| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/04/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/04/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
WIJAYAWARDENE, N. N.; HYDE, K. D.; AL-ANI, L. K. T.; TEDERSOO, L.; HAELEWATERS, D.; RAJESHKUMAR, K. C.; ZHAO, R. L; APTROOT, A.; LEONTYEV, D. V.; SAXENA, R. K.; TOKAREV, Y. S.; DAI, D. Q.; LETCHER, P. M.; STEPHENSON, S. L.; ERTZ, D.; LUMBSCH, H. T.; KUKWA, M.; ISSI, I. V.; MADRID, H.; PHILLIPS, A. J. L.; SELBMANN, L.; PFLIEGLER, W. P.; HORVÁTH, E.; BENSCH, K.; KIRK, P. M.; KOLARÍKOVÁ, K.; RAJA, H. A.; RADEK, R.; PAPP, V.; DIMA, V.; MA, J.; MALOSSO, E.; TAKAMATSU, S.; RAMBOLD, G.; GANNIBAL, P. B.; TRIEBEL, D.; GAUTAM, A. K.; AVASTHI, S.; SUETRONG, S.; TIMDAL, E.; FRYAR, S. C.; DELGADO, G.; RÉBLOVÁ, M.; DOILOM, M.; DOLATABADI, S.; PAWLOWSKA, J. Z.; HUMBER, R. A.; KODSUEB, R.; SÁNCHEZ-CASTRO, I.; GOTO, B. T.; SILVA, D. K. A.; SOUZA, F. A. de; OEHL, F.; SILVA, G. A. da; BLASZKOWSKI, J.; JOBIM, K.; MAIA, L. C.; BARBOSA, F. R.; FIUZA, P. O.; DIVAKAR, P. K.; SHENOY, B. D.; CASTAÑEDA-RUIZ, R. F.; SOMRITHIPOL, S.; LATEEF, A. A.; KARUNARATHNA, S. C.; TIBPROMMA, S.; MORTIMER, P. E.; WANASINGHE, D. N.; PHOOKAMSAK, R.; XU, J.; WANG, Y.; TIAN, F.; ALVARADO, P.; LI, D. W.; KUSAN, I.; MATOCEC, N.; MESIC, A.; TKALCEC, Z.; MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, S. S. N.; PAPIZADEH, M.; HEREDIA, G.; WARTCHOW, F.; BAKHSHI, M.; BOEHM, E.; YOUSSEF, N.; HUSTAD, V. P.; LAWREY, J. D.; SANTIAGO, A. L. C. M. A.; BEZERRA, J. D. P.; SOUZA-MOTTA, C. M.; FIRMINO, A. L.; TIAN, Q.; HOUBRAKEN, J.; HONGSANAN, S.; TANAKA, K.; DISSANAYAKE, A. J.; MONTEIRO, J. S.; GROSSART, H. P.; SUIJA, A.; WEERAKOON, G.; ETAYO, J.; TSURYKAU, A.; VÁZQUEZ, V.; MUNGAI, P.; DAMM, U.; LI, Q. R.; ZHANG, H.; BOONMEE, S.; LU, Y. Z.; BECERRA, A. G.; KENDRICK, B.; BREARLEY, F. Q.; MOTIEJUNAITE, J.; SHARMA, B.; KHARE, R.; GAIKWAD, S.; WIJESUNDARA, D. S. A.; TANG, L. Z.; HE, M. Q.; FLAKUS, A.; RODRIGUEZ-FLAKUS, P.; ZHURBENKO, M. P.; MCKENZIE, E. H. C.; STADLER, M.; BHAT, D. J.; LIU, J. K.; RAZA, M.; JEEWON, R.; NASSONOVA, E. S.; PRIETO, M.; JAYALAL, R. G. U.; ERDOGDU, M.; YURKOV, A.; SCHNITTLER, M.; SHCHEPIN, O. N.; NOVOZHILOV, Y. K.; SILVA-FILHO, A. G. S.; GENTEKAKI, E.; LIU, P.; CAVENDER, J. C.; KANG, Y.; MOHAMMAD, S.; ZHANG, L. F.; XU, R. F.; LI, Y. M.; DAYARATHNE, M. C.; EKANAYAKA, A. H.; WEN, T. C.; DENG, C. Y.; PEREIRA, O. L.; NAVATHE, S.; HAWKSWORTH, D. L.; FAN, X. L.; DISSANAYAKE, L. S.; KUHNERT, E.; GROSSART, H. P.; THINES, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
Qujing Normal University; Mae Fah Luang University; University of Baghdad; University of Tartu; University of South Bohemia; National Fungal Culture Collection of India -NFCCI; State Key Laboratory of Mycology; Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul; Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University; University Road; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Qujing Normal University; The University of Alabama; University of Arkansas; Botanic Garden Meise; The Field Museum; University of Gda?sk; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Universidad Mayor; Universidade de Lisboa; University of Tuscia; University of Debrecen; University of Debrecen; Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; Royal Botanic Gardens; Czech Academy of Sciences; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Freie Universität Berlin; Szent István University; Eötvös Loránd University; Jiangxi Agricultural University; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Mie University; Universität of Bayreuth; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns; Abhilashi University; Jiwaji University; National Science and Technology Development Agency -NSTDA; University of Oslo; Flinders University; EMLab P&K Houston; Academy of Sciences; Chiang Mai University; Sabzevar University of New Technology; University of Warsaw; USDA-ARS Emerging Pests and Pathogens Research; Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University; Universidad de Granada; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Universidade Federal da Paraíba; FRANCISCO ADRIANO DE SOUZA, CNPMS; Agroscope, Competence Div Plants & Plant Prod.; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; West Pomeranian University of Technology; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Universidad Complutense de Madrid; CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography Regional Centre; Instituto de Investigaciones Fundamentales en AgriculturaTropical; BIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency - NSTDA; University of Ilorin; Kunming Institute of Botany; Kunming Institute of Botany; Kunming Institute of Botany; Kunming Institute of Botany; Mae Fah Luang University; Kunming Institute of Botany; Guizhou University; Guizhou University; ALVALAB; Valley Laboratory; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Pasteur Institute of Iran; Instituto de Ecolog? 