| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/05/2001 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/03/2017 |
|
Autoria: |
TATE, K. R.; SCOTT, N. A.; PARSHOTAM, A.; BROWN, L.; WILDE, R. H.; GILTRAP, D. J.; TRUSTRUM, N. A.; GOMEZ, B.; ROSS, D. J. |
|
Título: |
A multi-scale analysis of a terrestrial carbon budget is a New Zealand a source or sink of carbon? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2000 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultuire Ecosystem & Environment, v.82, n.1/3, p.229-246, 2000. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Interest in national carbon (C) budgets has increased following the signing of the Kyoto Protocol as countries begin to develop source/sink C invetories. In this study, specific-site measurements, regional database, satellite observations, and models were used to test the hypothesis that New Zealand's terrestrial ecosystems are C neutral because C uptake by planted forests and scrub is roughly balanced by C losses from indigenous forests and soils. Net ecosystems C balance was estimated from the difference between net primary production (NPP) and heterotrophic soil respiration. The productivity portion of the CASA model and NOAA-AVHRR imagery were used to estimate national NPP (128 14 Mt C per year). Main sources of uncertainty were the coarse spatial scale (1 x 1 km2 grid cells), and the general lack of information on photosynthetically active radiation, light-use efficiency, and below-ground C allocation for the major vegetation types: indigenous and exotic forests, schrub, and grasslands (improved, unimproved and tussock). Total soil CO2-C production predicted from an Arrhenius-type function coupled to climate and land-cover data was 380 30 Mt C per year, suggesting that New Zeland's terrestrial ecosystems may be either (a) a net source of atmospheric CO2 or (b) roughly in C balance if ca. 252 Mt CO2-C per year (66%) can be attributed to roots. Soil moisture limitations on respiration were small, reducing the national value to 365 28 Mt C per year. Differences between NPP and heterotrophic soil respiration were -29 Mt C per year for improved pastures, 8 Mt C per year for indigenous forests, and +4 Mt C per year for planted forests; the large negative value for improved grassland may be due to under-estimation of NPP and root respiration. Soil C losses to coastal waters, as estimated from a consideration of all the major erosion processes, were ca. 3-11 Mt C per year. These national-scale estimates of ecosystems C balance were in general agreement with those based on plot-scale data for some major ecosystems including planted forests (4 Mt C per year vs 3.7 Mt C per year, respectively) and indigenous forest (-8 Mt C per year vs ca. -2.8 Mt C per year, respectively). Poor agreement for forest regenerating after land abandonment (-17 Mt C per year vs +3 Mt C per year) was probably due to an underestimate of NPP at the national scale. Overall, the results suggest that New Zealand is a net C source, despite the that some ecosystems are accumulating C. For some land-use types, using the balance between NPP and soil respiration at the national scale to estimate the net ecosystem C balance may be too coarse, and studies of land-use changes at finer spatial scales are needed to reduce uncertainties in national-scale C balance estimates. MenosInterest in national carbon (C) budgets has increased following the signing of the Kyoto Protocol as countries begin to develop source/sink C invetories. In this study, specific-site measurements, regional database, satellite observations, and models were used to test the hypothesis that New Zealand's terrestrial ecosystems are C neutral because C uptake by planted forests and scrub is roughly balanced by C losses from indigenous forests and soils. Net ecosystems C balance was estimated from the difference between net primary production (NPP) and heterotrophic soil respiration. The productivity portion of the CASA model and NOAA-AVHRR imagery were used to estimate national NPP (128 14 Mt C per year). Main sources of uncertainty were the coarse spatial scale (1 x 1 km2 grid cells), and the general lack of information on photosynthetically active radiation, light-use efficiency, and below-ground C allocation for the major vegetation types: indigenous and exotic forests, schrub, and grasslands (improved, unimproved and tussock). Total soil CO2-C production predicted from an Arrhenius-type function coupled to climate and land-cover data was 380 30 Mt C per year, suggesting that New Zeland's terrestrial ecosystems may be either (a) a net source of atmospheric CO2 or (b) roughly in C balance if ca. 252 Mt CO2-C per year (66%) can be attributed to roots. Soil moisture limitations on respiration were small, reducing the national value to 365 28 Mt C per year. Differences between NPP... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Model; Modelo; Primary production; Producao primaria. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Sensoriamento Remoto; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
carbon; remote sensing; soil. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03670naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1806236
005 2017-03-30
008 2000 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aTATE, K. R.
