|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Trigo. |
Data corrente: |
29/03/2023 |
Data da última atualização: |
16/02/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Documentos |
Autoria: |
SOSA-GÓMEZ, D. R.; CÔRREA-FERREIRA, B. S.; HOFFMANN-CAMPO, C. B.; CORSO, I. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. J.; MOSCARDI, F.; PANIZZI, A. R.; BUENO, A. de F.; HIROSE, E.; ROGGIA, S. |
Afiliação: |
DANIEL RICARDO SOSA GOMEZ, CNPSO; BEATRIZ SPALDING CÔRREA-FERREIRA, PESQUISADORA APOSENTADA EMBRAPA SOJA; CLARA BEATRIZ HOFFMANN CAMPO, CNPSO; IVAN CARLOS CORSO, IN MEMORIAM; LENITA JACOB DE OLIVEIRA, IN MEMORIAM; FLÁVIO MOSCARDI, IN MEMORIAM; ANTONIO RICARDO PANIZZI, CNPT; ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; EDSON HIROSE, CNPSO; SAMUEL ROGGIA, CNPSO. |
Título: |
Manual de identificação de insetos e outros invertebrados da cultura da soja. 4. ed. |
Edição: |
4. ed. atualizada. |
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2023. |
Páginas: |
104 p. |
Série: |
(Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 269). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Pragas que atacam plântulas; Lagarta-elasmo ou broca-do-colo (Elasmopalpus lignosellus); Lesmas e caracóis; Piolhos-de-cobra. Pragas que atacam raízes: Percevejo-castanho-da-raiz (Scaptocoris castanea, S. carvalhoi e S. buckupi Cochonilha-da-raiz (Dysmicoccus brevipes); Corós (Phyllophaga cuyabana, Liogenys spp., Plectris pexa e outros). Pragas atacam pecíolos e caules: Tamanduá-da-soja ou bicudo-da-soja (Sternechus subsignatus); Cascudinho (Myochrous armatus); Lagarta-maruca (Maruca vitrata) Broca-das-axilas (Crocidosema aporema); Búfalo-da-soja (Ceresa brunnicornis e C. fasciatithorax). Pragas que atacam folhas: Lagarta-da-soja (Anticarsia gemmatalis); Falsa-medideira (Chrysodeixis includens); Falsa-medideira (Rachiplusia nu); Lagarta-enroladeira (Omiodes indicata); Vaquinha-verde ou patriota (Diabrotica speciosa); Vaquinha (Cerotoma arcuata); Vaquinha (Colaspis sp.); Tripes (Caliothrips braziliensis e Frankliniella schultzei); Ácaro-verde da soja (Mononychellus planki); Ácaro-rajado (Tetranychus urticae); Ácaros-vermelhos (Tetranychus ludeni, Tetranychus desertorum e Tetranychus gigas); Ácaro-branco (Polyphagotarsonemus latus); Mosca-branca (Bemisia tabaci); Torrãozinho (Aracanthus mourei); Bicudo-pequeno-da-soja (Promecops claviger); Metaleiro (Magacelis sp.); Burrinho-da-batatinha (Epicauta atomaria; Gafanhotos. Pragas que atacam vagens: Lagarta-do-velho-mundo (Helicoverpa armigera); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera albula); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera cosmioides); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera eridania); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera frugiperda; Broca-da-vagem (Etiella zinckenella); Lagarta-da-maçã do algodoeiro (Heliothis virescens) -marrom (Euschistus heros); Percevejo-verde-pequeno (Piezodorus guildinii); Percevejo-verde (Nezara viridula); Percevejo-barriga-verde (Dichelops melacanthus e D. furcatus); Percevejo-edessa (Edessa meditabunda); Percevejo-acrosterno (Chinavia spp.); Percevejo-faixa-vermelha (Thyanta perditor); Bicudo-negro-pequeno-da-soja (Rhyssomatus sp.). Outros insetos comuns nas lavouras de soja: Percevejo-formigão (Neomegalotomus parvus); Larva-angorá (Astylus variegatus); ?Idi-Amin? (Lagria villosa). MenosPragas que atacam plântulas; Lagarta-elasmo ou broca-do-colo (Elasmopalpus lignosellus); Lesmas e caracóis; Piolhos-de-cobra. Pragas que atacam raízes: Percevejo-castanho-da-raiz (Scaptocoris castanea, S. carvalhoi e S. buckupi Cochonilha-da-raiz (Dysmicoccus brevipes); Corós (Phyllophaga cuyabana, Liogenys spp., Plectris pexa e outros). Pragas atacam pecíolos e caules: Tamanduá-da-soja ou bicudo-da-soja (Sternechus subsignatus); Cascudinho (Myochrous armatus); Lagarta-maruca (Maruca vitrata) Broca-das-axilas (Crocidosema aporema); Búfalo-da-soja (Ceresa brunnicornis e C. fasciatithorax). Pragas que atacam folhas: Lagarta-da-soja (Anticarsia gemmatalis); Falsa-medideira (Chrysodeixis includens); Falsa-medideira (Rachiplusia nu); Lagarta-enroladeira (Omiodes indicata); Vaquinha-verde ou patriota (Diabrotica speciosa); Vaquinha (Cerotoma arcuata); Vaquinha (Colaspis sp.); Tripes (Caliothrips braziliensis e Frankliniella schultzei); Ácaro-verde da soja (Mononychellus planki); Ácaro-rajado (Tetranychus urticae); Ácaros-vermelhos (Tetranychus ludeni, Tetranychus desertorum e Tetranychus gigas); Ácaro-branco (Polyphagotarsonemus latus); Mosca-branca (Bemisia tabaci); Torrãozinho (Aracanthus mourei); Bicudo-pequeno-da-soja (Promecops claviger); Metaleiro (Magacelis sp.); Burrinho-da-batatinha (Epicauta atomaria; Gafanhotos. Pragas que atacam vagens: Lagarta-do-velho-mundo (Helicoverpa armigera); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera albula); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera cosmioides); Lag... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Inseto; Praga de planta; Soja. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Plant pests; Soybeans. |
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1152855/1/Doc-269-4-ed-2023.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03048nam a2200313 a 4500 001 2152855 005 2024-02-16 008 2023 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSOSA-GÓMEZ, D. R. 245 $aManual de identificação de insetos e outros invertebrados da cultura da soja. 4. ed.$h[electronic resource] 250 $a4. ed. atualizada. 260 $aLondrina: Embrapa Soja$c2023 300 $a104 p. 490 $a(Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 269). 520 $aPragas que atacam plântulas; Lagarta-elasmo ou broca-do-colo (Elasmopalpus lignosellus); Lesmas e caracóis; Piolhos-de-cobra. Pragas que atacam raízes: Percevejo-castanho-da-raiz (Scaptocoris castanea, S. carvalhoi e S. buckupi Cochonilha-da-raiz (Dysmicoccus brevipes); Corós (Phyllophaga cuyabana, Liogenys spp., Plectris pexa e outros). Pragas atacam pecíolos e caules: Tamanduá-da-soja ou bicudo-da-soja (Sternechus subsignatus); Cascudinho (Myochrous armatus); Lagarta-maruca (Maruca vitrata) Broca-das-axilas (Crocidosema aporema); Búfalo-da-soja (Ceresa brunnicornis e C. fasciatithorax). Pragas que atacam folhas: Lagarta-da-soja (Anticarsia gemmatalis); Falsa-medideira (Chrysodeixis includens); Falsa-medideira (Rachiplusia nu); Lagarta-enroladeira (Omiodes indicata); Vaquinha-verde ou patriota (Diabrotica speciosa); Vaquinha (Cerotoma arcuata); Vaquinha (Colaspis sp.); Tripes (Caliothrips braziliensis e Frankliniella schultzei); Ácaro-verde da soja (Mononychellus planki); Ácaro-rajado (Tetranychus urticae); Ácaros-vermelhos (Tetranychus ludeni, Tetranychus desertorum e Tetranychus gigas); Ácaro-branco (Polyphagotarsonemus latus); Mosca-branca (Bemisia tabaci); Torrãozinho (Aracanthus mourei); Bicudo-pequeno-da-soja (Promecops claviger); Metaleiro (Magacelis sp.); Burrinho-da-batatinha (Epicauta atomaria; Gafanhotos. Pragas que atacam vagens: Lagarta-do-velho-mundo (Helicoverpa armigera); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera albula); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera cosmioides); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera eridania); Lagarta-das-vagens (Spodoptera frugiperda; Broca-da-vagem (Etiella zinckenella); Lagarta-da-maçã do algodoeiro (Heliothis virescens) -marrom (Euschistus heros); Percevejo-verde-pequeno (Piezodorus guildinii); Percevejo-verde (Nezara viridula); Percevejo-barriga-verde (Dichelops melacanthus e D. furcatus); Percevejo-edessa (Edessa meditabunda); Percevejo-acrosterno (Chinavia spp.); Percevejo-faixa-vermelha (Thyanta perditor); Bicudo-negro-pequeno-da-soja (Rhyssomatus sp.). Outros insetos comuns nas lavouras de soja: Percevejo-formigão (Neomegalotomus parvus); Larva-angorá (Astylus variegatus); ?Idi-Amin? (Lagria villosa). 650 $aPlant pests 650 $aSoybeans 650 $aInseto 650 $aPraga de planta 650 $aSoja 700 1 $aCÔRREA-FERREIRA, B. S. 700 1 $aHOFFMANN-CAMPO, C. B. 700 1 $aCORSO, I. C. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, L. J. 700 1 $aMOSCARDI, F. 700 1 $aPANIZZI, A. R. 700 1 $aBUENO, A. de F. 700 1 $aHIROSE, E. 700 1 $aROGGIA, S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Leite. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgl.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
