|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
07/11/2013 |
Data da última atualização: |
02/12/2013 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.; VASCONCELLOS, R. L. F.; BINI, D.; MIYAUCHI, M. Y. H.; SANTOS, C. A. dos; ALVES, P. R. L.; PAULA, A. M. de; NAKATANI, A. S.; PEREIRA, J. de M.; NOGUEIRA, M. A. |
Afiliação: |
ELKE JURANDY BRAN NOGUEIRA CARDOSO, USP/ESALQ; RAFAEL LEANDRO FIGUEIREDO VASCONCELLOS, USP/ESALQ; DANIEL BINI, USP/ESALQ; MARINA YUMI HORTA MIYAUCHI, USP/ESALQ; CRISTIANE ALCANTARA DOS SANTOS, USP/ESALQ; PAULO ROGER LOPES ALVES, USP/ESALQ; ALESSANDRA MONTEIRO DE PAULA, UFPR; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, USP/ESALQ; JAMIL DE MORAES PEREIRA, USP/ESALQ; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO. |
Título: |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013. |
DOI: |
10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Soil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems. MenosSoil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic ame... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Saúde do solo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/92114/1/Soil-health-looking-for-suitable-indicators.-What-should-be-considered-to-assess-the-effects-of-use-and-management-on-soil-health.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02547naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1970661 005 2013-12-02 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009$2DOI 100 1 $aCARDOSO, E. J. B. N. 245 $aSoil health$blooking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2013 520 $aSoil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems. 653 $aSaúde do solo 700 1 $aVASCONCELLOS, R. L. F. 700 1 $aBINI, D. 700 1 $aMIYAUCHI, M. Y. H. 700 1 $aSANTOS, C. A. dos 700 1 $aALVES, P. R. L. 700 1 $aPAULA, A. M. de 700 1 $aNAKATANI, A. S. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, J. de M. 700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, M. A. 773 $tScientia Agricola, Piracicaba$gv. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
13/08/1996 |
Data da última atualização: |
13/03/2008 |
Autoria: |
BOLDT, A.; HIROMOTO, D. M.; ALMEIDA, L. A.; OLIVEIRA, L. C.; CABRAL, N. T.; KIIHL, R. A. S.; HIGASHI, W. |
Afiliação: |
Do 3o. autor: EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Londrina, PR. |
Título: |
Avaliacao de cultivares e linhagens de soja para o Estado de Mato Grosso. |
Ano de publicação: |
1995 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIAO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIAO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 17., 1995, Goiania. Ata e resumos. Goiania: EMGOPA, 1995. |
Páginas: |
p.167. |
Série: |
(EMGOPA. Documentos, 28). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Cultivar; Cultivar line; Mato Grosso; Soybean. |
Thesagro: |
Linhagem; Soja. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00843naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1456194 005 2008-03-13 008 1995 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aBOLDT, A. 245 $aAvaliacao de cultivares e linhagens de soja para o Estado de Mato Grosso. 260 $c1995 300 $ap.167. 490 $a(EMGOPA. Documentos, 28). 650 $aBrazil 650 $aLinhagem 650 $aSoja 653 $aBrasil 653 $aCultivar 653 $aCultivar line 653 $aMato Grosso 653 $aSoybean 700 1 $aHIROMOTO, D. M. 700 1 $aALMEIDA, L. A. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, L. C. 700 1 $aCABRAL, N. T. 700 1 $aKIIHL, R. A. S. 700 1 $aHIGASHI, W. 773 $tIn: REUNIAO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIAO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 17., 1995, Goiania. Ata e resumos. Goiania: EMGOPA, 1995.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|