|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
07/06/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
14/03/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
LIEBIG, M. A.; FRANZLUEBBERS, A. J.; ALVAREZ, C.; CHIESA, T. D.; LEWCZUK, N.; PIÑEIRO, G.; POSSE, G.; YAHDJIAN, L.; GRACE, P.; CABRAL, O. M. R.; MARTIN NETO, L.; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.; AMIRO, B.; ANGERS, D.; HAO, X.; OELBERMANN, M.; TENUTA, M.; MUNKHOLM, L. J.; REGINA, K.; CELLIER, P.; EHRHARDT, F.; RICHARD, G.; DECHOW, R.; AGUS, F.; WIDIARTA, N.; SPINK, J.; BERTI, A.; GRIGNANI, C.; MAZZONCINI, M.; ORSINI, R.; ROGGERO, P. P.; SEDDAIU, G.; TEI, F.; VENTRELLA, D.; VITALI, G.; KISHIMOTO-MO, A.; SHIRATO, Y.; SUDO, S.; SHIN, J.; SCHIPPER, L.; SAVÉ, R.; LEIFELD, J.; SPADAVECCHIA, L.; YELURIPATI, J.; DEL GROSSO, S.; RICE, C.; SAWCHIK, J. |
Afiliação: |
M. A. LIEBIG, USDA-ARS; A. J. FRANZLUEBBERS, USDA-ARS; C. ALVAREZ, National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Manfredi, Cordoba, Argentina; T. D. CHIESA, IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía; N. LEWCZUK, National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Buenos Aires, Argentina; G. PIÑEIRO, IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires; G. POSSE, National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Buenos Aires, Argentina; L. YAHDJIAN, IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires; P. GRACE, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queesland, Australia; OSVALDO MACHADO RODRIGUES CABRAL, CNPMA; LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, DE/P&D; RENATO DE ARAGAO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, CNPS; B. AMIRO, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; D. ANGERS, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec, Quebec, Canada; X. HAO, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; M. OELBERMANN, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; M. TENUTA, University of Manitoba, Department of Soil Science, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; L. J. MUNKHOLM, Dept. of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Denmark; K. REGINA, Natural Resources Institute Finland; P. CELLIER, French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA); F. EHRHARDT, French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA); G. RICHARD, French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA); R. DECHOW, Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, Germany; F. AGUS, Indonesian Soil Research Institute; N. WIDIARTA, Indonesian Center for Food Crop Research and Development; J. SPINK, Oak Park Crops Research Centre, Teagasc, Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland; A. BERTI, Dipartimento di Agronomia Animali Alimenti risorse Naturali e Ambiente (DAFNAE), Universita di Padova, Agripolis; C. GRIGNANI, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin; M. MAZZONCINI, Department of Agronomy and Agroecosystem Management (DAGA), University of Pisa; R. ORSINI, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari e Ambientali, Universita Politecnica delle Marche; P. P. ROGGERO, Nucleo di Ricerca sulla Desertificazione and Dipartimento di Agraria, Universita di SassarI; G. SEDDAIU, Nucleo di Ricerca sulla Desertificazione and Dipartimento di Agraria, Universita di Sassari; F. TEI, Dept of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia; D. VENTRELLA, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry Environments (CRA-SCA); G. VITALI, Dipartimento di Scienze agrarie, Alma Mater Studiorum, Universita di Bologna; A. KISHIMOTO-MO, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Japan; Y. SHIRATO, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Japan; S. SUDO, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Japan; J. SHIN, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Seoul, South Korea; L. SCHIPPER, Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato, New Zealand; R. SAVÉ, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; J. LEIFELD, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland; L. SPADAVECCHIA, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London; J. YELURIPATI, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Scotland; S. DEL GROSSO, USDA Agricultural Research Service; C. RICE, Kansas State University; J. SAWCHIK, National Institute for Agricultural Research Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
Título: |
