| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 36 | |
| 13. |  | DURAES, F. O. M.; SUNDFELD, E.; SILVA, J. E. da. Fontes alternativas de energia e perspectivas do uso da agroenergia no mundo. In.: FALEIRO, F. G.; FARIAS NETO, A. L. de. (Ed.). Savanas: desafios e estratégias pra o equilíbrio entre sociedade, agronegócio e recursos naturais. Planaltina, DF: Embrapa Cerrados, 2008. p. 837-860. Publicado nos Anais do IX Simpósio Nacional dos Cerrados; II Simpósio Internacional Savanas Tropicais, 2008, Brasília, DF.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia. |
|   |
| Registros recuperados : 36 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Corte. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/11/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/12/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PEREIRA, M. de A.; COSTA, F. P.; ALMEIDA, R. G. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARIANA DE ARAGAO PEREIRA, CNPGC; FERNANDO PAIM COSTA, CNPGC; ROBERTO GIOLO DE ALMEIDA, CNPGC. |
|
Título: |
Is the "F word" an option for brazilian farmers? The place of forestry in future integrated farming systems. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Agricultural Management, v. 6, p. 134-140, 2018 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Artigo apresentado no International Farm Management Congress, 21., 2017. Edinburger. "Future farming system". |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study analyses the economic viability of forestry in integrated farming systems (IFS) in Brazil. A 12-year cash flow was built with both experimental data and estimates for three IFS in the Savannah region: ICL (crops + cattle); ICLF1 (ICL + 227 eucalyptus trees/ha); and ICLF2 (ICL + 357 eucalyptus trees/ha). Investment analysis showed all IFS were viable, but ICL was more profitable than ICLF, due to occasional high crops and beef prices and low wood prices in 2016. In extreme scenarios, i.e. all commodities prices were high (SCE I) or all low (SCE II), results remained the same. However, an alternative, most likely, scenario (SCE III) showed ICLF were more economically recommended than ICL, as beef and crop prices dropped and wood prices increased, which is expected because of commodities price volatility. Thus, the introduction of forestry in future IFS is economically viable, although market risks remain. Further adoption of IFS with trees relies on innovative and follower farmers, with strong support of R&D, technology transfer programmes and IFS policies. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
ABC Plan; Integrated crop-livestock-forest systems; Sustainable farming systems. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Economic analysis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01841nam a2200193 a 4500
001 2080389
005 2018-12-27
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPEREIRA, M. de A.
245 $aIs the "F word" an option for brazilian farmers? The place of forestry in future integrated farming systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aInternational Journal of Agricultural Management, v. 6, p. 134-140$c2018
500 $aArtigo apresentado no International Farm Management Congress, 21., 2017. Edinburger. "Future farming system".
520 $aThis study analyses the economic viability of forestry in integrated farming systems (IFS) in Brazil. A 12-year cash flow was built with both experimental data and estimates for three IFS in the Savannah region: ICL (crops + cattle); ICLF1 (ICL + 227 eucalyptus trees/ha); and ICLF2 (ICL + 357 eucalyptus trees/ha). Investment analysis showed all IFS were viable, but ICL was more profitable than ICLF, due to occasional high crops and beef prices and low wood prices in 2016. In extreme scenarios, i.e. all commodities prices were high (SCE I) or all low (SCE II), results remained the same. However, an alternative, most likely, scenario (SCE III) showed ICLF were more economically recommended than ICL, as beef and crop prices dropped and wood prices increased, which is expected because of commodities price volatility. Thus, the introduction of forestry in future IFS is economically viable, although market risks remain. Further adoption of IFS with trees relies on innovative and follower farmers, with strong support of R&D, technology transfer programmes and IFS policies.
650 $aEconomic analysis
653 $aABC Plan
653 $aIntegrated crop-livestock-forest systems
653 $aSustainable farming systems
700 1 $aCOSTA, F. P.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. G. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (CNPGC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
