| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Rondônia. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/08/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
RODRIGUES, V. G. S.; COSTA, R. S. C. da; LEONIDAS, F. das C. |
|
Afiliação: |
VANDA GORETE S. RODRIGUES, CPAF-RO; ROGERIO SEBASTIAO CORREA DA COSTA, CPAF-RO; FRANCISCO DAS CHAGAS LEONIDAS, CPAF-RO. |
|
Título: |
Vantagens, desvantagens e características da arborização em lavouras de café (Coffea canephora) em Rondônia. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2002 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL DO AGRONEGÓCIO DO CAFÉ NA AMAZÔNIA, 1., 2002, Ji-Paraná. Agronegócio do café na Amazônia: tecnologia para o aumento da renda do produtor rural: anais. Ji-Paraná: Embrapa Rondônia, 2002. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 93-95. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Rondônia. Documentos, 78). |
|
ISSN: |
0103-9865 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O cultivo de cafezais arborizados devem ser praticados com a intenção de desenvolver formas mais sustentáveis de uso da terra, que possa incrementar a produtividade na propriedade e o bem estar da comunidade rural. Este trabalho foi baseado no estudo das experiências de agricultores que consorciam árvores em lavouras de café, nos municípios de Ouro Preto do Oeste e de Machadinho do Oeste, RO. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Amazônia Ocidental; Ariquemes (RO); Coffee plant; Ji-Paraná (RO); Ouro Preto do Oeste (RO); Rondônia; Sistemas agroflorestais (SAF); Western Amazon. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agrossilvicultura; Arborização; Café; Coffea Canephora; Consorciação de Cultura; Lavoura. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Afforestation; Agroforestry; Coffea; Mixed cropping. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/225326/1/cpafro-18585.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01715nam a2200385 a 4500
001 2133707
005 2021-08-18
008 2002 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0103-9865
100 1 $aRODRIGUES, V. G. S.
245 $aVantagens, desvantagens e características da arborização em lavouras de café (Coffea canephora) em Rondônia.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL DO AGRONEGÓCIO DO CAFÉ NA AMAZÔNIA, 1., 2002, Ji-Paraná. Agronegócio do café na Amazônia: tecnologia para o aumento da renda do produtor rural: anais. Ji-Paraná: Embrapa Rondônia$c2002
300 $ap. 93-95.
490 $a(Embrapa Rondônia. Documentos, 78).
520 $aO cultivo de cafezais arborizados devem ser praticados com a intenção de desenvolver formas mais sustentáveis de uso da terra, que possa incrementar a produtividade na propriedade e o bem estar da comunidade rural. Este trabalho foi baseado no estudo das experiências de agricultores que consorciam árvores em lavouras de café, nos municípios de Ouro Preto do Oeste e de Machadinho do Oeste, RO.
650 $aAfforestation
650 $aAgroforestry
650 $aCoffea
650 $aMixed cropping
650 $aAgrossilvicultura
650 $aArborização
650 $aCafé
650 $aCoffea Canephora
650 $aConsorciação de Cultura
650 $aLavoura
653 $aAmazônia Ocidental
653 $aAriquemes (RO)
653 $aCoffee plant
653 $aJi-Paraná (RO)
653 $aOuro Preto do Oeste (RO)
653 $aRondônia
653 $aSistemas agroflorestais (SAF)
653 $aWestern Amazon
700 1 $aCOSTA, R. S. C. da
700 1 $aLEONIDAS, F. das C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Rondônia (CPAF-RO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/11/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/05/2011 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
RIBEIRO, C.; TOGAWA, R. C.; NESHICH, I. A. P.; MAZONI, I.; MANCINI, A. L.; MINARDI, R. C. de M.; SILVEIRA, C. H. da; JARDINE, J. G.; SANTORO, M. M.; NESHICH, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
CRISTINA RIBEIRO, UFMG; ROBERTO C. TOGAWA, CENARGEN; IZABELLA A. P. NESHICH, Estagiária/CNPTIA; IVAN MAZONI, CNPTIA; ADAUTO LUIZ MANCINI, CNPTIA; RAQUEL C. DE MELO MINARDI, UFMG; CARLOS H. DA SILVEIRA, UNIFEI; JOSE GILBERTO JARDINE, CNPTIA; MARCELO M. SANTORO, UFMG; GORAN NESHICH, CNPTIA. |
|
Título: |
Analysis of binding properties and specificity through identification of the interface forming residues (IFR) for serine proteases in silico docked to different inhibitors. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
BMC Structural Biology, London, v. 10, n. 36, p. 1-16, 2010. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Background: Enzymes belonging to the same super family of proteins in general operate on variety of substrates and are inhibited by wide selection of inhibitors. In this work our main objective was to expand the scope of studies that consider only the catalytic and binding pocket amino acids while analyzing enzyme specificity and instead, include a wider category which we have named the Interface Forming Residues (IFR). We were motivated to identify those amino acids with decreased accessibility to solvent after docking of different types of inhibitors to sub classes of serine proteases and then create a table (matrix) of all amino acid positions at the interface as well as their respective occupancies. Our goal is to establish a platform for analysis of the relationship between IFR characteristics and binding properties/specificity for bi-molecular complexes. Results: We propose a novel method for describing binding properties and delineating serine proteases specificity by compiling an exhaustive table of interface forming residues (IFR) for serine proteases and their inhibitors. Currently, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) does not contain all the data that our analysis would require. Therefore, an in silico approach was designed for building corresponding complexes The IFRs are obtained by ?rigid body docking? among 70 structurally aligned, sequence wise non-redundant, serine protease structures with 3 inhibitors: bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI), ecotine and ovomucoid third domain inhibitor. The table (matrix) of all amino acid positions at the interface and their respective occupancy is created. We also developed a new computational protocol for predicting IFRs for those complexes which were not deciphered experimentally so far, achieving accuracy of at least 0.97. Conclusions: The serine