'a A. C.; Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection; Oklahoma State University; Northwest Missouri State University; George Mason University; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Mae Fah Luang University; Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; Shenzhen University; Hirosaki University; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; Leibnitz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries - IGB; University of Tartu; The Natural History Museum; IES Zizur; Skorina Gomel State University; University of Málaga; Kenya Wildlife Service; Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz; Guizhou Medical University; Kunming University of Science and Technology; Mae Fah Luang University; Guizhou University; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Manchester Metropolitan University; Nature Research Centre; Agharkar Research Institute; Agharkar Research Institute; Agharkar Research Institute; National Institute of Fundamental Studies; Qujing Normal University; Institute of Microbiology Chinese Academy of Sciences; Szafer Institute of Botany; Szafer Institute of Botany; Russian Academy of Sciences; Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research; Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Institute of Microbiology Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Mauritius; Russian Academy of Sciences; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos; University of Sri Lanka; K?r?ehir Ahi Evran University; Leibniz Institute; Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald; Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian Academy of Sciences; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Mae Fah Luang University; Jilin Agricultural University; Ohio University; Guizhou Medical University; Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology -IROST; Qujing Normal University; Qujing Normal University; Qujing Normal University; Guizhou University; Mae Fah Luang University; Guizhou University; Guizhou Academy of Science; Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Agharkar Research Institute; Jilin Agricultural University; Beijing Forestry University; Guizhou University; Leibniz University; Leibnitz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries -IGB; Goethe University. |
|
Título: |
Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Mycosphere, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1060-1456, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This article provides an outline of the classification of the kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi. i.e. dispersed spores, mycelia, sporophores, mycorrhizas). We treat 19 phyla of fungi. These are Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Caulochytriomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota and Zoopagomycota. The placement of all fungal genera is provided at the class-, order- and family-level. The described number of species per genus is also given. Notes are provided of taxa for which recent changes or disagreements have been presented. Fungus-like taxa that were traditionally treated as fungi are also incorporated in this outline (i.e. Eumycetozoa, Dictyosteliomycetes, Ceratiomyxomycetes and Myxomycetes). Four new taxa are introduced: Amblyosporida ord. nov. Neopereziida ord. nov. and Ovavesiculida ord. nov. in Rozellomycota, and Protosporangiaceae fam. nov. in Dictyosteliomycetes. Two different classifications (in outline section and in discussion) are provided for Glomeromycota and Leotiomycetes based on recent studies. The phylogenetic reconstruction of a four-gene dataset (18S and 28S rRNA, RPB1, RPB2) of 433 taxa is presented, including all currently described orders of fungi. |
|
Thesagro: |
Fungo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Amblyosporidae; Ascomycota; Basidiomycota; Microsporidia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/212407/1/Outline-fungi.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 06573naa a2202065 a 4500
001 2121744
005 2020-04-20
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8$2DOI
100 1 $aWIJAYAWARDENE, N. N.
