| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/11/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/03/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, G. M. da; BROSE, A. D. P; NETO, A. P. R.; MAIA, M. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
GUSTAVO MARTINS DA SILVA, CPPSUL; A. D. P. BROSE, UNIPAMPA; A. P. R. NETO, IDEAU; Melissa Batista Maia, IDEAU. |
|
Título: |
Instrumento para monitoramento da qualidade no processo de produção de sementes de leguminosas forrageiras de clima temperado. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Informativo Abrates, Curitiba, v. 23, n. 2, set. 2015. |
|
Descrição Física: |
1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Número especial. Trabalho 631. Edição dos Resumos do 19º Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, Foz do Iguaçu, set. 2015. |
|
Conteúdo: |
A produção de sementes forrageiras de clima temperado no Rio Grande do Sul atravessa período de reorganização e qualificação técnica, com muitos produtores buscando se adequar aos padrões e normas legais. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Gestão da qualidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Semente. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/134227/1/631.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00944nam a2200193 a 4500
001 2029874
005 2016-03-04
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, G. M. da
245 $aInstrumento para monitoramento da qualidade no processo de produção de sementes de leguminosas forrageiras de clima temperado.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aInformativo Abrates, Curitiba, v. 23, n. 2, set. 2015.$c2015
300 $c1 CD-ROM.
500 $aNúmero especial. Trabalho 631. Edição dos Resumos do 19º Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, Foz do Iguaçu, set. 2015.
520 $aA produção de sementes forrageiras de clima temperado no Rio Grande do Sul atravessa período de reorganização e qualificação técnica, com muitos produtores buscando se adequar aos padrões e normas legais.
650 $aSemente
653 $aGestão da qualidade
700 1 $aBROSE, A. D. P
700 1 $aNETO, A. P. R.
700 1 $aMAIA, M. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sul (CPPSUL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/10/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/02/2009 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
NUTTI, M.; CARVALHO, J. L.; FUKUDA, W. |
|
Afiliação: |
Marilia Nutti, CTAA; José Luiz Carvalho, CTAA; Wania Maria Gonçalves Fukuda, CNPMF. |
|
Título: |
Institutionalizing the biofortification strategy in a sustainable way: the case of Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE GLOBAL CASSAVA PARTNERSHIP, 1., 2008, Ghent. Cassava: meeting the challenges of the new millennium. Ghent:: IPBO, 2008. p. 26. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
S1-2. |
|
Conteúdo: |
With worldwide escalating food prices and a growing demand for biofuels, it is vital to increase the productivity of cassava in Africa. With average cassava yields of 7.0 and 11.3 t/ha in Uganda and Kenya respectively, yield levels in East Africa are low, While differences in agro-ecology explained part of the variation between sites, monocropping, weed management and hiring labour contributed to higher yields within sites. The importance of good management practices (improved varieties, monocropping, proper plant spacing, timely planting) was confirmed by the higher yield levels - 10.4 and 14.2 t/ha in Kenya and Uganda respectively - obtained in farmer managed control plots in 99 on-farm trials. Abiotic factors were more important yield determining factors than biotic factors, while weed management also explained an important part of yield variability. Fertilizer use (100-50-100 N-P205-K20) increased cassava yields by 5.8 t/ha, above ground biomass by 9.0 t/ha and the number of storage roots per plant by 2.7, but did not affect harvest index or root dry matter content. Although cassava production was limited by different nutrient(s) across sites, combined NPK fertilizer always resulted in the highest yields. Fetilizer response was related to soil fertility and early rainfall, but did not between varieties, across management levels or pest and disease pressures. On the short term, cassava productivity in East Africa can be improved by the widespread promotion of simple agronomic practices and improved varieties. On the longer term, fertilizer will be essential for the development of sustainable and profitable comercial cassava schemes. MenosWith worldwide escalating food prices and a growing demand for biofuels, it is vital to increase the productivity of cassava in Africa. With average cassava yields of 7.0 and 11.3 t/ha in Uganda and Kenya respectively, yield levels in East Africa are low, While differences in agro-ecology explained part of the variation between sites, monocropping, weed management and hiring labour contributed to higher yields within sites. The importance of good management practices (improved varieties, monocropping, proper plant spacing, timely planting) was confirmed by the higher yield levels - 10.4 and 14.2 t/ha in Kenya and Uganda respectively - obtained in farmer managed control plots in 99 on-farm trials. Abiotic factors were more important yield determining factors than biotic factors, while weed management also explained an important part of yield variability. Fertilizer use (100-50-100 N-P205-K20) increased cassava yields by 5.8 t/ha, above ground biomass by 9.0 t/ha and the number of storage roots per plant by 2.7, but did not affect harvest index or root dry matter content. Although cassava production was limited by different nutrient(s) across sites, combined NPK fertilizer always resulted in the highest yields. Fetilizer response was related to soil fertility and early rainfall, but did not between varieties, across management levels or pest and disease pressures. On the short term, cassava productivity in East Africa can be improved by the widespread promotion of simple agro... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02211naa a2200157 a 4500
001 1637311
005 2009-02-19
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aNUTTI, M.
245 $aInstitutionalizing the biofortification strategy in a sustainable way$bthe case of Brazil.
260 $c2008
500 $aS1-2.
520 $aWith worldwide escalating food prices and a growing demand for biofuels, it is vital to increase the productivity of cassava in Africa. With average cassava yields of 7.0 and 11.3 t/ha in Uganda and Kenya respectively, yield levels in East Africa are low, While differences in agro-ecology explained part of the variation between sites, monocropping, weed management and hiring labour contributed to higher yields within sites. The importance of good management practices (improved varieties, monocropping, proper plant spacing, timely planting) was confirmed by the higher yield levels - 10.4 and 14.2 t/ha in Kenya and Uganda respectively - obtained in farmer managed control plots in 99 on-farm trials. Abiotic factors were more important yield determining factors than biotic factors, while weed management also explained an important part of yield variability. Fertilizer use (100-50-100 N-P205-K20) increased cassava yields by 5.8 t/ha, above ground biomass by 9.0 t/ha and the number of storage roots per plant by 2.7, but did not affect harvest index or root dry matter content. Although cassava production was limited by different nutrient(s) across sites, combined NPK fertilizer always resulted in the highest yields. Fetilizer response was related to soil fertility and early rainfall, but did not between varieties, across management levels or pest and disease pressures. On the short term, cassava productivity in East Africa can be improved by the widespread promotion of simple agronomic practices and improved varieties. On the longer term, fertilizer will be essential for the development of sustainable and profitable comercial cassava schemes.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, J. L.
700 1 $aFUKUDA, W.
773 $tIn: SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE GLOBAL CASSAVA PARTNERSHIP, 1., 2008, Ghent. Cassava: meeting the challenges of the new millennium. Ghent:: IPBO, 2008. p. 26.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
