| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Leite. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgl.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/01/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/01/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
ALVARENGA, R.; AUAD, A. M.; MORAES, J. C.; SILVA, S. E. B.; RODRIGUES, B. S.; SILVA, G. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
R. Alvarenga, UFLA; ALEXANDER MACHADO AUAD, CNPGL; Jair C. Moraes, UFLA; Sandra E. B. Silva, UFLA; Brunno S. Rodrigues; Giani B. Silva. |
|
Título: |
Spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) and their host plants: a strategy for pasture diversification. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Applied Entomology and Zoology, v. 52, n. 4, p. 653-660, 2017. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract Information about the biology of spittlebugs on different species of forage is necessary for the development of tactics for their control, and is also essential for evaluating, selecting and launching new forage cultivars. The aims of this study were to compare the nutritional suitability of different forage species?Brachiaria ruziziensis (Congo grass), Pennisetum purpureum (elephant grass), Panicum maximum (Guinea grass), and Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)?for the spittlebug species Mahanarva spectabilis (Distant) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), Deois schach (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) and Notozulia entreriana (Berg) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), and to evaluate the performance of each spittlebug species on forage monocultures. B. ruziziensis was the most suitable host plant for D. schach. Since N. entreriana did not show differences in the evaluated parameters, it was not possible to determine its ideal forage species. For M. spectabilis, P. purpureum was the most suitable forage species. The evaluation of the performance of the different spittlebugs on a single forage species also showed which spittlebugs are a problem. M. spectabilis and D. schach developed better on a monoculture of B. ruziziensis. M. spectabilis was a major problem when it fed on P. purpureum, but on C. dactylon and P. maximum, none of the spittlebugs developed properly, indicating that these plants are less suitable for them. These results suggest that the forage diversification of pastures may be a strategy for the integrated management of spittlebugs. MenosAbstract Information about the biology of spittlebugs on different species of forage is necessary for the development of tactics for their control, and is also essential for evaluating, selecting and launching new forage cultivars. The aims of this study were to compare the nutritional suitability of different forage species?Brachiaria ruziziensis (Congo grass), Pennisetum purpureum (elephant grass), Panicum maximum (Guinea grass), and Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)?for the spittlebug species Mahanarva spectabilis (Distant) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), Deois schach (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) and Notozulia entreriana (Berg) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), and to evaluate the performance of each spittlebug species on forage monocultures. B. ruziziensis was the most suitable host plant for D. schach. Since N. entreriana did not show differences in the evaluated parameters, it was not possible to determine its ideal forage species. For M. spectabilis, P. purpureum was the most suitable forage species. The evaluation of the performance of the different spittlebugs on a single forage species also showed which spittlebugs are a problem. M. spectabilis and D. schach developed better on a monoculture of B. ruziziensis. M. spectabilis was a major problem when it fed on P. purpureum, but on C. dactylon and P. maximum, none of the spittlebugs developed properly, indicating that these plants are less suitable for them. These results suggest that the forage diversification of pastures may... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bermuda grass; Biological features; Congo grass; Elephant grass; Plant resistance. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02276naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2084267
005 2023-01-27
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aALVARENGA, R.
245 $aSpittlebugs (Hemiptera$bCercopidae) and their host plants: a strategy for pasture diversification.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aAbstract Information about the biology of spittlebugs on different species of forage is necessary for the development of tactics for their control, and is also essential for evaluating, selecting and launching new forage cultivars. The aims of this study were to compare the nutritional suitability of different forage species?Brachiaria ruziziensis (Congo grass), Pennisetum purpureum (elephant grass), Panicum maximum (Guinea grass), and Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)?for the spittlebug species Mahanarva spectabilis (Distant) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), Deois schach (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) and Notozulia entreriana (Berg) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), and to evaluate the performance of each spittlebug species on forage monocultures. B. ruziziensis was the most suitable host plant for D. schach. Since N. entreriana did not show differences in the evaluated parameters, it was not possible to determine its ideal forage species. For M. spectabilis, P. purpureum was the most suitable forage species. The evaluation of the performance of the different spittlebugs on a single forage species also showed which spittlebugs are a problem. M. spectabilis and D. schach developed better on a monoculture of B. ruziziensis. M. spectabilis was a major problem when it fed on P. purpureum, but on C. dactylon and P. maximum, none of the spittlebugs developed properly, indicating that these plants are less suitable for them. These results suggest that the forage diversification of pastures may be a strategy for the integrated management of spittlebugs.
653 $aBermuda grass
653 $aBiological features
653 $aCongo grass
653 $aElephant grass
653 $aPlant resistance
700 1 $aAUAD, A. M.
700 1 $aMORAES, J. C.
700 1 $aSILVA, S. E. B.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, B. S.
700 1 $aSILVA, G. B.
773 $tApplied Entomology and Zoology$gv. 52, n. 4, p. 653-660, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/10/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/02/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
MONTEIRO, J. E. B. de A.; OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; NAKAI, A. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSÉ EDUARDO BOFFINO DE ALMEIDA MONTEIRO, CNPTIA; ARYEVERTON FORTES DE OLIVEIRA, CNPTIA; ALAN MASSARU NAKAI, CNPTIA. |
|
Título: |
ICT in agrometeorology and climate change. |
|
Título original: |
TIC em agrometeorologia e mudanças climáticas. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MASSRUHÁ, S. M. F. S.; LEITE, M. A. de A.; LUCHIARI JUNIOR, A.; ROMANI, L. A. S. (Ed.). Information and communication technologies and their relations with agriculture. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. ch. 7, |
|
Páginas: |
p. 121-138. |
|
ISBN: |
978-85-7035-582-9 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Agrometeorological monitoring. Climate risk analysis in agriculture. Agro-climatic zoning. Agro-environmental modeling and simulation. Climate change and agriculture. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Mudanças climáticas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Tecnologia da informação. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture; Climate change; Information technology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01050naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2055670
005 2017-02-09
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-85-7035-582-9
100 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. E. B. de A.
240 $aTIC em agrometeorologia e mudanças climáticas.
245 $aICT in agrometeorology and climate change.
260 $c2016
300 $ap. 121-138.
520 $aAgrometeorological monitoring. Climate risk analysis in agriculture. Agro-climatic zoning. Agro-environmental modeling and simulation. Climate change and agriculture.
650 $aAgriculture
650 $aClimate change
650 $aInformation technology
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aTecnologia da informação
653 $aMudanças climáticas
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. F. de
700 1 $aNAKAI, A. M.
773 $tIn: MASSRUHÁ, S. M. F. S.; LEITE, M. A. de A.; LUCHIARI JUNIOR, A.; ROMANI, L. A. S. (Ed.). Information and communication technologies and their relations with agriculture. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. ch. 7
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