245 $aOutline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThis article provides an outline of the classification of the kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi. i.e. dispersed spores, mycelia, sporophores, mycorrhizas). We treat 19 phyla of fungi. These are Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Caulochytriomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota and Zoopagomycota. The placement of all fungal genera is provided at the class-, order- and family-level. The described number of species per genus is also given. Notes are provided of taxa for which recent changes or disagreements have been presented. Fungus-like taxa that were traditionally treated as fungi are also incorporated in this outline (i.e. Eumycetozoa, Dictyosteliomycetes, Ceratiomyxomycetes and Myxomycetes). Four new taxa are introduced: Amblyosporida ord. nov. Neopereziida ord. nov. and Ovavesiculida ord. nov. in Rozellomycota, and Protosporangiaceae fam. nov. in Dictyosteliomycetes. Two different classifications (in outline section and in discussion) are provided for Glomeromycota and Leotiomycetes based on recent studies. The phylogenetic reconstruction of a four-gene dataset (18S and 28S rRNA, RPB1, RPB2) of 433 taxa is presented, including all currently described orders of fungi.
650 $aAmblyosporidae
650 $aAscomycota
650 $aBasidiomycota
650 $aMicrosporidia
650 $aFungo
700 1 $aHYDE, K. D.
700 1 $aAL-ANI, L. K. T.
700 1 $aTEDERSOO, L.
700 1 $aHAELEWATERS, D.
700 1 $aRAJESHKUMAR, K. C.
700 1 $aZHAO, R. L
700 1 $aAPTROOT, A.
700 1 $aLEONTYEV, D. V.
700 1 $aSAXENA, R. K.
700 1 $aTOKAREV, Y. S.
700 1 $aDAI, D. Q.
700 1 $aLETCHER, P. M.
700 1 $aSTEPHENSON, S. L.
700 1 $aERTZ, D.
700 1 $aLUMBSCH, H. T.
700 1 $aKUKWA, M.
700 1 $aISSI, I. V.
700 1 $aMADRID, H.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, A. J. L.
700 1 $aSELBMANN, L.
700 1 $aPFLIEGLER, W. P.
700 1 $aHORVÁTH, E.
700 1 $aBENSCH, K.
700 1 $aKIRK, P. M.
700 1 $aKOLARÍKOVÁ, K.
700 1 $aRAJA, H. A.
700 1 $aRADEK, R.
700 1 $aPAPP, V.
700 1 $aDIMA, V.
700 1 $aMA, J.
700 1 $aMALOSSO, E.
700 1 $aTAKAMATSU, S.
700 1 $aRAMBOLD, G.
700 1 $aGANNIBAL, P. B.
700 1 $aTRIEBEL, D.
700 1 $aGAUTAM, A. K.
700 1 $aAVASTHI, S.
700 1 $aSUETRONG, S.
700 1 $aTIMDAL, E.
700 1 $aFRYAR, S. C.
700 1 $aDELGADO, G.
700 1 $aRÉBLOVÁ, M.
700 1 $aDOILOM, M.
700 1 $aDOLATABADI, S.
700 1 $aPAWLOWSKA, J. Z.
700 1 $aHUMBER, R. A.
700 1 $aKODSUEB, R.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ-CASTRO, I.
700 1 $aGOTO, B. T.
700 1 $aSILVA, D. K. A.
700 1 $aSOUZA, F. A. de
700 1 $aOEHL, F.
700 1 $aSILVA, G. A. da
700 1 $aBLASZKOWSKI, J.
700 1 $aJOBIM, K.
700 1 $aMAIA, L. C.
700 1 $aBARBOSA, F. R.
700 1 $aFIUZA, P. O.
700 1 $aDIVAKAR, P. K.
700 1 $aSHENOY, B. D.
700 1 $aCASTAÑEDA-RUIZ, R. F.
700 1 $aSOMRITHIPOL, S.
700 1 $aLATEEF, A. A.
700 1 $aKARUNARATHNA, S. C.
700 1 $aTIBPROMMA, S.
700 1 $aMORTIMER, P. E.
700 1 $aWANASINGHE, D. N.
700 1 $aPHOOKAMSAK, R.
