Data/hora: 04/06/2024 14:01:35

Biblioteca(s): 	Embrapa Agrobiologia.	
Data corrente: 	21/10/2022	
Data da última atualização: 	21/10/2022	
Autoria: 	HOMEM, B. G. C.; SPASIANI, P. P.; DUBEUX JUNIOE, J. XC. B.; BODDEY, R. M.	
Afiliação: 	B. G. C. HOMEM, UFLA; P. P. SPASIANI, UFLA; JOSÉ C. B. DUBEUX JUNIOR, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; ROBERT MICHAEL BODDEY, CNPAB.	
Título: 	How does N fertilization or forage legumes affect forage and animal productin?	
Ano de publicação: 	2022	
Fonte/Imprenta: 	In: INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 24; INTERNATIONAL RANGELAND CONGRESS, 11, 2021 kentucky. Sustainable Use of Grassland and Rangeland Resources for Improved Livelihoods: proceeding...kentucky: University of kentucky, 2022.	
Idioma: 	Português	
Conteúdo: 	Livestock grazing in tropical climates is characterized by low productivity. Forage and animal production can be improved by applying nitrogen (N) fertiliser or using forage legumes. This 2.5-yr study assessed the canopy structure and productivity of beef cattle grazing either a mixed pasture of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu (palisadegrass) and Arachis pintoi (forage peanut) cv. BRS Mandobi or a Marandu palisade grass monoculture with or without N fertilisation. The experiment was carried out in Southeast Brazil, where the canopy structure (herbage mass) and animal productivity (stocking rate and liveweight gain per ha) were compared for three types of pastures: 1) mixed pasture of Marandu palisade grass and forage peanut (GRASS+LEGUME); 2) a monoculture of Marandu palisadegrass fertilised with 150 kg N/ha/year (GRASS+N); and 3) monoculture of Marandu palisadegrass without N application (GRASS), under continuous stocking. A minimum of two Nellore heifers and additional put-and-takes were used to keep canopy height at 20-25 cm. A randomized complete block design was used with four replicates; seasons were considered repeated measurements over time. Herbage mass was greater in the GRASS+N pasture (P < 0.001); however, in the last three seasons (Spring II, Summer III, and Fall III), there was no difference to GRASS+LEGUME pasture. In the GRASS+LEGUME pasture, there was an increase of legume mass (1.260 to 2.565 kg/ha) and botanical composition (23.6 to 39.1% of legume in forage mass) throughout the study. The stocking rate (P < 0.001) and liveweight gain per ha (P < 0.001) were greater in GRASS+N, without difference among GRASS+LEGUME and GRASS pastures in the first seven seasons. In the last three seasons, with an increase of legume proportion, stocking rate and liveweight were intermediate for GRASS+LEGUME pasture. Legume increased herbage mass and animal productivity in the long term. Immediate responses were achieved with N fertilization.	
Palavras-Chave: 	Animal productivity; Herbage mass; Mixed grass legume pasture.	
Categoria do assunto: 	P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra	
Registro original: 	Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB)	
Exemplares: 	CNPAB - (42056-1) - UPC - AA - DD -  -  -  - DIS