| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/02/1996 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/07/2007 |
|
Autoria: |
ROSA NETO, C. |
|
Título: |
Marketing e inovacao tecnologica: um estudo de caso em uma instituicao de pesquisa agropecuaria. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1995 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Belo Horizonte, 1995. |
|
Páginas: |
197 f. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Faz abordagem do processo de inovacao tecnologica de uma instituicao de pesquisa agropecuaria, verificando em que nivel esta utiliza os conceitos de marketing na elaboracao e desenvolvimento de suas pesquisas, bem como o grau de interacao existentes entre as fases de geracao, difusao e adocao das tecnologias geradas. A revisao de literatura mostra a importancia do processo de inovacao tecnologica para o desenvolvimento de um pais, do marketing como instrumento util para que uma organizacao possa realizar trocas com o mercado e deste como sendo o local onde estas trocas deverao se dar. Ressalta tembem, aspectos relacionados a difusao e adocao de tecnologias, tracando perfil da empresa estudada, Centro de Pesquisa Agroflorestal de Rondonia, da EMBRAPA. Foram utilizadas duas tecnologias adaptadas pelo referido Centro. Os dados foram coletados atraves de entrevista semi-estudadas realizadas com os pesquisadores que desenvolveram as tecnologias estudadas, difusores de tecnologias que participaram do processo de divulgacao destas e de entrevista com produtores da regioes para as quais as tecnologias foram recomendadas. Resultados indicaram que a empresa nao utiliza de maneira adequada as tecnicas preconizadas pelo marketing no seu processo de inovacao tecnologica. Verificou-se que esse processo ocorre de maneira inadequada das demandas do mercado por novas tecnologias e que nao ha uma identificacao clara da empresa com os produtores. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Adocao; Agricultural development; Agropecuária; Brasil; Desenvolvimento; Instituicao; Rondonia; Technology innovation. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Inovação; Pesquisa; Tecnologia. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
agricultural research; marketing. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02204nam a2200289 a 4500
001 1697589
005 2007-07-16
008 1995 bl uuuu m 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aROSA NETO, C.
245 $aMarketing e inovacao tecnologica$bum estudo de caso em uma instituicao de pesquisa agropecuaria.
260 $aBelo Horizonte$c1995
300 $a197 f.
520 $aFaz abordagem do processo de inovacao tecnologica de uma instituicao de pesquisa agropecuaria, verificando em que nivel esta utiliza os conceitos de marketing na elaboracao e desenvolvimento de suas pesquisas, bem como o grau de interacao existentes entre as fases de geracao, difusao e adocao das tecnologias geradas. A revisao de literatura mostra a importancia do processo de inovacao tecnologica para o desenvolvimento de um pais, do marketing como instrumento util para que uma organizacao possa realizar trocas com o mercado e deste como sendo o local onde estas trocas deverao se dar. Ressalta tembem, aspectos relacionados a difusao e adocao de tecnologias, tracando perfil da empresa estudada, Centro de Pesquisa Agroflorestal de Rondonia, da EMBRAPA. Foram utilizadas duas tecnologias adaptadas pelo referido Centro. Os dados foram coletados atraves de entrevista semi-estudadas realizadas com os pesquisadores que desenvolveram as tecnologias estudadas, difusores de tecnologias que participaram do processo de divulgacao destas e de entrevista com produtores da regioes para as quais as tecnologias foram recomendadas. Resultados indicaram que a empresa nao utiliza de maneira adequada as tecnicas preconizadas pelo marketing no seu processo de inovacao tecnologica. Verificou-se que esse processo ocorre de maneira inadequada das demandas do mercado por novas tecnologias e que nao ha uma identificacao clara da empresa com os produtores.
