|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
Data corrente: |
29/11/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/05/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
ROSA, J. M. da; ARIOLI, C. J.; SANTOS, J. P. dos; MENEZES-NETTO, A. C.; BOTTON, M. |
Afiliação: |
Joatan Machado da Rosa, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Laborat orio de Entomologia, Lages, SC 88520-000, Brazil (joatanmachado@gmail. com); Cristiano J. Arioli, EPAGRI, Estac ? ~ ao Experimental de S ~ ao Joaquim, Rua João F. Nunes, 102, Jardim Caic ?ara, São Joaquim, SC 88600-000, Brazil (cristianoarioli@epagri.sc.gov.br); Jana Pereira dos Santos, EPAGRI, Estac ? ~ ao Experimental de Cac ?ador, Rua Ab ?lio Franco, 1500, Bom Sucesso, Cac ?ador, SC 89500-000, Brazil (janapereira@epagri.sc.gov.br); Alexandre C. Menezes-Netto, EPAGRI, Estac ? ~ ao Experimental de Videira, Rua Jo ~ ao Zardo, 1660, Campo Experim ental, Videira, SC 89560-000, Brazil (alexandrenetto@ epagri.sc.gov.br); MARCOS BOTTON, CNPUV. |
Título: |
Evaluation of food lures for capture and monitoring of anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) on temperate fruit trees. |
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Economic Entomology, v. 110, n. 0, p. 995-1001, 2017. [online] |
DOI: |
doi: 10.1093/jee/tox084 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is the main pest of fruit trees grown in temperate climates in the southern region of Brazil. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the major commercial food lures used in Brazil for trapping and monitoring of A. fraterculus in plum, pear, and feijoa orchards. The assessed lures were hydrolyzed proteins of animal origin (CeraTrap) and plant origin (BioAnastrepha), torula yeast þ borax (Torula), and grape juice. Response variables included the rate of adult capture (flies per trap per day, FTD) and the percentage of females captured. We also evaluated the number of times the weekly capture rate exceeded the traditional threshold of 0.5 FTD for each lure. Traps baited with grape juice, currently used for monitoring A . fraterculus in Southern Brazil, captured fewer adults and a lower percentage of females compared with the other lures. CeraTrap trapped a greater number of A . fraterculus adults and, in some cases, a lower percentage of females compared with the other lures in pears. Traps baited with CeraTrap had greater capture rates (FTD), particularly during the stages of fruit maturation and harvest, and even in years with low population density of A. fraterculus , thus demonstrating greater sensitivity in the detection of this pest. These results show that, in order to detect and monitor the presence of A . fraterculus in plum, feijoa, and pear crops, protein-based lures are superior to grape juice, especially the animal protein CeraTrap. MenosThe Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is the main pest of fruit trees grown in temperate climates in the southern region of Brazil. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the major commercial food lures used in Brazil for trapping and monitoring of A. fraterculus in plum, pear, and feijoa orchards. The assessed lures were hydrolyzed proteins of animal origin (CeraTrap) and plant origin (BioAnastrepha), torula yeast þ borax (Torula), and grape juice. Response variables included the rate of adult capture (flies per trap per day, FTD) and the percentage of females captured. We also evaluated the number of times the weekly capture rate exceeded the traditional threshold of 0.5 FTD for each lure. Traps baited with grape juice, currently used for monitoring A . fraterculus in Southern Brazil, captured fewer adults and a lower percentage of females compared with the other lures. CeraTrap trapped a greater number of A . fraterculus adults and, in some cases, a lower percentage of females compared with the other lures in pears. Traps baited with CeraTrap had greater capture rates (FTD), particularly during the stages of fruit maturation and harvest, and even in years with low population density of A. fraterculus , thus demonstrating greater sensitivity in the detection of this pest. These results show that, in order to detect and monitor the presence of A . fraterculus in plum, feijoa, and pear crops, protein-based lures are superior to g... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Control index; Monitoring (pests); Temperate-zone fruit. |
Thesagro: |
Anastrepha Fraterculus; Doença de planta; Praga. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/167751/1/rosa2017.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02368naa a2200253 a 4500 001 2080998 005 2019-05-06 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $adoi: 10.1093/jee/tox084$2DOI 100 1 $aROSA, J. M. da 245 $aEvaluation of food lures for capture and monitoring of anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera$bTephritidae) on temperate fruit trees.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2017 520 $aThe Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is the main pest of fruit trees grown in temperate climates in the southern region of Brazil. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the major commercial food lures used in Brazil for trapping and monitoring of A. fraterculus in plum, pear, and feijoa orchards. The assessed lures were hydrolyzed proteins of animal origin (CeraTrap) and plant origin (BioAnastrepha), torula yeast þ borax (Torula), and grape juice. Response variables included the rate of adult capture (flies per trap per day, FTD) and the percentage of females captured. We also evaluated the number of times the weekly capture rate exceeded the traditional threshold of 0.5 FTD for each lure. Traps baited with grape juice, currently used for monitoring A . fraterculus in Southern Brazil, captured fewer adults and a lower percentage of females compared with the other lures. CeraTrap trapped a greater number of A . fraterculus adults and, in some cases, a lower percentage of females compared with the other lures in pears. Traps baited with CeraTrap had greater capture rates (FTD), particularly during the stages of fruit maturation and harvest, and even in years with low population density of A. fraterculus , thus demonstrating greater sensitivity in the detection of this pest. These results show that, in order to detect and monitor the presence of A . fraterculus in plum, feijoa, and pear crops, protein-based lures are superior to grape juice, especially the animal protein CeraTrap. 650 $aAnastrepha Fraterculus 650 $aDoença de planta 650 $aPraga 653 $aControl index 653 $aMonitoring (pests) 653 $aTemperate-zone fruit 700 1 $aARIOLI, C. J. 700 1 $aSANTOS, J. P. dos 700 1 $aMENEZES-NETTO, A. C. 700 1 $aBOTTON, M. 773 $tJournal of Economic Entomology$gv. 110, n. 0, p. 995-1001, 2017. [online]
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Unidades Centrais. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
10/08/2000 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/12/2019 |
Autoria: |
GRANGER, A.; GRIERSON, J.; QUIRINO, T. R.; ROMANO, L. |
Título: |
Evaluation in agricultural research management. |
Ano de publicação: |
1995 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
The Hague: ISNAR/INIA/EMBRAPA/ICA/CIAT, 1995. |
Páginas: |
67p. |
Série: |
(ISNAR. Manual, 4). |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Training in Planning, monitoring and evaluation for agricultural research management. |
Conteúdo: |
Frame of reference for evaluation; Evaluation methodology; Relating to other institutional processes. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Avaliacao; Evaluation; Management. |
Thesagro: |
Administração; Agricultura; Pesquisa. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
agriculture; research. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00857nam a2200277 a 4500 001 1102142 005 2019-12-12 008 1995 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 100 1 $aGRANGER, A. 245 $aEvaluation in agricultural research management. 260 $aThe Hague: ISNAR/INIA/EMBRAPA/ICA/CIAT$c1995 300 $a67p. 490 $a(ISNAR. Manual, 4). 500 $aTraining in Planning, monitoring and evaluation for agricultural research management. 520 $aFrame of reference for evaluation; Evaluation methodology; Relating to other institutional processes. 650 $aagriculture 650 $aresearch 650 $aAdministração 650 $aAgricultura 650 $aPesquisa 653 $aAvaliacao 653 $aEvaluation 653 $aManagement 700 1 $aGRIERSON, J. 700 1 $aQUIRINO, T. R. 700 1 $aROMANO, L.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|