| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/03/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/03/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CAPALBO, D. M. F.; MACDONALD, P.; FERNANDES, P. M. B; RUBINSTEIN, C. P.; VICIÉN, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
DEISE MARIA FONTANA CAPALBO, CNPMA; PHIL MACDONALD, Canadian Food Inspection Agency; PATRICIA MACHADO BUENO FERNANDES, UFES; CLARA RUBENSTEIN, Bayer Crop Science; CARMEN VICIÉN, Universidad de Buenos Aires. |
|
Título: |
Familiarity in the context of risk assessment of transgenic crops: focus on some countries in the Americas |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 7, article 463, Jan. 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
7 p. |
|
DOI: |
10.3389/fbioe.2019.00463 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Problem formulation is the formal opening stage of a risk assessment that determines its purpose and scope and hence guides the gathering of information data. The concepts of familiarity and history of safe use are an integral part of problem formulation. These concepts do not replace the case-by-case approach and are not taken as safety standards but are valuable components of the process that shape the generation of plausible, testable risk hypotheses. The International Life Sciences Institutes in Brazil and Argentina have facilitated numerous discussions on the scientific principles for risk assessment of transgenic crops in the Latin American region in the past 5?6 years. The session held at ISBR 15th elaborated on the familiarity concept and derived tools and their role in the evolution of risk evaluation criteria. Examples of how different countries in the Americas interpret and apply these conceptual tools show that familiarity is a valuable concept, although terms are very often confused and vaguely defined. Formalizing these terms with clear definitions and scope of application in guidelines and regulatory documents would reduce ambiguity, enhance predictability, and add transparency to the evaluation processes. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Familiarity; Harmonization; History of safe use; Problem formulation; Regulatory framework. |
|
Thesagro: |
Organismo Transgênico; Planta Transgênica. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
risk assessment; Transgenic plants. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/211857/1/Capalbo-Famiiarity-Context-2019.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02184naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2121244
005 2020-03-13
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3389/fbioe.2019.00463$2DOI
100 1 $aCAPALBO, D. M. F.
245 $aFamiliarity in the context of risk assessment of transgenic crops$bfocus on some countries in the Americas$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $a7 p.
520 $aAbstract: Problem formulation is the formal opening stage of a risk assessment that determines its purpose and scope and hence guides the gathering of information data. The concepts of familiarity and history of safe use are an integral part of problem formulation. These concepts do not replace the case-by-case approach and are not taken as safety standards but are valuable components of the process that shape the generation of plausible, testable risk hypotheses. The International Life Sciences Institutes in Brazil and Argentina have facilitated numerous discussions on the scientific principles for risk assessment of transgenic crops in the Latin American region in the past 5?6 years. The session held at ISBR 15th elaborated on the familiarity concept and derived tools and their role in the evolution of risk evaluation criteria. Examples of how different countries in the Americas interpret and apply these conceptual tools show that familiarity is a valuable concept, although terms are very often confused and vaguely defined. Formalizing these terms with clear definitions and scope of application in guidelines and regulatory documents would reduce ambiguity, enhance predictability, and add transparency to the evaluation processes.
650 $arisk assessment
650 $aTransgenic plants
650 $aOrganismo Transgênico
650 $aPlanta Transgênica
653 $aFamiliarity
653 $aHarmonization
653 $aHistory of safe use
653 $aProblem formulation
653 $aRegulatory framework
700 1 $aMACDONALD, P.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, P. M. B
700 1 $aRUBINSTEIN, C. P.
700 1 $aVICIÉN, C
773 $tFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology$gv. 7, article 463, Jan. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 4. |  | NEPOMUCENO, A. L.; FUGANTI-PAGLIARINI, R.; FELIPE, M. S. S.; MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VELINI, E. D.; PINTO, E. R. de C.; DAGLI, M. L. Z.; ANDRADE FILHO, G.; FERNANDES, P. M. B. Brazilian biosafety law and the new breeding technologies. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, v. 7, n. 2, p. 204-210, 2020.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 4 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|    |
| 5. | | VIEIRA, L. R.; FREITAS, N. C.; JUSTEN, F.; MIRANDA, V. de J.; GARCIA, B. de O.; NEPOMUCENO, A. L.; FUGANTI-PAGLIARINI, R.; FELIPE, M. S. S.; MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VELINI, E. D.; PINTO, E. R. de C.; DAGLI, M. L. Z.; ANDRADE, G.; FERNANDES, P. M. B.; MERTZ-HENNING, L. M.; KOBAYASHI, A. K. Regulatory framework of genome editing in Brazil and worldwide. In: MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VIEIRA, L. R.; SILVA, N. V. e; PRADO, G. S.; LOPES FILHO, J. F. (Ed.). CRISPR technology in plant genome editing: biotechnology applied to agriculture. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2021. Chapter 5, p. 169-195.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Soja. |
|  |
| 6. | | VIEIRA, L. R.; FREITAS, N. C.; JUSTEN, F.; MIRANDA, V. de J.; GARCIA, B. de O.; NEPOMUCENO, A. L.; FUGANTI-PAGLIARINI, R.; FELIPE, M. S. S.; MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VELINI, E. D.; PINTO, E. R. de C.; DAGLI, M. L. Z.; ANDRADE, G.; FERNANDES, P. M. B.; MERTZ-HENNING, L. M.; KOBAYASHI, A. K. Regulamentação da edição genômica em plantas no Brasil e no mundo. In: MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VIEIRA, L. R.; SILVA, N. V. e; PRADO, G. S.; LOPES FILHO, J. H. (Ed.). Tecnologia CRISPR na edição genômica de plantas: biotecnologia aplicada à agricultura. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2020. cap. 5. p. 179-205| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 7. | | MAURASTONI, M.; ANTUNES, T. F. S.; ABREU, E. F. M.; RIBEIRO, S. da G.; REIS, A. M. dos; SANCHES, M. M.; FONTES, W.; KITAJIMA, E. W.; CRUZ, F. T.; SANTOS, A. M. C.; VENTURA, J. A.; GOMES, A. C. M. M.; ZERBINI, F. M.; SOSA-ACOSTA, P.; NOGUEIRA, F. C. S.; RODRIGUES, S. P.; ARAGÃO, F. J. L.; WHITFIELD, A. E.; FERNANDES, P. M. B. A capsid protein fragment of a Fusagra-like virus found in Carica papaya latex interacts with the 50S Ribosomal protein L17. Viruses, v. 5, n. 2, 2023. 541. Na publicação: Simone G. Ribeiro; Angela Mehta.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
