-pedreira-efects-intake-supplementation-additives-ruminal-grazing-cattle.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03230nam a2200253 a 4500
001 2106190
005 2019-02-18
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSOARES, L. C. B.
245 $aEffects of high intake supplementation containing differents additives on ruminal fermentation of grazing cattle during the dry season.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 55.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 28., 2018, Goiânia. Construindo saberes, formando pessoas e transformando a produção animal: anais. Viçosa: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia; Brasília, DF: Associação Brasileira de Zootecnistas.$c2018
300 $anão paginado.
520 $aEffects of high intake supplementation containing different additives on ruminal ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentration and pH were evaluated in Nelore bulls grazing during dry season. Four Nelore bulls (425 ± 79.3 kg body weight, BW) fitted with ruminal cannula were studied in a 4 × 4 balanced Latin square design. Animals were distributed in 0.2 ha paddocks of Brachiaria brizantha cv. BRS Piatã where they received daily ad libitum protein-energy supplementation (160 g kg-1 crude protein). Treatments included the additives: 1) virginiamycin at 70 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM); 2) ADV: Advantage 4.1 (Alltech) at 1.25 g kg-1 DM, a yeast-based additive as replacement of virginiamycin; 3) TAN14: ByPro® (Silvateam Brasil) at 1.4 g kg-1 DM, a quebracho tannin extract as replacement of virginiamycin; and 4) TAN21: ByPro® at 2.1 g kg-1 DM as replacement of virginiamycin. All supplements contained salinomycin at 2.5 mg kg-1. Experimental periods lasted 20 days. On day 19, ruminal fluid was sampled from the animals at 8h00, 12h00, 16h00, and 20h00 hours (0, 4, 8, and 12 hours after supplementation, respectively). Statistical analyses were conducted using repeated measures. The average daily intake of supplementation was 16.7 ± 1.19 g kg-1 BW. The treatment × time interaction for RAN and pH were not observed (P>0.41). However, there were a sampling time effects for both measures (P<0.001), but in an opposite way. The lowest RAN values (P<0.01) were observed before supplementation (7.61 mg dL-1 vs. 14.4, 15.1 and 13.0 mg dL, for 4, 8, and 12 hours after supplementation, respectively), while pH were lowest 12 hours after supplementation (6.04 vs. 6.45, 6.50, and 6.35 for 0, 4, and 8 hours after supplementation, respectively). Treatments did not affect RAN concentration and pH (P>0.17), which averaged 12.51 mg dL-1 and 6.34, respectively. The average values of RAN concentration were 11.9 mg dL-1 for VIR, 15.6 mg dL-1 for ADV, 13.2 mg dL-1 for TAN14, and 9.3 mg dL-1 for TAN21. In conclusion, replacement of virginiamycin by the additives Advantage 4.1 and ByPro did not change RAN concentrations and pH in cattle receiving high intake supplementation during the dry season.
650 $aRuminal acidosis
650 $aTannins
650 $aVirginiamycin
650 $aYeasts
700 1 $aBRITO, J. I. M.
700 1 $aANJOS, E. dos
700 1 $aFARIAS, A. C. de
700 1 $aPEREIRA, D. H.
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
700 1 $aPRADO, T. A.
700 1 $aBATISTA, E. D.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/06/2005 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
21/06/2005 |
|
Autoria: |
CUNICO, M. M.; CARVALHO, J. L. S.; AUER, C. G.; GRIGOLETTI JUNIOR, A.; DELLE MONACHE, F.; KERBER, V. A.; MIGUEL, M. D.; MIGUEL, O. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
Auer e Grigoletti Junior, Pesquisadores da Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Título: |
Genêro Ottonia: uma revisão das principais características botânicas, fitoquímicas e biológicas. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2005 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, Botucatu, v. 7, n. 2, p. 17-21, fev. 2005. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Característica botânica; Efeito analgésico; Ottonia; Piperlonguminina; Piperovatina. |
|
Thesagro: |
Anestesia; Piperaceae; Planta Medicinal. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00867naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1283910
005 2005-06-21
008 2005 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCUNICO, M. M.
245 $aGenêro Ottonia$buma revisão das principais características botânicas, fitoquímicas e biológicas.
260 $c2005
650 $aAnestesia
650 $aPiperaceae
650 $aPlanta Medicinal
653 $aCaracterística botânica
653 $aEfeito analgésico
653 $aOttonia
653 $aPiperlonguminina
653 $aPiperovatina
700 1 $aCARVALHO, J. L. S.
700 1 $aAUER, C. G.
700 1 $aGRIGOLETTI JUNIOR, A.
700 1 $aDELLE MONACHE, F.
700 1 $aKERBER, V. A.
700 1 $aMIGUEL, M. D.
700 1 $aMIGUEL, O. G.
773 $tRevista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, Botucatu$gv. 7, n. 2, p. 17-21, fev. 2005.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
