| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 37 | |
| 5. |  | MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; SEDIYAMA, C. S.; MOREIRA, M. A.; REIS, M. S.; MASSONI, G. A.; PIOVESAN, N. D. Grain yield and seed quality of soybean selected for high protein content. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 39, n. 5, p. 445-450, maio 2004 Título em português: Produtividade de grãos e qualidade de sementes de soja selecionada para alto teor de proteína.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| 7. | | VAZ BISNETA, M.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; ANGHEDEN, S.; CÂMARA, A. R.; CARDOSO JUNIOR, L. A.; ZITO, R. K.; MEYER, M. C.; NUNES JUNIOR, J. Influência da época de semadura na duração dos estádios reprodutivos de cultivares de soja. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 6., 2011, Búzios. Panorama atual e perspectivas do melhoramento de plantas no Brasil. [Búzios]: SBMP, 2011. 1 CD-ROM. 5 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 8. | | MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; SEDIYAMA, C. S.; MOREIRA, M. A.; REIS, M. S.; DIAS, R. R.; ANDRADE, G. A. M. de; PIOVESAN, N. D. Estimates of correlations and path analyses for eight high protein and grain yield soybean populations. Crop Breeding in Applied Biotechnology, Viçosa, MG, v. 4, n. 3, p. 305-312, Sept. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 10. | | MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; SEDIYAMA, C. S.; MOREIRA, M. A.; REIS, M. S.; ANDRADE, G. A. M. de; DIAS, R. R.; PIOVESAN, N. D. Selection of high protein content and high yield soybean families. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Viçosa, MG, v. 4, n. 2, p. 171-177, June 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 11. | | MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; ZITO, R. K.; NUNES JÚNIOR, J.; PIMENTA, C. B.; MEYER, M. C.; HIROSE, E.; VIEIRA, N. E.; GASPRE, M.; CRUVINEL, A. Plantar, cultivar, colher. BRSGO 6959RR: a soja que acelera para os bons resultados! Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2013. 1 folder.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 12. | | SILVA, R. G. da; COSTA, N. D. L. da; VEIGA, K. S.; LIMA, D. F.; ELIAS, M. T. A.; FILIPPI, M. C. C. de; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; ZITO, R. K.; MEYER, M. C.; HOFFMANN, L. V. Inoculação com bactérias sobre a presença de sintomas de mancha-alvo em soja. In: SEMINÁRIO JOVENS TALENTOS, 13., 2019, Santo Antônio de Goiás. Resumos... Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2019. p. 51.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 13. | | CAMPOS, L. J. M.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M.; COSTA, R. V.; HIROSE, E.; ZITO, R. K.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; SANTOS, J. H. W. M. M.; GAGO, D. S.; ROCHA, B. R. Avaliação da produtividade da soja em dois ambientes no Tocantins. In: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA, 38., 2023, Londrina. Resumos expandidos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2023. (Embrapa Soja. Eventos técnicos & científicos, 1). Editado por Fernando Augusto Henning, Regina Maria Villas Bôas de Campos Leite. RPS 2023. p. 34-36.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura; Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 14. | | SILVA, L. O.; MONTEIRO, P. M. F. O.; VIEIRA, N. E.; NUNES, M. R.; NUNES JUNIOR, J.; NEIVA, L. C. S.; TOLEDO, R. M. C. P.; SOARES, R. M.; PIMENTA, C. B.; SEII, A. H.; ALMEIDA, A. M. R.; ARIAS, C. A. A.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; DIAS, W. P.; CARNEIRO, G. E. de S.; KASTER, M.; PIPOLO, A. E. Indicação da cultivar de soja BRSGO 7760RR para o estado de Goiás. In: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 30., 2008, Rio Verde. Resumos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2008. p. 216-217. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 304). Organizado por Odilon Ferreira Saraiva, César de Castro, Regina Maria Villas Bôas de Campos Leite, Fábio Alvares de Oliveira.