| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/04/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/04/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
CUSTÓDIO, A. A. P.; SILVA, D. D. da; UTIAMADA, C. M.; CAMPOS, H. D.; COSTA, R. V. da; FANTIN, L. H.; YADA, I. F. U.; DUARTE, A. P.; DIAS, A. R.; COSTA, A. A.; MOCHKO. A. C.; CHAGAS, D. F.; SICHOCKO, D.; LUJAN, D. W.; MOREIRA, E. N.; MEDEIROS, F. C. L.; JULIATTI, F. C.; JULIATTI, F. C.; FANTIN, G. M.; ARAÚJO, I. P.; ROY, J. M. T.; GRIGOLLI, J. F. J.; NUNES JÚNIOR, J.; FONTANA, L. F.; BELUFI, L. M. R.; CARNEIRO, L. C.; BRAGA, K.; KUDLAWIEC, K.; SOUSA, M. V.; SENGER, M.; STEFANELLO, M. S.; MÜLLER, M. A.; TORMEN, N. R.; BRAND, S. C.; CARLIN, V. J. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADRIANO A. P. CUSTÓDIO, INSTITUTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL DO PARANÁ; DAGMA DIONISIA DA SILVA ARAUJO, CNPMS; CARLOS M. UTIAMADA, TAGRO TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUÁRIA; HÉRCULES D. CAMPOS, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; RODRIGO VERAS DA COSTA, CNPMS; LUCAS H. FANTIN, FUNDAÇÃO CHAPADÃO; INÊS F. U. YADA, INSTITUTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL DO PARANÁ; AILDSON P. DUARTE, INSTITUTO AGRONOMICO DE CAMPINAS; ALFREDO R. DIAS, DESAFIOS AGRO; ALEXANDRE A. COSTA, AGROENSAIO; ANA CLÁUDIA MOCHKO, FUNDAÇÃO MS; DÉBORA F. CHAGAS, G12AGRO; DIEGO SICHOCKO, META CONSULTORIA; DIONATHAN W. LUJAN, INSTITUTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL DO PARANÁ; ÉDER N. MOREIRA, FITOLAB PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO AGRÍCOLA; FERNANDA C. L. MEDEIROS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; FERNANDA C. JULIATTI, JULIAGRO; FERNANDO C. JULIATTI, JULIAGRO; GISÈLE M. FANTIN, INSTITUTO BIOLOGICO; IVAN P. ARAÚJO, PROTEPLAN; JOÃO MAURÍCIO T. ROY, COPACOL; JOSÉ F. J. GRIGOLLI, FAMIVA PESQUISA & SOLUÇÕES AGRÍCOLAS; JOSÉ NUNES JÚNIOR, EMPRESA DE ASSISTÊNCIA TÉCNICA E EXTENSÃO RURAL DO ESTADO DE MINAS GERAIS; LAÍS F. FONTANA, INSTITUTO GOIANO DE AGRICULTURA; LUANA M. R. BELUFI, FUNDAÇÃO RIO VERDE; LUCIANA C. CARNEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JATAÍ; KARLA BRAGA, FUNDAÇÃO CHAPADÃO; KARLA KUDLAWIEC, SLC AGRÍCOLA; MARCELLA V. SOUSA, SYGENTA SEEDS; MARINA SENGER, 3M EXPERIMENTAÇÃO AGRÍCOLA; MAURÍCIO S. STEFANELLO, CERES CONSULTORIA; MÔNICA A. MÜLLER, FUNDAÇÃO MT; NÉDIO R. TORMEN, STAPHYT; SIMONE C. BRAND, INSTITUTO PLANT CARE; VALTEMIR JOSÉ CARLIN, AGRO DINÂMICA. |
|
Título: |
Eficiência de fungicidas DMI e MBC no controle das manchas de Bipolaris e túrcicum do milho safrinha em 2021 e 2022. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SEMINÁRIO NACIONAL DE MILHO SAFRINHA, 17., 2023, Campo Grande, MS. Preservar e produzir: anais. Maracaju: Fundação MS, 2023. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 77-78. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Químico; Doença de Planta; Fungicida; Milho. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1163694/1/Eficiencia-de-fungicidas-DMI-e-MBC.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01649nam a2200565 a 4500
001 2163694
005 2024-04-17
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCUSTÓDIO, A. A. P.