MAGGnet: an international network to foster mitigation of agricultural greenhouse gases. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Carbon Management, v. 7, N. 3-4, P. 243-248, 2016. |
DOI: |
10.1080/17583004.2016.1180586 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Research networks provide a framework for review, synthesis and systematic testing of theories by multiple scientists across international borders critical for addressing global-scale issues. In 2012, a GHG research network referred to as MAGGnet (Managing Agricultural Greenhouse Gases Network) was established within the Croplands Research Group of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA). With involvement from 46 alliance member countries, MAGGnet seeks to provide a platform for the inventory and analysis of agricultural GHG mitigation research throughout the world. To date, metadata from 315 experimental studies in 20 countries have been compiled using a standardized spreadsheet. Most studies were completed (74%) and conducted within a 1-3-year duration (68%). Soil carbon and nitrous oxide emissions were measured in over 80% of the studies. Among plant variables, grain yield was assessed across studies most frequently (56%), followed by stover (35%) and root (9%) biomass. MAGGnet has contributed to modeling efforts and has spurred other research groups in the GRA to collect experimental site metadata using an adapted spreadsheet. With continued growth and investment, MAGGnet will leverage limited-resource investments by any one country to produce an inclusive, globally shared meta-database focused on the science of GHG mitigation. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Gases de efeito estufa; Global Research Alliance; Óxido nitroso; Sequestro de carbono. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Carbon sequestration; Greenhouse gases; Nitrous oxide. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/157589/1/2016AP46.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/144121/1/2016-008.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03383naa a2200769 a 4500 001 2066933 005 2017-03-14 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1080/17583004.2016.1180586$2DOI 100 1 $aLIEBIG, M. A. 245 $aMAGGnet$ban international network to foster mitigation of agricultural greenhouse gases.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aResearch networks provide a framework for review, synthesis and systematic testing of theories by multiple scientists across international borders critical for addressing global-scale issues. In 2012, a GHG research network referred to as MAGGnet (Managing Agricultural Greenhouse Gases Network) was established within the Croplands Research Group of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA). With involvement from 46 alliance member countries, MAGGnet seeks to provide a platform for the inventory and analysis of agricultural GHG mitigation research throughout the world. To date, metadata from 315 experimental studies in 20 countries have been compiled using a standardized spreadsheet. Most studies were completed (74%) and conducted within a 1-3-year duration (68%). Soil carbon and nitrous oxide emissions were measured in over 80% of the studies. Among plant variables, grain yield was assessed across studies most frequently (56%), followed by stover (35%) and root (9%) biomass. MAGGnet has contributed to modeling efforts and has spurred other research groups in the GRA to collect experimental site metadata using an adapted spreadsheet. With continued growth and investment, MAGGnet will leverage limited-resource investments by any one country to produce an inclusive, globally shared meta-database focused on the science of GHG mitigation. 650 $aCarbon sequestration 650 $aGreenhouse gases 650 $aNitrous oxide 653 $aGases de efeito estufa 653 $aGlobal Research Alliance 653 $aÓxido nitroso 653 $aSequestro de carbono 700 1 $aFRANZLUEBBERS, A. J. 700 1 $aALVAREZ, C. 700 1 $aCHIESA, T. D. 700 1 $aLEWCZUK, N. 700 1 $aPIÑEIRO, G. 700 1 $aPOSSE, G. 700 1 $aYAHDJIAN, L. 700 1 $aGRACE, P. 700 1 $aCABRAL, O. M. R. 700 1 $aMARTIN NETO, L. 700 1 $aRODRIGUES, R. de A. R. 700 1 $aAMIRO, B. 700 1 $aANGERS, D. 700 1 $aHAO, X. 700 1 $aOELBERMANN, M. 700 1 $aTENUTA, M. 700 1 $aMUNKHOLM, L. J. 700 1 $aREGINA, K. 700 1 $aCELLIER, P. 700 1 $aEHRHARDT, F. 700 1 $aRICHARD, G. 700 1 $aDECHOW, R. 700 1 $aAGUS, F. 700 1 $aWIDIARTA, N. 700 1 $aSPINK, J. 700 1 $aBERTI, A. 700 1 $aGRIGNANI, C. 700 1 $aMAZZONCINI, M. 700 1 $aORSINI, R. 700 1 $aROGGERO, P. P. 700 1 $aSEDDAIU, G. 700 1 $aTEI, F. 700 1 $aVENTRELLA, D. 700 1 $aVITALI, G. 700 1 $aKISHIMOTO-MO, A. 700 1 $aSHIRATO, Y. 700 1 $aSUDO, S. 700 1 $aSHIN, J. 700 1 $aSCHIPPER, L. 700 1 $aSAVÉ, R. 700 1 $aLEIFELD, J. 700 1 $aSPADAVECCHIA, L. 700 1 $aYELURIPATI, J. 700 1 $aDEL GROSSO, S. 700 1 $aRICE, C. 700 1 $aSAWCHIK, J. 773 $tCarbon Management$gv. 7, N. 3-4, P. 243-248, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