245 $aA multi-scale analysis of a terrestrial carbon budget is a New Zealand a source or sink of carbon?
260 $c2000
520 $aInterest in national carbon (C) budgets has increased following the signing of the Kyoto Protocol as countries begin to develop source/sink C invetories. In this study, specific-site measurements, regional database, satellite observations, and models were used to test the hypothesis that New Zealand's terrestrial ecosystems are C neutral because C uptake by planted forests and scrub is roughly balanced by C losses from indigenous forests and soils. Net ecosystems C balance was estimated from the difference between net primary production (NPP) and heterotrophic soil respiration. The productivity portion of the CASA model and NOAA-AVHRR imagery were used to estimate national NPP (128 14 Mt C per year). Main sources of uncertainty were the coarse spatial scale (1 x 1 km2 grid cells), and the general lack of information on photosynthetically active radiation, light-use efficiency, and below-ground C allocation for the major vegetation types: indigenous and exotic forests, schrub, and grasslands (improved, unimproved and tussock). Total soil CO2-C production predicted from an Arrhenius-type function coupled to climate and land-cover data was 380 30 Mt C per year, suggesting that New Zeland's terrestrial ecosystems may be either (a) a net source of atmospheric CO2 or (b) roughly in C balance if ca. 252 Mt CO2-C per year (66%) can be attributed to roots. Soil moisture limitations on respiration were small, reducing the national value to 365 28 Mt C per year. Differences between NPP and heterotrophic soil respiration were -29 Mt C per year for improved pastures, 8 Mt C per year for indigenous forests, and +4 Mt C per year for planted forests; the large negative value for improved grassland may be due to under-estimation of NPP and root respiration. Soil C losses to coastal waters, as estimated from a consideration of all the major erosion processes, were ca. 3-11 Mt C per year. These national-scale estimates of ecosystems C balance were in general agreement with those based on plot-scale data for some major ecosystems including planted forests (4 Mt C per year vs 3.7 Mt C per year, respectively) and indigenous forest (-8 Mt C per year vs ca. -2.8 Mt C per year, respectively). Poor agreement for forest regenerating after land abandonment (-17 Mt C per year vs +3 Mt C per year) was probably due to an underestimate of NPP at the national scale. Overall, the results suggest that New Zealand is a net C source, despite the that some ecosystems are accumulating C. For some land-use types, using the balance between NPP and soil respiration at the national scale to estimate the net ecosystem C balance may be too coarse, and studies of land-use changes at finer spatial scales are needed to reduce uncertainties in national-scale C balance estimates.
650 $acarbon
650 $aremote sensing
650 $asoil
650 $aCarbono
650 $aSensoriamento Remoto
650 $aSolo
653 $aModel
653 $aModelo
653 $aPrimary production
653 $aProducao primaria
700 1 $aSCOTT, N. A.
700 1 $aPARSHOTAM, A.
700 1 $aBROWN, L.
700 1 $aWILDE, R. H.
700 1 $aGILTRAP, D. J.
700 1 $aTRUSTRUM, N. A.
700 1 $aGOMEZ, B.
700 1 $aROSS, D. J.