245 $aEficiência de fungicidas DMI e MBC no controle das manchas de Bipolaris e túrcicum do milho safrinha em 2021 e 2022.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SEMINÁRIO NACIONAL DE MILHO SAFRINHA, 17., 2023, Campo Grande, MS. Preservar e produzir: anais. Maracaju: Fundação MS$c2023
300 $ap. 77-78.
650 $aControle Químico
650 $aDoença de Planta
650 $aFungicida
650 $aMilho
700 1 $aSILVA, D. D. da
700 1 $aUTIAMADA, C. M.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, H. D.
700 1 $aCOSTA, R. V. da
700 1 $aFANTIN, L. H.
700 1 $aYADA, I. F. U.
700 1 $aDUARTE, A. P.
700 1 $aDIAS, A. R.
700 1 $aCOSTA, A. A.
700 1 $aMOCHKO. A. C.
700 1 $aCHAGAS, D. F.
700 1 $aSICHOCKO, D.
700 1 $aLUJAN, D. W.
700 1 $aMOREIRA, E. N.
700 1 $aMEDEIROS, F. C. L.
700 1 $aJULIATTI, F. C.
700 1 $aJULIATTI, F. C.
700 1 $aFANTIN, G. M.
700 1 $aARAÚJO, I. P.
700 1 $aROY, J. M. T.
700 1 $aGRIGOLLI, J. F. J.
700 1 $aNUNES JÚNIOR, J.
700 1 $aFONTANA, L. F.
700 1 $aBELUFI, L. M. R.
700 1 $aCARNEIRO, L. C.
700 1 $aBRAGA, K.
700 1 $aKUDLAWIEC, K.
700 1 $aSOUSA, M. V.
700 1 $aSENGER, M.
700 1 $aSTEFANELLO, M. S.
700 1 $aMÜLLER, M. A.
700 1 $aTORMEN, N. R.
700 1 $aBRAND, S. C.
700 1 $aCARLIN, V. J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/09/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.; FAVARIN, J. L.; LAGO, B. C.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; OLIVEIRA, S. M. de; TRIVELIN, P. C. O.; OLIVEIRA, F. B.; GILABEL, A. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
CLOVEIS PIEROZAN JUNIOR, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DO PARANÁ, Campus Palmas-TO; JOSE LAERCIO FAVARIN, ESALQ; BRUNO COCCO LAGO, ESALQ; RODRIGO ESTEVAM MUNHOZ DE ALMEIDA, CNPASA; SILAS MACIEL DE OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; PAULO CESAR OCHEUZE TRIVELIN, CENA; FELIPE BRENDLER OLIVEIRA, ESALQ; AMANDA PRADO GILABEL, ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Nitrogen fertilizer recovery and partitioning related to soybean yield. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
0718-9508 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00322-x |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Published: 24 August 2020. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study checked the nitrogen (N) uptake, fate of the N fertilizer, fertilizer recovery efficiency (FRE) and the residual amount of N fertilizer in the soil via 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), to explain any differences in the yields. Two soybean field experiments were established in Brazil, one conducted in a tropical (Trop) zone located at Cerrado Biome and the other in a subtropical (Subt) environment. The experimental design was a 2-factor in randomized complete block with four replications. Five doses of N (0, 20, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at two soybean growth stages (VE and R3). For all treatments, except No-N, 15N-labelled fertilizer was used. The N uptake and the amount of N fertilizer were analysed in the roots, shoots, grains and whole plant, the FRE and yield by soybean, and the residual of fertilizer in the soil. The total N uptake (Nplant) was greater with fertilization at R3 stage compared to the other stage, and N application increased the yield just at this stage and in the Trop condition. The increase in N shoot (not specifically from fertilizer) with the application at R3 appeared to be related to the increased in yield. However, the N from fertilizer found in the plant shoot was about 20% higher when fertilizer was applied at VE compared with R3. Under Subt condition, the FRE averaging 55%. In contrast, the FRE decreased from low to high nitrogen rates (64 to 40%, respectively) when soybean grown under Trop condition. Most N from fertilizer (38%) was found in the grains, followed by the shoot (14.6%) and the root (0.58%). The use of N fertilizer at reproductive growth stages is a better approach to meet soybean N demand through N fertilization. Potential yield gains are more reliable under Trop condition. MenosThis study checked the nitrogen (N) uptake, fate of the N fertilizer, fertilizer recovery efficiency (FRE) and the residual amount of N fertilizer in the soil via 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), to explain any differences in the yields. Two soybean field