| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/10/2003 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/01/2015 |
|
Autoria: |
ARAÚJO, G. G. L. de; HOLANDA JÚNIOR, E. V.; OLIVEIRA, M. C. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Gherman Garcia Leal de Araújo, CPATSA; Evandro Vasconcelos Holanda Junior, CPATSA; Martiniano Cavalcanti de Oliveira, CPATSA. |
|
Título: |
Alternativas atuais e potenciais de alimentação de caprinos e ovinos nos períodos secos no semi-árido brasileiro. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2003 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE CAPRINOS E OVINOS DE CORTE, 2.; SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE AGRONEGÓCIO DA CAPRINOCULTURA LEITEIRA, 1., 2003, João Pessoa. Anais... João Pessoa: EMEPA-PB, 2003. p. 553-564. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O cultivo diversificado de espécies forrageiras, nativas e/ou introduzidas, anuais e/ou perenes, para produção de feno e ou silagem, somadas a outras opções como resíduos agroindustriais e outros ingredientes de potencial regional, utilizados de forma planejada, podem deslocar a eficiência de produção dos sistemas de produção pecuária e em particular da caprino-ovinocultura do semi-árido. As práticas de suplementação alimentar, nos períodos críticos do ano, apresentam sua validade tanto pelo incremento na produtividade do rebanho, como pela menor susceptibilidade deste a determinadas enfermidades próprias da condição de subnutrição. Entretanto, todas essas práticas devem atender às condições sócio-econômicas dos produtores de caprinos e ovinos e as condições agro-ecológicas da região. Assim sendo, um grande desafio para o desenvolvimento da caprino-ovinocultura do semi-árido brasileiro é encontrar alternativas de alimentação, privilegiando o uso de fontes disponíveis regionalmente, para a formulação de dietas de baixo custo, com eficiência biológica, e que considerem as potencialidades dos animais e do ambiente.
Current and Potential Alternatives for Dry Season Feeding of Goat and Sheep in Semi-arid Northeast Brazil.
Abstract - The diversification of native or exotic, annual or perennial cultivated forages, for hay or silage production, in addition to other options, as industrial residues and other ingredients with regional potential, if utilized as a well planned way, may improve the efficiency of the husbandry production systems, mainly the sheep/goats in the Brazilian Semi-Arid region, Northeast Brazil. The supplemental feeding practice during the driest periods of the year is valid due to the increase of heard productivity, or to the decrease in its susceptibility to pathologies that appear as a result of underfeeding conditions of the animals. However, these feeding management practices must fulfill the social and economic conditions of farmers, as well as the agricultural and ecological conditions of the region. Therefore, the search for feeding alternatives, mainly protein and energy sources available in the region, to formulate diets and supplements with low costs and high biological efficiency, taking into consideration the potentialities of the animals and of the environment, is the challenge and the greatest objective for those interested in sustainable sheep and goat development systems in the Northeast Semi-Arid of Brazil. MenosO cultivo diversificado de espécies forrageiras, nativas e/ou introduzidas, anuais e/ou perenes, para produção de feno e ou silagem, somadas a outras opções como resíduos agroindustriais e outros ingredientes de potencial regional, utilizados de forma planejada, podem deslocar a eficiência de produção dos sistemas de produção pecuária e em particular da caprino-ovinocultura do semi-árido. As práticas de suplementação alimentar, nos períodos críticos do ano, apresentam sua validade tanto pelo incremento na produtividade do rebanho, como pela menor susceptibilidade deste a determinadas enfermidades próprias da condição de subnutrição. Entretanto, todas essas práticas devem atender às condições sócio-econômicas dos produtores de caprinos e ovinos e as condições agro-ecológicas da região. Assim sendo, um grande desafio para o desenvolvimento da caprino-ovinocultura do semi-árido brasileiro é encontrar alternativas de alimentação, privilegiando o uso de fontes disponíveis regionalmente, para a formulação de dietas de baixo custo, com eficiência biológica, e que considerem as potencialidades dos animais e do ambiente.
Current and Potential Alternatives for Dry Season Feeding of Goat and Sheep in Semi-arid Northeast Brazil.
Abstract - The diversification of native or exotic, annual or perennial cultivated forages, for hay or silage production, in addition to other options, as industrial residues and other ingredients with regional potential, if utilized as a well planned way, ma... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Dry period; Período seco; Semi-árido. |
|
Thesagro: |
Caprino; Estação do Ano; Nutrição animal; Ovino. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal nutrition; Brazil; Goats; semiarid zones; Sheep. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03509naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1529940
005 2015-01-13
008 2003 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aARAÚJO, G. G. L. de
245 $aAlternativas atuais e potenciais de alimentação de caprinos e ovinos nos períodos secos no semi-árido brasileiro.
