| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Café. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/07/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/07/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BLISKA, F.; VEGRO, C.; FRONZAGLIA, T.; SANTOS, J. de F. |
|
Afiliação: |
FLÁVIA BLISKA, INSTITUTO AGRONÔMICO; CELSO VEGRO, INSTITUTO DE ECONOMIA AGRÍCOLA; THOMAZ FRONZAGLIA, SIRE; JAMILSEN DE FREITAS SANTOS, CNPCa. |
|
Título: |
Comparative analysis of systems for assessing regional impacts of innovations applied to coffee production. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
EUROPEAN REGIONAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION. ERSA conference papers. Vienna, 2016. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 3-19 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The importance of education, research and extension institutions can be evaluated from the socio-economic impacts of their investments, capacity building and training of human resources, services rendered to the community and innovations resulting from their research. The knowledge and technologies generated in these institutions need to be transferred to the respective supply chains and increasingly used, to contribute in its development and environmental preservation. The dimension of their regional impacts is relevant to the strengthening of research institutions and to evaluate and update the guidelines of their programs. In Brazil there are few studies in this area and most of them are linked to the analysis of the role of universities in the growth of the regions where they are located. The evaluation of the environmental, social and economic impacts is even less significant, and emerged from the concept of sustainable development. In Brazil, progress in this area are derived primarily from studies of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) and from the State University of Campinas (Unicamp), who developed the systems known respectively by Ambitec and ESAC, which in this study on coffee production in Brazil, held by the Agronomic Institute (IAC), are compared mainly from their scope, complexity and cost of implementation. Both consist of the ex-post analysis of the impacts of a particular technology and are built based on criteria and indicators. Their application indicated that the ESAC system involves more complex software, and quantitative aspects more sophisticated than the Ambitec, and its use requires more intensive training of staff than Ambitec. A major difficulty of the analysis of impact assessments is to isolate the individual effects of technologies, effects resulting from their interactions with technologies developed by other R & D institutions, or even imported. The ability of the researcher to apply the questionnaires may reduce this problem. But the system ESAC presents an important advantage over the Ambitec because it considers two very important aspects for the analysis of impacts: the impacts resulting from the interactions between different technologies and the time elapsed between the development of technology and its adoption by the productive sector. MenosThe importance of education, research and extension institutions can be evaluated from the socio-economic impacts of their investments, capacity building and training of human resources, services rendered to the community and innovations resulting from their research. The knowledge and technologies generated in these institutions need to be transferred to the respective supply chains and increasingly used, to contribute in its development and environmental preservation. The dimension of their regional impacts is relevant to the strengthening of research institutions and to evaluate and update the guidelines of their programs. In Brazil there are few studies in this area and most of them are linked to the analysis of the role of universities in the growth of the regions where they are located. The evaluation of the environmental, social and economic impacts is even less significant, and emerged from the concept of sustainable development. In Brazil, progress in this area are derived primarily from studies of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) and from the State University of Campinas (Unicamp), who developed the systems known respectively by Ambitec and ESAC, which in this study on coffee production in Brazil, held by the Agronomic Institute (IAC), are compared mainly from their scope, complexity and cost of implementation. Both consist of the ex-post analysis of the impacts of a particular technology and are built based on criteria and indicators. Thei... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Café; Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Inovação; Produção Agrícola. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Coffea; Innovation adoption; Sustainable development. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/214547/1/comparative-analysis-ERSA-papers.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03088nam a2200241 a 4500
001 2123792
005 2020-07-09
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBLISKA, F.
