| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 16.208 | |
| Registros recuperados : 16.208 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/01/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/01/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
C - 0 |
|
Autoria: |
MEDEROS, A. E.; CARRACELAS, B.; MINHO, A. P.; FERNÁNDEZ, S.; SÁNCHEZ, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
America Mederos, National Institute of Agricultural Research; Beatriz Carracelas, National Institute of Agricultural Research; ALESSANDRO PELEGRINE MINHO, CPPSE; Silvina Fernández, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences; Javier Sánchez, Center of Veterinary Epidemiological Research. |
|
Título: |
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Health, v. 2, n. 2, p. 2-8, 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primary literature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalence surveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
GIN; Resistência parasitária. |
|
Thesagro: |
Resistência; Ruminante. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Animal parasitic nematodes; Gastrointestinal nematodes; Parasites; Ruminants. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/191333/1/PrevalenceFactorsAssociatedAnthelmintic.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02275naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2104774
005 2020-01-07
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMEDEROS, A. E.
245 $aPrevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle$bA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primary literature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalence surveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.
650 $aAnimal parasitic nematodes
650 $aGastrointestinal nematodes
650 $aParasites
650 $aRuminants
650 $aResistência
650 $aRuminante
653 $aGIN
653 $aResistência parasitária
700 1 $aCARRACELAS, B.
700 1 $aMINHO, A. P.
700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, S.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ, J.
773 $tJournal of Veterinary Medicine and Health$gv. 2, n. 2, p. 2-8, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