Data corrente: |
10/11/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/12/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
FILGUEIRAS, M. D. G.; MATOS, R. S.; BARRETO, L. P.; MASCARIN, G. M.; RIZZO, P. V.; FREITAS, F. M. C.; PRATA, M. C. de A.; MONTEIRO, C.; FERNANDES, E. K. K. |
Afiliação: |
MARCOS DANIEL GOMES FILGUEIRAS, Universidade Federal de Goiás; RENATA SILVA MATOS; LUCAS PRADO BARRETO, Universidade Federal de Goiás; GABRIEL MOURA MASCARIN, CNPMA; PRICILA VETRANO RIZZO, CNPGL; FERNANDA MARA CUNHA FREITAS, CNPGL; MARCIA CRISTINA DE AZEVEDO PRATA, CNPGL; CAIO MONTEIRO, Universidade Federal de Goiás; ÉVERTON KORT KAMP FERNANDES, Universidade Federal de Goiás. |
Título: |
From the laboratory to the field: efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes to control the cattle tick. |
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pest Management Science, v. 79, n. 1, p. 216-225, 2023. |
DOI: |
http://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7190 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
BACKGROUND - The control of ticks is challenged by the resistance of tick populations to chemical acaricides. In this study, we evaluated, under laboratory conditions, the efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus engorged females with varying body weights (150, 200, 250, 300 or 350 mg per female) or from eight different geographical populations. We also determined the efficacy of H. bacteriophora for tick control under field conditions. RESULTS - R. microplus engorged females with varying body weights exposed to 150 juveniles of H. bacteriophora resulted in a high control efficacy (97.5% to 98.4%). Tests with females from different geographical populations comprised eight tick strains treated with H. bacteriophora and their respective control groups. The biological parameters of females exposed to nematode treatments did not differ significantly and resulted in 89% to 99% of control efficacy. Trials conducted under field conditions were performed in field plots with Megathyrsus maximus grass. Treatment groups received eight cadavers of Tenebrio molitor fully colonized with H. bacteriophora at 1 week prior to the release of female ticks, whereas control groups were untreated. On the first day of the experiment, six engorged females were distributed in each plot. On day 42 and day 63, the apical portion of the grasses with R. microplus larvae were collected and quantified. The population of R. microplus larvae was reduced up to 73.1% in plots treated with H. bacteriophora at day 63 after treatment. CONCLUSION - R. microplus engorged females with varying body weights or from different geographical populations were highly susceptible to H. bacteriophora. The field test demonstrated the efficacy of H. bacteriophora in reducing R. microplus larvae in infested pastures. MenosBACKGROUND - The control of ticks is challenged by the resistance of tick populations to chemical acaricides. In this study, we evaluated, under laboratory conditions, the efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus engorged females with varying body weights (150, 200, 250, 300 or 350 mg per female) or from eight different geographical populations. We also determined the efficacy of H. bacteriophora for tick control under field conditions. RESULTS - R. microplus engorged females with varying body weights exposed to 150 juveniles of H. bacteriophora resulted in a high control efficacy (97.5% to 