Portal do Governo Brasileiro
BDPA - Bases de Dados da Pesquisa Agropecuária Embrapa
 






Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s):  Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos.
Data corrente:  03/04/2013
Data da última atualização:  01/07/2016
Autoria:  AGUIAR, G. M. N.; SIMÕES, S. V. D.; SILVA, T. R.; ASSIS, A. C. O.; MEDEIROS, J. M. A.; GARINO JÚNIOR, F.; RIET-CORREA, F.
Título:  Foot rot and other foot diseases of goat and sheep in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil.
Ano de publicação:  2011
Fonte/Imprenta:  Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 31, n. 10, p. 879-884, out., 2011.
DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2011001000008
Idioma:  Inglês
Conteúdo:  Abstract: This paper reports the occurrence and epidemiology of outbreaks of foot rot and other foot diseases in goats and sheep in the semiarid region of Paraíba, northeastern Brazil. Four farms were inspected for the presence of foot lesion in sheep and goats and for environmental conditions, general hygiene, pastures, and disease control measures. The prevalence of foot lesions was 19.41% (170/876) in sheep and 17.99% (52/289) in goats, ranging between 5.77% and 33.85% in different farms. Foot rot was the most common disease, affecting 12.1% of the animals examined (141/1165), but with significantly higher (p<0.05) prevalence in sheep (13.69%) than in goats (7.27%). The frequency of malignant foot rot was also significantly lower (p<0.05) in goats (9.53%) than in the sheep (40.83%). On one farm, Dorper sheep showed significantly higher (p<0.05) prevalence of foot rot (17.5%) than Santa Inês sheep (6.79%), and the number of digits affected was also higher in the former. Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum were isolated from cases of foot rot. White line disease was found in 3.95% of the animals, sole ulcers in 1.29%, foot abscess in 1.03% and hoof overgrowth in 0.5%. The high rainfall at the time of occurrence, grazing in wetlands, clay soils with poor drainage, presence of numerous stony grounds, closure of the flocks in pens at night, and introduction of affected animals were considered predisposing factors for the occurrence of foot diseases. [Pododerma... Mostrar Tudo
Palavras-Chave:  Pododermatite.
Thesagro:  Caprino; Doença animal; Ovino.
Thesaurus Nal:  Dichelobacter nodosus; Fusobacterium necrophorum.
Categoria do assunto:  --
Marc:  Mostrar Marc Completo
Registro original:  Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC)
Biblioteca ID Origem Tipo/Formato Classificação Cutter Registro Volume Status URL
CNPC26935 - 1ADDAP - PP
Voltar






Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br.

Registro Completo

Biblioteca(s):  Embrapa Solos.
Data corrente:  05/09/2022
Data da última atualização:  06/09/2022
Tipo da produção científica:  Artigo em Periódico Indexado
Circulação/Nível:  A - 1
Autoria:  ALVES, A. C.; SOUZA, E. R. de; MELO, H. F. de; PINTO, J. G. O; REGO JUNIOR, F. E. de A.; SOUZA JÚNIOR, V. S. de; MARQUES, F. A.; SANTOS, M. A. do; SCHAFFER, B.; GHEYI, H. R.
Afiliação:  AGLAIR CARDOSO ALVES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO; EDIVAN RODRIGUES DE SOUZA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO; HIDELBLANDI FARIAS DE MELO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; JOSÉ GEORGE OLIVEIRA PINTO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO; FRANCISCO ERNESTO DE ANDRADE REGO JUNIOR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO; VALDOMIRO SEVERINO DE SOUZA JÚNIOR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO; FLAVIO ADRIANO MARQUES, CNPS; MONALIZA ALVES DO SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO; BRUCE SCHAFFER, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; HANS RAJ GHEYI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE.
Título:  Comparison of solution extraction methods for estimating electrical conductivity in soils with contrasting mineralogical assemblages and textures.
Ano de publicação:  2022
Fonte/Imprenta:  Catena, v. 218, 106581, Nov. 2022.
DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106581
Idioma:  Inglês
Conteúdo:  Characterization of the soil solution is of fundamental importance for monitoring plant nutrient availability, environmental contamination, and evaluation of salt-affected soils. Due to the diversity of methodologies adopted in various parts of the world, comparison of the most common extraction methods in different types of soils is warranted. This study compared the efficiency of five soil solution extraction methods for five soils with different mineralogical assemblages and textures with the most commonly used saturated paste extract method. The extraction methods compared were: centrifugation, porous extractor capsules, and soil-water extracts (soil:water ratio of 1:2, 1:5, or 1:10). The soil types evaluated were: Regosol, Luvisol, Gleysol, Nitisol and Ferrosol in the soil surface and subsurface horizons. Linear regression equations were developed that allowed accurate estimation of electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (ECse). Ten equations were developed for the porous capsule method, eight were developed for the centrifugation method (with the exception of the Regosol with 900 g k-1 of total sand, which was not suitable for this method due to the high sand content), and 30 equations were developed for the soil-water extract method (at each of the soil:water ratios tested). The diversity of equations developed for soils with different mineralogical assemblages and textures should assist growers and extension workers who need to know the soil electrica... Mostrar Tudo
Palavras-Chave:  Cápsula porosa; Centrifugation method; Métodos de extração; Porous capsules; Saturated paste extract; Soil-water extracts.
Thesagro:  Centrifugação; Condutividade Eletrica; Extração; Relação Solo-Água; Solução do Solo.
Categoria do assunto:  P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra
Marc:  Mostrar Marc Completo
Registro original:  Embrapa Solos (CNPS)
Biblioteca ID Origem Tipo/Formato Classificação Cutter Registro Volume Status
CNPS21142 - 1UPCAP - DD
Fechar
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!!
 
 

Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área Restrita

Embrapa Agricultura Digital
Av. André Tosello, 209 - Barão Geraldo
Caixa Postal 6041- 13083-886 - Campinas, SP
SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional