| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/12/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/04/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
ZAGATTO, M. R. G.; NIVA, C. C.; THOMAZINI, M. J.; BARETTA, D.; SANTOS, A.; NADOLNY, H.; CARDOSO, G. B. X.; BROWN, G. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
MAURÍCIO RUMENOS GUIDETTI ZAGATTO, USP; CINTIA CARLA NIVA, CPAC; MARCILIO JOSE THOMAZINI, CNPF; DILMAR BARETTA, UESC; ALESSANDRA SANTOS, UFPR; HERLON NADOLNY, UFPR; GUILHERME BORGES XARÃO CARDOSO, UFPR; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF. |
|
Título: |
Soil invertebrates in different land use systems: how integrated production systems and seasonality affect soil mesofauna communities. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B, v. 7, p. 158-169, 2017. |
|
DOI: |
10.17265/2161-6264/2017.03.003 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: The soil mesofauna plays a role in organic matter comminution and decomposition, and can be used as bioindicators, since they are sensitive to soil management, vegetation and climate changes. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate mesofauna density and diversity in different land use systems to identify faunal relationships with soil properties, management and seasonality. The study area included five land use systems in Ponta Grossa municipality, Paraná State: integrated crop-livestock (ICL), integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF), grazed native pasture (NP), Eucalyptus dunnii plantation (EU) and no-tillage (NT) cropping systems. In each system, eight soil samples for mesofauna were collected with Berlese funnels of 8 cm diameter along a transect in three replicate plots of 50 m × 100 m. For physical and chemical analysis, soil was sampled at five points per plot in two seasons: winter 2012 and autumn 2013. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan?s test (P < 0.05), nonparametric statistics (when necessary) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Diversity was calculated based on the group richness and Simpson index. The main mesofauna groups found were: Acarina, Collembola and Hymenoptera. Diplopoda, Enchytraeidae, Isopoda, Collembola, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera larvae were more abundant in autumn than winter. Soil moisture was the main factor responsible for higher mesofauna abundance in autumn. Integrated production systems, especially ICLF had similar invertebrate community abundance and composition with EU, while NT favored Oribatid mites, although the use of insecticides, herbicides and fungicides reduced total mesofauna density. Most correlations between mesofauna and physical-chemical attributes in the winter were not observed in the autumn and vice versa, revealing that there are more factors involved in regulating soil mesofauna distribution. MenosAbstract: The soil mesofauna plays a role in organic matter comminution and decomposition, and can be used as bioindicators, since they are sensitive to soil management, vegetation and climate changes. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate mesofauna density and diversity in different land use systems to identify faunal relationships with soil properties, management and seasonality. The study area included five land use systems in Ponta Grossa municipality, Paraná State: integrated crop-livestock (ICL), integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF), grazed native pasture (NP), Eucalyptus dunnii plantation (EU) and no-tillage (NT) cropping systems. In each system, eight soil samples for mesofauna were collected with Berlese funnels of 8 cm diameter along a transect in three replicate plots of 50 m × 100 m. For physical and chemical analysis, soil was sampled at five points per plot in two seasons: winter 2012 and autumn 2013. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan?s test (P < 0.05), nonparametric statistics (when necessary) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Diversity was calculated based on the group richness and Simpson index. The main mesofauna groups found were: Acarina, Collembola and Hymenoptera. Diplopoda, Enchytraeidae, Isopoda, Collembola, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera larvae were more abundant in autumn than winter. Soil moisture was the main factor responsible for higher mesofauna abundance in autumn. Integrated production systems, especially ICLF had... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioindicador. |
|
Thesagro: |
Animal Invertebrado; Biodiversidade; Manejo do Solo; Umidade do Solo; Variação Sazonal. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/175721/1/2017-G.Brown-JAST-Soil-invertebrates.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02827naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2083495
005 2018-04-19
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.17265/2161-6264/2017.03.003$2DOI
100 1 $aZAGATTO, M. R. G.
245 $aSoil invertebrates in different land use systems$bhow integrated production systems and seasonality affect soil mesofauna communities.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aAbstract: The soil mesofauna plays a role in organic matter comminution and decomposition, and can be used as bioindicators, since they are sensitive to soil management, vegetation and climate changes. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate mesofauna density and diversity in different land use systems to identify faunal relationships with soil properties, management and seasonality. The study area included five land use systems in Ponta Grossa municipality, Paraná State: integrated crop-livestock (ICL), integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF), grazed native pasture (NP), Eucalyptus dunnii plantation (EU) and no-tillage (NT) cropping systems. In each system, eight soil samples for mesofauna were collected with Berlese funnels of 8 cm diameter along a transect in three replicate plots of 50 m × 100 m. For physical and chemical analysis, soil was sampled at five points per plot in two seasons: winter 2012 and autumn 2013. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan?s test (P < 0.05), nonparametric statistics (when necessary) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Diversity was calculated based on the group richness and Simpson index. The main mesofauna groups found were: Acarina, Collembola and Hymenoptera. Diplopoda, Enchytraeidae, Isopoda, Collembola, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera larvae were more abundant in autumn than winter. Soil moisture was the main factor responsible for higher mesofauna abundance in autumn. Integrated production systems, especially ICLF had similar invertebrate community abundance and composition with EU, while NT favored Oribatid mites, although the use of insecticides, herbicides and fungicides reduced total mesofauna density. Most correlations between mesofauna and physical-chemical attributes in the winter were not observed in the autumn and vice versa, revealing that there are more factors involved in regulating soil mesofauna distribution.
