| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/10/1996 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/11/2015 |
|
Autoria: |
PAGE, A. L.; MILLER, R. H.; KEENEY, D. R. |
|
Título: |
Methods of soil analysis; Chemical and microbiological properties. |
|
Edição: |
2.ed. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1982 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Madison: American society of agronomy/Soil science society of america. |
|
Páginas: |
1159p. |
|
Série: |
(Agronomy, 9). |
|
ISBN: |
0-89118-072-9 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Dissolution for total elemental analysis. Atomic absorption and flame emission spectrometry. Optical emission spectrometry. Neutron actibation analysis. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. High-pressure liquid chromatography. Anodic stripping voltammetry and differential pulse polarography. Cation exchage capacity. Exchageable cations. Soluble salts. Carbonate and gypsum. Soil pH and lime requirement. Lithium, sodium, and potassium. Magnesium, clacium, strontium, and barium. Silicon. Aluminum. Iron. Manganese. Nickel, copper, zinc, and cadmium. Chromium. Lead. Mercury. Arsenic. Phosphorus. Boron. Bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. Cobalt, molybdenum, and selenium. Sulfur. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Organic matter characterization. Nitrogen.Nitrogen-organic forms. Nitrogen-inorganic forms. Nitrogen-urea. Nitrogen-availability indices. Nitrogen-isotope-ratio-analysis. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. Microscopic methods for soil microorganisms. Most probable number method for microbial populations. Microbial biomass. Soil respiration. composition of soil atmospheres. Soil enzymes. Filamentous fungi. Actinomycetes. Anaerobic bacteria and processes. Denitrification. nitrifying bacteria. Rhizobium. Free-living dinitrogen-fixing bacteria. Algae. Protozoa. Nematodes. Mites and other soil microarthropods. Method for preparation of sample. Methods for loss on ignition. Method for digestion with hydrofluoric acid in closed vessel. Methods for digestion with hydrofluoric, sulfuric, and perchloric. MenosDissolution for total elemental analysis. Atomic absorption and flame emission spectrometry. Optical emission spectrometry. Neutron actibation analysis. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. High-pressure liquid chromatography. Anodic stripping voltammetry and differential pulse polarography. Cation exchage capacity. Exchageable cations. Soluble salts. Carbonate and gypsum. Soil pH and lime requirement. Lithium, sodium, and potassium. Magnesium, clacium, strontium, and barium. Silicon. Aluminum. Iron. Manganese. Nickel, copper, zinc, and cadmium. Chromium. Lead. Mercury. Arsenic. Phosphorus. Boron. Bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. Cobalt, molybdenum, and selenium. Sulfur. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Organic matter characterization. Nitrogen.Nitrogen-organic forms. Nitrogen-inorganic forms. Nitrogen-urea. Nitrogen-availability indices. Nitrogen-isotope-ratio-analysis. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. Microscopic methods for soil microorganisms. Most probable number method for microbial populations. Microbial biomass. Soil respiration. composition of soil atmospheres. Soil enzymes. Filamentous fungi. Actinomycetes. Anaerobic bacteria and processes. Denitrification. nitrifying bacteria. Rhizobium. Free-living dinitrogen-fixing bacteria. Algae. Protozoa. Nematodes. Mites and other soil microarthropods. Method for preparation of sample. Methods for loss on ignition. Method for digestion with hydrofluoric acid in closed vessel. Methods for digestion with ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Soil analysis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02077nam a2200193 a 4500
001 1621792
005 2015-11-12
008 1982 bl uuuu de 00u1 u #d
020 $a0-89118-072-9
100 1 $aPAGE, A. L.
245 $aMethods of soil analysis; Chemical and microbiological properties.
250 $a2.ed.
260 $aMadison: American society of agronomy/Soil science society of america.$c1982
300 $a1159p.
490 $a(Agronomy, 9).
