| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/07/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/01/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
RAMOS, N.; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; TOMM, G. O.; FERREIRA, P. E. P.; VIEIRA, H. B.; FONTES, L. P.; RODRIGUES, I. A.; RODRIGUES, G. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
NILZA PATRICIA RAMOS, CNPMA; CLAUDIO CESAR DE A BUSCHINELLI, CNPMA; GILBERTO OMAR TOMM, CNPT; PAULO ERNANI PERES FERREIRA, CNPT; HENRIQUE BARROS VIEIRA, CNPMA; CNPMA; CNPMA; GERALDO STACHETTI RODRIGUES, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Assessment of social and environmental impacts of canola on the biodiesel production chain in Southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL RAPESEED CONGRESS, 13., 2011, Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract book... Prague: International Consultative Research Group on Rapeseed, 2011. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Oral presentations, p. 92. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This research aimed to assess the social and environmental impacts of canola on the biodiesel production chain, as well as to analyze sustainability indicators in a reference term were canola is produced in the Passo Fundo region, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methodology included extensive literature review and application of two impact assessment tools: a) an Eco·certification system for rural activities (Eco·certRural) with 24 criteria for evaluating production chain impacts, based on the input of 15 experts knowledgeable on the diverse segments of the biodiesel chain in the region of the study, and b) a System for weighted environmental impact assessment of rural activities (APOIA-NovoRural) with 62 indicators based on detailed interview and field analyses with a canola- producing farmer. The assessment led to the conclusion that in the Passo Fundo region the biodiesel production chain based on canola brings mostly positive impacts on the environment and for the livelihood of people involved in its production. Since it increases the use of farming inputs and off-farm resources, the aspects related to input and resources demands were less favorable. Canola production brought important contributions for the sustainability of the reference farm, with a general index of 0.77 (in a 0 to 1.0 utility scale). |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil. |
|
Thesagro: |
Colza. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
biodiesel. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/36988/1/Assessment....pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02143nam a2200241 a 4500
001 1895035
005 2017-01-26
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aRAMOS, N.
245 $aAssessment of social and environmental impacts of canola on the biodiesel production chain in Southern Brazil.
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL RAPESEED CONGRESS, 13., 2011, Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract book... Prague: International Consultative Research Group on Rapeseed$c2011
500 $aOral presentations, p. 92.
520 $aThis research aimed to assess the social and environmental impacts of canola on the biodiesel production chain, as well as to analyze sustainability indicators in a reference term were canola is produced in the Passo Fundo region, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methodology included extensive literature review and application of two impact assessment tools: a) an Eco·certification system for rural activities (Eco·certRural) with 24 criteria for evaluating production chain impacts, based on the input of 15 experts knowledgeable on the diverse segments of the biodiesel chain in the region of the study, and b) a System for weighted environmental impact assessment of rural activities (APOIA-NovoRural) with 62 indicators based on detailed interview and field analyses with a canola- producing farmer. The assessment led to the conclusion that in the Passo Fundo region the biodiesel production chain based on canola brings mostly positive impacts on the environment and for the livelihood of people involved in its production. Since it increases the use of farming inputs and off-farm resources, the aspects related to input and resources demands were less favorable. Canola production brought important contributions for the sustainability of the reference farm, with a general index of 0.77 (in a 0 to 1.0 utility scale).
650 $abiodiesel
650 $aColza
653 $aBrasil
700 1 $aBUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.
700 1 $aTOMM, G. O.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, P. E. P.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, H. B.
700 1 $aFONTES, L. P.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, I. A.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, G. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/05/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/05/2018 |
|
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, L. C. L.; FERNANDES, H. J.; SILVA, A. G.; FERNANDES, C. E.; DUTRA, I. S.; PUPIN, R. C.; LEMOS, R. A. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
Luiz C. L. Ferreira, Veterinary practicioner; Henrique J. Fernandes, Programa de Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana; Aline G. Silva, Departamento de Zootecnia/Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Carlos E. Fernandes, Departamento de Zootecnia/Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Iveraldo S. Dutra, Departamento de Zootecnia/Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Rayane C. Pupin, Departamento de Zootecnia/Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Ricardo A. A. Lemos, Departamento de Zootecnia/Universidade Federal de Viçosa. |
|
Título: |
