| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/05/1999 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/05/1999 |
|
Autoria: |
FARIAS, A. R. N.; OLIVEIRA, A. M. G.; SANTOS FILHO, H. P.; OLIVEIRA, J. R. P. de; DANTAS, J. L. L.; OLIVEIRA, M. de A.; SANCHEZ, N. F.; MEDINA, V. M.; CORDEIRO, Z. J. M. |
|
Título: |
A cultura do mamao. |
|
Edição: |
2.ed.rev.aum. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1998 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasilia: Embrapa Servico de Producao de Informacao, 1998. |
|
Páginas: |
94p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Servico de Producao de Informacao. Colecao Plantar, 37). |
|
ISBN: |
8573830336 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cultivation; Cultivo; Plant diseases; Production; Tropical fruits. |
|
Thesagro: |
Adubação; Carica Papaya; Colheita; Doença; Fruta Tropical; Mamão; Praga; Produção; Variedade. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
fertilizer application; harvesting; papayas; pests; varieties. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01213nam a2200469 a 4500
001 1558856
005 1999-05-24
008 1998 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
020 $a8573830336
100 1 $aFARIAS, A. R. N.
245 $aA cultura do mamao.
250 $a2.ed.rev.aum.
260 $aBrasilia: Embrapa Servico de Producao de Informacao$c1998
300 $a94p.
490 $a(Embrapa Servico de Producao de Informacao. Colecao Plantar, 37).
650 $afertilizer application
650 $aharvesting
650 $apapayas
650 $apests
650 $avarieties
650 $aAdubação
650 $aCarica Papaya
650 $aColheita
650 $aDoença
650 $aFruta Tropical
650 $aMamão
650 $aPraga
650 $aProdução
650 $aVariedade
653 $aCultivation
653 $aCultivo
653 $aPlant diseases
653 $aProduction
653 $aTropical fruits
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. M. G.
700 1 $aSANTOS FILHO, H. P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. R. P. de
700 1 $aDANTAS, J. L. L.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. de A.
700 1 $aSANCHEZ, N. F.
700 1 $aMEDINA, V. M.
700 1 $aCORDEIRO, Z. J. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/02/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/02/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PEDREIRA, B. C. e; CARVALHO, A. P.; PARAISO, I.; SILVA, D.; DOMICIANO, L. F.; CABRAL, L.; PEREIRA, D. H.; SOLLENBERGER, L. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; ANA PAULA CARVALHO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ISADORA PARAISO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; DÉBORA SILVA, UFMT, Sinop-MT; LEANDRO FERREIRA DOMICIANO, UFMT, Cuiabá-MT; LUCIANO CABRAL, UFMT, Sinop-MT; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT, Sinop-MT; LYNN E. SOLLENBERGER, UNIVERSITY of FLORIDA, Gainsville-FL. |
|
Título: |
Forage production and animal performance of Ipyporã and Mulato II Brachiariagrasses under continuous stocking. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ASA, CSSA & SSSA INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETING, 2020, San Antonio. Embracing the digital environment: abstracts [eletrônico]... Phoenix: ASA; CSSA; SSSA, 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In the last two decades breeders have focused on hybridization within the grass genus Brachiaria in order to integrate the most outstanding characteristics of several species to enhance animal performance in forage-livestock system, especially when addressing edaphoclimatic conditions and pest susceptibility. The objective of this study was to compare herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and animal performance of ?Ipyporã? [B. ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ?Mulato II? (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha× B. decumbens Stapf) brachiariagrasses in the Brazilian Amazon biome. All experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate from May 2016 to May 2018. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg DM ha?1) than Ipyporã (14,930 kg DM ha?1), resulting in 25 and 23% greater stocking rate (SR) and gain ha?1 than Ipyporã, respectively. Herbage allowance did not differ between grasses (averaging 6.52 kg DM kg?1 BW). The crude protein (CP), neutral (NDF), and acid (ADF) detergent fiber concentrations did not differ between cultivars (P > 0.05). Greater annual HA and gain ha-1 for Mulato II support its use in intensive forage-based systems. However, susceptibility of Mulato II to spittlebug requires regular monitoring and treatment in regions like the Amazon biome, where risk of spittlebug damage is great. In contrast, spittlebug-resistant Ipyporã can provide excellent plant and animal response with no spittlebug risk, offering a sustainable alternative to Mulato II for forage diversification. MenosIn the last two decades breeders have focused on hybridization within the grass genus Brachiaria in order to integrate the most outstanding characteristics of several species to enhance animal performance in forage-livestock system, especially when addressing edaphoclimatic conditions and pest susceptibility. The objective of this study was to compare herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and animal performance of ?Ipyporã? [B. ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ?Mulato II? (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha× B. decumbens Stapf) brachiariagrasses in the Brazilian Amazon biome. All experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate from May 2016 to May 2018. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg DM ha?1) than Ipyporã (14,930 kg DM ha?1), resulting in 25 and 23% greater stocking rate (SR) and gain ha?1 than Ipyporã, respectively. Herbage allowance did not differ between grasses (averaging 6.52 kg DM kg?1 BW). The crude protein (CP), neutral (NDF), and acid (ADF) detergent fiber concentrations did not differ between cultivars (P > 0.05). Greater annual HA and gain ha-1 for Mulato II support its use in intensive forage-based systems. However, susceptibility of Mulato II to spittlebug requires regular monitoring and treatment in regions like the Amazon biome, where risk of spittlebug damage is great. In contrast, spittlebug-resistant Ipyporã can provide excellent plant and animal response with n... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BRS RB331; Ipyporã; Mato Grosso; Mulato II; Sinop-MT. |
|
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria Ruziziensis; Forragem. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; Animal performance; Forage. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/221334/1/2020-cpamt-bcp-forage-animal-performance-ipypora-mulato-ii-brachiariagrasses-continuous-stocking.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02595nam a2200313 a 4500
001 2130142
005 2021-02-19
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
245 $aForage production and animal performance of Ipyporã and Mulato II Brachiariagrasses under continuous stocking.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: ASA, CSSA & SSSA INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETING, 2020, San Antonio. Embracing the digital environment: abstracts [eletrônico]... Phoenix: ASA; CSSA; SSSA$c2020
520 $aIn the last two decades breeders have focused on hybridization within the grass genus Brachiaria in order to integrate the most outstanding characteristics of several species to enhance animal performance in forage-livestock system, especially when addressing edaphoclimatic conditions and pest susceptibility. The objective of this study was to compare herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and animal performance of ?Ipyporã? [B. ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ?Mulato II? (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha× B. decumbens Stapf) brachiariagrasses in the Brazilian Amazon biome. All experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate from May 2016 to May 2018. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg DM ha?1) than Ipyporã (14,930 kg DM ha?1), resulting in 25 and 23% greater stocking rate (SR) and gain ha?1 than Ipyporã, respectively. Herbage allowance did not differ between grasses (averaging 6.52 kg DM kg?1 BW). The crude protein (CP), neutral (NDF), and acid (ADF) detergent fiber concentrations did not differ between cultivars (P > 0.05). Greater annual HA and gain ha-1 for Mulato II support its use in intensive forage-based systems. However, susceptibility of Mulato II to spittlebug requires regular monitoring and treatment in regions like the Amazon biome, where risk of spittlebug damage is great. In contrast, spittlebug-resistant Ipyporã can provide excellent plant and animal response with no spittlebug risk, offering a sustainable alternative to Mulato II for forage diversification.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aAnimal performance
650 $aForage
650 $aBrachiaria Ruziziensis
650 $aForragem
653 $aBRS RB331
653 $aIpyporã
653 $aMato Grosso
653 $aMulato II
653 $aSinop-MT
700 1 $aCARVALHO, A. P.
700 1 $aPARAISO, I.
700 1 $aSILVA, D.
700 1 $aDOMICIANO, L. F.
700 1 $aCABRAL, L.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, D. H.
700 1 $aSOLLENBERGER, L. E.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
