| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/09/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/09/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
BISPO, A.; CREAMER, R.; DOMBOS, M.; FUCHS, M.; GRAEFE, U.; SOUSA, J. P.; PERES, G.; ROMBKE, J.; RUTGERS, M.; WINDING, A. |
|
Título: |
Monitoring the decline of soil biodiversity in European soils. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The soil biota have important fundamental roles in soil processes and contribute both directly
and indirectly to many important ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling, soil structure,
decomposition of organic matter. It is essential to understand the importance of species
diversity in soil and their impact upon soil quality and function. The EU project ENVASSO
(Environmental Assessment of Soil for Monitoring) addressed the 8 threats to soil identified
by the Commission (CEC, 2002). The aim of the project was to design and test a single,
integrated and operational set of EU-wide criteria and indicators that will provide a basis for
a harmonised comprehensive soil and land information system for monitoring in Europe. To
identify suitable indicators for monitoring the decline in soil biodiversity, indicators were
selected both from a literature review and an inventory of national monitoring EU programmes.
Within this project decline in soil biodiversity was defined as the reduction of forms of life
living in soils (both in terms of quantity and variety) and of related functions, causing a
deterioration or loss of one or more soil functions. Whereas the literature review allows the
identification of about 100 possible indicators the inventory of existing monitoring networks
shows that few indicators are really measured. For monitoring application it was considered
that only 3 key indicators per soil stress were practical, however this was considered a
difficult task for indicating biodiversity decline due to the complexity of soil biota and multifunctionality
in soils. Therefore stringent criteria were applied to the selection process to
evaluate: 1) methodology standardisation, 2) complementarity to other indicators, and 3)
interpretation at both scientific and policy levels. The key indicators selected were chosen
as representative of 3 functional levels in soil: a) abundance, biomass and species diversity
of Earthworms ? macrofauna, b) abundance and species diversity of Collembola ? mesofauna
and c) microbial respiration. Procedures and protocols were written based upon current ISO
standards and adapted for assessment at a European scale. Pilot sites were then established
in 4 countries (France, Ireland, Portugal and Hungary) to test the ease of measurement of
the selected indicators and their efficiency to indicate the decline in soil biodiversity. The
effectiveness of each indicator and their sensitivity to detect change across a range of landuse
categories at a European scale will be discussed using data from these sites. MenosThe soil biota have important fundamental roles in soil processes and contribute both directly
and indirectly to many important ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling, soil structure,
decomposition of organic matter. It is essential to understand the importance of species
diversity in soil and their impact upon soil quality and function. The EU project ENVASSO
(Environmental Assessment of Soil for Monitoring) addressed the 8 threats to soil identified
by the Commission (CEC, 2002). The aim of the project was to design and test a single,
integrated and operational set of EU-wide criteria and indicators that will provide a basis for
a harmonised comprehensive soil and land information system for monitoring in Europe. To
identify suitable indicators for monitoring the decline in soil biodiversity, indicators were
selected both from a literature review and an inventory of national monitoring EU programmes.
Within this project decline in soil biodiversity was defined as the reduction of forms of life
living in soils (both in terms of quantity and variety) and of related functions, causing a
deterioration or loss of one or more soil functions. Whereas the literature review allows the
identification of about 100 possible indicators the inventory of existing monitoring networks
shows that few indicators are really measured. For monitoring application it was considered
that only 3 key indicators per soil stress were practical, however this was considered a
difficult task for in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03419naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1314890
005 2008-09-22
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBISPO, A.
245 $aMonitoring the decline of soil biodiversity in European soils.
260 $c2008
520 $aThe soil biota have important fundamental roles in soil processes and contribute both directly and indirectly to many important ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling, soil structure, decomposition of organic matter. It is essential to understand the importance of species diversity in soil and their impact upon soil quality and function. The EU project ENVASSO (Environmental Assessment of Soil for Monitoring) addressed the 8 threats to soil identified by the Commission (CEC, 2002). The aim of the project was to design and test a single, integrated and operational set of EU-wide criteria and indicators that will provide a basis for a harmonised comprehensive soil and land information system for monitoring in Europe. To identify suitable indicators for monitoring the decline in soil biodiversity, indicators were selected both from a literature review and an inventory of national monitoring EU programmes. Within this project decline in soil biodiversity was defined as the reduction of forms of life living in soils (both in terms of quantity and variety) and of related functions, causing a deterioration or loss of one or more soil functions. Whereas the literature review allows the identification of about 100 possible indicators the inventory of existing monitoring networks shows that few indicators are really measured. For monitoring application it was considered that only 3 key indicators per soil stress were practical, however this was considered a difficult task for indicating biodiversity decline due to the complexity of soil biota and multifunctionality in soils. Therefore stringent criteria were applied to the selection process to evaluate: 1) methodology standardisation, 2) complementarity to other indicators, and 3) interpretation at both scientific and policy levels. The key indicators selected were chosen as representative of 3 functional levels in soil: a) abundance, biomass and species diversity of Earthworms ? macrofauna, b) abundance and species diversity of Collembola ? mesofauna and c) microbial respiration. Procedures and protocols were written based upon current ISO standards and adapted for assessment at a European scale. Pilot sites were then established in 4 countries (France, Ireland, Portugal and Hungary) to test the ease of measurement of the selected indicators and their efficiency to indicate the decline in soil biodiversity. The effectiveness of each indicator and their sensitivity to detect change across a range of landuse categories at a European scale will be discussed using data from these sites.