650 $aAnimal Invertebrado
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aManejo do Solo
650 $aUmidade do Solo
650 $aVariação Sazonal
653 $aBioindicador
700 1 $aNIVA, C. C.
700 1 $aTHOMAZINI, M. J.
700 1 $aBARETTA, D.
700 1 $aSANTOS, A.
700 1 $aNADOLNY, H.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, G. B. X.
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
773 $tJournal of Agricultural Science and Technology B$gv. 7, p. 158-169, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Roraima. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/09/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Nota Técnica/Nota Científica |
|
Autoria: |
FURTINI, I. V.; CASTRO, A. P. de; LACERDA, M. C.; BRESEGHELLO, F.; UTUMI, M. M.; SILVEIRA FILHO, A.; PEREIRA, J. A.; ABREU, G. B.; CORDEIRO, A. C. C.; SOUSA, N. R. G.; FRAGOSO, D. de B.; MOURA NETO, F. P.; COLOMBARI FILHO, J. M.; BASSINELLO, P. Z.; LOBO, V. L. da S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ISABELA VOLPI FURTINI, CNPAF; ADRIANO PEREIRA DE CASTRO, CNPAF; MABIO CHRISLEY LACERDA, CNPAF; FLAVIO BRESEGHELLO, CNPAF; MARLEY MARICO UTUMI, CPAF-RO; AUSTRELINO SILVEIRA FILHO, CPATU; JOSE ALMEIDA PEREIRA, CPAMN; GUILHERME BARBOSA ABREU, CPACP; ANTONIO CARLOS CENTENO CORDEIRO, CPAF-RR; NARA REGINA GERVINI SOUSA, EMPAER-MT; DANIEL DE BRITO FRAGOSO, CNPASA; FRANCISCO PEREIRA MOURA NETO, CNPAF; JOSE MANOEL COLOMBARI FILHO, CNPAF; PRISCILA ZACZUK BASSINELLO, CNPAF; VALACIA LEMES DA SILVA LOBO, CNPAF. |
|
Título: |
BRS A502: an upland rice cultivar for intensive sustainable cropping systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 22, n. 3, e41792234, 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
1984-7033 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332022v22n3c27 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Cultivar release. |
|
Conteúdo: |
BRS A502 is an upland rice cultivar with a medium cycle, high resistance to lodging, superior yield potential and grains of excellent industrial and cooking quality. The cultivar is indicated for crop rotation and succession in areas under intensive agriculture in the main field crop regions of Brazil. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BRS A502. |
|
Thesagro: |
Arroz; Cerrado; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal; Oryza Sativa; Rotação de Cultura; Variedade Resistente. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Breeding; Cerrado soils; Crop rotation; Grain yield; Intensive cropping; Rice. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1146794/1/cbap-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01702naa a2200481 a 4500
001 2146794
005 2022-09-26
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1984-7033
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332022v22n3c27$2DOI
100 1 $aFURTINI, I. V.
245 $aBRS A502$ban upland rice cultivar for intensive sustainable cropping systems in the Brazilian Cerrado.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aCultivar release.
520 $aBRS A502 is an upland rice cultivar with a medium cycle, high resistance to lodging, superior yield potential and grains of excellent industrial and cooking quality. The cultivar is indicated for crop rotation and succession in areas under intensive agriculture in the main field crop regions of Brazil.
650 $aBreeding
650 $aCerrado soils
650 $aCrop rotation
650 $aGrain yield
650 $aIntensive cropping
650 $aRice
650 $aArroz
650 $aCerrado
650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal
650 $aOryza Sativa
650 $aRotação de Cultura
650 $aVariedade Resistente
653 $aBRS A502
700 1 $aCASTRO, A. P. de
700 1 $aLACERDA, M. C.
700 1 $aBRESEGHELLO, F.
700 1 $aUTUMI, M. M.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA FILHO, A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, J. A.
700 1 $aABREU, G. B.
700 1 $aCORDEIRO, A. C. C.
700 1 $aSOUSA, N. R. G.
700 1 $aFRAGOSO, D. de B.
700 1 $aMOURA NETO, F. P.
700 1 $aCOLOMBARI FILHO, J. M.
700 1 $aBASSINELLO, P. Z.
700 1 $aLOBO, V. L. da S.
773 $tCrop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology$gv. 22, n. 3, e41792234, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