700 1 $aXU, J.
700 1 $aWANG, Y.
700 1 $aTIAN, F.
700 1 $aALVARADO, P.
700 1 $aLI, D. W.
700 1 $aKUSAN, I.
700 1 $aMATOCEC, N.
700 1 $aMESIC, A.
700 1 $aTKALCEC, Z.
700 1 $aMAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, S. S. N.
700 1 $aPAPIZADEH, M.
700 1 $aHEREDIA, G.
700 1 $aWARTCHOW, F.
700 1 $aBAKHSHI, M.
700 1 $aBOEHM, E.
700 1 $aYOUSSEF, N.
700 1 $aHUSTAD, V. P.
700 1 $aLAWREY, J. D.
700 1 $aSANTIAGO, A. L. C. M. A.
700 1 $aBEZERRA, J. D. P.
700 1 $aSOUZA-MOTTA, C. M.
700 1 $aFIRMINO, A. L.
700 1 $aTIAN, Q.
700 1 $aHOUBRAKEN, J.
700 1 $aHONGSANAN, S.
700 1 $aTANAKA, K.
700 1 $aDISSANAYAKE, A. J.
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. S.
700 1 $aGROSSART, H. P.
700 1 $aSUIJA, A.
700 1 $aWEERAKOON, G.
700 1 $aETAYO, J.
700 1 $aTSURYKAU, A.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, V.
700 1 $aMUNGAI, P.
700 1 $aDAMM, U.
700 1 $aLI, Q. R.
700 1 $aZHANG, H.
700 1 $aBOONMEE, S.
700 1 $aLU, Y. Z.
700 1 $aBECERRA, A. G.
700 1 $aKENDRICK, B.
700 1 $aBREARLEY, F. Q.
700 1 $aMOTIEJUNAITE, J.
700 1 $aSHARMA, B.
700 1 $aKHARE, R.
700 1 $aGAIKWAD, S.
700 1 $aWIJESUNDARA, D. S. A.
700 1 $aTANG, L. Z.
700 1 $aHE, M. Q.
700 1 $aFLAKUS, A.
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ-FLAKUS, P.
700 1 $aZHURBENKO, M. P.
700 1 $aMCKENZIE, E. H. C.
700 1 $aSTADLER, M.
700 1 $aBHAT, D. J.
700 1 $aLIU, J. K.
700 1 $aRAZA, M.
700 1 $aJEEWON, R.
700 1 $aNASSONOVA, E. S.
700 1 $aPRIETO, M.
700 1 $aJAYALAL, R. G. U.
700 1 $aERDOGDU, M.
700 1 $aYURKOV, A.
700 1 $aSCHNITTLER, M.
700 1 $aSHCHEPIN, O. N.
700 1 $aNOVOZHILOV, Y. K.
700 1 $aSILVA-FILHO, A. G. S.
700 1 $aGENTEKAKI, E.
700 1 $aLIU, P.
700 1 $aCAVENDER, J. C.
700 1 $aKANG, Y.
700 1 $aMOHAMMAD, S.
700 1 $aZHANG, L. F.
700 1 $aXU, R. F.
700 1 $aLI, Y. M.
700 1 $aDAYARATHNE, M. C.
700 1 $aEKANAYAKA, A. H.
700 1 $aWEN, T. C.
700 1 $aDENG, C. Y.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, O. L.
700 1 $aNAVATHE, S.
700 1 $aHAWKSWORTH, D. L.
700 1 $aFAN, X. L.
700 1 $aDISSANAYAKE, L. S.
700 1 $aKUHNERT, E.
700 1 $aGROSSART, H. P.
700 1 $aTHINES, M.