experiments were established in Brazil, one conducted in a tropical (Trop) zone located at Cerrado Biome and the other in a subtropical (Subt) environment. The experimental design was a 2-factor in randomized complete block with four replications. Five doses of N (0, 20, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at two soybean growth stages (VE and R3). For all treatments, except No-N, 15N-labelled fertilizer was used. The N uptake and the amount of N fertilizer were analysed in the roots, shoots, grains and whole plant, the FRE and yield by soybean, and the residual of fertilizer in the soil. The total N uptake (Nplant) was greater with fertilization at R3 stage compared to the other stage, and N application increased the yield just at this stage and in the Trop condition. The increase in N shoot (not specifically from fertilizer) with the application at R3 appeared to be related to the increased in yield. However, the N from fertilizer found in the plant shoot was about 20% higher when fertilizer was applied at VE compared with R3. Under Subt condition, the FRE averaging 55%. In contrast, the FRE decreased from low to high nitrogen rates (64 to 40%, respectively) when soybean grown under... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Fertilizante Nitrogenado; Glycine Max; Nitrogênio; Soja; Solo Tropical. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Nitrogen; Nitrogen fertilizers; Soybeans; Tropical agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02816naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2124693
005 2020-09-04
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0718-9508
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00322-x$2DOI
100 1 $aPIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.
245 $aNitrogen fertilizer recovery and partitioning related to soybean yield.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aPublished: 24 August 2020.
520 $aThis study checked the nitrogen (N) uptake, fate of the N fertilizer, fertilizer recovery efficiency (FRE) and the residual amount of N fertilizer in the soil via 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), to explain any differences in the yields. Two soybean field experiments were established in Brazil, one conducted in a tropical (Trop) zone located at Cerrado Biome and the other in a subtropical (Subt) environment. The experimental design was a 2-factor in randomized complete block with four replications. Five doses of N (0, 20, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at two soybean growth stages (VE and R3). For all treatments, except No-N, 15N-labelled fertilizer was used. The N uptake and the amount of N fertilizer were analysed in the roots, shoots, grains and whole plant, the FRE and yield by soybean, and the residual of fertilizer in the soil. The total N uptake (Nplant) was greater with fertilization at R3 stage compared to the other stage, and N application increased the yield just at this stage and in the Trop condition. The increase in N shoot (not specifically from fertilizer) with the application at R3 appeared to be related to the increased in yield. However, the N from fertilizer found in the plant shoot was about 20% higher when fertilizer was applied at VE compared with R3. Under Subt condition, the FRE averaging 55%. In contrast, the FRE decreased from low to high nitrogen rates (64 to 40%, respectively) when soybean grown under Trop condition. Most N from fertilizer (38%) was found in the grains, followed by the shoot (14.6%) and the root (0.58%). The use of N fertilizer at reproductive growth stages is a better approach to meet soybean N demand through N fertilization. Potential yield gains are more reliable under Trop condition.
650 $aNitrogen
650 $aNitrogen fertilizers
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aTropical agriculture
650 $aFertilizante Nitrogenado
650 $aGlycine Max
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aSoja
650 $aSolo Tropical
700 1 $aFAVARIN, J. L.
700 1 $aLAGO, B. C.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. E. M. de
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, S. M. de
700 1 $aTRIVELIN, P. C. O.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, F. B.
700 1 $aGILABEL, A. P.
773 $tJournal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