260 $c2003
520 $aO cultivo diversificado de espécies forrageiras, nativas e/ou introduzidas, anuais e/ou perenes, para produção de feno e ou silagem, somadas a outras opções como resíduos agroindustriais e outros ingredientes de potencial regional, utilizados de forma planejada, podem deslocar a eficiência de produção dos sistemas de produção pecuária e em particular da caprino-ovinocultura do semi-árido. As práticas de suplementação alimentar, nos períodos críticos do ano, apresentam sua validade tanto pelo incremento na produtividade do rebanho, como pela menor susceptibilidade deste a determinadas enfermidades próprias da condição de subnutrição. Entretanto, todas essas práticas devem atender às condições sócio-econômicas dos produtores de caprinos e ovinos e as condições agro-ecológicas da região. Assim sendo, um grande desafio para o desenvolvimento da caprino-ovinocultura do semi-árido brasileiro é encontrar alternativas de alimentação, privilegiando o uso de fontes disponíveis regionalmente, para a formulação de dietas de baixo custo, com eficiência biológica, e que considerem as potencialidades dos animais e do ambiente. Current and Potential Alternatives for Dry Season Feeding of Goat and Sheep in Semi-arid Northeast Brazil. Abstract - The diversification of native or exotic, annual or perennial cultivated forages, for hay or silage production, in addition to other options, as industrial residues and other ingredients with regional potential, if utilized as a well planned way, may improve the efficiency of the husbandry production systems, mainly the sheep/goats in the Brazilian Semi-Arid region, Northeast Brazil. The supplemental feeding practice during the driest periods of the year is valid due to the increase of heard productivity, or to the decrease in its susceptibility to pathologies that appear as a result of underfeeding conditions of the animals. However, these feeding management practices must fulfill the social and economic conditions of farmers, as well as the agricultural and ecological conditions of the region. Therefore, the search for feeding alternatives, mainly protein and energy sources available in the region, to formulate diets and supplements with low costs and high biological efficiency, taking into consideration the potentialities of the animals and of the environment, is the challenge and the greatest objective for those interested in sustainable sheep and goat development systems in the Northeast Semi-Arid of Brazil.
650 $aAnimal nutrition
650 $aBrazil
650 $aGoats
650 $asemiarid zones
650 $aSheep
650 $aCaprino
650 $aEstação do Ano
650 $aNutrição animal
650 $aOvino
653 $aBrasil
653 $aDry period
653 $aPeríodo seco
653 $aSemi-árido
700 1 $aHOLANDA JÚNIOR, E. V.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. C. de
773 $tIn: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE CAPRINOS E OVINOS DE CORTE, 2.; SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE AGRONEGÓCIO DA CAPRINOCULTURA LEITEIRA, 1., 2003, João Pessoa. Anais... João Pessoa: EMEPA-PB, 2003. p. 553-564.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/02/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/02/2012 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
CAPALBO, D. M. F.; ARANTES, O. M. N.; OLIVEIRA, P. R. S.; MAIA, A. G.; SILVEIRA, J. M. F. J. da; BORGES, I. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
DEISE MARIA FONTANA CAPALBO, CNPMA; OLÍVIA MARCIA NAGY ARANTES, LAC-BIOSAFETY; PAULO RICARDO S. OLIVEIRA, IE-UNICAMP; ALEXANDRE GORI MAIA, IE-UNICAMP; JOSÉ MARIA FERREIRA JARDIM DA SILVEIRA, IE-UNICAMP; IZAIAS DE CARVALHO BORGES, IE-UNICAMP. |
|
Título: |
View of stakeholders on GMOs in Brazil: where we are now? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY AND THE BIOECONOMY, 15., 2011, Rome. Sustainability and the bioeconomy. Rome: ICABR, 2011. |
|
Páginas: |
22 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT: Transgenic crops have being grown in Brazil since 1995, however regulation for such crops only came into force in 2005, granting a key role to CTNBio (National Technical Committee on Biosafety). There are currently 19 transgenic varieties growing in Brazil and the risk perception of the general public is virtually unknown. This paper presents the results of a survey regarding the public´s risk perception. The survey is part of LAC-Biosafety, a multi-country capacity building project in compliance with the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) determinations. It is a pioneering initiative that seeks to promote cooperation among Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica and Peru, all of which are considered mega-diverse countries. Although some authors, such as Oda and Soares (2000), Vogt and Polino (2003), Massarani and Moreira (2005), Guivant (2006), Furnival and Pinheiro (2008) and Gonzales et al (2009a and b), have studied the population´s risk perception, this paper is groundbreaking in the sense that it explicitly incorporates in the same sample both users of the technology, and those who do not use the technology but are in some way affected by it. The conceptual model adopted for this study, based on Costa-Font et al (2008), Gracia (2003) and the EUROBAROMETRO methodology, considers that the decision-making, the public´s perception, the autonomy of decision and the subjective knowledge is a result of a combination of scientific information and objective knowledge and culture ? such as beliefs and values. The sample was made up of 1442 individuals who filled out an online questionnaire containing 15 questions. Among the main results, it can be highlighted that (1) the general public