773 $tMycosphere$gv. 11, n. 1, p. 1060-1456, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/10/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/11/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
MATEUS, J. R.; MARQUES, J. M.; DAL RIO, I.; VOLLÚ, R. E.; COELHO, M. R. R.; SELDIN, L. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
UFRJ; UFPA; UFRJ; UFRJ; MARCIA REED RODRIGUES COELHO, CNPAB; UFRJ. |
|
Título: |
Response of the microbial community associated with sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) to Bacillus safensis and Bacillus velezensis strains. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, v. 112, n. 4, p. 501-512. |
|
ISSN: |
1572-9699 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1181-y |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sweet potato is a subsistence crop cultivated worldwide. Although it is generally considered tolerant to different diseases, it is quite susceptible to the fungus Plenodomus destruens that causes foot-rot disease. Plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with sweet potato remain poorly studied, but some Bacillus strains may have potential as biological control agents. Here, we evaluate the persistence of two bacterial strains?Bacillus safensis T052-76 and Bacillus velezensis T149-19?in pot experiments and assess their impact on indigenous bacterial and fungal communities associated with sweet potato. Numbers of cells of both strains introduced into pots remained stable in the rhizosphere of sweet potato over the 180-day experiment. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis based on the rrs gene encoding bacterial 16S rRNA and the fungal ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region showed that bands corresponding to the introduced strains were not detected in plant endosphere. PERMANOVA and non-metric multidimensional scaling statistical analyses showed that: (1) strain T052-76 altered the structure of the indigenous bacterial community (rhizosphere and soil) more than strain T149-19; (2) T052-76 slightly altered the structure of the indigenous fungal community (rhizosphere and soil) and (3) strain T149-19 did not disturb the fungal community. Our results demonstrate the stability of both Bacillus strains in the sweet potato rhizosphere and, apart from the influence of B. safensis T052-76 on the bacterial community, their limited impact on the microbial community associated with this important crop plant. MenosSweet potato is a subsistence crop cultivated worldwide. Although it is generally considered tolerant to different diseases, it is quite susceptible to the fungus Plenodomus destruens that causes foot-rot disease. Plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with sweet potato remain poorly studied, but some Bacillus strains may have potential as biological control agents. Here, we evaluate the persistence of two bacterial strains?Bacillus safensis T052-76 and Bacillus velezensis T149-19?in pot experiments and assess their impact on indigenous bacterial and fungal communities associated with sweet potato. Numbers of cells of both strains introduced into pots remained stable in the rhizosphere of sweet potato over the 180-day experiment. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis based on the rrs gene encoding bacterial 16S rRNA and the fungal ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region showed that bands corresponding to the introduced strains were not detected in plant endosphere. PERMANOVA and non-metric multidimensional scaling statistical analyses showed that: (1) strain T052-76 altered the structure of the indigenous bacterial community (rhizosphere and soil) more than strain T149-19; (2) T052-76 slightly altered the structure of the indigenous fungal community (rhizosphere and soil) and (3) strain T149-19 did not disturb the fungal community. Our results demonstrate the stability of both Bacillus strains in the sweet potato rhizosphere and, apart from the influence of B. saf... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bacillus safensis; Bacillus velezensis; Microbial community. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Sweet potatoes. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02442naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2097752
005 2019-11-14
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1572-9699
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1181-y$2DOI
100 1 $aMATEUS, J. R.
245 $aResponse of the microbial community associated with sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) to Bacillus safensis and Bacillus velezensis strains.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aSweet potato is a subsistence crop cultivated worldwide. Although it is generally considered tolerant to different diseases, it is quite susceptible to the fungus Plenodomus destruens that causes foot-rot disease. Plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with sweet potato remain poorly studied, but some Bacillus strains may have potential as biological control agents. Here, we evaluate the persistence of two bacterial strains?Bacillus safensis T052-76 and Bacillus velezensis T149-19?in pot experiments and assess their impact on indigenous bacterial and fungal communities associated with sweet potato. Numbers of cells of both strains introduced into pots remained stable in the rhizosphere of sweet potato over the 180-day experiment. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis based on the rrs gene encoding bacterial 16S rRNA and the fungal ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region showed that bands corresponding to the introduced strains were not detected in plant endosphere. PERMANOVA and non-metric multidimensional scaling statistical analyses showed that: (1) strain T052-76 altered the structure of the indigenous bacterial community (rhizosphere and soil) more than strain T149-19; (2) T052-76 slightly altered the structure of the indigenous fungal community (rhizosphere and soil) and (3) strain T149-19 did not disturb the fungal community. Our results demonstrate the stability of both Bacillus strains in the sweet potato rhizosphere and, apart from the influence of B. safensis T052-76 on the bacterial community, their limited impact on the microbial community associated with this important crop plant.
650 $aSweet potatoes
653 $aBacillus safensis
653 $aBacillus velezensis
653 $aMicrobial community
700 1 $aMARQUES, J. M.
700 1 $aDAL RIO, I.
700 1 $aVOLLÚ, R. E.
700 1 $aCOELHO, M. R. R.
700 1 $aSELDIN, L. C.
773 $tAntonie van Leeuwenhoek$gv. 112, n. 4, p. 501-512.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
