|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Roraima; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
30/11/1993 |
Data da última atualização: |
02/02/2018 |
Autoria: |
MÜLLER, C. H. |
Afiliação: |
CARLOS HANS MÜLLER, CPATU. |
Título: |
Quebra da dormência da semente e enxertia em castanha-do-brasil. |
Ano de publicação: |
1982 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Belém, PA: EMBRAPA-CPATU, 1982. |
Páginas: |
40 p. |
Descrição Física: |
il. |
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-CPATU. Documentos, 16). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
O objetivo deste trabalho é descrever as técnicas da quebra da dormência da semente e da enxertia da castanha-do-brasil, apontar os pontos críticos de cada etapa e mostrar os equipamentos em uso. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Brazil nut; Castanha do brasil; Castanha-do-brasil; Castanha-do-Pará; Enxertia; Grafting; Propagacao vegatativa; Quebra de dormência; Seed; Sementes. |
Thesagro: |
Bertholletia Excelsa; Castanha do Para; Dormência; Germinação; Propagação Vegetativa; Quebra da Dormência; Semente. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
dormancy; germination; vegetative propagation. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/57649/1/DOCUMENTOS-16-CPATU.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01219nam a2200385 a 4500 001 1381176 005 2018-02-02 008 1982 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aMÜLLER, C. H. 245 $aQuebra da dormência da semente e enxertia em castanha-do-brasil. 260 $aBelém, PA: EMBRAPA-CPATU$c1982 300 $a40 p.$cil. 490 $a(EMBRAPA-CPATU. Documentos, 16). 520 $aO objetivo deste trabalho é descrever as técnicas da quebra da dormência da semente e da enxertia da castanha-do-brasil, apontar os pontos críticos de cada etapa e mostrar os equipamentos em uso. 650 $adormancy 650 $agermination 650 $avegetative propagation 650 $aBertholletia Excelsa 650 $aCastanha do Para 650 $aDormência 650 $aGerminação 650 $aPropagação Vegetativa 650 $aQuebra da Dormência 650 $aSemente 653 $aBrasil 653 $aBrazil nut 653 $aCastanha do brasil 653 $aCastanha-do-brasil 653 $aCastanha-do-Pará 653 $aEnxertia 653 $aGrafting 653 $aPropagacao vegatativa 653 $aQuebra de dormência 653 $aSeed 653 $aSementes
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
23/08/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/09/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 4 |
Autoria: |
VASQUES, G. de M.; RODRIGUES, H. M.; COELHO, M. R.; BACA, J. F. M.; DART, R. de O.; OLIVEIRA, R. P. de; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; CEDDIA, M. B. |
Afiliação: |
GUSTAVO DE MATTOS VASQUES, CNPS; HUGO MACHADO RODRIGUES, UFRRJ; MAURICIO RIZZATO COELHO, CNPS; JESUS FERNANDO MANSILLA BACA, CNPS; RICARDO DE OLIVEIRA DART, CNPS; RONALDO PEREIRA DE OLIVEIRA, CNPS; WENCESLAU GERALDES TEIXEIRA, CNPS; MARCOS BACIS CEDDIA, UFRRJ. |
Título: |
Field proximal soil sensor fusion for improving high-resolution soil property maps. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Soil Systems, v. 4, n. 3, 52, 2020. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4030052 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Mapping soil properties, using geostatistical methods in support of precision agriculture and related activities, requires a large number of samples. To reduce soil sampling and measurement time and cost, a combination of field proximal soil sensors was used to predict and map laboratory-measured soil properties in a 3.4-ha pasture field in southeastern Brazil. Sensor soil properties were measured in situ on a 10 × 10-m dense grid (377 samples) using apparent electrical conductivity meters, apparent magnetic susceptibility meter, gamma-ray spectrometer, water content reflectometer, cone penetrometer, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). Soil samples were collected on a 20 × 20-m thin grid (105 samples) and analyzed in the laboratory for organic C, sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, clay content, soil volumetric moisture, and bulk density. Another 25 samples collected throughout the area were also analyzed for the same soil properties and used for independent validation of models and maps. To test whether the combination of sensors enhances soil property predictions, stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) models of the laboratory soil properties were derived using individual sensor covariate data versus combined sensor data-except for the pXRF data, which were evaluated separately. Then, to test whether a denser grid sample boosted by sensor-based soil property predictions enhances soil property maps, ordinary kriging of the laboratory-measured soil properties from the thin grid was compared to ordinary kriging of the sensor-based predictions from the dense grid, and ordinary cokriging of the laboratory properties aided by sensor covariate data. The combination of multiple soil sensors improved the MLR predictions for all soil properties relative to single sensors. The pXRF data produced the best MLR predictions for organic C content, clay content, and bulk density, standing out as the best single sensor for soil property prediction, whereas the other sensors combined outperformed the pXRF sensor for the sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, and soil volumetric moisture, based on independent validation. Ordinary kriging of sensor-based predictions outperformed the other interpolation approaches for all soil properties, except organic C content, based on validation results. Thus, combining soil sensors, and