245 $aComparative analysis of systems for assessing regional impacts of innovations applied to coffee production.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aEUROPEAN REGIONAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION. ERSA conference papers. Vienna$c2016
300 $ap. 3-19
520 $aThe importance of education, research and extension institutions can be evaluated from the socio-economic impacts of their investments, capacity building and training of human resources, services rendered to the community and innovations resulting from their research. The knowledge and technologies generated in these institutions need to be transferred to the respective supply chains and increasingly used, to contribute in its development and environmental preservation. The dimension of their regional impacts is relevant to the strengthening of research institutions and to evaluate and update the guidelines of their programs. In Brazil there are few studies in this area and most of them are linked to the analysis of the role of universities in the growth of the regions where they are located. The evaluation of the environmental, social and economic impacts is even less significant, and emerged from the concept of sustainable development. In Brazil, progress in this area are derived primarily from studies of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) and from the State University of Campinas (Unicamp), who developed the systems known respectively by Ambitec and ESAC, which in this study on coffee production in Brazil, held by the Agronomic Institute (IAC), are compared mainly from their scope, complexity and cost of implementation. Both consist of the ex-post analysis of the impacts of a particular technology and are built based on criteria and indicators. Their application indicated that the ESAC system involves more complex software, and quantitative aspects more sophisticated than the Ambitec, and its use requires more intensive training of staff than Ambitec. A major difficulty of the analysis of impact assessments is to isolate the individual effects of technologies, effects resulting from their interactions with technologies developed by other R & D institutions, or even imported. The ability of the researcher to apply the questionnaires may reduce this problem. But the system ESAC presents an important advantage over the Ambitec because it considers two very important aspects for the analysis of impacts: the impacts resulting from the interactions between different technologies and the time elapsed between the development of technology and its adoption by the productive sector.
650 $aCoffea
650 $aInnovation adoption
650 $aSustainable development
650 $aCafé
650 $aDesenvolvimento Sustentável
650 $aInovação
650 $aProdução Agrícola
700 1 $aVEGRO, C.
700 1 $aFRONZAGLIA, T.
700 1 $aSANTOS, J. de F.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Café (CNPCa) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 20 | |
| 11. |  | FRONZAGLIA, T.; SALLES-FILHO, S. L. M.; RAYNAUD, E. A indicação geográfica sob a ótica da evolução das instituições. In: VIERIA, A. C. P.; LOURENZANI, A. E. B.S.; BRUCH, K. L.; LOCATELLI, L.; GASPAR, L. C. M. (Org.). Indicações geográficas, signos coletivos e desenvolvimento local/regional. Erechim: Deviant, 2019. p. 13-37| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| 15. | | MARCIAL, E. C.; SCHNEIDERB, E. R.; PIO, M. J.; LEAL, R. M.; FRONZAGLIA, T.; GIMENE, M. Post-COVID-19 scenarios: a method for moments of crisis. Futures, v. 142, 102996, 2022. Available online 14 July 2022, 102996.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 16. | | TURCO, P. H. N.; BLISKA, F. M. DE M.; FRONZAGLIA, T.; TOSTO, S. G.; VEGRO, C. L. Trajetória da pesquisa cafeeira no Brasil - 1932 a 2012. In: CONGRESSO DA SOBER - SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA, ADMINISTRAÇÃO E SOCIOLOGIA RURAL., 51, 2013, Belém, PA. Anais... Belém: SOBER, 2013.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
|  |
| 17. | | FRONZAGLIA, T.; TORRES, D. A. P.; LOPES, D. B.; PEREIRA, V. da F.; GUEDES, V. G. F.; JESUS, K. R. E. de. Gestão estratégica em organizações públicas de pesquisa agropecuária: análise comparativa de planos estratégicos. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, v. 39, n. 3, e27073, 2022. Título em inglês: Strategic management in public organizations of agricultural research: comparative analysis of strategic plans.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 19. | | TORRES, D. A. P.; FRONZAGLIA, T.; SANTANA, C. A. M.; ARAUJO, D. L. M. de; BOLFE, E. L.; LOPES, D. B.; PENA JUNIOR, M. A. G.; HENZ, G. P. Cenas: bioeconomia: moldando o futuro. In: MARCIAL, E. C.; CURADO, M. P. F.; OLIVEIRA, M. G. de; CRUZ JÚNIOR, S. C. da; COUTO, L. F. (Ed.). Brasil 2035: cenários para o desenvolvimento. Brasília, DF: Ipea: Assecor, 2017. p. 219-238| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 20. | | CAMPOS, S. K.; TORRES, L. A.; FRANCOZO, M. A. S.; PRADO, R. B.; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; BOLFE, E. L.; FRONZAGLIA, T.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; CURY, C.; BALSADI, O. V.; CARDOSO, F. de A. Drivers relacionados à agricultura, ambiente e sociedade com impacto para a Ciência do Solo. In: TORRES, L. A.; CAMPOS, S. K. (ed.). Megatendências da Ciência do Solo 2030. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2022. E-book. cap. 2.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Solos; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 20 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
