| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 51 | |
| 21. |  | MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; BONETTI, J. de A.; LEVIEN, R.; SCHNEPF, A.; LEITNER, D. Mechanical and Hydric Stress Effects on Maize Root System Development at Different Soil Compaction Levels Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 10, artigo. 1358, out. 2019. 18 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|    |
| 22. | | MORAES, M. T. de; BENGOUGH, A. G.; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; LEVIEN, R.; SCHNEPF, A.; LEITNER, D. Mechanistic framework to link root growth models with weather and soil physical properties, including example applications to soybean growth in Brazil. Plant and Soil, v. 42, n. 8, p. 67-92, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|  |
| 23. | | DEBIASI, H.; MORAES, M. T. de; FRANCHINI, J. C.; DIAS, W. P.; SILVA, J. F. V.; RIBAS, L. N. Monitamento da fertilidade do solo e da ocorrência do nematoide das lesoes radiculares em soja no Mato Grosso. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 33., 2011, Uberlândia. Solos nos biomas brasileiros: sustentabilidade e mudanças climáticas: anais. Uberlândia: SBCS: UFU: ICIAG, 2011. 4 p. 1 CD-ROM. Título correto: Monitoramento da fertilidade do solo e da ocorrência do nematoide das lesoes radiculares em soja no Mato Grosso.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|  |
| 24. | | MORAES, M. T. de; SILVA, V. R. da; CHERUBIN, M. R.; CARLESSO, R.; DEBIASI, H.; LEVIEN, R. Charges in a rhodic hapludox under no-tillage and urban wast compost in the northwest of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa, MG, v. 38, N. 4, p. 1327-1336, Jul./Aug. 2014.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 25. | | MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; SILVA, V. R. da; CARLESSO, R.; LUZ, F. B. da. Curva de retenção de água de um latossolo sob estados de compactação. In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE MANEJO E CONSERVAÇÃO DO SOLO E DA ÁGUA, 19., 2012, Lages. Conservação do solo e da água no Brasil: preceitos e ações no ensino, na pesquisa e na extensão. Lages: SBCS: UDESC: IF: EPAGRI, 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 26. | | MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; SILVA, V. R. da; CARLESSO, R.; LUZ, F. B. da. Curva de retenção de água de um Latossolo sob estados de compactação. In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE MANEJO E CONSERVAÇÃO DO SOLO E DA ÁGUA, 19., 2012, Lages. Conservação do solo e da água no Brasil: preceitos e ações no ensino, na pesquisa e na extensão: [anais]. [S.l.]: SBCS, 2012. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 27. | | MORAES, M. T. de; SILVA, V. R. da; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; ORTIGARA, C.; LUZ, F. B. da. Compressibilidade de um latossolo vermelho sob diferentes estados de compactação. In: JORNADA ACADÊMICA INTEGRADA, 26., 2011, Santa Maria. Anais... Santa Maria: UFSM, 2011. 4 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 29. | | MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; CARLESSO, R.; SILVA, V. R. da; FRANCHINI, J. C.; LEVIEN, R. Qualidade física de um Latossolo Vermelho avaliada por meio da curva de resistência do solo à penetração. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 34., 2013, Florianópolis. Ciência do solo: para quê e para quem? Anais... Florianópolis: SBCS, 2013. 4 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 31. | | SILVA, V. R. da; ORTIGARA, C.; DEBIASI, H.; MORAES, M. T. de; LUZ, F. B.; FRANCHINI, J. C. Retenção e perda de água por evaporação de um Latossolo Vermelho sob diferentes níveis de compactação. In: REUNIÃO SUL-BRASILEIRA DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 10., 2014, Pelotas. Fatos e mitos em ciência do solo. Pelotas: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo; UFPEL, 2014. 1 pen drive.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 32. | | LUZ, F. B. da; MORAES, M. T. de; SILVA, V. R. da; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; ORTIGARA, C. Tempo de escarificação e adoção do sistema plantio direto e a relação com a densidade do solo máxima. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 34., 2013, Florianópolis. Ciência do solo: para quê e para quem? Anais... Florianópolis: SBCS, 2013. 4 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 33. | | BALBINOT JUNIOR, A. A.; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; OLIVEIRA, M. A. de; COELHO, A. E.; MORAES, M. T. de. Soybean yield, seed protein and oil concentration, and soil fertility affected by off-season crops. European Journal of Agronomy, v. 153, 127039, 2024. 11 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 34. | | TREIN, C. R.; MORAES, M. T. de; LEVIEN, R.; MAZURANA, M.; ANGHIGNONI, I.; DEBIASI, H.; BONETTI, J. A. Tillage systems with controlled traffic and limits to maize production. In: CIOSTA, 36., CIGR SECTION, 5. 2015, Saint Petersburg. Environmentally friendly agriculture and forestry for future generations. Saint Peterburg: Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University, 2015. p. 818-823.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 35. | | MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; MASTROBERTI, A. A.; LEVIEN, R.; LEITNER, D.; SCHNEPF, A. Soil compaction impacts soybean root growth in an Oxisol from subtropical Brazil Soil & Tillage Research, v. 200, 104611, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 38. | | ZULPO, L.; MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; LUZ, F. B. da; LEVIEN, R. Sistemas de manejo do solo e de culturas em latossolo vermelho e sua relação com a produtividade de soja. In: REUNIÃO SUL-BRASILEIRA DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 10., 2014, Pelotas. Fatos e mitos em ciência do solo. Pelotas: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo; UFPEL, 2014. 1 pen drive.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 39. | | ARNUTI, F.; SILVA, V. R. da; MORAES, M. T. de; PIOVESAN, M. T.; MIGLIORINI, P.; CADORIN, A. M. R. Utilização de lodo na cultura do girassol (Helianthus annuuus L.) In: REUNIÃO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA DO GIRASSOL, 18., SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL SOBRE A CULTURA DO GIRASSOL, 6., 2009. Pelotas. Anais... Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2009. p. 274-281. Editado por Ana Claudia Barneche de Oliveira, Ana Paula Afonso Scheneid da Rosa e Márcia Vizzotto.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 40. | | FRANCHINI, J. C.; MORAES, M. T. de; DEBIASI, H.; DIAS, W. P.; RIBAS, L. N.; SILVA, J. F. V. Variabilidade espacial de atributos químicos do solo e relação com os danos pelo nematoide das lesões radiculares em soja. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 33., 2011, Uberlândia. Solos nos biomas brasileiros: sustentabilidade e mudanças climáticas: anais. Uberlândia: SBCS: UFU: ICIAG, 2011. 4 p. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 51 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/09/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PALHARES, J. C. P.; MORELLI, M.; COSTA JUNIOR, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; Marcela Morelli, FMVZ/USP; Ciniro Costa Junior, Instituto de Manejo e Certificação Florestal e Agrícola. |
