| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Rondônia. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/05/1997 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/05/1997 |
|
Autoria: |
DUBOIS, J. C. L.; VIANA, V. M.; ANDERSON, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
Instituto Rede Brasileira Agroflorestal - REBRAF. |
|
Título: |
Manual agroflorestal para a Amazonia. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1996 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Rio de Janeiro: FEBRAF, 1996. |
|
Volume: |
v.1 |
|
Páginas: |
228p. |
|
ISBN: |
85-86118-01-X |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Orienta pequenos agricultores no sentido de introduzir arvores e arbustos com finalidade de manter capacidade de producao de suas terras. Dessa maneira, eles terao possibilidade de permanecer em suas propriedades para sempre. Mostra tambem como utilizar tecnicas agroflorestais para recuperar suas areas degradadas, sem investir em dinheiro. Serve ainda como instrumento de trabalho aos extencionistas dos servicos publicos, cooperativas, sindicatos rurais e ONG's que atual na Amazonia. Util na preparacao de cursos e elaboracao de pequenas cartilhas para desenvolvimento da atividade de assistencia tecnica. Divide-se em duas partes: 1. Conceitos gerais de agrossilvicultura; 2. Fornece informacoes mais especializadas sobre sistemas e praticas agroflorestais de maior interesse para Amazonia. Que sao sistemas agroflorestais; SAFs e desenvolvimento sustentavel na Amazonia; Uso de SAFs: vantagens e desvantagens; SAFs diretamente ligados a pratica do pousio florestal; Quintais florestais; Agroflorestas; Consorcio agroflorestais comerciais; Sistema "Taunguia"; O sistema Silvibananeiro; Producao agricola em Aleias; Producao agricola ou pecuaria em Faixas; Sistemas silvopastoris; Praticas agroflorestais. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agrofloresta; Brasil; Silvopastoris; Sistema. |
|
Thesagro: |
Desenvolvimento Sustentável. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Amazonia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01790nam a2200241 a 4500
001 1698221
005 1997-05-06
008 1996 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
020 $a85-86118-01-X
100 1 $aDUBOIS, J. C. L.
245 $aManual agroflorestal para a Amazonia.
260 $aRio de Janeiro: FEBRAF$c1996
300 $a228p. v.1
490 $vv.1
520 $aOrienta pequenos agricultores no sentido de introduzir arvores e arbustos com finalidade de manter capacidade de producao de suas terras. Dessa maneira, eles terao possibilidade de permanecer em suas propriedades para sempre. Mostra tambem como utilizar tecnicas agroflorestais para recuperar suas areas degradadas, sem investir em dinheiro. Serve ainda como instrumento de trabalho aos extencionistas dos servicos publicos, cooperativas, sindicatos rurais e ONG's que atual na Amazonia. Util na preparacao de cursos e elaboracao de pequenas cartilhas para desenvolvimento da atividade de assistencia tecnica. Divide-se em duas partes: 1. Conceitos gerais de agrossilvicultura; 2. Fornece informacoes mais especializadas sobre sistemas e praticas agroflorestais de maior interesse para Amazonia. Que sao sistemas agroflorestais; SAFs e desenvolvimento sustentavel na Amazonia; Uso de SAFs: vantagens e desvantagens; SAFs diretamente ligados a pratica do pousio florestal; Quintais florestais; Agroflorestas; Consorcio agroflorestais comerciais; Sistema "Taunguia"; O sistema Silvibananeiro; Producao agricola em Aleias; Producao agricola ou pecuaria em Faixas; Sistemas silvopastoris; Praticas agroflorestais.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aDesenvolvimento Sustentável
653 $aAgrofloresta
653 $aBrasil
653 $aSilvopastoris
653 $aSistema
700 1 $aVIANA, V. M.
