| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/09/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
RAMOS, M. R.; FREIRE, T. M.; SANTOS, F. M. B. dos; UHLMANN, A.; SANTOS, D. M. A. dos; CAMPOS, L. dos S. |
|
Afiliação: |
Michele Ribeiro Ramos, Universidade Estadual do Tocantins; Talita Maia Freire, Universidade Estadual do Tocatins; Franscisca Marta Barbosa dos Santos, Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Aquicultura de Tocatns; ALEXANDRE UHLMANN, CNPF; Danilo Marcelo Aires dos Santos, Universidade Estadual do Tocantins; Lorena dos Santos Campos, Universidade Estadual do Tocantins. |
|
Título: |
Pineapple quality in a traditional cultivation system in different soil classes. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Comunicata Scientiae, v. 11, e3329, 2020. 9 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v11i0.3329 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merril) is considered one of the most important fruits of the tropical and subtropical regions, and the third most-produced in the world due to its high commercial expansion in the world market, in recent years. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the influence of landscape position on pineapple quality. The work was developed at the Providência Farm, located in the municipality of Miracema do Tocantins. The following soil parameters were evaluated: hydraulic conductivity - KS, soil bulk density ? DS, and total porosity ? TP, as well as the following quality attributes: titratable acidity - TA, length and diameter of infructescences, total fresh mass - TM, fresh mass of infructescences ? IM, and soluble solids ? SS. The analyses were performed at the Agri-Environmental Laboratory of the Agricultural Sciences Complex of the Federal University of Tocantins. Less massive infructescences developed on more porous soils. The variation in the mass of infructescences is not associated with soil types, but rather with soil porosity. Soils with higher KS tend to increase the chances of producing infructescences with high acidity and high levels of soluble solids. The DS did not result in a significant association with the pineapple quality attributes. The infructescences were not affected by the landscape position. No position in the landscape influenced fruit quality. In general, the infructescences showed low acidity and low levels of soluble solids, with length and diameter of infructescences below the standard of the cultivar ?Pérola?. MenosPineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merril) is considered one of the most important fruits of the tropical and subtropical regions, and the third most-produced in the world due to its high commercial expansion in the world market, in recent years. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the influence of landscape position on pineapple quality. The work was developed at the Providência Farm, located in the municipality of Miracema do Tocantins. The following soil parameters were evaluated: hydraulic conductivity - KS, soil bulk density ? DS, and total porosity ? TP, as well as the following quality attributes: titratable acidity - TA, length and diameter of infructescences, total fresh mass - TM, fresh mass of infructescences ? IM, and soluble solids ? SS. The analyses were performed at the Agri-Environmental Laboratory of the Agricultural Sciences Complex of the Federal University of Tocantins. Less massive infructescences developed on more porous soils. The variation in the mass of infructescences is not associated with soil types, but rather with soil porosity. Soils with higher KS tend to increase the chances of producing infructescences with high acidity and high levels of soluble solids. The DS did not result in a significant association with the pineapple quality attributes. The infructescences were not affected by the landscape position. No position in the landscape influenced fruit quality. In general, the infructescences showed low acidity and low levels of soluble solids... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural production factors. |
|
Thesagro: |
Abacaxi; Crescimento; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Fruit growing; Pineapples; Soil. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02388naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2124854
005 2020-09-10
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v11i0.3329$2DOI
100 1 $aRAMOS, M. R.
245 $aPineapple quality in a traditional cultivation system in different soil classes.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aPineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merril) is considered one of the most important fruits of the tropical and subtropical regions, and the third most-produced in the world due to its high commercial expansion in the world market, in recent years. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the influence of landscape position on pineapple quality. The work was developed at the Providência Farm, located in the municipality of Miracema do Tocantins. The following soil parameters were evaluated: hydraulic conductivity - KS, soil bulk density ? DS, and total porosity ? TP, as well as the following quality attributes: titratable acidity - TA, length and diameter of infructescences, total fresh mass - TM, fresh mass of infructescences ? IM, and soluble solids ? SS. The analyses were performed at the Agri-Environmental Laboratory of the Agricultural Sciences Complex of the Federal University of Tocantins. Less massive infructescences developed on more porous soils. The variation in the mass of infructescences is not associated with soil types, but rather with soil porosity. Soils with higher KS tend to increase the chances of producing infructescences with high acidity and high levels of soluble solids. The DS did not result in a significant association with the pineapple quality attributes. The infructescences were not affected by the landscape position. No position in the landscape influenced fruit quality. In general, the infructescences showed low acidity and low levels of soluble solids, with length and diameter of infructescences below the standard of the cultivar ?Pérola?.
650 $aFruit growing
650 $aPineapples
650 $aSoil
650 $aAbacaxi
650 $aCrescimento
650 $aSolo
653 $aAgricultural production factors
700 1 $aFREIRE, T. M.
700 1 $aSANTOS, F. M. B. dos
700 1 $aUHLMANN, A.
700 1 $aSANTOS, D. M. A. dos
700 1 $aCAMPOS, L. dos S.
773 $tComunicata Scientiae$gv. 11, e3329, 2020. 9 p.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/12/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/02/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
YANO, S. A. C.; HUSCH, P. E.; SOSA-GÓMEZ, D. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
SILVIA AKIMI CAVAGUCHI YANO, UFPR; PATRICIA ELIZABETH HUSCH, UFPR; DANIEL RICARDO SOSA GOMEZ, CNPSO. |
|
Título: |
Manejo de pragas. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SEDIYAMA, T.; SILVA, F.; BORÉM, A. Soja do plantio à colheita. Viçosa: UFV, 2015. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 256-287. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Principais pragas na cultura da soja. Lagartas desfolhadoras da cultura da soja. A lagarta do velho mundo, Helicoverpa armigera. Manejo de lagartas desfolhadoras. Implicações da soja que expressa a toxina Cry 1 AC no MIP. Principais insetos sugadores de soja. Manejo de percevejos. Principais problemas na implementação do manejo integrado de pragas. Manejo das pragas de solo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Manejo de pragas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Praga de planta; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Crop entomology; Pest management; Plant pests. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01004naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2031962
005 2017-02-13
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aYANO, S. A. C.
245 $aManejo de pragas.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
300 $ap. 256-287.
520 $aPrincipais pragas na cultura da soja. Lagartas desfolhadoras da cultura da soja. A lagarta do velho mundo, Helicoverpa armigera. Manejo de lagartas desfolhadoras. Implicações da soja que expressa a toxina Cry 1 AC no MIP. Principais insetos sugadores de soja. Manejo de percevejos. Principais problemas na implementação do manejo integrado de pragas. Manejo das pragas de solo.
650 $aCrop entomology
650 $aPest management
650 $aPlant pests
650 $aPraga de planta
650 $aSoja
653 $aManejo de pragas
700 1 $aHUSCH, P. E.
700 1 $aSOSA-GÓMEZ, D. R.
773 $tIn: SEDIYAMA, T.; SILVA, F.; BORÉM, A. Soja do plantio à colheita. Viçosa: UFV, 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