98.4%). Tests with females from different geographical populations comprised eight tick strains treated with H. bacteriophora and their respective control groups. The biological parameters of females exposed to nematode treatments did not differ significantly and resulted in 89% to 99% of control efficacy. Trials conducted under field conditions were performed in field plots with Megathyrsus maximus grass. Treatment groups received eight cadavers of Tenebrio molitor fully colonized with H. bacteriophora at 1 week prior to the release of female ticks, whereas control groups were untreated. On the first day of the experiment, six engorged females were distributed in each plot. On day 42 and day 63, the apical portion of the grasses with R. microplus larvae were collected and quantified. The population of R. microplus larvae was reduced up to 73.1... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Ensaio de campo; Field assays. |
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Carrapato; Controle Biológico; Nematóide. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biological control; Heterorhabditis bacteriophora; Rhipicephalus microplus. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 02848naa a2200337 a 4500 001 2148178 005 2022-12-12 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttp://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7190$2DOI 100 1 $aFILGUEIRAS, M. D. G. 245 $aFrom the laboratory to the field$befficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes to control the cattle tick.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 520 $aBACKGROUND - The control of ticks is challenged by the resistance of tick populations to chemical acaricides. In this study, we evaluated, under laboratory conditions, the efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus engorged females with varying body weights (150, 200, 250, 300 or 350 mg per female) or from eight different geographical populations. We also determined the efficacy of H. bacteriophora for tick control under field conditions. RESULTS - R. microplus engorged females with varying body weights exposed to 150 juveniles of H. bacteriophora resulted in a high control efficacy (97.5% to 98.4%). Tests with females from different geographical populations comprised eight tick strains treated with H. bacteriophora and their respective control groups. The biological parameters of females exposed to nematode treatments did not differ significantly and resulted in 89% to 99% of control efficacy. Trials conducted under field conditions were performed in field plots with Megathyrsus maximus grass. Treatment groups received eight cadavers of Tenebrio molitor fully colonized with H. bacteriophora at 1 week prior to the release of female ticks, whereas control groups were untreated. On the first day of the experiment, six engorged females were distributed in each plot. On day 42 and day 63, the apical portion of the grasses with R. microplus larvae were collected and quantified. The population of R. microplus larvae was reduced up to 73.1% in plots treated with H. bacteriophora at day 63 after treatment. CONCLUSION - R. microplus engorged females with varying body weights or from different geographical populations were highly susceptible to H. bacteriophora. The field test demonstrated the efficacy of H. bacteriophora in reducing R. microplus larvae in infested pastures. 650 $aBiological control 650 $aHeterorhabditis bacteriophora 650 $aRhipicephalus microplus 650 $aBovino 650 $aCarrapato 650 $aControle Biológico 650 $aNematóide 653 $aEnsaio de campo 653 $aField assays 700 1 $aMATOS, R. S. 700 1 $aBARRETO, L. P. 700 1 $aMASCARIN, G. M. 700 1 $aRIZZO, P. V. 700 1 $aFREITAS, F. M. C. 700 1 $aPRATA, M. C. de A. 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, C. 700 1 $aFERNANDES, E. K. K. 773 $tPest Management Science$gv. 79, n. 1, p. 216-225, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|