700 1 $aCREAMER, R.
700 1 $aDOMBOS, M.
700 1 $aFUCHS, M.
700 1 $aGRAEFE, U.
700 1 $aSOUSA, J. P.
700 1 $aPERES, G.
700 1 $aROMBKE, J.
700 1 $aRUTGERS, M.
700 1 $aWINDING, A.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/12/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/01/2009 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA, M. C. de; STUCHI, E. S.; GOES, A. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
M. C. de Souza, UNESP; Eduardo Sanches Stuchi, CNPMF/EECB; A. de Goes, UNESP. |
|
Título: |
Resistance research of tangerine hybrids and cultivars to Alternaria alternata. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CITRUS CONGRESS, 11., 2008, Wuhan, China. Program and abstracts... Wuhan: The International Society of Citriculture, 2008. p. 259. P416 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Alternaria brown spot is caused to A. alternata and is one of the most important problems to production in susceptible citrus species. Resistance cultivars are essential for a sustainable mandarin cultivation. The reaction of 22 tangerines and its hybrids to A. alternata were studied in February 2008 in field trees in Bebedouro, São Paulo, Brazil. Initially, 25 fruits measuring 30-40 mm and 100 young leaves (6 to 12 days) by plant, were inoculated by a patogenic isolate in conidial concentration ajusted to 104 conidiamL-1. After inoculation, fruits and leaves were protected in paper bags semi-kraft, previously sprayed to steril water, for 12 hours. Fruits and leaves were evaluated using note scale between 0 (no symptoms) and 3 (several symptoms). Were observed resistance to A. alternata infection in: 4 Clementines: (C. clementina Hort. ex Tan.); 6 Mandarins: 2 (C. reticulata Blanco), 2 (C. tangerina Hort. ex Tan.), 1 (C. deliciosa Tan.) and 1 (C. nobilis Lour); 1 Tangelo: (C. tangerina x C. paradisi Macf.); 2 Mandarins (hybrids): 1 (C. nobilis x C. deliciosa) and 1 (C. clementina x C. reticulata); 1 Tangor (hybrid): (C. clementina Hort. ex Tan. x C. sinensis (L.) Osb.); and 2 Satsumas (hybrids): (C. unshiu Marc. x C. deliciosa Tan.). |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Citros. |
|
Thesagro: |
Doença de Planta; Hibrido. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01851naa a2200181 a 4500
001 1655365
005 2009-01-15
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSOUZA, M. C. de
245 $aResistance research of tangerine hybrids and cultivars to Alternaria alternata.
260 $c2008
520 $aAlternaria brown spot is caused to A. alternata and is one of the most important problems to production in susceptible citrus species. Resistance cultivars are essential for a sustainable mandarin cultivation. The reaction of 22 tangerines and its hybrids to A. alternata were studied in February 2008 in field trees in Bebedouro, São Paulo, Brazil. Initially, 25 fruits measuring 30-40 mm and 100 young leaves (6 to 12 days) by plant, were inoculated by a patogenic isolate in conidial concentration ajusted to 104 conidiamL-1. After inoculation, fruits and leaves were protected in paper bags semi-kraft, previously sprayed to steril water, for 12 hours. Fruits and leaves were evaluated using note scale between 0 (no symptoms) and 3 (several symptoms). Were observed resistance to A. alternata infection in: 4 Clementines: (C. clementina Hort. ex Tan.); 6 Mandarins: 2 (C. reticulata Blanco), 2 (C. tangerina Hort. ex Tan.), 1 (C. deliciosa Tan.) and 1 (C. nobilis Lour); 1 Tangelo: (C. tangerina x C. paradisi Macf.); 2 Mandarins (hybrids): 1 (C. nobilis x C. deliciosa) and 1 (C. clementina x C. reticulata); 1 Tangor (hybrid): (C. clementina Hort. ex Tan. x C. sinensis (L.) Osb.); and 2 Satsumas (hybrids): (C. unshiu Marc. x C. deliciosa Tan.).
650 $aDoença de Planta
650 $aHibrido
653 $aCitros
700 1 $aSTUCHI, E. S.
700 1 $aGOES, A. de
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL CITRUS CONGRESS, 11., 2008, Wuhan, China. Program and abstracts... Wuhan: The International Society of Citriculture, 2008. p. 259. P416
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
