|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
25/08/2009 |
Data da última atualização: |
25/08/2009 |
Autoria: |
COLETTA, L. D.; NARDOTO, G. B.; LATANSIO-AIDAR, S. R.; ROCHA, H. R. da; AIDAR, M. P. M.; OMETTO, J. P. H. B. |
Título: |
Visão isotópica da vegetação e os ciclos do carbono e nitrogênio num ecossistema de cerrado, sudeste do Brasil. |
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 66, n. 4, p. 467-475, jul./ago. 2009. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Savana. |
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Cerrado; Nitrogênio. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00663naa a2200217 a 4500 001 1257204 005 2009-08-25 008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCOLETTA, L. D. 245 $aVisão isotópica da vegetação e os ciclos do carbono e nitrogênio num ecossistema de cerrado, sudeste do Brasil. 260 $c2009 650 $aCarbono 650 $aCerrado 650 $aNitrogênio 653 $aSavana 700 1 $aNARDOTO, G. B. 700 1 $aLATANSIO-AIDAR, S. R. 700 1 $aROCHA, H. R. da 700 1 $aAIDAR, M. P. M. 700 1 $aOMETTO, J. P. H. B. 773 $tScientia Agricola, Piracicaba$gv. 66, n. 4, p. 467-475, jul./ago. 2009.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
Data corrente: |
08/10/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
25/08/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
Autoria: |
HOLLINGSWORTH, R. G.; ARISTIZÁBAL, L. F.; SHRINER, S.; MASCARIN, G. M.; MORAL, R. de A.; ARTHURS, S. P. |
Afiliação: |
ROBERT G HOLLINGSWORTH, USDA-ARS; LUIS F ARISTIZÁBAL, Coffee Growers and Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council; SUZANNE SHRINER, Coffee Growers and Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council; GABRIEL MOURA MASCARIN, CNPMA; RAFAEL DE ALMEIDA MORAL, Maynooth University; STEVEN P ARTHURS, BioBee USA. |
Título: |
Incorporating Beauveria bassiana into an integrated pest management plan for coffee berry borer in Hawaii. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 4, article 22, March 2020. |
Páginas: |
p. 1-10. |
ISSN: |
2571-581X |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Since its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka?u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4?5 vs. 7?11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs; however, additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands. MenosSince its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka?u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4?5 vs. 7?11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged l... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Coffee farms; Mycoinsecticide. |
Thesagro: |
Beauveria Bassiana; Café; Controle Biológico; Fungo Para Controle Biológico; Hypothenemus Hampei; Praga de Planta. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biological control; Biological control agents; Coffea arabica var. arabica; Entomopathogenic fungi; Insect pests. |
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/216488/1/Mascarin-Incorporating-Beauveria-2020.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02968naa a2200373 a 4500 001 2125356 005 2021-08-25 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2571-581X 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022$2DOI 100 1 $aHOLLINGSWORTH, R. G. 245 $aIncorporating Beauveria bassiana into an integrated pest management plan for coffee berry borer in Hawaii.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 300 $ap. 1-10. 520 $aSince its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka?u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4?5 vs. 7?11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs; however, additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands. 650 $aBiological control 650 $aBiological control agents 650 $aCoffea arabica var. arabica 650 $aEntomopathogenic fungi 650 $aInsect pests 650 $aBeauveria Bassiana 650 $aCafé 650 $aControle Biológico 650 $aFungo Para Controle Biológico 650 $aHypothenemus Hampei 650 $aPraga de Planta 653 $aCoffee farms 653 $aMycoinsecticide 700 1 $aARISTIZÁBAL, L. F. 700 1 $aSHRINER, S. 700 1 $aMASCARIN, G. M. 700 1 $aMORAL, R. de A. 700 1 $aARTHURS, S. P. 773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems$gv. 4, article 22, March 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|