|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/10/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/10/2018 |
|
Autoria: |
ENGELBRECHT, C. R.; THOMAS, W. C. |
|
Título: |
Agricultural policy implementation in Alaska. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1987 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Administration and Extension, v. 26, n. 2, p. 75-90, 1987. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7475(87)90044-4 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: This paper discusses the implementation of public policy supporting an aggressive, agricultural development in Alaska, a state of the United States. Three development projects emphasizing large-scale agriculture were proposed and initiated during the period 1976-82. In this evaluation, the implementation process was related to the major events of the development activity. Implementation of the agricultural projects was split off from an existing government agency and given to a new council. However, a key activity, that of land disposal remained with the agency. Much of the ensuing controversy concerning implementation stemmed from this split in authority. In addition, public participation and internal government interaction in the implementation process had substantial impact on policy outcomes. This case study demonstrates that policy-making goes beyond the jurisdiction of elected representatives and members of cabinet. It involves many participants, including the bureaucracy, in a continuous process of implementation. Success in achieving the goal of a new agricultural policy depends, to a large degree, on the ability of power groups to force change. In the situation discussed here, a mechanism was necessary to ensure cooperation between those groups directing the development process. However, as the power of this mechanism, the aforementioned council, diminished, the rate of development slowed. As such, the council became less effective as it was rendered increasingly impotent politically. MenosAbstract: This paper discusses the implementation of public policy supporting an aggressive, agricultural development in Alaska, a state of the United States. Three development projects emphasizing large-scale agriculture were proposed and initiated during the period 1976-82. In this evaluation, the implementation process was related to the major events of the development activity. Implementation of the agricultural projects was split off from an existing government agency and given to a new council. However, a key activity, that of land disposal remained with the agency. Much of the ensuing controversy concerning implementation stemmed from this split in authority. In addition, public participation and internal government interaction in the implementation process had substantial impact on policy outcomes. This case study demonstrates that policy-making goes beyond the jurisdiction of elected representatives and members of cabinet. It involves many participants, including the bureaucracy, in a continuous process of implementation. Success in achieving the goal of a new agricultural policy depends, to a large degree, on the ability of power groups to force change. In the situation discussed here, a mechanism was necessary to ensure cooperation between those groups directing the development process. However, as the power of this mechanism, the aforementioned council, diminished, the rate of development slowed. As such, the council became less effective as it was rendered incre... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agricultural policy; Agricultural programs and projects; Public policy; Rural development. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
D Governo, Leis e Regulamentações |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02120naa a2200193 a 4500
001 2097461
005 2018-10-16
008 1987 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7475(87)90044-4$2DOI
100 1 $aENGELBRECHT, C. R.
245 $aAgricultural policy implementation in Alaska.
260 $c1987
520 $aAbstract: This paper discusses the implementation of public policy supporting an aggressive, agricultural development in Alaska, a state of the United States. Three development projects emphasizing large-scale agriculture were proposed and initiated during the period 1976-82. In this evaluation, the implementation process was related to the major events of the development activity. Implementation of the agricultural projects was split off from an existing government agency and given to a new council. However, a key activity, that of land disposal remained with the agency. Much of the ensuing controversy concerning implementation stemmed from this split in authority. In addition, public participation and internal government interaction in the implementation process had substantial impact on policy outcomes. This case study demonstrates that policy-making goes beyond the jurisdiction of elected representatives and members of cabinet. It involves many participants, including the bureaucracy, in a continuous process of implementation. Success in achieving the goal of a new agricultural policy depends, to a large degree, on the ability of power groups to force change. In the situation discussed here, a mechanism was necessary to ensure cooperation between those groups directing the development process. However, as the power of this mechanism, the aforementioned council, diminished, the rate of development slowed. As such, the council became less effective as it was rendered increasingly impotent politically.
650 $aAgricultural policy
650 $aAgricultural programs and projects
650 $aPublic policy
650 $aRural development
700 1 $aTHOMAS, W. C.
773 $tAgricultural Administration and Extension$gv. 26, n. 2, p. 75-90, 1987.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