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 15. | | VIEIRA, N. E.; MONTEIRO, P. M. F. O.; NUNES JUNIOR, J.; NEIVA, L. C. S.; NUNES, M. R.; TOLEDO, R. M. C. P.; SOARES, R. M.; KASTER, M.; PIMENTA, C. B.; SEII, A. H.; DIAS, W. P.; ARIAS, C. A. A.; CARNEIRO, G. E de S.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; PIPOLO, A. E.; ALMEIDA, M. R.; SILVA, L. O. Indicação da cultivar de soja EMGOPA 313RR para os estados de Goiás e Tocantins. In: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 30., 2008, Rio Verde. Resumos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2008. p. 236-237. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 304). Organizado por Odilon Ferreira Saraiva, César de Castro, Regina Maria Villas Bôas de Campos Leite, Fábio Alvares de Oliveira. Nome correto do décimo sexto autor: ALMEIDA, A.M.R.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 16. | | MONTEIRO, P. M. F. O.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; NEIVA, L. C. S.; NUNES, M. R.; NUNES JUNIOR, J.; TOLEDO, R. M. C. P.; VIEIRA, N. E.; FARIAS NETO, A. L. de; MOREIRA, C. T.; MEYER, M. C.; SEII, A. H.; VAZ BISNETA, M. Extensão de registro da cultivar de soja BRSGO 8360RR para Bahia e Maranhão IN: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 32, 2011, São Pedro, SP. Resumos... Londrina, PR: Embrapa Soja, 2011. v. 1 p. 286-287| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 17. | | NUNES, M. R.; NEIVA, L. C. S.; NUNES JUNIOR, J.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; TOLEDO, R. M. C. P.; VIEIRA, N. E.; FARIAS NETO, A. L. de; MOREIRA, C. T.; MONTEIRO, P. M. F. O.; MEYER, M. C.; SEII, A. H.; CÂMARA, A. R.; VAZ BISNETA, M. Extensão de registro da cultivar de soja BRSGO 8560RR para Bahia, Goiás (Norte), Maranhão e Tocantins IN: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 32, 2011, São Pedro, SP. Resumos... Londrina, PR: Embrapa Soja, 2011. v. 1 p. 290-291| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 18. | | NUNES, M. R.; MONTEIRO, P. M. F. O.; VIEIRA, N. E.; NUNES JUNIOR, J.; NEIVA, L. C. S.; SILVA, L. O.; TOLEDO, R. M. C. P.; DIAS, W. P.; SOARES, R. M.; ALMEIDA, A. M. R.; PIMENTA, C. B.; ARIAS, C. A. A.; PÍPOLO, A. E.; CARNEIRO, G. E. de S.; KASTER, M.; MELLO FILHO, O. L de. Indicação da cultivar BRSGO 7961 para os estados de Goiás, Distrito Federal e Minas Gerais. In: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 30., 2008, Rio Verde. Resumos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2008. p. 204-205. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 304). Organizado por Odilon Ferreira Saraiva, César de Castro, Regina Maria Villas Bôas de Campos Leite, Fábio Alvares de Oliveira.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 19. | | NEIVA, L. C. S.; MONTEIRO, P. M. F. O.; VIEIRA, N. E.; NUNES JUNIOR, J.; NUNES, M. R.; SILVA, L. O.; TOLEDO, R. M. C. P.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; DIAS, W. P.; CARNEIRO, G. E. de S.; SOARES, R. M.; ALMEIDA, A. M. R.; PIMENTA, C. B.; SEII, A. H.; ARIAS, C. A. A.; PIPOLO, A. E.; KASTER, M. Indicação da cultivar BRSGO 7963 para os estados de Goiás, Distrito Federal e Minas Gerais. In: REUNIÃO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIÃO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 30., 2008, Rio Verde. Resumos... Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2008. p. 209-210. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 304). Organizado por Odilon Ferreira Saraiva, César de Castro, Regina Maria Villas Bôas de Campos Leite, Fábio Alvares de Oliveira.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 20. | | ZITO, R. K.; MELLO FILHO, O. L. de; PEREIRA, M. J. Z.; MEYER, M. C.; HIROSE, E.; FIDELIS, A. C.; NUNES JÚNIOR, J.; VIEIRA, N. E.; SEII, A. H.; PIMENTA, C. B.; SANCHEZ, I.; MOREIRA, A. J. A.; DESSIMONE, M. G. L.; SENE, B. R. A. de; SOUSA, R. C.; NEIVA, L. C. da S. Cultivares de soja Macrorregiões 3, 4 e 5: Goiás e Região Central do Brasil. Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2017. 48 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 37 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