700 1 $aANDERSON, A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Rondônia (CPAF-RO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/05/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/12/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MANDARINO, R. A.; BARBOSA, F. A.; LOPES, L. B.; TELLES, V.; FLORENCE, E. de A. S.; BICALHO, F. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAPHAEL AMAZONAS MANDARINO, UFMG, MG; FABIANO ALVIM BARBOSA, DE HEUS ANIMAL NUTRITION, Netherlands; LUCIANO BASTOS LOPES, CPAMT; VANDO TELLES, UNEMAT, Alta Floresta-MT; EDUARDO DE AZEVEDO SONDRÉ FLORENCE, ICV, Alta Floesta-MT; FILIPE LAGE BICALHO, PECSA, Alta Floresta-MT. |
|
Título: |
Evaluation of good agricultural practices and sustaintability indicators in livestock systems under tropical conditions. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Systems, v. 174, p. 32-38, 2019. |
|
ISSN: |
0308-521X |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.04.006 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The present scenario of Brazilian livestock farming presents a poor ability of management skills and an inexperienced adoption of modern technologies. The aim of this research was to study the setback of carrying out the Brazilian Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) on sustainability indicators, focusing at production in the economic, productive, natural and social conditions of beef cattle breeding systems in the Amazonian biome in the northern part of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Researchers conducted the experiment in the town of Alta Floresta between August 2012 and August 2014 in six cattle ranching lands. They carried out diagnoses in the properties, and, afterwards, applied an application to the producers, focusing on their supervisory skills, their technological knowledge status and their strength for choosing some technologies in sanitary and reproductive management, feeding systems, types of supplements and water sources provided to the animals and to the facilities. The team collected the technical and commercial data between 2013 and 2014. In addition, they carried out a complementary examination to test enteric methane emissions. Based on the results, the following GAP made it possible to reach better indicators than those found in pastures that tried none GAP. Complementarily, methane emissions per kg of live weight were lower in intensified areas. Intensification generated better economic indicators, with gross margin differences of US$ 318.89. The results in the intensified areas, when compared to the one in the conventional systems, presented a 16% increase in productive weight in live weight.ha−1, with a 2.05% increase in investment return rates and US$ 142.94 in net present value. The GAP has provided economic, social and environmental gains, such as an increase of almost 5% in investment return rates, generating higher production, continuing employment in farms with historical negative gross margins and reducing the methane emissions per kg of live weight in the dry season by 54%. MenosThe present scenario of Brazilian livestock farming presents a poor ability of management skills and an inexperienced adoption of modern technologies. The aim of this research was to study the setback of carrying out the Brazilian Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) on sustainability indicators, focusing at production in the economic, productive, natural and social conditions of beef cattle breeding systems in the Amazonian biome in the northern part of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Researchers conducted the experiment in the town of Alta Floresta between August 2012 and August 2014 in six cattle ranching lands. They carried out diagnoses in the properties, and, afterwards, applied an application to the producers, focusing on their supervisory skills, their technological knowledge status and their strength for choosing some technologies in sanitary and reproductive management, feeding systems, types of supplements and water sources provided to the animals and to the facilities. The team collected the technical and commercial data between 2013 and 2014. In addition, they carried out a complementary examination to test enteric methane emissions. Based on the results, the following GAP made it possible to reach better indicators than those found in pastures that tried none GAP. Complementarily, methane emissions per kg of live weight were lower in intensified areas. Intensification generated better economic indicators, with gross margin differences of US$ 318.89. The results in the intens... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; Brazil; Livestock. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02766naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2109094
005 2019-12-04
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0308-521X
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.04.006$2DOI
100 1 $aMANDARINO, R. A.
245 $aEvaluation of good agricultural practices and sustaintability indicators in livestock systems under tropical conditions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aThe present scenario of Brazilian livestock farming presents a poor ability of management skills and an inexperienced adoption of modern technologies. The aim of this research was to study the setback of carrying out the Brazilian Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) on sustainability indicators, focusing at production in the economic, productive, natural and social conditions of beef cattle breeding systems in the Amazonian biome in the northern part of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Researchers conducted the experiment in the town of Alta Floresta between August 2012 and August 2014 in six cattle ranching lands. They carried out diagnoses in the properties, and, afterwards, applied an application to the producers, focusing on their supervisory skills, their technological knowledge status and their strength for choosing some technologies in sanitary and reproductive management, feeding systems, types of supplements and water sources provided to the animals and to the facilities. The team collected the technical and commercial data between 2013 and 2014. In addition, they carried out a complementary examination to test enteric methane emissions. Based on the results, the following GAP made it possible to reach better indicators than those found in pastures that tried none GAP. Complementarily, methane emissions per kg of live weight were lower in intensified areas. Intensification generated better economic indicators, with gross margin differences of US$ 318.89. The results in the intensified areas, when compared to the one in the conventional systems, presented a 16% increase in productive weight in live weight.ha−1, with a 2.05% increase in investment return rates and US$ 142.94 in net present value. The GAP has provided economic, social and environmental gains, such as an increase of almost 5% in investment return rates, generating higher production, continuing employment in farms with historical negative gross margins and reducing the methane emissions per kg of live weight in the dry season by 54%.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aBrazil
650 $aLivestock
700 1 $aBARBOSA, F. A.
700 1 $aLOPES, L. B.
700 1 $aTELLES, V.
700 1 $aFLORENCE, E. de A. S.
700 1 $aBICALHO, F. L.
773 $tAgricultural Systems$gv. 174, p. 32-38, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