|
Título: |
Impact of roughage-concentrate ratio on the water footprints of beef feedlots. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Systems, v. 155, p. 126-135, 2017. |
|
ISSN: |
0308-521X |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.009 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The aim of this study was to determine the water footprint of beef feedlots up to the farm gate and evaluate the impact of roughage-concentrate ratio on the green water footprint. The study purpose was to provide strategic insights about nutritional management and water used that have a positive impact reducing water demand and increasing water efficiency. A regional bottom-up approach of the beef feedlot production was applied and water footprint methodology was used as the primary method. We included green and blue volumetric water footprint. Sensitivity assessment was done to explore differences in agricultural performance. Total water footprint ranged from 1935 to 9673 m3 kg− 1 of meat. The results are demonstrating the variability in water footprint that can exist from farm to farm. Green water represented on average 84.5% and blue water 15.4% of the footprint value. The farms with larger amounts of concentrate in the diet had high footprint values and the differences in feed composition have a significant effect on the water footprint. The average water footprint of the current crop yield was 5814 L kg− 1 of meat. With a reduction of 25% in the current crop yields, it was 7.416 L kg− 1 of meat and with an increase of 25% in the current crop yields, 4677 L kg− 1 of meat. These results show that increasing agricultural productivity has positive impacts on reducing the water footprint. The results show that the water footprint values of feedlots are determined largely by the type of animal diet and by performance indicators of the animals. The roughage-concentrate ratio and type of roughage are the nutritional aspects that most significantly influence the footprint values. This study supports the recommendation that beef feedlots should place emphasis on maximizing the use of roughage, because this could decrease the pressure on fresh water resources. MenosThe aim of this study was to determine the water footprint of beef feedlots up to the farm gate and evaluate the impact of roughage-concentrate ratio on the green water footprint. The study purpose was to provide strategic insights about nutritional management and water used that have a positive impact reducing water demand and increasing water efficiency. A regional bottom-up approach of the beef feedlot production was applied and water footprint methodology was used as the primary method. We included green and blue volumetric water footprint. Sensitivity assessment was done to explore differences in agricultural performance. Total water footprint ranged from 1935 to 9673 m3 kg− 1 of meat. The results are demonstrating the variability in water footprint that can exist from farm to farm. Green water represented on average 84.5% and blue water 15.4% of the footprint value. The farms with larger amounts of concentrate in the diet had high footprint values and the differences in feed composition have a significant effect on the water footprint. The average water footprint of the current crop yield was 5814 L kg− 1 of meat. With a reduction of 25% in the current crop yields, it was 7.416 L kg− 1 of meat and with an increase of 25% in the current crop yields, 4677 L kg− 1 of meat. These results show that increasing agricultural productivity has positive impacts on reducing the water footprint. The results show that the water footprint values of feedlots ar... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Blue water; Green water. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Nellore. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02517naa a2200205 a 4500
001 2074819
005 2017-12-05
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0308-521X
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.009$2DOI
100 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P.
245 $aImpact of roughage-concentrate ratio on the water footprints of beef feedlots.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aThe aim of this study was to determine the water footprint of beef feedlots up to the farm gate and evaluate the impact of roughage-concentrate ratio on the green water footprint. The study purpose was to provide strategic insights about nutritional management and water used that have a positive impact reducing water demand and increasing water efficiency. A regional bottom-up approach of the beef feedlot production was applied and water footprint methodology was used as the primary method. We included green and blue volumetric water footprint. Sensitivity assessment was done to explore differences in agricultural performance. Total water footprint ranged from 1935 to 9673 m3 kg− 1 of meat. The results are demonstrating the variability in water footprint that can exist from farm to farm. Green water represented on average 84.5% and blue water 15.4% of the footprint value. The farms with larger amounts of concentrate in the diet had high footprint values and the differences in feed composition have a significant effect on the water footprint. The average water footprint of the current crop yield was 5814 L kg− 1 of meat. With a reduction of 25% in the current crop yields, it was 7.416 L kg− 1 of meat and with an increase of 25% in the current crop yields, 4677 L kg− 1 of meat. These results show that increasing agricultural productivity has positive impacts on reducing the water footprint. The results show that the water footprint values of feedlots are determined largely by the type of animal diet and by performance indicators of the animals. The roughage-concentrate ratio and type of roughage are the nutritional aspects that most significantly influence the footprint values. This study supports the recommendation that beef feedlots should place emphasis on maximizing the use of roughage, because this could decrease the pressure on fresh water resources.
650 $aNellore
653 $aBlue water
653 $aGreen water
700 1 $aMORELLI, M.
700 1 $aCOSTA JUNIOR, C.
773 $tAgricultural Systems$gv. 155, p. 126-135, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