650 $aagricultural research
650 $amarketing
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aInovação
650 $aPesquisa
650 $aTecnologia
653 $aAdocao
653 $aAgricultural development
653 $aAgropecuária
653 $aBrasil
653 $aDesenvolvimento
653 $aInstituicao
653 $aRondonia
653 $aTechnology innovation
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Rondônia (CPAF-RO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/09/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/09/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
BAROIS, I.; VELASQUEZ, E.; LAVELLE, P.; NEGRETE-YANKELEVICH, S; GARCÍA, J. A.; SANTOS, M.; ÁLVAREZ-SÁNCHEZ, J.; CASTILLO-CAMPOS, G.; CRAM, S.; FRAGOSO, C; FRANCO-NAVARRO, F.; MARTÍNEZ-ROMERO, E.; MEZA, E.; MORÓN, M. A.; RODRÍGUEZ, P.; ROJAS, P.; SOSA, V.; TREJO, D.; VARELA, L.; BUENO-VILLEGAS, J.; GÓMEZ, J. A.; SORMANI, C. |
|
Título: |
Soil quality parameters that determine the below ground biodiversity in Los Tuxtlas Veracruz Mexico. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In the frame of the project ?Conservation and sustainable management of below ground
biodiversity (GEF/UNEP-CIAT/TSBF)? soil organisms inventories were done in the biosphere
reserve of Los Tuxtlas around Santa Martha volcano. 3 Sites (LM, SF and VC) and 4 land use
(forest (S), fallow (A), pasture (P) and maize (M) were sampled, in 89 points . The sampled
organisms were the biological nitrogen fixators, the mychorrizal fungi, the nematodes, the
macrofauna (earthworms, ants, termites, beetles, millipedes, centipedes?). In each point the
samples for the microorganisms and nematodes came from a composite soil sample made of
12 cores of 5 cm diameter and 20 cm height. The macrofauna was sampled with monoliths
(25x25x30cm), Winkler bags and Pitfall traps. Some chemical parameters (pH, Na, K, Mg. Ca
and P Bray), physical (% H,EC, clay, lime, sand, ad, rd, slope) and organic parameters ( C, N,
NH4, NO3, litter and deshydrogenase and B-glucosidase activity) were measured in each points
from the composed sample.
In order to synthesized the results and to evaluate which parameters of the soil determine the
diversity of organisms the general indicator of soil quality (GISQ) was build after 4 subindicators
that evaluates the physical, chemical, organic matter and the macrofauna data. The construction
of the GISQ was made with PCA of each of the 4 sets of variables and a cluster analysis. Also
identification of species indicators (Ind Val) and coinertia analysis was carried out.
The PCA of the 4 set of variables showed significant separation among sites and among land
uses. LM site had the best soil quality, followed by SF and VC. In the land use system S showed
the best soil quality and M the lowest, although in some group of variables P and A uses presented
a quality near to S.
The highest GISQ (1.00-0.85) were from LM but in different land uses (S, A and P); the lowest
(0.49-0.21) were in VC in maize and pasture and in SF in maize. The cluster analysis did
discriminate 8 groups of the sampling points having a similar GISQ.
The Ind Val analysis extracted some species indicators many from the ants and the nematodes
and few from the earthworms, termites and mycorrhizal fungi.
The co-inertia analysis between soil quality indicators and species richness displayed that
some diplopodes and coleoptera and native earthworms required a high soil quality soil. Other
coleoptera, ants and exotic earthworms required a less rich soil although with a high quality in
organic matter. Finally ,the microorganisms (Rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi), Nematodes and
Chilopoda, were more represented in poor quality soils MenosIn the frame of the project ?Conservation and sustainable management of below ground
biodiversity (GEF/UNEP-CIAT/TSBF)? soil organisms inventories were done in the biosphere
reserve of Los Tuxtlas around Santa Martha volcano. 3 Sites (LM, SF and VC) and 4 land use
(forest (S), fallow (A), pasture (P) and maize (M) were sampled, in 89 points . The sampled
organisms were the biological nitrogen fixators, the mychorrizal fungi, the nematodes, the
macrofauna (earthworms, ants, termites, beetles, millipedes, centipedes?). In each point the
samples for the microorganisms and nematodes came from a composite soil sample made of
12 cores of 5 cm diameter and 20 cm height. The macrofauna was sampled with monoliths
(25x25x30cm), Winkler bags and Pitfall traps. Some chemical parameters (pH, Na, K, Mg. Ca
and P Bray), physical (% H,EC, clay, lime, sand, ad, rd, slope) and organic parameters ( C, N,
NH4, NO3, litter and deshydrogenase and B-glucosidase activity) were measured in each points
from the composed sample.