773 $tAgricultuire Ecosystem & Environment$gv.82, n.1/3, p.229-246, 2000.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/10/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/03/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PEDROSA, F. O.; MONTEIRO, R. A.; WASSEM, R.; CRUZ, L. M.; AYUB, R. A.; COLAUTO, N. B.; FERNANDEZ, M. A.; FUNGARO, M. H. P; GRISARD, E. C.; CUNHA, M. H. da; MADEIRA, H. M. F.; NODARI, R. O.; OSAKU, C. A.; PETZLERLER, M. L.; TERENZI, H.; VIEIRA, L G. E.; STEFFENS, M. B. R.; WEISS, V. A.; PEREIRA, L. F. P.; ALMEIDA, M. I. M.; ALVEZ, L. R.; MARIN, A.; ARAUJO, L. M.; BALSANELLI, E.; BAURA, V. A.; CHUBATSU, L. S.; FAORO, H.; FAVETTI, A.; FRIEDERMANN, G.; GLIENKE, C.; KARP, S.; KAVA-CORDEIRO, V.; RAITTZ R, T.; RAMOS, H. J. O.; RIBEIRO, E. M. S. F.; RIGO, L. U.; ROCHA, S. N.; SCHWAB, S.; SILVA, A. G.; SOUZA, E. M.; TANDRA-SFEIR, M. Z.; TORRES, R. A.; DABUL, A. N. G.; SOARES, M. A. M.; GASQUES, L. S.; GIMENES, C. C. T.; VALLE, J. S.; CIFERRI, R. R.; CORREA, L. C.; MURACE, N. K.; PAMPHILE, J. A.; PATUSSI, E. V.; PRIOLI, A. J.; PRIOLI, S. M. A.; ROCHA, C. L. M. S. C.; ARANTES, O. M. N.; FURLANETO, M. C.; GODOY, L. P.; OLIVEIRA, C. E. C.; SATORI, D.; VILAS-BOAS, L. A.; WARANABE, M. A. E.; DAMBROS, B. P.; GUERRA, M. P.; MATHIONI, S. M.; SANTOS, K. L.; STEINDEL, M.; VERNAL, J.; CHUEIRE, L. M. de O.; BARCELLOS, F. G.; CAMPO, R. J.; NICOLÁS, M. F.; PEREIRA-FERRARI, L.; SILVA, J. L. C.; GIOPPO, N. M. R.; MARGARIDO, V. P.; MENCK-SOARES, M. A.; PINTO, F. G. S.; SIMÃO R. C. G.; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; YATES, M. G.; SOUZA, E. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
FÁBIO O. PEDROSA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ROSE ADELE MONTEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ROSELI WASSEM, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; LEONARDO M. CRUZ, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; RICARDO A. AYUB, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE PONTA GROSSA; NELSON B. COLAUTO, UNIVERSIDADE PARANAENSE; MARIA APARECIDA FERNANDEZ, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; MARIA HELENA P. FUNGARO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; EDMUNDO C. GRISARD, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; MARIANGELA HUNGRIA DA CUNHA, CNPSO; HUMBERTO M. F. MADEIRA, PONTIFÍCA UNIVERSIDADE DO PARANÁ; RUBENS O. NODARI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; CLARICE A. OSAKU, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; MARIA LUIZA PETZLERLER, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; HERNÁN TERENZI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; LUIZ G. E. VIEIRA, INSTITUTO AGRONÔMICO DO PARANÁ; MARIA BERENICE R. STEFFENS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; VINICIUS A. WEISS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; LUIZ F. P. PEREIRA, INSTITUTO AGRONÔMICO DO PARANÁ; MARINA I. M. ALMEIDA, UNIVERSIDADE DO PARANÁ; LYSANGELA R. A., UNIVERSIDADE DO PARANÁ; ANELIS MARIN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; LUIZA MARIA ARAUJO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; EDUARDO BALSANELLI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; VALTER A. BAURA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; LEDA S. CHUBATSU, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; HELISSON FAORO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; AUGUSTO FAVETTI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; GERALDO FRIEDERMANN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; CHIRLEI GLIENKE, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; SUSAN KARP, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; VANESSA KAVA-CORDEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ROBERTO T. RAITTZ, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; HUMBERTO J. O. RAMOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ENILZE MARIA S. F. RIBEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; LIU UN RIGO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; SAUL N. ROCHA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; STEFAN SCHWAB, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ANILDA G. SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ELIEL M. SOUZA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; MICHELLE Z. TANDRA-SFEIR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; RODRIGO A. TORRES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; AUDREI N. G. DABUL, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE PONTA GROSSA; MARIA ALBERTINA M. SOARES, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE