|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
Data corrente: |
21/05/2008 |
Data da última atualização: |
04/12/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
WANDER, A. E.; MAGALHÃES, M. C.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; MARTINS, E. C. |
Afiliação: |
Alcido Elenor Wander, CNPC; GRACIELA LUZIA VEDOVOTO, SGE; ESPEDITO CEZARIO MARTINS, CNPC. |
Título: |
Using the economic surplus method to assess economic impacts of new technologies: case studies of Embrapa. |
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2004, Berlin. Book of abstracts... Berlin: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, 2004. 10 f. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract - Assessment of economic impacts of new technologies delivers helpful information to justify investment efforts in research and development to generate new technologies. In Brazilian agricultural research and development, it?s a convention to assess economic impacts of technologies generated and adapted by EMBRAPA. As soon as new technologies are adopted, expost assessment is conducted to evaluate net benefits of its adoption. In agricultural research, the economic surplus method represents one of the suitable frameworks to measure the aggregated social benefits of a research project. With this method it is possible to estimate the return of investments by calculating a variation of consumer and producer surplus through a technological change originated by research results. Therefore, in a first step the gain of adoption i.e., increases in productivity, quality improvements, cost reduction etc. is estimated. In a second step, costs involved in generation and adaptation of the technology are enumerated. The difference between the gains and the costs of generation and transfer represents the net benefit of the technology, explained by the net present value, the internal rate of return and the benefit-costratio. The so far obtained results serve as additional information for each technology to improve its adoption by beneficiaries and to enable access to the new financing sources. Some examples of such technologies are (a) the finishing of lambs in confinement in the Brazilian semi-arid Northeast during the dry season, when feeding resources are scarce and the lamb meat prices are high; (b) strategic vermifugation of goats herds and sheep flocks in the Brazilian semi-arid areas; (c) standardized cuts for goat and sheep carcass and (d) enrichment of the native pastures in Brazilian Northeast with Cynodon dactylon for sheep production. The assessment of the economic impacts of these technologies estimated positive net present values for all four considered technologies, internal rates of return of 26.2% (a), 13.8% (b), 52.8% (c) and 31.0% (d) and the benefit-cost-ratios of 2.92 (a), 1.19 (b), 11.64 (c) and 3.37 (d). MenosAbstract - Assessment of economic impacts of new technologies delivers helpful information to justify investment efforts in research and development to generate new technologies. In Brazilian agricultural research and development, it?s a convention to assess economic impacts of technologies generated and adapted by EMBRAPA. As soon as new technologies are adopted, expost assessment is conducted to evaluate net benefits of its adoption. In agricultural research, the economic surplus method represents one of the suitable frameworks to measure the aggregated social benefits of a research project. With this method it is possible to estimate the return of investments by calculating a variation of consumer and producer surplus through a technological change originated by research results. Therefore, in a first step the gain of adoption i.e., increases in productivity, quality improvements, cost reduction etc. is estimated. In a second step, costs involved in generation and adaptation of the technology are enumerated. The difference between the gains and the costs of generation and transfer represents the net benefit of the technology, explained by the net present value, the internal rate of return and the benefit-costratio. The so far obtained results serve as additional information for each technology to improve its adoption by beneficiaries and to enable access to the new financing sources. Some examples of such technologies are (a) the finishing of lambs in confinement in the B... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Adoção de tecnologia; Avaliação de impactos; Avaliação econômica; Brasil; Embrapa; Environmental impact assessment; Fattening; Semiárido. |
Thesagro: |
Adoção de inovações; Análise de Risco; Análise econômica; Confinamento; Cordeiro; Impacto ambiental; Impacto econômico; Ovino; Terminação. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Brazil; Innovation adoption; Lambs; Risk analysis; Semiarid zones; Sheep; Technology transfer. |
Categoria do assunto: |
B Sociologia Rural |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/50772/1/AAC-Using-the-economic.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03559nam a2200433 a 4500 001 1534035 005 2023-12-04 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aWANDER, A. E. 245 $aUsing the economic surplus method to assess economic impacts of new technologies$bcase studies of Embrapa.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2004, Berlin. Book of abstracts... Berlin: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, 2004. 10 f.$c2004 520 $aAbstract - Assessment of economic impacts of new technologies delivers helpful information to justify investment efforts in research and development to generate new technologies. In Brazilian agricultural research and development, it?s a convention to assess economic impacts of technologies generated and adapted by EMBRAPA. As soon as new technologies are adopted, expost assessment is conducted to evaluate net benefits of its adoption. In agricultural research, the economic surplus method represents one of the suitable frameworks to measure the aggregated social benefits of a research project. With this method it is possible to estimate the return of investments by calculating a variation of consumer and producer surplus through a technological change originated by research results. Therefore, in a first step the gain of adoption i.e., increases in productivity, quality improvements, cost reduction etc. is estimated. In a second step, costs involved in generation and adaptation of the technology are enumerated. The difference between the gains and the costs of generation and transfer represents the net benefit of the technology, explained by the net present value, the internal rate of return and the benefit-costratio. The so far obtained results serve as additional information for each technology to improve its adoption by beneficiaries and to enable access to the new financing sources. Some examples of such technologies are (a) the finishing of lambs in confinement in the Brazilian semi-arid Northeast during the dry season, when feeding resources are scarce and the lamb meat prices are high; (b) strategic vermifugation of goats herds and sheep flocks in the Brazilian semi-arid areas; (c) standardized cuts for goat and sheep carcass and (d) enrichment of the native pastures in Brazilian Northeast with Cynodon dactylon for sheep production. The assessment of the economic impacts of these technologies estimated positive net present values for all four considered technologies, internal rates of return of 26.2% (a), 13.8% (b), 52.8% (c) and 31.0% (d) and the benefit-cost-ratios of 2.92 (a), 1.19 (b), 11.64 (c) and 3.37 (d). 650 $aBrazil 650 $aInnovation adoption 650 $aLambs 650 $aRisk analysis 650 $aSemiarid zones 650 $aSheep 650 $aTechnology transfer 650 $aAdoção de inovações 650 $aAnálise de Risco 650 $aAnálise econômica 650 $aConfinamento 650 $aCordeiro 650 $aImpacto ambiental 650 $aImpacto econômico 650 $aOvino 650 $aTerminação 653 $aAdoção de tecnologia 653 $aAvaliação de impactos 653 $aAvaliação econômica 653 $aBrasil 653 $aEmbrapa 653 $aEnvironmental impact assessment 653 $aFattening 653 $aSemiárido 700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, M. C. 700 1 $aVEDOVOTO, G. L. 700 1 $aMARTINS, E. C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
1. | | BAZZO, J. H. B.; MARINHO, J. de L.; SOUZA, D. N. de; SILVA, S. R.; CARDOSO, C. P.; CESCO, V. J. S.; FAVORETTO, V. R.; ZUCARELI, C. Adubação nitrogenada na qualidade fisiológica de sementes de genótipos trigo. In: REUNIÃO DA COMISSÃO BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA DE TRIGO E TRITICALE, 10., 2016, Londrina. Anais... Londrina: Comissão Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo e Triticale, 2016. 5 p. 1 CD-ROM.Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
2. | | MARINHO, J. de L.; SILVA, S. R.; SOUZA, D. N. DE; FONSECA, I. C. DE B.; BAZZO, J. H. B.; ZUCARELI, C. Wheat yield and seed physiological quality affected by initial seed vigor, sowing density, and environmental conditions Sêmina: Ciências Agrárias, v. 42, n. 3, supl. 1, p. 1595-1614, 2021Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
3. | | SOUZA, D. N. de; SILVA, S. R.; MARINHO, J. L.; BAZZO, J. H. B.; FONSECA, I. C. de B.; ZUCARELI, C. Wheat yield and seed physiological quality as influenced by seed vigor, nitrogen fertilization and edaphoclimatic conditions. Semina: Ciências Agrárias Londrina, v. 42, n. 6, Sipl. 2, p. 3581-3602, 2021.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
4. | | SILVA, M. S. L. da; MELLO, A. C.; MARINHO, R. E. M.; ARAÚJO, J. A. de; ANJOS, J. B. dos; GNALDLINGER, J.; SOUZA, D. N. de; VIANA, J. R.; LEITE, W. de M.; BRITO, L. T. de L. Barragem subterrânea: I - Diagnóstico nos estados da Bahia, Pernambuco e Paraíba. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE CAPTAÇÃO E MANEJO DE ÁGUA DE CHUVA, 5., 2005, Teresina. Anais... Teresina: ABCMAC: Embrapa Semi-Árido: IRPAA: ASA, 2005. 1 CD-ROM.Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|