using sensor-based soil property predictions to increase the sample size and spatial coverage, leads to more detailed and accurate soil property maps. MenosMapping soil properties, using geostatistical methods in support of precision agriculture and related activities, requires a large number of samples. To reduce soil sampling and measurement time and cost, a combination of field proximal soil sensors was used to predict and map laboratory-measured soil properties in a 3.4-ha pasture field in southeastern Brazil. Sensor soil properties were measured in situ on a 10 × 10-m dense grid (377 samples) using apparent electrical conductivity meters, apparent magnetic susceptibility meter, gamma-ray spectrometer, water content reflectometer, cone penetrometer, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). Soil samples were collected on a 20 × 20-m thin grid (105 samples) and analyzed in the laboratory for organic C, sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, clay content, soil volumetric moisture, and bulk density. Another 25 samples collected throughout the area were also analyzed for the same soil properties and used for independent validation of models and maps. To test whether the combination of sensors enhances soil property predictions, stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) models of the laboratory soil properties were derived using individual sensor covariate data versus combined sensor data-except for the pXRF data, which were evaluated separately. Then, to test whether a denser grid sample boosted by sensor-based soil property predictions enhances soil property maps, ordinary kriging of the laboratory-measured soil pr... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Fluorescência de raios X; Fusão de sensor proximal; Geoestatística; Radiometria gama; Susceptibilidade magnética. |
Thesagro: |
Condutividade Eletrica; Sensoriamento Remoto. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Electrical conductivity; Geostatistics; Remote sensing. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/215532/1/Field-proximal-soil-sensor-fusion-for-improving-high-resolution-soil-property-maps-2020.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03550naa a2200337 a 4500 001 2124518 005 2020-09-08 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4030052$2DOI 100 1 $aVASQUES, G. de M. 245 $aField proximal soil sensor fusion for improving high-resolution soil property maps.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aMapping soil properties, using geostatistical methods in support of precision agriculture and related activities, requires a large number of samples. To reduce soil sampling and measurement time and cost, a combination of field proximal soil sensors was used to predict and map laboratory-measured soil properties in a 3.4-ha pasture field in southeastern Brazil. Sensor soil properties were measured in situ on a 10 × 10-m dense grid (377 samples) using apparent electrical conductivity meters, apparent magnetic susceptibility meter, gamma-ray spectrometer, water content reflectometer, cone penetrometer, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). Soil samples were collected on a 20 × 20-m thin grid (105 samples) and analyzed in the laboratory for organic C, sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, clay content, soil volumetric moisture, and bulk density. Another 25 samples collected throughout the area were also analyzed for the same soil properties and used for independent validation of models and maps. To test whether the combination of sensors enhances soil property predictions, stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) models of the laboratory soil properties were derived using individual sensor covariate data versus combined sensor data-except for the pXRF data, which were evaluated separately. Then, to test whether a denser grid sample boosted by sensor-based soil property predictions enhances soil property maps, ordinary kriging of the laboratory-measured soil properties from the thin grid was compared to ordinary kriging of the sensor-based predictions from the dense grid, and ordinary cokriging of the laboratory properties aided by sensor covariate data. The combination of multiple soil sensors improved the MLR predictions for all soil properties relative to single sensors. The pXRF data produced the best MLR predictions for organic C content, clay content, and bulk density, standing out as the best single sensor for soil property prediction, whereas the other sensors combined outperformed the pXRF sensor for the sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, and soil volumetric moisture, based on independent validation. Ordinary kriging of sensor-based predictions outperformed the other interpolation approaches for all soil properties, except organic C content, based on validation results. Thus, combining soil sensors, and using sensor-based soil property predictions to increase the sample size and spatial coverage, leads to more detailed and accurate soil property maps. 650 $aElectrical conductivity 650 $aGeostatistics 650 $aRemote sensing 650 $aCondutividade Eletrica 650 $aSensoriamento Remoto 653 $aFluorescência de raios X 653 $aFusão de sensor proximal 653 $aGeoestatística 653 $aRadiometria gama 653 $aSusceptibilidade magnética 700 1 $aRODRIGUES, H. M. 700 1 $aCOELHO, M. R. 700 1 $aBACA, J. F. M. 700 1 $aDART, R. de O. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, R. P. de 700 1 $aTEIXEIRA, W. G. 700 1 $aCEDDIA, M. B. 773 $tSoil Systems$gv. 4, n. 3, 52, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|