| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/12/2007 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/08/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso / Nota Técnica |
|
Autoria: |
SERAFIM, M. E.; ONO, F. B.; NOVELINO, J. O.; CREMON, C.; RANGEL, M. A. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
M. E. Serafim, UNEMAT; F. B. Ono, UFGD; J. O. Novelino, UFGD; C. Cremon, UNEMAT; Marcos Antônio Sedrez Rangel, CNPMF. |
|
Título: |
Influência da adubação potássica e umidade do solo na produção da soja. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 29., 2007, Campo Grande, MS. Resumos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2007. p. 165-167. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 287). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O potássio (K) é o segundo elemento mais absorvido pelas plantas e sua reserva mineral, nos solos da região dos Cerrados, é muito pequena, insuficiente para suprir as quantidades extraídas pelas culturas por cultivos sucessivos e, portatnto, sua reposição ao solo deve ser feita com a adubação (Sousa et al., 2004). O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar o efeito de doses crescentes de K em diferentes condições de umidade no solo sobre as características agronômicas da soja, em casa-de-vegetação. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Nutrientes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Solo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/654153/1/Influencia-da-adubacao-potassica-e-umidade-do-solo-na-producao-da-soja.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01167nam a2200181 a 4500
001 1654153
005 2023-08-10
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSERAFIM, M. E.
245 $aInfluência da adubação potássica e umidade do solo na produção da soja.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 29., 2007, Campo Grande, MS. Resumos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2007. p. 165-167. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 287).$c2007
520 $aO potássio (K) é o segundo elemento mais absorvido pelas plantas e sua reserva mineral, nos solos da região dos Cerrados, é muito pequena, insuficiente para suprir as quantidades extraídas pelas culturas por cultivos sucessivos e, portatnto, sua reposição ao solo deve ser feita com a adubação (Sousa et al., 2004). O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar o efeito de doses crescentes de K em diferentes condições de umidade no solo sobre as características agronômicas da soja, em casa-de-vegetação.
650 $aSolo
653 $aNutrientes
700 1 $aONO, F. B.
700 1 $aNOVELINO, J. O.
700 1 $aCREMON, C.
700 1 $aRANGEL, M. A. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/11/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SORDI, A.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. A.; PIVA, J. T.; ZANATTA, J. A.; TOMAZI, M.; ROSA, C. M. da; MORAES, A. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANDRÉ SORDI, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; Jeferson Dieckow, UFPR; Cimélio Bayer, UFRGS; MÁRCIO AMARAL ALBUQUERQUE, Programa de pós-graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; JONATAS THIAGO PIVA, UFSC; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; Michely Tomazi, UFRGS; CARLA MACHADO DA ROSA, UFRGS; Anibal de Moraes, UFPR. |
|
Título: |
Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 94-103, 2014. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
tCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil. MenostCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or d... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fator de emissão; Óxido nitroso; Volume de urina. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado; Nitrato; Pastagem. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03383naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1999594
005 2014-11-10
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSORDI, A.
245 $aNitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $atCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil.
650 $aGado
650 $aNitrato
650 $aPastagem
653 $aFator de emissão
653 $aÓxido nitroso
653 $aVolume de urina
700 1 $aDIECKOW, J.
700 1 $aBAYER, C.
700 1 $aALBUQUERQUE, M. A.
700 1 $aPIVA, J. T.
700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A.
700 1 $aTOMAZI, M.
700 1 $aROSA, C. M. da
700 1 $aMORAES, A. de
773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment$gv. 190, p. 94-103, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