BOULAY, A. M.; DRASTIG, K.; AMANULLAH; CHAPAGAIN, A.; CHARLON, V.; CIVIT, B.; CAMILLIS, C. DE; SOUZA, M. DE; HESS, T.; HOEKSTRA, A. Y.; IBIDHI, R.; LATHUILLIERE, M. J.; MANZARDO, A.; MCALLISTER, T.; MORALES, R. A.; MOTOSHITA, M.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; PIRLO, G.; RIDOUTT, B.; RUSSO, V.; SALMORAL, G.; SINGH, R.; VANHAM, D.; WIEDEMANN, S.; ZHENG, W.; PFISTER, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANNE-MARIE BOULAY, Sherbrooke University; KATRIN DRASTIG, Polytechnique Montreal; AMANULLAH, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences; ASHOK CHAPAGAIN, Pacific Institute, USA; VERONICA CHARLON, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); BÁRBARA CIVIT, INAHE CONICET and UTN FRM Mendoza; CAMILLO DE CAMILLIS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); MARLOS DE SOUZA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); TIM HESS, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; ARJEN Y. HOEKSTRA, Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; RIDHA IBIDHI, Department of Animal and Forage Production, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Ariana, Tunisia; MICHAEL J. LATHUILLIÈRE, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ALESSANDRO MANZARDO, CESQA, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; TIM MCALLISTER, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; RICARDO A. MORALES, AgroDer SC, Mexico DF, Mexico; MASAHARU MOTOSHITA, Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; GIACOMO PIRLO, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Lodi, Italy; BRAD RIDOUTT, Department Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; VALENTINA RUSSO, Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; GLORIA SALMORAL, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; RANVIR SINGH, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; DAVY VANHAM, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; STEPHEN WIEDEMANN, Integrity Ag and Environment, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; WEICHAO ZHENG, China Agricultural University, China; STEPHAN PFISTER, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. |
|
Título: |
Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391. |
|
Páginas: |
11 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors. MenosThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantifica... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Water footprinting; Water productivity; Water scarcity footprint; Water use assessment. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Livestock production. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/229026/1/BuildingConsensusWater.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04009naa a2200505 a 4500
001 2137681
005 2021-12-13
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391$2DOI
100 1 $aBOULAY, A. M.
245 $aBuilding consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains$boutcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a11 p.
520 $aThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
650 $aLivestock production
653 $aWater footprinting
653 $aWater productivity
653 $aWater scarcity footprint
653 $aWater use assessment
700 1 $aDRASTIG, K.
700 1 $aAMANULLAH
700 1 $aCHAPAGAIN, A.
700 1 $aCHARLON, V.
700 1 $aCIVIT, B.
700 1 $aCAMILLIS, C. DE
700 1 $aSOUZA, M. DE
700 1 $aHESS, T.
700 1 $aHOEKSTRA, A. Y.
700 1 $aIBIDHI, R.
700 1 $aLATHUILLIERE, M. J.
700 1 $aMANZARDO, A.
700 1 $aMCALLISTER, T.
700 1 $aMORALES, R. A.
700 1 $aMOTOSHITA, M.
700 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P.
700 1 $aPIRLO, G.
700 1 $aRIDOUTT, B.
700 1 $aRUSSO, V.
700 1 $aSALMORAL, G.
700 1 $aSINGH, R.
700 1 $aVANHAM, D.
700 1 $aWIEDEMANN, S.
700 1 $aZHENG, W.
700 1 $aPFISTER, S.
773 $tEcological Indicators$gv.124, may 2021, 107391.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
