| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/08/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/02/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CRUZ, D. C. da; BENAYAS, J. M. R.; FERREIRA, G. C.; MONTEIRO, A. L.; SCHWARTZ, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
Denis Conrado da CRUZ, University of Alcalá; José María Rey BENAYAS, University of Alcalá; Gracialda Costa FERREIRA, UFRA; André Luis MONTEIRO, Geoforest Consultancy; GUSTAVO SCHWARTZ, CPATU. |
|
Título: |
Evaluation of soil erosion process and conservation practices in the Paragominas-PA municipality (Brazil). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Geographia Technica, v. 14, n. 1, p. 14-35, Mar. 2019. |
|
DOI: |
10.21163/GT_2019.141.02 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Over the last decades, the natural environment has been degraded at a much greater speed than its own resilience. Lack of knowledge about soil natural limitations and mismanagement can increase their degradation and nutrient losses by erosion. The objective of this study was to estimate and map soil vulnerability to erosion through the Universal Equation of Revised Soil Loss (RUSLE) and based on the ecodynamic concept of physical and biotic environment analysis, and finally to evaluate conservation practices in the municipality of Paragominas with the economic database of IBGE / SIDRA. In the two analyzed methods the percentage of area with low and high potential and erosivity estimation were similar. The estimation of low and low-moderate loss and vulnerability represents about 77% (15,064 km2) of the territory by RUSLE and 60% (11,485 km2), by ecodynamic concept. The high to very high soil loss zones represent only 3% (642 km2) and 2.7% (584 km2), in the RUSLE and ecodynamic concept, respectively. Most of the variables analyzed in both methods presented low estimation values of loss and erosivity potential. The soil and slope attributes, for example, obtained exactly 79% (15,377 km2 - RUSLE) and 80% (15,572 km2 - ecodynamic concept), except for the climate and factor R attributes, in both methods the vulnerability potential and erosion, were only 1.5% (292 km2) and 1.3% (253 km2), based on the ecodynamic concept and RUSLE respectively. The geospatial analysis of the use practices correlated with the economic data showed an intense use of agricultural activities, logging and mining, which caused severe environmental damages, considering that 45% (8,773.3 km2) of the municipality have already been deforested and converted into other uses. The municipality still has 47% (9,182 km2) of its territory covered by altered primary vegetation and 23% (4,441 km2) by secondary vegetation, important information to subsidize decision-making processes related to ecological-economic strategies for the management of natural resources in the study area. MenosOver the last decades, the natural environment has been degraded at a much greater speed than its own resilience. Lack of knowledge about soil natural limitations and mismanagement can increase their degradation and nutrient losses by erosion. The objective of this study was to estimate and map soil vulnerability to erosion through the Universal Equation of Revised Soil Loss (RUSLE) and based on the ecodynamic concept of physical and biotic environment analysis, and finally to evaluate conservation practices in the municipality of Paragominas with the economic database of IBGE / SIDRA. In the two analyzed methods the percentage of area with low and high potential and erosivity estimation were similar. The estimation of low and low-moderate loss and vulnerability represents about 77% (15,064 km2) of the territory by RUSLE and 60% (11,485 km2), by ecodynamic concept. The high to very high soil loss zones represent only 3% (642 km2) and 2.7% (584 km2), in the RUSLE and ecodynamic concept, respectively. Most of the variables analyzed in both methods presented low estimation values of loss and erosivity potential. The soil and slope attributes, for example, obtained exactly 79% (15,377 km2 - RUSLE) and 80% (15,572 km2 - ecodynamic concept), except for the climate and factor R attributes, in both methods the vulnerability potential and erosion, were only 1.5% (292 km2) and 1.3% (253 km2), based on the ecodynamic concept and RUSLE respectively. The geospatial analysis of the use pr... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Paragominas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação do Solo; Erosão do Solo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02751naa a2200217 a 4500
001 2111463
005 2022-02-07
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.21163/GT_2019.141.02$2DOI
100 1 $aCRUZ, D. C. da
245 $aEvaluation of soil erosion process and conservation practices in the Paragominas-PA municipality (Brazil).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aOver the last decades, the natural environment has been degraded at a much greater speed than its own resilience. Lack of knowledge about soil natural limitations and mismanagement can increase their degradation and nutrient losses by erosion. The objective of this study was to estimate and map soil vulnerability to erosion through the Universal Equation of Revised Soil Loss (RUSLE) and based on the ecodynamic concept of physical and biotic environment analysis, and finally to evaluate conservation practices in the municipality of Paragominas with the economic database of IBGE / SIDRA. In the two analyzed methods the percentage of area with low and high potential and erosivity estimation were similar. The estimation of low and low-moderate loss and vulnerability represents about 77% (15,064 km2) of the territory by RUSLE and 60% (11,485 km2), by ecodynamic concept. The high to very high soil loss zones represent only 3% (642 km2) and 2.7% (584 km2), in the RUSLE and ecodynamic concept, respectively. Most of the variables analyzed in both methods presented low estimation values of loss and erosivity potential. The soil and slope attributes, for example, obtained exactly 79% (15,377 km2 - RUSLE) and 80% (15,572 km2 - ecodynamic concept), except for the climate and factor R attributes, in both methods the vulnerability potential and erosion, were only 1.5% (292 km2) and 1.3% (253 km2), based on the ecodynamic concept and RUSLE respectively. The geospatial analysis of the use practices correlated with the economic data showed an intense use of agricultural activities, logging and mining, which caused severe environmental damages, considering that 45% (8,773.3 km2) of the municipality have already been deforested and converted into other uses. The municipality still has 47% (9,182 km2) of its territory covered by altered primary vegetation and 23% (4,441 km2) by secondary vegetation, important information to subsidize decision-making processes related to ecological-economic strategies for the management of natural resources in the study area.