Data corrente: |
11/04/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
11/04/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BETTIOL, W.; GHINI, R.; GALVAO, J. A. H.; LIGO, M. A. V.; MINEIRO, J. L. de CARVALHO. |
Afiliação: |
WAGNER BETTIOL, CNPMA; RAQUEL GHINI, CNPMA; JOSE ABRAHAO HADDAD GALVAO, CNPMA; MARCOS ANTONIO VIEIRA LIGO, CNPMA; JEFERSON LUIZ DE CARVALHO MINEIRO. |
Título: |
Soil organisms in organic and conventional cropping systems. |
Ano de publicação: |
2002 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Scientia Agricola, v.59, n.3, p.565-572, 2002. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Despite the recent interest in organic agriculture, little research has been carried out in this area. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare, in a dystrophic Ultisol, the effects of organic and conventional agricultures on soil organism populations, for the tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and corn (Zea mays) crops. In general, it was found that fungus, bacterium and actinomycet populations counted by the number of colonies in the media, were similar for the two cropping systems. CO2 evolution during the cropping season was higher, up to the double for the organic agriculture system as compared to the conventional. The number of earthworms was about ten times higher in the organic system. There was no difference in the decomposition rate of organic matter of the two systems. In general, the number of microartropods was always higher in the organic plots in relation to the conventional ones, reflectining on the Shannon index diversity. The higher insect population belonged to the Collembola order, and in the case of mites, to the superfamily Oribatuloidea. Individuals of the groups Aranae, Chilopoda, Dyplopoda, Pauropoda, Protura and Symphyla were occasionally collected in similar number in both cropping systems. Key words: soil microorganisms, organic agriculture, microartropods, cropping systems, environmental impacts |
Palavras-Chave: |
Organismos dos solos; Sistemas de cultivo; Soil organisms. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/195743/1/2001AP-Bettiol-Soil.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01939naa a2200205 a 4500 001 2108159 005 2019-04-11 008 2002 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aBETTIOL, W. 245 $aSoil organisms in organic and conventional cropping systems.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2002 520 $aDespite the recent interest in organic agriculture, little research has been carried out in this area. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare, in a dystrophic Ultisol, the effects of organic and conventional agricultures on soil organism populations, for the tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and corn (Zea mays) crops. In general, it was found that fungus, bacterium and actinomycet populations counted by the number of colonies in the media, were similar for the two cropping systems. CO2 evolution during the cropping season was higher, up to the double for the organic agriculture system as compared to the conventional. The number of earthworms was about ten times higher in the organic system. There was no difference in the decomposition rate of organic matter of the two systems. In general, the number of microartropods was always higher in the organic plots in relation to the conventional ones, reflectining on the Shannon index diversity. The higher insect population belonged to the Collembola order, and in the case of mites, to the superfamily Oribatuloidea. Individuals of the groups Aranae, Chilopoda, Dyplopoda, Pauropoda, Protura and Symphyla were occasionally collected in similar number in both cropping systems. Key words: soil microorganisms, organic agriculture, microartropods, cropping systems, environmental impacts 653 $aOrganismos dos solos 653 $aSistemas de cultivo 653 $aSoil organisms 700 1 $aGHINI, R. 700 1 $aGALVAO, J. A. H. 700 1 $aLIGO, M. A. V. 700 1 $aMINEIRO, J. L. de CARVALHO 773 $tScientia Agricola$gv.59, n.3, p.565-572, 2002.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|