proteases interfaces prefer polar (including glycine) residues (with some exceptions). Charged residues were found to be uniquely prevalent at the interfaces between the ?miscellaneous-virus? subfamily and the three inhibitors. This prompts speculation about how important this difference in IFR characteristics is for maintaining virulence of those organisms. Our work here provides a unique tool for both structure/function relationship analysis as well as a compilation of indicators detailing how the specificity of various serine proteases may have been achieved and/or could be altered. It also indicates that the interface forming residues which also determine specificity of serine protease sub-family can not be presented in a canonical way but rather as a matrix of alternative populations of amino acids occupying variety of IFR positions. MenosBackground: Enzymes belonging to the same super family of proteins in general operate on variety of substrates and are inhibited by wide selection of inhibitors. In this work our main objective was to expand the scope of studies that consider only the catalytic and binding pocket amino acids while analyzing enzyme specificity and instead, include a wider category which we have named the Interface Forming Residues (IFR). We were motivated to identify those amino acids with decreased accessibility to solvent after docking of different types of inhibitors to sub classes of serine proteases and then create a table (matrix) of all amino acid positions at the interface as well as their respective occupancies. Our goal is to establish a platform for analysis of the relationship between IFR characteristics and binding properties/specificity for bi-molecular complexes. Results: We propose a novel method for describing binding properties and delineating serine proteases specificity by compiling an exhaustive table of interface forming residues (IFR) for serine proteases and their inhibitors. Currently, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) does not contain all the data that our analysis would require. Therefore, an in silico approach was designed for building corresponding complexes The IFRs are obtained by ?rigid body docking? among 70 structurally aligned, sequence wise non-redundant, serine protease structures with 3 inhibitors: bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI), ecotine and ovomuco... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Enzimas; Interface Forming Residues; Propriedades ligantes; Proteases. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Binding properties; Enzymes. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/23695/1/1472-6807-10-36.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03631naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1867859
005 2011-05-23
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aRIBEIRO, C.
245 $aAnalysis of binding properties and specificity through identification of the interface forming residues (IFR) for serine proteases in silico docked to different inhibitors.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2010
520 $aBackground: Enzymes belonging to the same super family of proteins in general operate on variety of substrates and are inhibited by wide selection of inhibitors. In this work our main objective was to expand the scope of studies that consider only the catalytic and binding pocket amino acids while analyzing enzyme specificity and instead, include a wider category which we have named the Interface Forming Residues (IFR). We were motivated to identify those amino acids with decreased accessibility to solvent after docking of different types of inhibitors to sub classes of serine proteases and then create a table (matrix) of all amino acid positions at the interface as well as their respective occupancies. Our goal is to establish a platform for analysis of the relationship between IFR characteristics and binding properties/specificity for bi-molecular complexes. Results: We propose a novel method for describing binding properties and delineating serine proteases specificity by compiling an exhaustive table of interface forming residues (IFR) for serine proteases and their inhibitors. Currently, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) does not contain all the data that our analysis would require. Therefore, an in silico approach was designed for building corresponding complexes The IFRs are obtained by ?rigid body docking? among 70 structurally aligned, sequence wise non-redundant, serine protease structures with 3 inhibitors: bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI), ecotine and ovomucoid third domain inhibitor. The table (matrix) of all amino acid positions at the interface and their respective occupancy is created. We also developed a new computational protocol for predicting IFRs for those complexes which were not deciphered experimentally so far, achieving accuracy of at least 0.97. Conclusions: The serine proteases interfaces prefer polar (including glycine) residues (with some exceptions). Charged residues were found to be uniquely prevalent at the interfaces between the ?miscellaneous-virus? subfamily and the three inhibitors. This prompts speculation about how important this difference in IFR characteristics is for maintaining virulence of those organisms. Our work here provides a unique tool for both structure/function relationship analysis as well as a compilation of indicators detailing how the specificity of various serine proteases may have been achieved and/or could be altered. It also indicates that the interface forming residues which also determine specificity of serine protease sub-family can not be presented in a canonical way but rather as a matrix of alternative populations of amino acids occupying variety of IFR positions.
650 $aBinding properties
650 $aEnzymes
653 $aEnzimas
653 $aInterface Forming Residues
653 $aPropriedades ligantes
653 $aProteases
700 1 $aTOGAWA, R. C.
700 1 $aNESHICH, I. A. P.
700 1 $aMAZONI, I.
700 1 $aMANCINI, A. L.
700 1 $aMINARDI, R. C. de M.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, C. H. da
700 1 $aJARDINE, J. G.
700 1 $aSANTORO, M. M.
700 1 $aNESHICH, G.
773 $tBMC Structural Biology, London$gv. 10, n. 36, p. 1-16, 2010.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