650 $aConservação do Solo
650 $aErosão do Solo
653 $aParagominas
700 1 $aBENAYAS, J. M. R.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, G. C.
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, A. L.
700 1 $aSCHWARTZ, G.
773 $tGeographia Technica$gv. 14, n. 1, p. 14-35, Mar. 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cenargen.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
02/08/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/11/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SREEDASYAM, A.; PLOTT, C.; HOSSAIN, M. S.; LOVELL, J. T.; GRIMWOOD, J.; JENKINS, J. W.; DAUM, C.; BARRY, K.; CARLSON, J.; SHU, S.; PHILLIPS, J.; AMIREBRAHIMI, M.; ZANE, M.; WANG, M.; GOODSTEIN, D.; HAAS, F. B.; HISS, M.; PERROUD, P.-F.; JAWDY, S. S.; YANG, Y.; HU, R.; JOHNSON, J.; KROPAT, J.; GALLAHER, S. D.; LIPZEN, A.; SHAKIROV, E. V.; WENG, X.; TORRES-JEREZ, I.; WEERS, B.; CONDE, D.; PAPPAS, M. de C. R.; LIU, L.; MUCHLINSKI, A.; JIANG, H.; SHYU, C.; HUANG, P.; SEBASTIAN, J.; LAIBEN, C.; MEDLIN, A.; CAREY, S.; CARRELL, A. A.; CHEN, J.-G.; PERALES, M.; SWAMINATHAN, K.; ALLONA, I.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; COOPER, E. A.; THOLL, D.; VOGEL, V. P.; WESTON, D. J.; YANG, X.; BRUTNELL, T. P.; KELLOGG, E. A.; BAXTER, I.; UDVARDI, M.; TANG, Y.; MOCKLER, T. C.; JUENGER, T. E.; MULLET, J.; RENSING, S. A.; TUSKAN, G. A.; MERCHANT, S. S.; STACEY, G.; SCHMUTZ, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
AVINASH SREEDASYAM, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, USA; CHRISTOPHER PLOTT, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, USA; MD SHAKHAWAT HOSSAIN, University of Missouri, USA; JOHN T. LOVELL, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, USA; JANE GRIMWOOD, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, USA; JERRY W. JENKINS, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, USA; CHRISTOPHER DAUM, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; KERRIE BARRY, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; JOSEPH CARLSON, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; SHENGQIANG SHU, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; JEREMY PHILLIPS, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; MOJGAN AMIREBRAHIMI, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; MATTHEW ZANE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; MEI WANG, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; DAVID GOODSTEIN, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; FABIAN B. HAAS, University of Marburg, Germany; MANUEL HISS, University of Marburg, Germany; PIERRE-FRANÇOIS PERROUD, University of Marburg, Germany; SARA S. JAWDY, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; YONGIL YANG, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; RONGBIN HU, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; JENIFER JOHNSON, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; JANETTE KROPAT, University of California, USA; SEAN D. GALLAHER, University of California, USA; ANNA LIPZEN, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; EUGENE V. SHAKIROV, University of Texas at Austin, USA; XIAOYU WENG, University of Texas at Austin, USA; IVONE TORRES-JEREZ, Noble Research Institute, USA; BROCK WEERS, Texas A&M University, USA; DANIEL CONDE, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain; MARILIA DE CASTRO RODRIGUES PAPPAS, Cenargen; LIFENG LIU, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; ANDREW MUCHLINSKI, Virginia Tech, USA; HUI JIANG, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; CHRISTINE SHYU, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; PU HUANG, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; JOSE SEBASTIAN, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; CAROL LAIBEN, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; ALYSSA MEDLIN, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; SANKALPI