Impact of vaccination on the reproductive performance of multiparous Nellore cows. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 38, n. 3, p. 456-461, março 2018 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Impacto da vacinação sobre o desempenho reprodutivo de vacas Nelore multíparas. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of two vaccines on the reproductive performance of multiparous beef cows in Mato Grosso do Sul, Midwest Brazil. In Experiment 1,765 calved multiparous Nellore cows were subjected to the same fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocol and rebred. Ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis was performed 30 and 90 days post-FTAI (DPI). Rates of pregnancy and pregnancy loss were determined for three periods: from 30 to 90 DPI, from 30 DPI to calving, and from 90 DPI to calving. The cows were assigned to three groups with different vaccination protocols - namely, Group VACMULT (n=250): vaccine against bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV?1), bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and leptospirosis; Group VACL (n=245): vaccine against leptospirosis alone; Group NOVAC (n=270): no vaccination. Serum antibody titers for BoHV?1, BVDV, and leptospirosis, measured in 57 cows from each group indicated active infection, suggesting circulation of these pathogens in the herd. No differences in pregnancy rates were observed across groups. Pregnancy loss rates did not differ significantly across groups within any of the periods investigated (30 to 90 DPI, 30 DPI to calving, or 90 DPI to calving). In Experiment 2, two vaccination protocols for each vaccine were investigated. Group VACGEST was vaccinated on day zero of FTAI (D0) and again 30 days post-FTAI (30 DPI). Group VACPREV was vaccinated on D0 and again on the day of insemination (D11). No significant difference was observed between groups, or significant gestational loss in the group that received the second vaccine on the day of insemination. The results revealed that neither vaccine interfered with the reproductive performance of multiparous cows. No differences were observed between vaccination carried out on both D0 and D11 and that performed on both D0 and D30. The performance of the IBR/BVDV/Leptospirosis vaccine on the day of the artificial insemination did not cause adverse effects on the reproductive parameters. MenosTwo experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of two vaccines on the reproductive performance of multiparous beef cows in Mato Grosso do Sul, Midwest Brazil. In Experiment 1,765 calved multiparous Nellore cows were subjected to the same fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocol and rebred. Ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis was performed 30 and 90 days post-FTAI (DPI). Rates of pregnancy and pregnancy loss were determined for three periods: from 30 to 90 DPI, from 30 DPI to calving, and from 90 DPI to calving. The cows were assigned to three groups with different vaccination protocols - namely, Group VACMULT (n=250): vaccine against bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV?1), bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and leptospirosis; Group VACL (n=245): vaccine against leptospirosis alone; Group NOVAC (n=270): no vaccination. Serum antibody titers for BoHV?1, BVDV, and leptospirosis, measured in 57 cows from each group indicated active infection, suggesting circulation of these pathogens in the herd. No differences in pregnancy rates were observed across groups. Pregnancy loss rates did not differ significantly across groups within any of the periods investigated (30 to 90 DPI, 30 DPI to calving, or 90 DPI to calving). In Experiment 2, two vaccination protocols for each vaccine were investigated. Group VACGEST was vaccinated on day zero of FTAI (D0) and again 30 days post-FTAI (30 DPI). Group VACPREV was vaccinated on D0 and again on the day of insemination (D11). No significant... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Doença reprodutiva; Nellore cows; Reproductive diseases; Vaca Nelore multípara. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Reprodução; Vacinação. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cattle; Reproduction; Vaccination. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/177583/1/Impact-of-vaccination-on-the-reproductive-performance.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03059naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2091891
005 2018-05-23
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFERREIRA, L. C. L.
245 $aImpact of vaccination on the reproductive performance of multiparous Nellore cows.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aTítulo em português: Impacto da vacinação sobre o desempenho reprodutivo de vacas Nelore multíparas.
520 $aTwo experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of two vaccines on the reproductive performance of multiparous beef cows in Mato Grosso do Sul, Midwest Brazil. In Experiment 1,765 calved multiparous Nellore cows were subjected to the same fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocol and rebred. Ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis was performed 30 and 90 days post-FTAI (DPI). Rates of pregnancy and pregnancy loss were determined for three periods: from 30 to 90 DPI, from 30 DPI to calving, and from 90 DPI to calving. The cows were assigned to three groups with different vaccination protocols - namely, Group VACMULT (n=250): vaccine against bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV?1), bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and leptospirosis; Group VACL (n=245): vaccine against leptospirosis alone; Group NOVAC (n=270): no vaccination. Serum antibody titers for BoHV?1, BVDV, and leptospirosis, measured in 57 cows from each group indicated active infection, suggesting circulation of these pathogens in the herd. No differences in pregnancy rates were observed across groups. Pregnancy loss rates did not differ significantly across groups within any of the periods investigated (30 to 90 DPI, 30 DPI to calving, or 90 DPI to calving). In Experiment 2, two vaccination protocols for each vaccine were investigated. Group VACGEST was vaccinated on day zero of FTAI (D0) and again 30 days post-FTAI (30 DPI). Group VACPREV was vaccinated on D0 and again on the day of insemination (D11). No significant difference was observed between groups, or significant gestational loss in the group that received the second vaccine on the day of insemination. The results revealed that neither vaccine interfered with the reproductive performance of multiparous cows. No differences were observed between vaccination carried out on both D0 and D11 and that performed on both D0 and D30. The performance of the IBR/BVDV/Leptospirosis vaccine on the day of the artificial insemination did not cause adverse effects on the reproductive parameters.
650 $aCattle
650 $aReproduction
650 $aVaccination
650 $aBovino
650 $aReprodução
650 $aVacinação
653 $aDoença reprodutiva
653 $aNellore cows
653 $aReproductive diseases
653 $aVaca Nelore multípara
700 1 $aFERNANDES, H. J.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. G.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, C. E.
700 1 $aDUTRA, I. S.
700 1 $aPUPIN, R. C.
700 1 $aLEMOS, R. A. A.
773 $tPesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro$gv. 38, n. 3, p. 456-461, março 2018
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