PONTA GROSSA; LUCIANO S. GASQUES, UNIVERSIDADE PARANAENSE; CIELA C. T. GIMENES, UNIVERSIDADE PARANAENSE; JULIANA S. VALLE, UNIVERSIDADE PARANAENSE; RICARDO R. CIFERRI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; LUIZ C. CORREA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; NORMA K. MURACE, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; JOÃO A. PAMPHILE, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; ELIANA VALÉRIA PATUSSI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; ALBERTO J. PRIOLI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; SONIA MARIA A. PRIOLI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; CARMEM LÚCIA M. S. C. ROCHA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; OLÍVIA MÁRCIA N. ARANTES, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; MÁRCIA CRISTINA FULANETO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; LEANDRO P. GODOY, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; CARLOS E. C. OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; DANIELE SATORI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; LAURIVAL A. VILAS-BOAS, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; MARIA ANGÉLICA E. WATANABE, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; BIBIANA PAULA DAMBROS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; MIGUEL P. GUERRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; SANDRA MARISA MATHIONI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; KARINE LOUISE SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; MARIO STEINDEL, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; JAVIER VERNAL, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; LIGIA MARIA DE OLIVEIRA CHUEIRE, CNPSO; FERNANDO G. BARCELLOS, EMBRAPA SOJA; RUBENS J. CAMPO, EMBRAPA SOJA; MARISA FABIANA NICOLÁS, EMBRAPA SOJA; LILIAN PEREIRA-FERRARI, PONTIFÍCA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO PARANÁ; JOEL L. SA CONCEIÇÃO SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; NERIDA M. R. GIOPPO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; VLADIMIR P. MARGARIDO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; MARIA AMÉLIA MENCK-SOARES, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; FABIANA GISELE S. PINTO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; RITA DE CÁSSIA G. SIMÃO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO OESTE DO PARANÁ; ELIZABETE K. TAKAHASHI, INSTITUTO AGRONÔMICO DO PARANÁ; MARSHALL G. YATES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; EMANUEL M. SOUZA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ. |
|
Título: |
Genome of herbaspirillum seropedicae strain SmR1, a specialized diazotrophic endophyte of tropical grasses. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
PLoS Genetics, v. 7, n. 5, p. 1-10, may 2011. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The molecular mechanisms of plant recognition, colonization, and nutrient exchange between diazotrophic endophytes and plants are scarcely known. Herbaspirillum seropedicae is an endophytic bacterium capable of colonizing intercellular spaces of grasses such as rice and sugar cane. The genome of H. seropedicae strain SmR1 was sequenced and annotated by The Paraná State Genome Programme?GENOPAR. The genome is composed of a circular chromosome of 5,513,887 bp and contains a total of 4,804 genes. The genome sequence revealed that H. seropedicae is a highly versatile microorganism with capacity to metabolize a wide range of carbon and nitrogen sources and with possession of four distinct terminal oxidases. The genome contains a multitude of protein secretion systems, including type I, type II, type III, type V, and type VI secretion systems, and type IV pili, suggesting a high potential to interact with host plants. H. seropedicae is able to synthesize indole acetic acid as reflected by the four IAA biosynthetic pathways present. A gene coding for ACC deaminase, which may be involved in modulating the associated plant ethylene-signaling pathway, is also present. Genes for hemagglutinins/hemolysins/adhesins were found and may play a role in plant cell surface adhesion. These features may endow H. seropedicae with the ability to establish an endophytic life-style in a large number of plant species. |
|
Thesagro: |
Genoma. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04342naa a2201105 a 4500
001 1902646
005 2015-03-03
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPEDROSA, F. O.
245 $aGenome of herbaspirillum seropedicae strain SmR1, a specialized diazotrophic endophyte of tropical grasses.