520 $aDissolution for total elemental analysis. Atomic absorption and flame emission spectrometry. Optical emission spectrometry. Neutron actibation analysis. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. High-pressure liquid chromatography. Anodic stripping voltammetry and differential pulse polarography. Cation exchage capacity. Exchageable cations. Soluble salts. Carbonate and gypsum. Soil pH and lime requirement. Lithium, sodium, and potassium. Magnesium, clacium, strontium, and barium. Silicon. Aluminum. Iron. Manganese. Nickel, copper, zinc, and cadmium. Chromium. Lead. Mercury. Arsenic. Phosphorus. Boron. Bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. Cobalt, molybdenum, and selenium. Sulfur. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Organic matter characterization. Nitrogen.Nitrogen-organic forms. Nitrogen-inorganic forms. Nitrogen-urea. Nitrogen-availability indices. Nitrogen-isotope-ratio-analysis. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. Microscopic methods for soil microorganisms. Most probable number method for microbial populations. Microbial biomass. Soil respiration. composition of soil atmospheres. Soil enzymes. Filamentous fungi. Actinomycetes. Anaerobic bacteria and processes. Denitrification. nitrifying bacteria. Rhizobium. Free-living dinitrogen-fixing bacteria. Algae. Protozoa. Nematodes. Mites and other soil microarthropods. Method for preparation of sample. Methods for loss on ignition. Method for digestion with hydrofluoric acid in closed vessel. Methods for digestion with hydrofluoric, sulfuric, and perchloric.
650 $aSoil analysis
700 1 $aMILLER, R. H.
700 1 $aKEENEY, D. R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpms.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/03/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/10/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
FARIA, L. C. de; MELO, P. G. S.; PEREIRA, H. S.; DEL PELOSO, M. J.; BRÁS, A. J. B. P.; MOREIRA, J. A. A.; CARVALHO, H. W. L. de; MELO, L. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUIS CLAUDIO DE FARIA, CNPAF; PATRICIA GUIMARÃES SANTOS MELO, UFG; HELTON SANTOS PEREIRA, CNPAF; MARIA JOSE DEL PELOSO, CNPAF; ANTONIO JOAQUIM BRAGA PEREIRA BRÁS, FESURV; JOSE ALOISIO ALVES MOREIRA, CNPMS; HELIO WILSON LEMOS DE CARVALHO, CPATC; LEONARDO CUNHA MELO, CNPAF. |
|
Título: |
Genetic progress during 22 years of improvement of carioca-type common bean in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Field Crops Research, Amsterdam, v. 142, p. 68-74, Feb. 2013. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.016 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Between 1984 and 2010, the program for the improvement of common bean coordinated by Embrapa Rice & Beans released 50 new cultivars at an average rate of 1.9 cultivars per year. Any breeding program must be periodically subjected to critical analysis with respect to its performance, seeking methodologies that can improve its effectiveness. In this context, the estimation of genetic progress is one of the options used in this analysis. The aim of the present study was to estimate the genetic progress in terms of grain yield and other agronomic traits achieved by the Embrapa program. These estimates represent the progress achieved during a 22-year period between 1985 and 2006 and totaling 11 biannual cycles of final assessments of the lines. Two types of field experiments were performed to assess the genetic progress: field experiments of lines and of cultivars. To perform the line experiments, the top three inbred lines from each of the 11 cycles evaluated comprised the 33 evaluated treatments. These evaluations were established in 20 environments and served to estimate the progress in yield, quality, and size of grains because these were the criteria applied to select the elite lines. The cultivar evaluations included the 10 cultivars recommended by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária ? Embrapa) during the investigated period and were established in 21 environments. These evaluations served to estimate the improvements in the reaction to angular leaf spot, plant architecture, and resistance to lodging because cultivars usually exhibit superior phenotypes for such characteristics. The experimental design in all evaluations included completely randomized blocks with four replicates. The evaluations were performed during three sowing seasons (rainy, dry, and fall-winter) between 2008 and 2010. The results show the efficiency of the Embrapa program in improving the genetic makeup of common bean in Brazil between 1985 and 2006. The estimated improvement in grain yield was 17.3 kg ha−1 or 0.72% per year. Improvements were also found in plant architecture (2.0%), tolerance to lodging (2.0%), and grain quality (2.4%). There was no significant progress for the character weight of the 100 grains or for resistance