In order to synthesized the results and to evaluate which parameters of the soil determine the
diversity of organisms the general indicator of soil quality (GISQ) was build after 4 subindicators
that evaluates the physical, chemical, organic matter and the macrofauna data. The construction
of the GISQ was made with PCA of each of the 4 sets of variables and a cluster analysis. Also
identification of species indicators (Ind Val) and coinertia analysis was carried out.
The PCA o... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03903naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1314804
005 2008-09-15
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBAROIS, I.
245 $aSoil quality parameters that determine the below ground biodiversity in Los Tuxtlas Veracruz Mexico.
260 $c2008
520 $aIn the frame of the project ?Conservation and sustainable management of below ground biodiversity (GEF/UNEP-CIAT/TSBF)? soil organisms inventories were done in the biosphere reserve of Los Tuxtlas around Santa Martha volcano. 3 Sites (LM, SF and VC) and 4 land use (forest (S), fallow (A), pasture (P) and maize (M) were sampled, in 89 points . The sampled organisms were the biological nitrogen fixators, the mychorrizal fungi, the nematodes, the macrofauna (earthworms, ants, termites, beetles, millipedes, centipedes?). In each point the samples for the microorganisms and nematodes came from a composite soil sample made of 12 cores of 5 cm diameter and 20 cm height. The macrofauna was sampled with monoliths (25x25x30cm), Winkler bags and Pitfall traps. Some chemical parameters (pH, Na, K, Mg. Ca and P Bray), physical (% H,EC, clay, lime, sand, ad, rd, slope) and organic parameters ( C, N, NH4, NO3, litter and deshydrogenase and B-glucosidase activity) were measured in each points from the composed sample. In order to synthesized the results and to evaluate which parameters of the soil determine the diversity of organisms the general indicator of soil quality (GISQ) was build after 4 subindicators that evaluates the physical, chemical, organic matter and the macrofauna data. The construction of the GISQ was made with PCA of each of the 4 sets of variables and a cluster analysis. Also identification of species indicators (Ind Val) and coinertia analysis was carried out. The PCA of the 4 set of variables showed significant separation among sites and among land uses. LM site had the best soil quality, followed by SF and VC. In the land use system S showed the best soil quality and M the lowest, although in some group of variables P and A uses presented a quality near to S. The highest GISQ (1.00-0.85) were from LM but in different land uses (S, A and P); the lowest (0.49-0.21) were in VC in maize and pasture and in SF in maize. The cluster analysis did discriminate 8 groups of the sampling points having a similar GISQ. The Ind Val analysis extracted some species indicators many from the ants and the nematodes and few from the earthworms, termites and mycorrhizal fungi. The co-inertia analysis between soil quality indicators and species richness displayed that some diplopodes and coleoptera and native earthworms required a high soil quality soil. Other coleoptera, ants and exotic earthworms required a less rich soil although with a high quality in organic matter. Finally ,the microorganisms (Rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi), Nematodes and Chilopoda, were more represented in poor quality soils
700 1 $aVELASQUEZ, E.
700 1 $aLAVELLE, P.
700 1 $aNEGRETE-YANKELEVICH, S
700 1 $aGARCÍA, J. A.
700 1 $aSANTOS, M.
700 1 $aÁLVAREZ-SÁNCHEZ, J.
700 1 $aCASTILLO-CAMPOS, G.
700 1 $aCRAM, S.
700 1 $aFRAGOSO, C
700 1 $aFRANCO-NAVARRO, F.
700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ-ROMERO, E.
700 1 $aMEZA, E.
700 1 $aMORÓN, M. A.
700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, P.
700 1 $aROJAS, P.
700 1 $aSOSA, V.
700 1 $aTREJO, D.
700 1 $aVARELA, L.
700 1 $aBUENO-VILLEGAS, J.
700 1 $aGÓMEZ, J. A.
700 1 $aSORMANI, C.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