260 $c2011
520 $aThe molecular mechanisms of plant recognition, colonization, and nutrient exchange between diazotrophic endophytes and plants are scarcely known. Herbaspirillum seropedicae is an endophytic bacterium capable of colonizing intercellular spaces of grasses such as rice and sugar cane. The genome of H. seropedicae strain SmR1 was sequenced and annotated by The Paraná State Genome Programme?GENOPAR. The genome is composed of a circular chromosome of 5,513,887 bp and contains a total of 4,804 genes. The genome sequence revealed that H. seropedicae is a highly versatile microorganism with capacity to metabolize a wide range of carbon and nitrogen sources and with possession of four distinct terminal oxidases. The genome contains a multitude of protein secretion systems, including type I, type II, type III, type V, and type VI secretion systems, and type IV pili, suggesting a high potential to interact with host plants. H. seropedicae is able to synthesize indole acetic acid as reflected by the four IAA biosynthetic pathways present. A gene coding for ACC deaminase, which may be involved in modulating the associated plant ethylene-signaling pathway, is also present. Genes for hemagglutinins/hemolysins/adhesins were found and may play a role in plant cell surface adhesion. These features may endow H. seropedicae with the ability to establish an endophytic life-style in a large number of plant species.
650 $aGenoma
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, R. A.
700 1 $aWASSEM, R.
700 1 $aCRUZ, L. M.
700 1 $aAYUB, R. A.
700 1 $aCOLAUTO, N. B.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, M. A.
700 1 $aFUNGARO, M. H. P
700 1 $aGRISARD, E. C.
700 1 $aCUNHA, M. H. da
700 1 $aMADEIRA, H. M. F.
700 1 $aNODARI, R. O.
700 1 $aOSAKU, C. A.
700 1 $aPETZLERLER, M. L.
700 1 $aTERENZI, H.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, L G. E.
700 1 $aSTEFFENS, M. B. R.
700 1 $aWEISS, V. A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, L. F. P.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, M. I. M.
700 1 $aALVEZ, L. R.
700 1 $aMARIN, A.
700 1 $aARAUJO, L. M.
700 1 $aBALSANELLI, E.
700 1 $aBAURA, V. A.
700 1 $aCHUBATSU, L. S.
700 1 $aFAORO, H.
700 1 $aFAVETTI, A.
700 1 $aFRIEDERMANN, G.
700 1 $aGLIENKE, C.
700 1 $aKARP, S.
700 1 $aKAVA-CORDEIRO, V.
700 1 $aRAITTZ R, T.
700 1 $aRAMOS, H. J. O.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO, E. M. S. F.
700 1 $aRIGO, L. U.
700 1 $aROCHA, S. N.
700 1 $aSCHWAB, S.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. G.
700 1 $aSOUZA, E. M.
700 1 $aTANDRA-SFEIR, M. Z.
700 1 $aTORRES, R. A.
700 1 $aDABUL, A. N. G.
700 1 $aSOARES, M. A. M.
700 1 $aGASQUES, L. S.
700 1 $aGIMENES, C. C. T.
700 1 $aVALLE, J. S.
700 1 $aCIFERRI, R. R.
700 1 $aCORREA, L. C.
700 1 $aMURACE, N. K.
700 1 $aPAMPHILE, J. A.
700 1 $aPATUSSI, E. V.
700 1 $aPRIOLI, A. J.
700 1 $aPRIOLI, S. M. A.
700 1 $aROCHA, C. L. M. S. C.
700 1 $aARANTES, O. M. N.
700 1 $aFURLANETO, M. C.
700 1 $aGODOY, L. P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, C. E. C.
700 1 $aSATORI, D.
700 1 $aVILAS-BOAS, L. A.
700 1 $aWARANABE, M. A. E.
700 1 $aDAMBROS, B. P.
700 1 $aGUERRA, M. P.
700 1 $aMATHIONI, S. M.
700 1 $aSANTOS, K. L.
700 1 $aSTEINDEL, M.
700 1 $aVERNAL, J.
700 1 $aCHUEIRE, L. M. de O.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, F. G.
700 1 $aCAMPO, R. J.
700 1 $aNICOLÁS, M. F.
700 1 $aPEREIRA-FERRARI, L.
700 1 $aSILVA, J. L. C.
700 1 $aGIOPPO, N. M. R.
700 1 $aMARGARIDO, V. P.
700 1 $aMENCK-SOARES, M. A.
700 1 $aPINTO, F. G. S.
700 1 $aSIMÃO R. C. G.
700 1 $aTAKAHASHI, E. K.
700 1 $aYATES, M. G.
700 1 $aSOUZA, E. M.
773 $tPLoS Genetics$gv. 7, n. 5, p. 1-10, may 2011.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