considers the terminology used for means of communication inadequate; (2) knowledge about the GMO regulations, the Cartagena Protocol and the CTNBio is insufficient; (3) The negative perception is higher for terms such as ´transgenic plant´ and ´GMO´ and lower for terms such as ´biotechnology´ and ´genetic engineering´; (4) the public´s perception of transgenic plants destined for drugs production is better than of those destined for food production; (5) the public is more confident about information supplied by scientists and professors than that supplied by the government, the media and NGOs, even though these are the main channels for spreading information these days. MenosABSTRACT: Transgenic crops have being grown in Brazil since 1995, however regulation for such crops only came into force in 2005, granting a key role to CTNBio (National Technical Committee on Biosafety). There are currently 19 transgenic varieties growing in Brazil and the risk perception of the general public is virtually unknown. This paper presents the results of a survey regarding the public´s risk perception. The survey is part of LAC-Biosafety, a multi-country capacity building project in compliance with the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) determinations. It is a pioneering initiative that seeks to promote cooperation among Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica and Peru, all of which are considered mega-diverse countries. Although some authors, such as Oda and Soares (2000), Vogt and Polino (2003), Massarani and Moreira (2005), Guivant (2006), Furnival and Pinheiro (2008) and Gonzales et al (2009a and b), have studied the population´s risk perception, this paper is groundbreaking in the sense that it explicitly incorporates in the same sample both users of the technology, and those who do not use the technology but are in some way affected by it. The conceptual model adopted for this study, based on Costa-Font et al (2008), Gracia (2003) and the EUROBAROMETRO methodology, considers that the decision-making, the public´s perception, the autonomy of decision and the subjective knowledge is a result of a combination of scientific information and objective knowledge and cult... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
OGMs. |
|
Thesagro: |
Organismo transgênico. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Genetically modified organisms. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/54489/1/2011AA36.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03118nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1916057
005 2012-02-23
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCAPALBO, D. M. F.
245 $aView of stakeholders on GMOs in Brazil$bwhere we are now?$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY AND THE BIOECONOMY, 15., 2011, Rome. Sustainability and the bioeconomy. Rome: ICABR$c2011
300 $a22 p.
520 $aABSTRACT: Transgenic crops have being grown in Brazil since 1995, however regulation for such crops only came into force in 2005, granting a key role to CTNBio (National Technical Committee on Biosafety). There are currently 19 transgenic varieties growing in Brazil and the risk perception of the general public is virtually unknown. This paper presents the results of a survey regarding the public´s risk perception. The survey is part of LAC-Biosafety, a multi-country capacity building project in compliance with the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) determinations. It is a pioneering initiative that seeks to promote cooperation among Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica and Peru, all of which are considered mega-diverse countries. Although some authors, such as Oda and Soares (2000), Vogt and Polino (2003), Massarani and Moreira (2005), Guivant (2006), Furnival and Pinheiro (2008) and Gonzales et al (2009a and b), have studied the population´s risk perception, this paper is groundbreaking in the sense that it explicitly incorporates in the same sample both users of the technology, and those who do not use the technology but are in some way affected by it. The conceptual model adopted for this study, based on Costa-Font et al (2008), Gracia (2003) and the EUROBAROMETRO methodology, considers that the decision-making, the public´s perception, the autonomy of decision and the subjective knowledge is a result of a combination of scientific information and objective knowledge and culture ? such as beliefs and values. The sample was made up of 1442 individuals who filled out an online questionnaire containing 15 questions. Among the main results, it can be highlighted that (1) the general public considers the terminology used for means of communication inadequate; (2) knowledge about the GMO regulations, the Cartagena Protocol and the CTNBio is insufficient; (3) The negative perception is higher for terms such as ´transgenic plant´ and ´GMO´ and lower for terms such as ´biotechnology´ and ´genetic engineering´; (4) the public´s perception of transgenic plants destined for drugs production is better than of those destined for food production; (5) the public is more confident about information supplied by scientists and professors than that supplied by the government, the media and NGOs, even though these are the main channels for spreading information these days.
650 $aGenetically modified organisms
650 $aOrganismo transgênico
653 $aOGMs
700 1 $aARANTES, O. M. N.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, P. R. S.
700 1 $aMAIA, A. G.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, J. M. F. J. da
700 1 $aBORGES, I. C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