CAREY, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; ALYSSA A. CARRELL, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; JIN-GUI CHEN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; MARIANO PERALES, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid; KANKSHITA SWAMINATHAN, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, USA; ISABEL ALLONA, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid; DARIO GRATTAPAGLIA, Cenargen; ELIZABETH A. COOPER, Clemson University, USA; DOROTHEA THOLL, Virginia Tech, USA; JOHN P. VOGEL, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; DAVID J. WESTON, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; XIAOHAN YANG, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; THOMAS P. BRUTNELL, McClintock LLC, USA; ELIZABETH A. KELLOGG, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; IVAN BAXTER, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; MICHAEL UDVARDI, Noble Research Institute, USA; YUHONG TANG, Noble Research Institute, USA; TODD C. MOCKLER, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, USA; THOMAS E. JUENGER, University of Texas at Austin, USA; JOHN MULLET, Texas A&M University, USA; STEFAN A. RENSING, University of Marburg, Germany; GERALD A. TUSKAN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; SABEEHA S. MERCHANT, Univerty of California, USA; GARY STACEY, University of Missouri, USA; JEREMY SCHMUTZ, Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, USA. |
|
Título: |
JGI Plant Gene Atlas: an updateable transcriptome resource to improve functional gene descriptions across the plant kingdom. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nucleic Acids Research, v. 51, n. 16, p. 8383-8401, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad616 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Na publicação: Marilia R. Pappas. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Gene Atlas plants; Joint Genome Institute (JGI); Ontology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02411naa a2200925 a 4500
001 2155579
005 2023-11-07
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad616$2DOI
100 1 $aSREEDASYAM, A.
245 $aJGI Plant Gene Atlas$ban updateable transcriptome resource to improve functional gene descriptions across the plant kingdom.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aNa publicação: Marilia R. Pappas.
653 $aGene Atlas plants
653 $aJoint Genome Institute (JGI)
653 $aOntology
700 1 $aPLOTT, C.
700 1 $aHOSSAIN, M. S.
700 1 $aLOVELL, J. T.
700 1 $aGRIMWOOD, J.
700 1 $aJENKINS, J. W.
700 1 $aDAUM, C.
700 1 $aBARRY, K.
700 1 $aCARLSON, J.
700 1 $aSHU, S.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, J.
700 1 $aAMIREBRAHIMI, M.
700 1 $aZANE, M.
700 1 $aWANG, M.
700 1 $aGOODSTEIN, D.
700 1 $aHAAS, F. B.
700 1 $aHISS, M.
700 1 $aPERROUD, P.-F.
700 1 $aJAWDY, S. S.
700 1 $aYANG, Y.
700 1 $aHU, R.
700 1 $aJOHNSON, J.
700 1 $aKROPAT, J.
700 1 $aGALLAHER, S. D.
700 1 $aLIPZEN, A.
700 1 $aSHAKIROV, E. V.
700 1 $aWENG, X.
700 1 $aTORRES-JEREZ, I.
700 1 $aWEERS, B.
700 1 $aCONDE, D.
700 1 $aPAPPAS, M. de C. R.
700 1 $aLIU, L.
700 1 $aMUCHLINSKI, A.
700 1 $aJIANG, H.
700 1 $aSHYU, C.
700 1 $aHUANG, P.
700 1 $aSEBASTIAN, J.
700 1 $aLAIBEN, C.
700 1 $aMEDLIN, A.
700 1 $aCAREY, S.
700 1 $aCARRELL, A. A.
700 1 $aCHEN, J.-G.
700 1 $aPERALES, M.
700 1 $aSWAMINATHAN, K.
700 1 $aALLONA, I.
700 1 $aGRATTAPAGLIA, D.
700 1 $aCOOPER, E. A.
700 1 $aTHOLL, D.
700 1 $aVOGEL, V. P.
700 1 $aWESTON, D. J.
700 1 $aYANG, X.
700 1 $aBRUTNELL, T. P.
700 1 $aKELLOGG, E. A.
700 1 $aBAXTER, I.
700 1 $aUDVARDI, M.
700 1 $aTANG, Y.
700 1 $aMOCKLER, T. C.
700 1 $aJUENGER, T. E.
700 1 $aMULLET, J.
700 1 $aRENSING, S. A.
700 1 $aTUSKAN, G. A.
700 1 $aMERCHANT, S. S.
700 1 $aSTACEY, G.
700 1 $aSCHMUTZ, J.
773 $tNucleic Acids Research$gv. 51, n. 16, p. 8383-8401, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