to bacterial blight. MenosBetween 1984 and 2010, the program for the improvement of common bean coordinated by Embrapa Rice & Beans released 50 new cultivars at an average rate of 1.9 cultivars per year. Any breeding program must be periodically subjected to critical analysis with respect to its performance, seeking methodologies that can improve its effectiveness. In this context, the estimation of genetic progress is one of the options used in this analysis. The aim of the present study was to estimate the genetic progress in terms of grain yield and other agronomic traits achieved by the Embrapa program. These estimates represent the progress achieved during a 22-year period between 1985 and 2006 and totaling 11 biannual cycles of final assessments of the lines. Two types of field experiments were performed to assess the genetic progress: field experiments of lines and of cultivars. To perform the line experiments, the top three inbred lines from each of the 11 cycles evaluated comprised the 33 evaluated treatments. These evaluations were established in 20 environments and served to estimate the progress in yield, quality, and size of grains because these were the criteria applied to select the elite lines. The cultivar evaluations included the 10 cultivars recommended by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária ? Embrapa) during the investigated period and were established in 21 environments. These evaluations served to estimate the improvements... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Características agronômicas; Feijão; Melhoramento genético vegetal; Phaseolus vulgaris; Programa de pesquisa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agronomic traits; Grain yield. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03269naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1953605
005 2013-10-18
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.016$2DOI
100 1 $aFARIA, L. C. de
245 $aGenetic progress during 22 years of improvement of carioca-type common bean in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
520 $aBetween 1984 and 2010, the program for the improvement of common bean coordinated by Embrapa Rice & Beans released 50 new cultivars at an average rate of 1.9 cultivars per year. Any breeding program must be periodically subjected to critical analysis with respect to its performance, seeking methodologies that can improve its effectiveness. In this context, the estimation of genetic progress is one of the options used in this analysis. The aim of the present study was to estimate the genetic progress in terms of grain yield and other agronomic traits achieved by the Embrapa program. These estimates represent the progress achieved during a 22-year period between 1985 and 2006 and totaling 11 biannual cycles of final assessments of the lines. Two types of field experiments were performed to assess the genetic progress: field experiments of lines and of cultivars. To perform the line experiments, the top three inbred lines from each of the 11 cycles evaluated comprised the 33 evaluated treatments. These evaluations were established in 20 environments and served to estimate the progress in yield, quality, and size of grains because these were the criteria applied to select the elite lines. The cultivar evaluations included the 10 cultivars recommended by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária ? Embrapa) during the investigated period and were established in 21 environments. These evaluations served to estimate the improvements in the reaction to angular leaf spot, plant architecture, and resistance to lodging because cultivars usually exhibit superior phenotypes for such characteristics. The experimental design in all evaluations included completely randomized blocks with four replicates. The evaluations were performed during three sowing seasons (rainy, dry, and fall-winter) between 2008 and 2010. The results show the efficiency of the Embrapa program in improving the genetic makeup of common bean in Brazil between 1985 and 2006. The estimated improvement in grain yield was 17.3 kg ha−1 or 0.72% per year. Improvements were also found in plant architecture (2.0%), tolerance to lodging (2.0%), and grain quality (2.4%). There was no significant progress for the character weight of the 100 grains or for resistance to bacterial blight.
650 $aAgronomic traits
650 $aGrain yield
650 $aCaracterísticas agronômicas
650 $aFeijão
650 $aMelhoramento genético vegetal
650 $aPhaseolus vulgaris
650 $aPrograma de pesquisa
700 1 $aMELO, P. G. S.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, H. S.
700 1 $aDEL PELOSO, M. J.
700 1 $aBRÁS, A. J. B. P.
700 1 $aMOREIRA, J. A. A.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, H. W. L. de
700 1 $aMELO, L. C.
773 $tField Crops Research, Amsterdam$gv. 142, p. 68-74, Feb. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
